CONCILIATION PROCESS. 1.1.1 If a dispute is referred for conciliation, the AIRC shall do everything that appears to it to be right and proper to assist the Parties to agree on terms for the settlement of the dispute. In doing so, the AIRC may make suggestions and conduct an initial assessment of the dispute. The action that may be taken by the AIRC under this clause 1.1 includes, without limitation:
a) arranging conferences of the Parties presided over by the AIRC;
b) meeting or otherwise discussing the dispute with one or more of the Parties in order to conciliate the dispute;
c) arranging for the Parties to confer among themselves at conferences (with or without the presence of the AIRC);
d) making an interim recommendation or assessment in relation to all or any matters in dispute;
e) hearing submissions from the Parties as to the facts or issues pertaining to the dispute;
f) conducting the conciliation at any place;
g) adjourning the conciliation to any time and place;
h) correcting, amending, or waiving any error, defect or irregularity, whether in substance or form;
i) allowing the amendment, on such terms as it considers appropriate, of any application or other document relating to any proceeding; and
j) generally giving all direction and do all such things as are necessary or expedient for the speedy and just conciliation of the matter in dispute.
CONCILIATION PROCESS. If an issue, complaint or problem isn’t able to be resolved at the workplace level in accordance with subclause (2) of this Appendix and is referred to the AIRC in accordance with Division 5 of Part 13 of the WR Act 1996 it shall be dealt with by conciliation at first instance.
CONCILIATION PROCESS. At any time during the Term, upon the occurrence of one or more breaches under this Agreement, the Non-Breaching Party shall promptly deliver written notification to the alleged Breaching Party setting out in reasonable detail and in clear and concise language the good faith basis for and the specifics of such breach. Within the applicable cure period provided in Section 11.03, either Party has the right to demand the following meetings:
(a) Upon fourteen (14) calendar days' notice, a meeting of the Program Coordinators for the purposes of, among other things:
(i) assessing the good faith basis for the claimed breach;
(ii) defining, assessing and prioritizing the alternatives reasonably available to cure such breach or to correct the circumstances or situations that gave rise to such breach so as to make its reoccurrence unlikely; and
(iii) adopting by unanimous vote, one or more curative or corrective courses of action.
(b) If, after meeting in accordance with Section 11.04(a), the Program Coordinators are unable to resolve the breach, a meeting of an advisory committee consisting of the President of Anam and the TI Executive Vice President responsible for the Semiconductor Group and two additional personnel of their choice, one of each from TI and Anam or Amkor for further attempts at resolution, upon fourteen (14) calendar days' notice.
(c) If, after meeting in accordance with Section 11.04(b), such advisory committee is unable to resolve the dispute, a meeting of the respective Chief Executive Officer of each of TI and Anam for the purpose of attempting to resolve the breach, upon fourteen calendar days' notice.
CONCILIATION PROCESS. 16. If the European Parliament votes amendments to the Council's position, the President of the Council will, during the same plenary meeting, take note of the differences in the position of the two institutions and give his/her agreement for the President of the EP to convene the Conciliation Committee immediately. The letter convening the Conciliation Committee will be sent at the latest on the first working day of the week following the end of the parliamentary session during which the plenary vote was delivered and the conciliation period will start on the following day. The 21-day time period is calculated pursuant to Regulation (EEC Euratom) No 1182/71 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits.
17. If the Council cannot agree on all the amendments voted by the European Parliament, it would confirm its position by letter sent before the first trilogue foreseen during the conciliation period. In such case, the Conciliation Committee will proceed in accordance with the conditions laid down in the following points.
18. The Conciliation Committee shall be chaired jointly by representatives of the European Parliament and of the Council. Committee meetings shall be chaired by the co-chair of the institution hosting the meeting. Each institution, in accordance with its own rules of procedure, shall designate its participants for each meeting and define its mandate for the negotiations.
19. In accordance with Article 314(5) TFEU, second subparagraph, the Commission shall take part in the conciliation proceedings and shall take all the necessary initiatives with a view to reconciling the positions of the European Parliament and the Council.
