SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE Sample Clauses

SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. 9.13.1 All bids to a permanent/temporary Positions shall be reviewed by the Chief Pilot. Should the Chief Pilot not select the senior Pilot candidate, they will forward the disputed bid, with reason(s) of their decision, to the SRC for evaluation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. All bids to a Assignment shall be reviewed by the Chief Pilot. Should the Chief Pilot not select the senior Pilot candidate, he will forward the disputed bid to the for evaluation. A reporting to the Chief Pilot, shall be established to evaluate Pilot candidates who bid to any Assignment when so required by the Chief Pilot. The shall comprise of, where possible, a Company A or B Check Pilot (appropriate to type currently flown) or the most senior Captain on the type currently flown who is not otherwise included on the Committee, the Training Captain (appropriate to type currently flown), and two line Captains chosen by the Chairman, or his designate. The shall be empowered to evaluate a Pilot’s qualifications, demonstrated competence and such other factors, as the deems appropriate, relevant to the Assignment being sought. Throughout the evaluation process, the shall endeavour to reach mutual consensus on the evaluation of a candidate. The shall submit supporting or non-supporting recommendations to the Chief Pilot (based on its majority decision), who still retains the right to decide the selection. In the event a senior Pilot candidate is not selected for an Assignment, the Company shall inform such Pilot in writing stating the reasons therefore and provide a copy to the Chairman, or his designate within fourteen
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. Standby: A Pilot who has been designated by the Company to remain at a specified location in order to be available to report for an Assignment on notice of one (1) hour or less. Standby assignments will not be used by the Company, unless mutually agreed by the Association. Status: A Pilot’s classification of either Captain or First Officer. Statutory Holiday: See definition of “Holiday”.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Selection Review Committee may be comprised of up to five (5) members. The role of the Selection Review Committee is to evaluate the Proposals submitted and make a recommendation of award. The City may also seek expert advice to help review Proposals. Such advisors to the Selection Review Committee may attend evaluation meetings, Proposer presentations, evaluate the Proposals, and lend any such expertise to the process as requested by the City. However, any such person that is contacted by the City for their expert advice shall not, from first being contacted until the RFP process is completed, or otherwise brought to an end, have communications with any Proposers regarding their Proposals or the process. Initial scoring will be completed covering Comprehensiveness of Services and Experience and Qualifications listed below in the Evaluation Criteria. The scores for both of those will be added together to arrive at an initial score for each Proposer. Fee information will then be requested from the top three scoring proposers. The fee information will be scored to determine a final ranking for the top thee proposers prior to any interviews. Point values for each category are listed below. The City is seeking value from the service requested. If additional information is deemed necessary as part of the evaluations, such information will be solicited in order to allow the committee to complete the evaluation process. At the City’s option, interviews may be conducted with all or a select few of the Proposers after the Proposals are evaluated. If held, a possible 15 points will be attributed to interviews. The interview scores will be added to the paper scores, and the list re-ordered.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Selection Review Committee may be comprised of up to three members. The role of the Selection Review Committee is to evaluate the proposals submitted and make a recommendation of award. Scoring will be completed covering all areas listed below in the Evaluation Criteria. All scores for each Proposer shall be added together to arrive at a final score for each Proposer. Proposals will then be ranked in descending order by the total Proposal score. The City is seeking value from the service requested. While cost is important to the overall evaluation process, the experience and qualifications will be assigned a higher value. If additional information is deemed necessary as part of the evaluations, such information will be solicited in order to allow the committee to complete the evaluation process. At the City’s option, interviews may be conducted with all or a select few of the Proposers after the Proposals are evaluated. If held, a possible 50 points will be attributed to interviews. The interview scores will be added to the paper scores, and the list re-ordered. If final scores are within five points, the City reserves the right to negotiate with any of these Proposers or may elect to negotiate a contract using best and final offers.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Selection Review Committee will be comprised of at least four (4) members. The role of the Selection Review Committee is to evaluate the proposals submitted and make a recommendation of award to City Council. Scoring will be completed covering all areas listed in Section 5.3. If additional information is deemed necessary as part of the evaluations, such information will be solicited in order to allow the committee to complete the evaluation process.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE joint committee comprised of four (4) representatives of the Association and four (4) representatives of the Board. The Committee will review and discuss the implementationand operation of the holiday selection system in Article
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. All bids to a assignment shall be reviewed by the Chief Pilot. Should the Chief Pilot not select the senior Pilot candidate, he will forward the disputed bid to the Selection Review Committee for evaluation.
Sample 1

Related to SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE

  • Review Committee A. 1. Representatives of the District and the Association shall meet informally once a month from September through May for the purpose of reviewing the implementation of this Agreement and of resolving problems which may arise. The meetings shall be called on the last school-day Wednesday of each month at 3:45 p.m. Additional meetings may be scheduled at mutual request.

  • Selection Committee A. Each building site will appoint a selection committee for the TLS. The committee shall be comprised of equal numbers of teachers and administrators and at least one teacher will be appointed by the Des Moines Education Association.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements:

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Monitoring Committee The Monitoring Committee shall be established within six months of the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding. Its role is stipulated in the Regulation, in particular Article 4.4 thereof.

  • Steering Committee The Project Manager shall set up a Steering Committee for the Project, consisting of representatives from the Department, the Contractor, and any other key organisations whom the project will impact on, to be agreed between the parties. The function of the Steering Committee shall be to review the scope and direction of the Project against its aims and objectives, monitor progress and efficiency, and assess, manage and review expected impact and use of the findings from the Project. The Committee shall meet at times and dates agreed by the parties, or in the absence of agreement, specified by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall report their views on the progress of the Project to the Steering Committee in writing if requested by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall attend all meetings of the Steering Committee unless otherwise agreed by the Department.

  • Staffing Committee The Board and the teachers agree to the following:

  • Consultative Committee 26.1 The parties agree to establish a consultative committee to assist the parties improve productivity, efficiency and to provide for the effective involvement of employees in decision making processes. The committee will consist of an equal number of company and elected employee representatives.

  • Benefits Advisory Committee An advisory committee with representatives designated by VSEA and the State shall meet and consult regularly concerning the operation and administration of the Medical, Dental Assistance and Life Insurance Plans, Wellness, Department fitness programs, and any other health related subjects.

  • Scheduling Committee (a) The parties agree to the formation of a Scheduling Committee to discuss and assist in resolving scheduling issues.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!