Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.; and the Model System for Educator Evaluation developed and which may be updated from time to time by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. See 603 CMR 35.02 (definition of model system). In the event of a conflict between this collective bargaining agreement and the governing laws and regulations, the laws and regulations will prevail.
B) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
i) To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a);
ii) To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b);
iii) To ensure that every school committee has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of teachers and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and
iv) To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.; and the Model System for Educator Evaluation developed and which may be updated from time to time by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. See 603 CMR
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq. In the event of a conflict between this collective bargaining agreement and the governing laws and regulations, the laws and regulations will prevail.
B) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
i) To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a);
ii) To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b);
iii) To ensure that every school committee has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of teachers and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and
iv) To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.; and the Model System for Educator Evaluation developed and which may be updated from time to time by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. See 603 CMR 35.02 (definition of model system). In the event of a conflict between this collective bargaining agreement and the governing laws and regulations, the laws and regulations will prevail.
B) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
Purpose of Educator Evaluation.
A) The purpose of the Belmont Public Schools’ Educator Evaluation Procedure is to provide for the continuous growth of staff and the continuous improvement in the quality of education for all students. Evaluation of administrator performance is an essential component of an effective educational program, as well as a requirement of the state law and regulations (MGL c. 71, s. 38; 603 CMR 35.00). We believe that professional growth and development, and the resulting improvement in the quality of education, are best achieved by a cooperative process, characterized by mutual respect, teamwork and trust. Administrators and their supervisors share responsibility in this evaluation process. The Educator Evaluation Procedure described here has been designed to:
i) Raise the quality of instruction and educational services to the children.
ii) Recognize, encourage and support growth and improvement in teaching.
iii) Define goals, identify, gather and use information as part of a process to improve professional performance, and to assess total job effectiveness and make personnel decisions. This Handbook is part of the collective bargaining agreement between Unit B of the Belmont Education Association and the Belmont School Committee. (See Article 16 of this contract.) In the event of a conflict between this collective bargaining agreement and the governing laws and regulations, the laws and regulations will prevail.
B) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
i) To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a);
ii) To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b);
iii) To ensure that every school committee has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of educators and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and
iv) To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
C) Educator Evaluation Procedures are not meant to be disciplinary in nature; neither do the Educator Evaluation Procedures prevent the Committee from imposing discipline.
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) The Xxxxxxx Public Schools believes that proficient educators focus on their own professional growth to enrich practice, which will lead to improved student achievement. This process relies on the willingness of each educator to engage in authentic self- assessment, professional and reflective conversations with colleagues and supervisors, and a deep commitment to professional growth.
B) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
i) To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a);
ii) To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b);
iii) To ensure that every school committee has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of teachers and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and
iv) To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
v) To promote proficient educators
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.; and the Model System for Educator Evaluation developed, and which may be updated from time to time bythe Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. See 603 CMR 35.02 (definition of model system). In the event of a conflict between this collective bargaining agreement and the governing laws and regulations, the laws and regulations will prevail.
B) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
i) To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a);
ii) To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b);
iii) To ensure that the Board of the Directors has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of teachers and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and
iv) To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
C) The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/her personnel file. All evaluation documents shall remain confidential as personnel records of each member of the bargaining unit.
Purpose of Educator Evaluation a) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.; and the Model System for Educator Evaluation developed and which may be updated from time to time by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. See 603 CMR 35.02 (definition of model system). In the event of a conflict between this collective
b) The regulatory purposes of evaluation are:
i) To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a);
ii) To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b);
iii) To ensure that every school committee has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of teachers and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and
iv) To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. The purpose of our Educator Evaluation System is to promote student learning and achievement, by providing Educators with feedback for growth. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms and give targeted constructive feedback to Educators. Feedback and ratings are based on observations and discussions of practice, examination of evidence, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.
Purpose of Educator Evaluation. A) This contract language is locally negotiated and based on M.G.L., c.71, § 38; M.G.L. c.150E; the Educator Evaluation regulations, 603 CMR 35.00 et seq.
B) The specific purposes of evaluation are: • To promote student learning, growth, and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement, enhanced opportunities for professional growth, and clear structures for accountability, 603 CMR 35.01(2)(a); • To provide a record of facts and assessments for personnel decisions, 35.01(2)(b); • To ensure that every school committee has a system to enhance the professionalism and accountability of teachers and administrators that will enable them to assist all students to perform at high levels, 35.01(3); and • To assure effective teaching and administrative leadership, 35.01(3).