20. Trilogues shall take place throughout the conciliation procedure, at different levels of representation, with the aim of resolving outstanding issues and preparing the ground for an agreement to be reached in the Conciliation Committee.
21. The meeting of the Conciliation Committee and of the trilogues shall be held alternately at the premises of the European Parliament and the Council, with a view to an equal sharing of facilities, including interpretation facilities.
22. The dates of the meetings of the Conciliation Committee and the trilogues will be set in advance before the beginning of the budgetary procedure by agreement of the three institutions.
23. A common set of documents (input documents) comparing the various steps of the budgetary procedure will be made available for the Conciliat...
CONCILIATION PROCESS. At any time during the Term, upon the occurrence of one or more breaches under this Agreement, the non-breaching Party shall promptly deliver written notification to the alleged breaching Party setting out in reasonable detail and in clear and concise language the good faith basis for and the specifics of such breach. If the breaching Party has not cured such breach within ten (10) business days after delivery of such written notification, a coordinating committee consisting of the Project Coordinators (hereinafter, the "Coordinating Committee") shall be established by the Parties and shall convene a meeting of itself within ten (1 0) business days thereafter for the purposes of, among other things: - assessing the good faith basis for the claimed breach, - defining, assessing and prioritizing the alternatives reasonably available to cure such breach or to correct the circumstances or situations that gave rise to such breach so as to make its reoccurrence unlikely; and - adopting by unanimous vote, one or more curative or corrective courses of action (the "Proposed Resolution"). Either the breaching Party or the non-breaching Party shall be entitled to (i) make reasonable requests for information ("Information Requests") pertaining to the breach (provided such requests are not unduly burdensome and can be accomplished within two (2) business days) and (ii) present its views to the Coordinating Committee with respect to the breach, through its appropriate officer "Presentation". If within five (5) business days of its first meeting the Coordinating Committee shall be unable to resolve the breach by unanimous vote, then the matter shall immediately be referred to an advisory committee consisting of the President of Anam and the TI Executive Vice President responsible for the Semiconductor Group and two additional personnel of their choice, one of each from TI and Anam (hereinafter the "Advisory Committee") for further attempts at resolution. Within fourteen (14) business days of such referral, the Advisory Committee shall convene a meeting for the purpose of attempting to resolve the breach. The procedures described above concerning Information Requests and Presentation shall also apply to the Advisory Committee proceedings. If within five (5) business days of its first meeting the Advisory Committee shall be unable to resolve the breach by unanimous vote, then the matter shall immediately be referred to the respective Chairman of each of TI and Anam, Group ...
CONCILIATION PROCESS. If the European Parliament votes amendments to the Council's position, the President of the Council will, during the same plenary meeting, take note of the differences in the position of the two institutions and give his/her agreement for the President of the EP to convene the Conciliation Committee immediately. The letter convening the Conciliation Committee will be sent at the latest on the first working day of the week following the end of the parliamentary session during which the plenary vote was delivered and the conciliation period will start on the following day. The 21-day time period is calculated pursuant to Regulation (EEC Euratom) No 1182/71 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits.
