Counselor Evaluation Sample Clauses

Counselor Evaluation. ‌ PURPOSE‌ The purposes of counselor evaluation are:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Counselor Evaluation. Counselors may work with their supervisor and choose to pilot a new counselor evaluation tool and will be held harmless on their evaluation rating for the duration of the CBA if the supervisor and counselor mutually agree to pilot this new tool. Those piloting the new evaluation tool may make recommendation to their respective bargaining teams for consideration for the CBA that would be implemented on September 1, 2025. There is no obligation by either party to make any changes to the CBA by permitting this pilot for the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 school years. This MOU shall expire on August 31, 2024 for the Student Growth Goal portion and at the end of the current CBA for the Counselor evaluation portion. Aug 17, 2023 /s/ Aug 17, 2023 /s/ Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XXX President Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Assistant Superintendent of HR MoU for SGG and eval 23.24 Final Audit Report 2023-08-17 "MoU for SGG and eval 23.24" History Document created by Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx) 2023-08-09 - 4:20:07 PM GMT Document emailed to Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) for signature 2023-08-09 - 4:20:58 PM GMT Email viewed by Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) 2023-08-17 - 0:03:16 AM GMT New document URL requested by Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) 2023-08-17 - 0:03:25 AM GMT Document e-signed by Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) Signature Date: 2023-08-17 - 9:12:28 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx) for signature 2023-08-17 - 9:12:29 PM GMT Email viewed by Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx) 2023-08-17 - 9:44:32 PM GMT Document e-signed by Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx) Signature Date: 2023-08-17 - 9:44:53 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed. 2023-08-17 - 9:44:53 PM GMT Created: 2023-08-09 By: Status: Transaction ID: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx) Signed
Sample 1
Counselor Evaluation. All counselors will be evaluated using a process of self-reflection and appraisal of performance based on the National Association for College Admission Counseling competencies. The following apply to all counselors. • By September 30 of each year, principals will hold an individual conference with each counselor to establish goals for that school year. Prior to this meeting, the principal will provide the counselor with copies of his/her evaluation documents for the year and expectations for the meeting. Focus areas may be changed or modified during the school year at the mutual discretion of the principal and teacher. • Counselors shall be formally evaluated twice each school year, the first fifteen days prior to the end of the first semester and the second fifteen working days prior to the end of the school year. • Counselor reflections will be submitted on a date mutually agreed upon by the counselor and administrator. Submission of reflections will be followed by a conference within ten working days to review and sign the evaluation. Counselor Self-Reflection Name of Counselor: School Site: Date: Counselors will be evaluated once a semester. The following competencies were taken from the National Association for College Admission Counseling. These standards will be used to assess a counselor’s effectiveness. • Prior to the evaluation, a counselor will provide a rating for each indicator under each competency. • In addition, the counselor will provide a written reflection on two competencies, one identified as a strength and one identified as an area for improvement. • The evaluator will use the counselor’s reflections as the evaluation is completed, and the counselor will have a meeting to discuss his/her evaluation, progress towards goals and next steps once the evaluation has been completed. Competency 1:
Sample 1
Counselor Evaluation 
Sample 1

Related to Counselor Evaluation

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!