Traditional Evaluation Sample Clauses

Traditional Evaluation. An evaluation conducted by an administrator that entails at least two classroom observations (one per semester) and a summative final evaluation report and conference. Temporary, probationary 1, probationary 2 teachers, teachers with emergency or provisional credentials, and on cycle permanent teachers will be evaluated by an administrator using the traditional evaluation process, except in the case of a permanent teacher who is participating in the alternative evaluation process. As part of the traditional evaluation process, there will be a minimum of two formal observations (one per semester) during the school year in addition to regular informal observations. For non-tenured members there will be a minimum of two formal observations in the first semester and a minimum of one formal observation in the second semester. Formal observations will be announced in advance by the administrator. Following a formal observation, the administrator will provide the unit member with a written observation report. A post- observation meeting will be held at the request of either the administrator or the unit member.

Traditional Evaluation. Upon request of the unit member or the evaluator, a meeting may be held to discuss the evaluation process.

Traditional Evaluation. A permanent teacher select- 10 ing this method of evaluation will participate in a pre- 11 observation conference, a full-period observation and a 12 post-observation conference. The result of this proc- 13 ess will be a summary letter of evaluation written by 14 the administrator of record. The administrator of re- 15 cord and the teacher shall meet in the pre-evaluation 16 conference and mutually agree to the elements upon 17 which the evaluation is to be based. These elements 18 shall include: 1) objectives set for the specific les- 19 son(s) to be observed, 2) means for assessing whether 20 these objectives were met, and 3) a review of how this 21 lesson fits into the overall curriculum. 23 11.3.4.3.2.1 The bargaining unit member and the 24 evaluator shall make a good faith at- 25 tempt to reach mutual agreement on the 26 member’s goals and objectives. To the 27 extent the evaluator and the bargaining 28 unit member disagree, the evaluator 29 shall state reasonable goals and objec- 30 tives by which the member is to be 31 evaluated. The bargaining unit member 32 may specify his/her positions, in writing, 1 to be attached to the Evaluation docu- 2 ments, including any constraints which 3 the member believes inhibit his/her abil- 4 ity to meet the stated goals and objec-

Traditional Evaluation. A permanent teacher 5 selecting this method of evaluation will partici- 6 ▇▇▇▇ in a pre-observation conference, a full-period 7 observation and a post-observation conference. 8 The result of this process will be a summary letter 9 of evaluation written by the administrator of re-

Traditional Evaluation. 15.3.1 Every Long-Term Substitute, Temporary, Intern, Probationary 1 and Probationary 2 unit member shall be evaluated annually in writing by a Board-authorized evaluator using Evaluation Form A- Traditional. 15.3.2 Every permanent unit member shall be evaluated in writing by a Board authorized evaluator at least once every other year. Summative evaluations will be completed no later than April 1 of the years in which they are conducted. A Board-authorized evaluator may evaluate permanent unit members in the bargaining unit who have at least ten (10) years of District service and whose previous evaluation rated the unit member as meeting or exceeding standards every five (5) years, provided the unit member is “highly qualified” as defined by applicable law, and provided further that the every five (5) year evaluation cycle is established by mutual agreement of the District and the bargaining unit member. The certificated unit member or the evaluator may withdraw consent to the five (5) year evaluation cycle at any time. If such consent is withdrawn by the District, the District will provide the unit member with timely advance written notice of such withdrawal of consent including reasons. 15.3.3 The evaluator and the evaluatee shall meet to review the evaluation forms, process and timeline by October 31st. Only the forms cited in 15.1.2 shall be used. The first observation may be scheduled at this time and must occur by January 31st for every Long-Term Substitute, Temporary, Intern, Probationary 1, Probationary 2, and unit members on an assistance plan. Any evaluation constraints identified by the evaluatee shall be documented at this time. 15.3.4 During the course of the evaluation period, mitigating circumstances may arise which require modification of the evaluation parameters. With the mutual agreement of the evaluatee and the evaluator, the evaluation parameters may be modified. Under no circumstances shall the evaluatee be penalized if circumstances change. 15.3.5 Each evaluation shall be based upon the California Standards for the Teaching Profession. For a Traditional Evaluation, there shall be at least one (1) observation, lasting twenty to fifty (20-50) minutes, which will be followed by a conference within ten (10) working days in which the evaluator and the evaluatee shall review and discuss the unit member Observation Notes. 15.3.6.1 If a standard or element is not observed during a particular observation, the relevant box on the evaluation fo...

Traditional Evaluation. Process 11 3.7.1. Probationary and temporary unit members must select three (3) standards for 12 goals. 13 3.7.2. Permanent unit members must select any two (2) standards.

Traditional Evaluation. An evaluation conducted by an administrator that entails at least two classroom observations (one per semester) and a summative final evaluation report and conference The site administration of each high school shall have the responsibility for evaluation of unit members. 2.1 A unit member assigned to more than one school shall be evaluated by the principal site administrator of the school where the teacher has the majority of the assignment. If a unit member is assigned equally to two schools, then the evaluation will be done by the site administrator of the teacher’s choice. In all cases, any site administrator for whom the teacher serves will provide input to the teacher’s primary evaluating site administrator. 2.2 Teachers transferred from one school to another will maintain the same evaluation category as given by the principal site administrator at their previous school.

Traditional Evaluation