SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE Sample Clauses

SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. All bids to a assignment shall be reviewed by the Chief Pilot. Should the Chief Pilot not select the senior pilot candidate, he will forward the disputed bid to the Selection Review Committee for evaluation.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Selection Review Committee will be comprised of at least four (4) members. The role of the Selection Review Committee is to evaluate the proposals submitted and make a recommendation of award to City Council. Scoring will be completed covering all areas listed in Section 5.3. If additional information is deemed necessary as part of the evaluations, such information will be solicited in order to allow the committee to complete the evaluation process.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Selection Review Committee may be comprised of up to five (5) members. The role of the Selection Review Committee is to evaluate the Proposals submitted and make a recommendation of award. The City may also seek expert advice to help review Proposals. Such advisors to the Selection Review Committee may attend evaluation meetings, Proposer presentations, evaluate the Proposals, and lend any such expertise to the process as requested by the City. However, any such person that is contacted by the City for their expert advice shall not, from first being contacted until the RFP process is completed, or otherwise brought to an end, have communications with any Proposers regarding their Proposals or the process. Initial scoring will be completed covering Comprehensiveness of Services and Experience and Qualifications listed below in the Evaluation Criteria. The scores for both of those will be added together to arrive at an initial score for each Proposer. Fee information will then be requested from the top three scoring proposers. The fee information will be scored to determine a final ranking for the top thee proposers prior to any interviews. Point values for each category are listed below. The City is seeking value from the service requested. If additional information is deemed necessary as part of the evaluations, such information will be solicited in order to allow the committee to complete the evaluation process. At the City’s option, interviews may be conducted with all or a select few of the Proposers after the Proposals are evaluated. If held, a possible 15 points will be attributed to interviews. The interview scores will be added to the paper scores, and the list re-ordered.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. All bids to a Assignment shall be reviewed by the Chief Pilot. Should the Chief Pilot not select the senior Pilot candidate, he will forward the disputed bid to the for evaluation. A reporting to the Chief Pilot, shall be established to evaluate Pilot candidates who bid to any Assignment when so required by the Chief Pilot. The shall comprise of, where possible, a Company A or B Check Pilot (appropriate to type currently flown) or the most senior Captain on the type currently flown who is not otherwise included on the Committee, the Training Captain (appropriate to type currently flown), and two line Captains chosen by the Chairman, or his designate. The shall be empowered to evaluate a Pilot’s qualifications, demonstrated competence and such other factors, as the deems appropriate, relevant to the Assignment being sought. Throughout the evaluation process, the shall endeavour to reach mutual consensus on the evaluation of a candidate. The shall submit supporting or non-supporting recommendations to the Chief Pilot (based on its majority decision), who still retains the right to decide the selection. In the event a senior Pilot candidate is not selected for an Assignment, the Company shall inform such Pilot in writing stating the reasons therefore and provide a copy to the Chairman, or his designate within fourteen
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. 9.13.1 All bids to a permanent/temporary Positions shall be reviewed by the Chief Pilot. Should the Chief Pilot not select the senior Pilot candidate, they will forward the disputed bid, with reason(s) of their decision, to the SRC for evaluation. 9.13.2 An SRC, reporting to the Chief Pilot, shall be established to evaluate Pilot candidates who bid to any permanent/temporary Position Vacancy when so required by the Chief Pilot. The SRC shall comprise of, where possible, a Company Check Pilot (appropriate to type currently flown) or a senior Captain on the type currently flown who is not otherwise included on the Committee, a non-management Training Captain (appropriate to type currently flown), and two (2) line Captains chosen by the MEC Chair. 9.13.3 The SRC shall be empowered to evaluate a Pilot’s qualifications, demonstrated competence and such other factors, as the SRC deems appropriate, relevant to the Position being sought. 9.13.4 Throughout the evaluation process, the SRC shall endeavor to reach mutual consensus on the evaluation of a candidate. The SRC shall submit supporting or non-supporting recommendations to the Chief Pilot, based on its majority decision. The Chief Pilot retains the right to decide the selection. In the event a senior Pilot candidate is not selected for a Position, the Company shall inform such Pilot in writing stating the reasons therefore and provide a copy to the MEC Chair, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the delivery of the recommendation of the SRC to the Chief Pilot. A Pilot who has been disqualified shall be able to grieve such decision in accordance with Section 22.0 (GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE). 9.13.5 Recommendations by the SRC shall be valid for one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days. 9.13.6 Notwithstanding paragraph 9.13.5, a Pilot displaying improvement may, at the discretion of the Chief Pilot, have their file re-evaluated by the SRC.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE joint committee comprised of four (4) representatives of the Association and four (4) representatives of the Board. The Committee will review and discuss the implementationand operation of the holiday selection system in Article
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. Standby: A Pilot who has been designated by the Company to remain at a specified location in order to be available to report for an Assignment on notice of one (1) hour or less. Standby assignments will not be used by the Company, unless mutually agreed by the Association. Status: A Pilot’s classification of either Captain or First Officer. Statutory Holiday: See definition of “Holiday”.
Sample 1
SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Selection Review Committee may be comprised of up to three members. The role of the Selection Review Committee is to evaluate the proposals submitted and make a recommendation of award. Scoring will be completed covering all areas listed below in the Evaluation Criteria. All scores for each Proposer shall be added together to arrive at a final score for each Proposer. Proposals will then be ranked in descending order by the total Proposal score. The City is seeking value from the service requested. While cost is important to the overall evaluation process, the experience and qualifications will be assigned a higher value. If additional information is deemed necessary as part of the evaluations, such information will be solicited in order to allow the committee to complete the evaluation process. At the City’s option, interviews may be conducted with all or a select few of the Proposers after the Proposals are evaluated. If held, a possible 50 points will be attributed to interviews. The interview scores will be added to the paper scores, and the list re-ordered. If final scores are within five points, the City reserves the right to negotiate with any of these Proposers or may elect to negotiate a contract using best and final offers.
Sample 1

