City of Portland. LUBA Nos. 2010-039-04 concluding the evidence supporting the City’s Goal 9 analysis and findings was insufficient. As a result, the City Council is deferring the natural resource program update for industrially zoned properties (not owned by the Port of Portland) that were included in the Airport Futures City of Portland Recommended Land Use Plan for further analysis and review.
City of Portland. Technical Assistance Letter Regarding In-Service Training, dated Feb. 26, 2016, available at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/crt/file/847051/download. While we observed PPB’s significant dedication to training, one area of serious concern was the training offered by an Assistant City Attorney. That session emphasized the City’s asserted defenses to problematic uses of force, rather than demonstrating compliance with Par. 79(d)’s direction to use problematic uses of force to inform training needs. • One of PPB’s recently re-investigated force incidents reveals an effective feedback loop to inform training needs based on problematic uses of force, as envisioned in Par. 79(d). In our 2015 report card for Par. 121, we discussed at length allegation 2014-C-0265. Portland Police Bureau recently completed a re-investigation of that allegation, for which the investigation identified a failure to train in the particularized, individualized suspicion requirement for Xxxxx stops. As an outgrowth of this more fulsome investigation, the reviewing supervisor provided a memo to the training division on the lack of a record of training on this basic constitutional requirement. See 2014-C-0265. While we critique the adequacy of the investigation and finding in that case (see Section VIII, below), we laud PPB’s use of an administrative investigation to identify a training need. • Par. 79(h) requires that PPB research best practices for training. Following our provision of technical assistance in a February 26, 2016 letter, we engaged in follow-up discussions with PPB. We recommended that PPB employ a de- escalation training scheme approved by the Court monitor in our Seattle Police matter. See United States v. City of Seattle, 2:12-cv-01282-JLR, D.E. 198-1, Filed 04/01/15. PPB’s Training Captain reported that PPB had already sought out and planned to use those very same materials. This is emblematic of PPB’s willingness to adopt best practices. Lastly, after lengthy and detailed negotiations, DOJ recently approved a revised Policy 1500, which includes provisions that govern PPB’s training plan. DOJ and the City specifically considered and incorporated, where appropriate, COAB’s recommendations to Policy 1500. Technical Assistance We will assess whether and how PPB responds to the TAC recommendations as we continue to monitor compliance with this provision. The PPB’s Employee Information System (“EIS”), though not yet fully matured, also should inform future training plans. As befor...
City of Portland. [Do Not Execute] By: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Chair Multnomah County Board of Commissioners _[Do Not Execute By: Xxx Xxxx, Housing Commissioner City of Portland Approved as to Form: [Do Not Execute] County Attorney Approved as to Form: [Do Not Execute] Office of the City Attorney Attachment 1 EXHIBIT H The City's FY21-22 Budget (Revised July 1, 2021) Total Budget City Funds: General Fund Ongoing $26,697,375 Retained by PHB* ($133,000) Service Coordination Team $2,159,003 Total General Funds Sub-Total $28,723,378 Recreational Cannabis Funds $332,690 Total City Funds $ 29,056,068 Federal Funds (Regular Allocation): HUD HOPWA Grant $1,797,490 HUD HOPWA Grant 2020 (Carryover) $100,000 HUD ESG Grant $745,050 Federal Funds (COVID-19): HUD ESG-CV2 (Carryover) $6,000,000 HUD CDBG-CV3 (Carryover) $2,000,000 Total Federal Funds $10,642,540 Grand Total FY21-22 Funds $39,698,608 * Funds retained by PHB for Risk Mitigation Pool Attachment 2 SAMPLE INVOICE TEMPLATES Joint Office of Homeless Services General Fund Reconciliation Quarter 1: July - September 0000 Xxxxxxxx # 00000000 Xxxx xx Xxxxxxxx / XXX Xxxx Xxxxx November 23, 2021 Attn: Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx 000-000-0000 000 XX 0xx Xxx, Xxxxx 000 Joint Office of Homeless Services Xxxxxxxx, XX 00000 000 XX Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx 000 000-000-0000 Xxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Program/Service Category Provider IGA Budget Expenditures Reported for Current Quarter Total Expenditures Reported YTD Remaining Balance OFFICE SUPPORT STAFF OFFICE LEASED SPACE CONSULTING - AHFE Administration and Operations 211 INFO INC CENTRAL CITY CONCERN JOIN NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT STREET ROOTS TRANSITION PROJECTS INC System Support Services 211 INFO CASCADIA CATHOLIC CHARITIES CENTRAL CITY CONCERN DO GOOD MULTNOMAH HOME FORWARD HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS JOIN MENTAL HEALTH SHELTER ALTERNATIVES FACILITIES SHELTER PERSONNEL TEMPORARY WINTER SHELTER TRANSITION PROJECTS INC Safety Off the Streets CATHOLIC CHARITIES DO GOOD MULTNOMAH HOME FORWARD HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC JOIN NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSN NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT OUTSIDE IN SELF ENHANCEMENT INC TRANSITION PROJECTS INC URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND Housing Placement & Retention CASCADIA BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CENTRAL CITY CONCERN DO GOOD MULTNOMAH HOME FORWARD HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC JOIN NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSN NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH NEW NARRATIVE PSU SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PERSONNEL URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND Supportive Housing CENTRAL CITY CONCERN HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC TRANSITION PRO...
