Compliance Status Clause Samples
The Compliance Status clause defines the requirement for parties to adhere to applicable laws, regulations, or specified standards throughout the duration of the agreement. It typically obligates each party to confirm and maintain their compliance, and may require them to provide evidence or notification if their compliance status changes. This clause serves to ensure that all parties remain legally and ethically aligned, reducing the risk of legal violations and associated liabilities during the contractual relationship.
Compliance Status. (i) All Tax Returns (as defined below) required to be filed by or on behalf of the Company have been filed on a timely basis with the appropriate governmental authority in all jurisdictions in which such Tax Returns are required to be filed, and all such Tax Returns were (at the time they were filed) true, correct and complete in all material respects; (ii) all Taxes (as defined below) of the Company (whether or not reflected on any Tax Return) have been fully and timely paid; (iii) no waivers of statutes of limitation have been given or requested with respect to the Company in connection with any Tax Returns covering the Company with respect to any Taxes payable by it; (iv) no taxing authority in a jurisdiction where the Company does not file Tax Returns has made a claim, assertion or threat to the Company that the Company is or may be subject to taxation by such jurisdiction; (v) the Company has duly and timely withheld from employee salaries, wages and other compensation and paid over to the appropriate governmental authority all amounts required to be so withheld and paid over for all periods under all applicable laws, and no amounts have been or would be required to be withheld with respect to the lapse of restrictions on Company Common Stock; (vi) there are no liens with respect to Taxes on any of the Company's property or assets other than liens for current Taxes not yet payable; (vii) there are no Tax rulings, requests for rulings or closing agreements relating to the Company that could affect the liability for Taxes or the amount of taxable income of the Company for any period (or portion of a period) after the date hereof; and (viii) no audits or other administrative or court proceedings are presently pending with respect to any Taxes or Tax Returns of the Company.
(b) The Company is not a party to any Tax allocation or sharing agreement and does not have any liability for Taxes of any Person as a transferee or successor by contract or otherwise.
(c) Since the date of the Company Balance Sheet, the Company has not incurred any liability to Taxes other than in the ordinary course of business. There are no reasons why any tax assessment would be considered to be incorrect or capable of being reopened by the relevant tax authority. The Company has not over the past three years been engaged in any disputes with any tax authorities and has retained all records which tax authorities require them to retain. The Company has established, in accordance wit...
Compliance Status. Jostens has a process to document non-compliance of any statutory, regulatory or contractual requirement:
a. Jostens identify and quantify the risks and mitigation plans and documents the business decision for alternate controls or risk acceptance; and
b. The mitigation plan and business decision are signed off by the Chief Information Officer (CIO) or an authorized individual who can accept responsibility and accountability.
Compliance Status. (a) Following a product model’s Certification by NIJ and until that model is withdrawn from NIJ CTP Surveillance, the Applicant or Applicant’s multiple Listees may use the phrase “certified by NIJ” as an indication of a model’s compliance status.
(b) The phrase may only be used when placed adjacent to:
(1) a single model designation as it appears on the Notice of Compliance;
(2) the Listee name as identified on the CPL;
(3) the applicable standard as it appears on the Notice of Compliance; and
(4) if applicable, the type or performance level as it appears on the Notice of Compliance.
(c) The phrase shall not be:
(1) applied or affixed directly to individual products;
(2) used in any way that, in the opinion of the CAB, is misleading, unauthorized, inaccurate, or brings the CAB into disrepute; or
(3) used to imply applicability to the Applicant, a general product type or group of products, a manufacturing location, or a test laboratory.
Compliance Status. Project Approval Documents ☐ Not Available ☒ Provided to CTG on 9/13/2023 Power Purchase Agreement(s) ☐ Not Available ☒ Provided to CTG on 9/13/2023 Land Title Document ☐ Not Available ☐ Land Ownership Certificate OR ☒ Lease Agreement OR ☐ Land License Agreement provided to CTG on 9/13/2023 Location of the Separate Meter ☐ Next to the high voltage transformer ☒ Next to the low voltage transformer ☐ Next to the container or plant ☐ Other: Ultimate Beneficiary Owner of Data Center Facility1 Mawson Infrastructure Group Inc, listed on Nasdaq
Compliance Status and engineering contractor. DOE has consolidated the defenses for litigation purposes. The National Primary Drinking Water Regulations of the Safe Drinking Water Act apply to the drink ing water supplies at the Hanford Site. These regulations are enforced by the DOH. The Hanford Site water supplies are monitored for the contami nants listed in the rules and regulations of the DOE regarding public water systems. In 1994, all drink ing water systems on the Site were in compliance with requirements and agreements. There are cur rently six Group A and six Group B water systems at Hanford. The Group A systems consist of five surface water systems and one ground water sys tem; the Group B systems consist of two surface water systems and four ground water systems. A study is currently being performed that will validate the water’s quality for the five Group A surface wa ter systems onsite. The study will include measure ments of chlorine concentration, temperature, and pH.