Related to SELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE

  • Review Committee The Board representatives agree to have meetings during the school year with the West Branch- Rose City Education Association to discuss problems that may or may not be covered by the provisions of this Agreement; said meetings and problems pertaining to the West Branch-Rose City Area Schools must have a reasonable advance notice and tentative agenda.

  • Selection Committee A. Each building site will appoint a selection committee for the TLS. The committee shall be comprised of equal numbers of teachers and administrators and at least one teacher will be appointed by the Des Moines Education Association. B. The committee will accept and review application for a TLS position and will make recommendations to the hiring administrator. In developing recommendations, the committee will utilize measures of teacher effectiveness and professional growth, consider the needs of the school district and review the performance and professional development of the applicants. Teachers who are selected must meet all of the qualification contained in the TLS grant and contained in the law.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements: (i) Written guidelines that establish the formation and composition of the Advisory Committee, terms of service for members, contingency for removal or resignation of members, a schedule of meetings, and any other administrative details; (ii) Composition that includes at least an equal number of local representatives as state representatives; (iii) A process for receiving input from Subdivisions and other communities regarding how the opioid crisis is affecting their communities, their abatement needs, and proposals for abatement strategies and responses; and (iv) A process by which Advisory Committee recommendations for expenditures for Opioid Remediation will be made to and considered by the appropriate state agencies.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Development Committee Arcadia and Xxxxxx shall establish a development committee (the “Development Committee”) comprised of no more than three (3) representatives of each of Arcadia and Xxxxxx. The Development Committee shall be chaired by a member thereof designated from time to time by Arcadia. The Development Committee shall oversee the Research Plan, Milestones and development and production of plants and microorganisms that produce Transgenic Oil in accordance with the Research Plan. The Development Committee may revise the Research Plan and the Milestones as deemed necessary and appropriate by unanimous written consent of all members. Meetings of the Development Committee shall be at least biannual and at such times and places or in such form (e.g., in person, telephonic or video conference) as the members of the Development Committee shall determine. Representatives of both Parties shall be present at any meeting of the Development Committee. Decisions of the Development Committee shall be made by a written consent signed by all six (6) members thereof. The Development Committee shall keep minutes of its deliberations setting forth, among other matters, all proposed actions and all votes thereon. All records of the Development Committee shall at all times be available to both Parties. The Development Committee by unanimous consent may delegate to one Party or to a specific representative the authority to make certain decisions. The Development Committee may revoke such authority by the written consent of four members. All disagreements within the Development Committee shall be subject to the following: (i) The members of the committee will endeavor in good faith for a period of not more than ninety (90) days to attempt to resolve the disagreement; (ii) If the members of the committee are unable to resolve the disagreement by the end of such period, the committee shall promptly present the disagreement to the President of Xxxx Products Division and the President of Arcadia or their respective designees, and the two executives shall endeavor to resolve the disagreement for a period of not more than thirty (30) days; (iii) If the two executives are unable to resolve this disagreement, the disagreement shall be submitted for ADR as provided in Section 12(a).