City of Portland. By: Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Digitally signed by Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Date: 2020.12.21 08:11:44 -08'00' (Official’s Signature) (Printed Name and Title of Official) Date: ODOT STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Transportation Xxxxx Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Approved as to legal sufficiency by the Attorney General's office. By: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, AAG (Official's Signature) Date: via e-mail dated November 10, 2020 Xxx XxXxxx Digitally signed by Xxx XxXxxx Date: 2020.12.17 16:18:20 -08'00' City of Portland, City Attorney By: Date: 2020.12.28 14:11:34 -08'00' Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Division Administrator or designee Policy, Data & Analysis Division Date: EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF PORTLAND LOWER SOUTHEAST RISING TRANSPORTATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (“TGM”) FILE CODE 1B-19 Abbreviations Agency or ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation APM Agency Project Manager City City of Portland PAC Project Advisory Committee PMT Project Management Team Project Lower Southeast Rising TAC Technical Advisory Committee TGM Transportation and Growth Management Program Name: Address: Phone: Email: Agency’s Project Manager Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx ODOT Region 0 000 XX Xxxxxxxx Portland, OR 00000 (000) 000-0000 xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx-xxxx@xxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx Name: Address: Phone: Email: Local Project Manager Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Bureau of Planning and Sustainability 0000 XX 0xx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Xxxxxxxx, XX 00000 (000) 000-0000 Xxxxx.Xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
City of Portland. The City will know that it has chosen the most qualified providers to continue on to the finalist process. Phase III—Negotiations Step 1: Finalist Meetings We will conduct face-to-face finalist meetings at the City’s offices. Our trusted relationship with the vendor community serves us well in conducting and facilitating effective finalist meetings. We treat these meetings as an integral tool in the evaluation process. Before the meetings occur, we develop complete discussion guides, scoring and agendas. We will prepare each vendor beforehand to make sure that the people they bring and materials they present are relevant to you and are focused on the issues we raise during the proposal evaluation process.
City of Portland. We use these meetings as an opportunity to allow the City to get to know the xxxxxx’s team and address any open questions.
City of Portland. As the marketing process comes to a conclusion, you will be confident that you received a competitive deal and a substantial return on your consulting investment and confidence that a solid bid was completed following public bidding rules. Phase IV—Implementation Step 1: Plan Implementation As you work to implement your new programs and vendors, we have the experience and expertise to assist you. The scope of the implementation activities will vary significantly depending on the availability of your internal resources and the vendor’s implementation process and services. We can support the following activities 🞕 Development of a detailed implementation plan and team; 🞕 Initial planning meeting to outline tasks, responsible parties and targeted completion dates; 🞕 Regularly scheduled teleconferences to review the implementation efforts of the team, with participation among the vendor(s), the City and Aon Hewitt; 🞕 Review of contracts, plan documents and performance guarantees for accuracy per previously agreed to components; 🞕 Provision of IT resources to facilitate discussions between the City, the vendors and other TPA regarding electronic interfaces and transactions; �� Pre-implementation audits to conclusively determine how accurately the administrator’s claim system has been programmed to adjudicate the City’s claims (typically funded by vendors); and 🞕 Review of communications and training materials for managers, employees and other key audiences such as Human Resources, Management and Payroll.
City of Portland. Subject to the limitations and conditions of the Oregon Constitution, Article XI, Section 9 and the Oregon Tort Claims Act (ORS 30.260 to 30.300), City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless EN and its officers, and employees, against all claims, demands, losses and liabilities to or by third parties arising from, resulting from or connected with the Services performed or to be performed under this Agreement by City or City’s agents or employees, for bodily injury or wrongful death to persons and damage to property even though such claims may prove to be groundless or fraudulent.
City of Portland. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "State" or “ODOT”; and the CITY OF PORTLAND, acting by and through its elected officials, hereinafter referred to as "Agency”, herein each referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” RECITALS Cascade Highway North is under the jurisdiction and control of the Oregon Transportation Commission. Cascade Highway North, State Highway number 068, is also designated as State Route OR 213 and is known as NE 00xx Xxxxxx xxx XX 00xx Xxxxxx. By the authority granted in Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 366.395, State may relinquish title to any of its property not needed by it for state highway purposes to any other governmental body or political subdivision within the State of Oregon, subject to such restrictions, if any, imposed by deed or other legal instrument or otherwise imposed by State. By the authority granted in ORS 190.110, 366.572 and 366.576, State may enter into cooperative agreements with counties, cities and units of local governments for the performance of work on certain types of improvement projects with the allocation of costs on terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the contracting Pparties. By the authority granted in ORS 190.110 and 374.329(1), State and cities may enter into an agreement to transfer jurisdiction and ownership of a state highway when it is in the best interest of highway users to abandon a segment of the state highway. The National Highway System (NHS) was adopted by Congress as part of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administers this program and must approve all changes to the system. Cascade Highway North is subject to Title 23, Title 49 of the Federal Regulations and all applicable FHWA policies, 23 USC 131, and the Oregon Motorist Information Act, ORS 377.700 to 377.840 and 377.992. Cascade Highway is a part of the NHS, or part of the federal aid primary system in existence on June 1, 1991.
City of Portland. Case No. 1202-02223 (In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah). On March 30, 2012, the city and county filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that the online travel companies should be required to exhaust their administrative remedies including the payment of any taxes allegedly owed before proceeding in a lawsuit. On June 15, 2012, the court denied the city and county’s motion to dismiss and the case will proceed in court without the prepayment of the city and county’s claims for taxes. After the court granted their motion for leave to amend, the city and county filed their amended answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims on June 11, 2013. In February, 2014 the city and county moved to amend their answer to assert counterclaims based on recently amended state legislation. The court denied their motion on April 3, 2014. On April 28, 2014, the online travel companies filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On July 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the online travel companies’ motion for summary judgment. Claims for hotel taxes under the Portland ordinance will proceed to trial. A trial date has not been set. The city’s common law claims have been dismissed.