CONCILIATION PROCESS. Upon determining and verifying that a participant failed or refused to comply with their employment requirements, that individual must be offered a conciliation to provide reasons for the non-compliance. Participants are provided a 10-day period in which to contact the agency and conduct their conciliation. Conciliation staff will be responsible for mediating any dispute between what the agency has indicated as an infraction or deficiency in engagement hours and/or review any claims for good cause and non-willful infractions with the participant. Staff must complete the conciliation when the participant reports. If the individual reports for their conciliation, as long as the 10-day conciliation period has not ended, staff must conduct the conciliation even if it is prior to the conciliation appointment date. For individuals who fail to report to conciliation within the 10-day period, HRA will review the circumstances of the case to see if the participant has reengaged, become employed, or is now exempt (including recent claims of exemption). If any of those are found, HRA will resolve the infraction and no notice of intent will be issued. If none of those are found, the sanction process will start with the issuance of a notice of intent to reduce or discontinue benefits. Note: For certain cases involving WeCARE Vocational Rehabilitation Services (VRS) an additional pre- NOI review consisting of an outreach attempt and thorough file review will be conducted by designated staff. Determining Good Cause If the participant appears for Conciliation within the conciliation period, conciliation staff must review the participant’s reasons and/or statements, and review any documentation provided, to determine if there was a good cause reason for the infraction. Note: Documentation submitted in support of a reasonable accommodation may be used as a basis for a good cause determination. Once good cause is granted, Conciliation staff must reengage the participant, through the Employment Plan (EP). Individuals who have an infraction with WeCARE must be referred back to WeCARE. If during the conciliation the participant makes a claim of a new employment exemption, the conciliation worker must grant good cause and then complete a new assessment through the EP. Referrals and documentation requirements are unique based on the claimed exemption and current policy for each exemption should be applied. The individuals will be temporarily exempt pending the outcome of the indi...
CONCILIATION PROCESS. 1.1.1 If a dispute is referred for conciliation, the AIRC shall do everything that appears to it to be right and proper to assist the Parties to agree on terms for the settlement of the dispute. In doing so, the AIRC may make suggestions and conduct an initial assessment of the dispute.
1.1.2 The action that may be taken by the AIRC under this clause 1.1 includes, without limitation:
(a) arranging conferences of the Parties presided over by the AIRC;
(b) meeting or otherwise discussing the dispute with one or more of the Parties in order to conciliate the dispute;
(c) arranging for the Parties to confer among themselves at conferences (with or without the presence of the AIRC);
(d) making an interim recommendation or assessment in relation to all or any matters in dispute;
CONCILIATION PROCESS. 20.4.1 Where a dispute is referred for conciliation, the AIRC shall do everything that appears to it to be right and proper to assist the Parties to agree on terms for the settlement of the dispute. In doing so, the AIRC may make suggestions and conduct an initial assessment of the dispute.
20.4.2 The action that may be taken by the AIRC under this Clause 20.4 includes, without limitation:
(a) Arranging conferences of the Parties presided over by the AIRC;
(b) Meeting or otherwise discussing the dispute with one or more of the Parties in order to conciliate the dispute;
(c) Arranging for the Parties to confer among themselves at conferences (with or without the presence of the AIRC);
(d) Making an interim recommendation or assessment in relation to all or any matters in dispute;
(e) Hearing submissions from the Parties as to the facts or issues pertaining to the dispute;
(f) Conducting the conciliation at any place;
(g) Adjourning the conciliation to any time and place;
(h) Correcting, amending, or waiving any error, defect or irregularity, whether in substance or form;
(i) Allowing the amendment, on such terms as it considers appropriate, of any application or other document relating to any proceeding; and
(j) Generally giving all direction and doing all such things as are necessary or expedient for the speedy and just conciliation of the matter in dispute.
CONCILIATION PROCESS. At any time during the Term, upon the -------------------- occurrence of one or more disputes under this Agreement and/or under any other agreements described herein, the Party allegedly aggrieved and/or damaged (the "Asserting Party") shall promptly deliver written notification to the allegedly offending and/or non-complying Party (the "Defending Party") and the Coordinating Committee, setting out in reasonable detail and in clear and concise language and on a good faith basis, the specifics of the matter in dispute. If the Defending Party has not cured the matter prior to the later of (i). five (5) business days after delivery of such written notification or (ii) the expiration of the time period, if any, specified for such cure in this Agreement or the applicable agreement (the "Applicable Cure Period"), then the Coordinating Committee shall convene a meeting within ten (10) business days thereafter for the purpose of, among other things:
(a) Assessing the good faith basis for the assertions;
(b) Defining, assessing and prioritizing the alternatives reasonably available to cure or to correct the circumstances and, to make its reoccurrence unlikely; and
(c) Adopting by unanimous votes, one or more curative or corrective courses of action.