  • Steering Committee 3.1 The Parties shall form a steering committee (the “Steering Committee”), which shall analyse and develop potential areas of strategic cooperation between the Parties and oversee the Parties’ cooperation in these areas. 3.2 The Steering Committee shall consist of three representatives of QIWI Group and three representatives of Otkritie (each, a “Committee Member”). The representatives shall include: (a) at least one representative from Otkritie occupying the position of Chief Executive Officer or the Chairman of the Management Board or similar within Otkritie Holding JSC, PJSC Khanty-Mansiysk Bank Otkritie or JSC Bank Otkritie Financial Corporation; and (b) QIWI’s Chief Executive Officer. Each of Otkritie and QIWI Group shall have the exclusive right to remove and replace any of its designees to the Steering Committee at any time by notice to the other party. 3.3 The Steering Committee shall meet at least once in each month and as otherwise agreed between Committee Member. Such meetings shall take place in Moscow, in a location agreed by Otkritie and QIWI Group or by telephone. 3.4 The presence of four Committee Members, including two representatives of Otkritie and two representatives of QIWI Group, shall constitute a quorum. 3.5 The Steering Committee shall validly act only at a duly convened meeting with the approval of at least four (4) of the Committee Members present at such meeting. Upon the approval of a proposal by the Steering Committee, the Steering Committee shall present such proposal to the respective governing body of each Otkritie and of QIWI for approval. For the avoidance of doubt, no decision of the Steering Committee shall be binding on the Parties unless, and the Parties are only required to act upon any decision of the Steering Committee if and to the extent that, such decision is properly approved/ratified by the relevant governing bodies of both Otkritie and QIWI. 3.6 The Parties agree that the following items are potential areas of joint cooperation to be discussed, among other matters, at Steering Committee meetings: (a) Participation of Otkritie as a privileged party in banking projects established by QIWI where QIWI seeks a banking partner; (b) Subject to Applicable Law, commercial terms for QIWI to provide consumer scoring data it has collected to Otkritie; (c) Commercial terms for Otkritie to act as settlement bank of NKO Rapida in accordance with Clause 4.1; (d) Commercial terms relating to the amounts of deposits to be placed by NKO Rapida in Otkritie; (e) Separation of NKO Rapida’s digital wallet business from the core business of NKO Rapida; (f) Commercial terms of cooperation of the parties in the areas of pre-paid cards and loyalty programs; (g) Commercial terms of the use by Otkritie of the NKO Rapida brands owned by QIWI Group; and (h) Commercial terms of the potential sale of the NKO Rapida’s banking license to Otkritie. 3.7 The Parties agree and acknowledge that no agreement has been reached between the Parties with respect to any of the matters referenced in Clause 3.6, the matters in Clause 3.6 merely reflects potential areas of discussion for the Steering Committee. 3.8 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed as QIWI and Otkritie having reached a binding agreement in respect of any items listed in Clause 3.6. 3.9 The Parties agree and acknowledge that the Steering Committee shall not represent an exclusive forum through which any of the matters set forth in Clause 3.6 may be discussed between the Parties and that the Parties may reach agreement with respect to any of the matters set forth in Clause 3.6 or any other matter without Steering Committee approval or action.

  • Consultative Committee (a) To assist in creating a stable and co-operative environment for the project, a consultative committee has been established which shall operate in accordance with its charter. It is not the objective of parties to this clause that the committee would over-ride the function and responsibilities of management or unions.

  • Scheduling Committee (a) The parties agree to the formation of a Scheduling Committee to discuss and assist in resolving scheduling issues. (b) The committee will be comprised of equal representation from the Union and management. One Union Representative shall be the Bargaining Unit President and one Management Representative shall be the Chief Nursing Officer or designate. (c) Terms of Reference will be developed and mutually agreed to by the Committee.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • The Joint Committee (a) shall be composed of representatives of the Governments of the Parties; and (b) may establish and delegate its responsibilities to Sub-Committees.