Rating Factors and Weights Sample Clauses

Rating Factors and Weights. All examinations shall be impartial and shall relate to those matters which will test the candidate’s ability to discharge the duties of the position to be filled. The placement of employees on the preliminary promotion lists shall be based on the points achieved by the employee on promotion examinations consisting of the following four (4) components weighted as specified: 1. Written Examinations % Weight 60
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Rating Factors and Weights. All examinations shall be impartial and related to those matters which test the candidates’ ability to discharge the duties of the position being filled. The placement of employees on promotional eligibility registers shall be based on the points achieved by the employee on the promotional examinations consisting of the following components and weights as specified, provided that final scores will be calculated and rounded out to the hundredths decimal place (two decimal places): 1. Seniority Weight 20% This shall be accomplished by awarding .42 points per each full month from years 11- 30 for a maximum of 100 points. The date of the written exam shall be used as the cutoff date for purposes of determining the number of complete months. 2. Ascertained Merit Weight 15% This shall be accomplished by awarding 20 points for each of the following certifications or degrees for a maximum of 100 points: a. Fire Officer I b. Fire Officer II c. Fire Science or Fire Service Officer Associates Degree
Sample 1Sample 2
Rating Factors and Weights. All examinations shall be impartial and shall relate to those matters which will test the candidate’s ability to discharge the duties of the position to be filled. The placement of employees on the promotional list shall be based on the points achieved by the employee on promotional examinations consisting of the following three (3) components weighted as specified, followed by seniority points and military preference credit as described in subsequent paragraphs of this Article: Written Examination. 40% Department Merit Review. 20% Assessment Center. 40% The order of the administration of the test shall be department merit review, written examination and assessment center. The written test shall not be administered until the Department Merit Review is posted.
Sample 1Sample 2
Rating Factors and Weights. The placement of members on promotional lists shall be based on the points achieved by each member on the promotional examinations consisting of the following six (6) components weighted as specified: 1. Chief’s Points 10% 2. Seniority 10% 3. Ascertained Merit 5% 4. Assessment Center 35% 5. Oral Examination 10%
Sample 1
Rating Factors and Weights. Candidates for promotion to the rank of 1. Written examination/practical 50points
Sample 1
Rating Factors and Weights. Promotional tests initiated before ratification of the May 1, 2023, bargaining agreement shall be administered pursuant to the rating factors and weights in effect at the start of the exam. For promotional tests initiated after ratification of the May 1, 2023, bargaining agreement, all examinations shall be impartial and shall relate to those matters which will test the candidate’s ability to discharge the duties of the position to be filled. The placement of employees on promotional lists shall be based on the points achieved by the employee on promotional examinations consisting of the following five (5) components weighted as specified: 1. Written Examination 45% 2. Seniority 5%
Sample 1
Rating Factors and Weights. 799 All examinations shall be impartial and shall relate to those matters which will test the 800 candidate’s ability to discharge the duties of the position to be filled. The placement of 801 employees on promotional lists shall be based on the points achieved by the employee on 802 promotional examinations consisting of the following components in the following order 803 (Sec. 35 paragraph A of The Act) weighted as specified: 804 Component Percentage Weighting Seniority 7% Fire Chief’s Points 3% Ascertained Merit 20% Promotional Potential Rating 5% BPFC Oral Interview 15% Assessment Center 15% Written Examination 35% 805 806 If a candidate wishes to withdraw from the promotional process before the completion of all 807 the components of the promotional process, the candidate shall so advise the Fire Chief in 808 writing. 809 810 D. Test Components 812 1. 813 814 2. 815 816 817 818 819 820 3. 821 822 823 824 Seniority points shall be computed as of the date of the written examination. Points shall be awarded on the following basis: one-half a point (.5) for each year of service in a sworn position on the Wheaton Fire Department up to a maximum of twenty –five (25) years. A maximum of ten (10) points can be earned (e.g., 10 points = 100) for ascertained merit which shall be earned based on the professional achievements listed below: Bachelor’s Degree – Fire, EMS or Public Administration Related 3 Bachelor’s Degree – Any field of study 2 Associates Degree – Fire, EMS or Public Administration Related 2 Associates Degree – Any field of study 1 Minimum of 30 hours of college credit but no degree .5 Fire Officer II class attendance (For Lt Only) .5 points per class; maximum of 2.5 points Attendance at any course work at National Fire Academy in Emmetsburg, Maryland (minimum of 24 hour course) 1 point per class; maximum of 2 points University of Illinois FSI course (or equivalent) – 40 or more hour class (Does not include courses resulting in an OSFM certification covered elsewhere in this document). .5 points per class; maximum of 5 points University of Illinois FSI course (or equivalent) – classes of 17-39 hours (Does not include courses resulting in an OSFM certification covered elsewhere in this document). .25 points per class; maximum of 2.5 points University of Illinois FSI course (or equivalent) – classes of 8-16 hours (Does not include courses resulting in an OSFM certification covered elsewhere in this document). .125 points per class; maximum of 1.25 p...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Rating Factors and Weights

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will: describe the Performance Factor and its actual or anticipated impact; include a description of any action the party is undertaking, or plans to undertake, to remedy or mitigate the Performance Factor; indicate whether the party is requesting a meeting to discuss the Performance Factor; and address any other issue or matter the party wishes to raise with the other party. (b) The recipient party will provide a written acknowledgment of receipt of the Notice within 7 Days of the date on which the Notice was received (“Date of the Notice”). (c) Where a meeting has been requested under paragraph 7.2(a)(3), the parties agree to meet and discuss the Performance Factors within 14 Days of the Date of the Notice, in accordance with the provisions of section 7.3.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Debt Rating The Liquidity Provider has a short-term debt ratings of “P-1” from Xxxxx’x and “F1+” from Fitch.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it: a. Is authorized to do business in the State of Kansas; b. Carries a Best's policyholder rating of A- or better; and c. Carries at least a Class VIII financial rating; or d. Is a company mutually agreed upon by the City and Consulting Engineer/Architect.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!