Compliance Status. Yes No | ------------------------------------- ================================================================================ 115 FY 2000 IMATRON INC. FORM 10-K ================================================================================ Sincerely, IMATRON INCORPORATED __________________________________ SIGNATURE __________________________________ TITLE __________________________________ DATE ================================================================================ 116 FY 2000 IMATRON INC. FORM 10-K ================================================================================ CORPORATE BORROWING RESOLUTION Borrower: Imatron Incorporated Bank: Silicon Valley Bank ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ I, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of Imatron Incorporated ("Borrower"), CERTIFY that Borrower is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey. I certify that at a meeting of Borrower's Directors (or by other authorized corporate action) duly held the following resolutions were adopted. It is resolved that any one of the following officers of Borrower, whose name, title and signature is below: NAMES POSITIONS ACTUAL SIGNATURES ----- --------- ----------------- ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ may act for Borrower and: Borrow Money. Borrow money from Silicon Valley Bank ("Bank").
Compliance Status. In March 1993, an agreement was signed by the DOE, Ecology, and EPA Region 10 to identify addi tional measures to accelerate Hanford Site cleanup. As part of the newly renegotiated Tri-Party Agree ment, a new milestone was established focusing on removal of physical hazards and asbestos from the North Slope. This milestone required that the re mediation of the North Slope be completed by October 1994. Remedial actions were completed in September 1994. Remediation consisted of cleaning up 39 waste sites and decommissioning 16 ▇▇▇▇▇. A re cord of decision is expected from the regulators in mid-1995. Hazardous waste removed from the North Slope included the following: 460 m3 (600 yd3) of DDT-contaminated soil, 230 m3 (300 yd3) of petroleum-contaminated soil, several hundred containers of various petroleum-based lu bricants and solvents, and lead-acid battery plates. The soils were disposed of at waste facilities in Ar lington, Oregon and Pasco, Washington. The other wastes were taken to the 100-N storage pad. Addi tionally, several of the water ▇▇▇▇▇ had been broken into and used for the disposal of waste motor oil. These ▇▇▇▇▇ were cleaned to Ecology standards be fore being decommissioned.
Compliance Status. Yes No ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Status specified in the license will be incorporated into the upcoming Hanford air operating permit, required by Title V of the Clean Air Act and 1990 amendments. EPA has retained authority in Washington State for regulating certain hazardous pollutants under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), in accordance with 40 CFR 61. These standards are designed to protect the public from hazardous air pollutants (for example, arsenic, asbestos, beryllium, mercury, radionuclides, and vinyl chloride). Pursuant to this program within the Clean Air Act, the EPA has promulgated regulations specifically addressing asbestos emissions. These regulations apply at the Hanford Site in building demolition and/or disposal and waste disposal operations. Of the approximately 1,400 facilities on the Hanford Site, 456 facilities currently contain asbestos. Dur ing 1994, approximately 2,063 m 3 (72,860 ft3) of asbestos were removed and disposed of in the ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Central Landfill in accordance with applicable regulations. Revised Clean Air Act requirements for radioactive air emissions were issued in December 1989 under 40 CFR 61, Subpart H. Emissions from the ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Site are within the new EPA offsite emission standards of 10 mrem/yr (effective dose equivalent). The 1989 requirements for flow and emissions mea surements, quality assurance, and sampling docu mentation are in the process of being implemented at all Hanford Site sources. These specific reporting and monitoring require ments necessitate additional effort. The Richland Operations Office received a 2-year compliance ex tension for the Subpart H requirements until De cember 1991. During this extension period, evalua tions were conducted to determine the need for any additional continuous sampling equipment and oth er actions to meet EPA criteria. Negotiations con tinued with the EPA in 1992 and 1993. In February 1993, the DOE Richland Operations Office received a Compliance Order and Information Request from EPA, Region 10. The Order required 1) evaluation of all radionuclide emission points on the Hanford Site to determine which are subject to continuous emission measurement requirements in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart H, and 2) continuous measurement of radionuclide emissions in accordance with 40 CFR Part 61.93. DOE Richland Operations Office sub mitted a compliance plan to the EPA, Region 10, in April 1993. The compliance plan included, as one of its milestones, the requirement to ...
Compliance Status. The Local Program shall routinely track, evaluate, and document the compliance status of major, synthetic minor, and minor sources (facilities) within Polk County.