Feasibility of Approach Sample Clauses

Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Feasibility of Approach. Proposals will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the Offeror’s methods and approach in meeting the requirements in a timely manner provide the Government with a high level of confidence that the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. In the event that enhancements are proposed, the enhancements will be evaluated to determine whether the approach taken is feasible and will result in the solicitation requirements being fully met or exceeded.
Sample 1Sample 2
Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule. All proposals submitted in response to the solicitation will be evaluated by a formally established Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). An overall assessment of the merit of each proposal will be derived from the evaluation of the proposal as it relates to each factor in this solicitation. A narrative explanation will be provided to support the adjectival ratings and risk assessment for the Mission Support, Past Performance, and Price factors.
Sample 1
Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule. FACTOR 1 - Technical Approach FACTOR 2 – Management Approach FACTOR 3 - Past Performance For Factors 1 and 2, Offerors will be assigned a combined technical/risk rating from the following tables, based on the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the requirements of the solicitation: TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS 1. FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH The Government will evaluate the proposed technical approach to conduct recurring maintenance and minor repair describing the methodology in performing the following tasks:  The degree that the proposal clearly specifies how to implement all requirements of the PWS.  The degree that the proposal demonstrates a reasonable process and rationale for the number and capability of staff to perform the tasks in a cost effective manner, provide an adequate safety program, comply with regulatory requirements, and maintain the specific performance metrics  How the contractor will determine the frequency of inspections at each facility and schedule resources to meet PWS and UFC requirements.  How the contractor will track, report and schedule service orders at both Installations concurrently, from the management standpoint and from the cost standpoint to ensure all work is conducted within the dollar threshold of the individual line item  The degree that the proposal demonstrates an understanding of the service order process from initiation to close out, to include the methodology used to respond to the service order request within time specified in the PWS; troubleshoot the deficiency; prepare the cost estimates for each individual service order; execute service order repair; perform quality control; document closeout; and invoicing  How the Offeror will use proposed personnel and sub-contractor resources to assure the delivery of quality projects in accordance with contract provisions; and  A Technical Approach that demonstrates the least risk to the operations at DoD fuel facilities. The Government may give additional considerati...
Sample 1
Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule. FACTOR 1 - Technical Approach FACTOR 2 – Management Approach FACTOR 3 - Past Performance For Factors 1 and 2, Offerors will be assigned a combined technical/risk rating from the following tables, based on the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the requirements of the solicitation:
Sample 1
Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the Offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule. The evaluation approach for each factor follows: 3.1 FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL (VOLUME II): The Offeror shall describe their technical approach in meeting the Program, Contract, and Management objectives as stated in the PWS cited in this solicitation. The Offeror shall describe their approach and processes as outlined in the following six subfactors above; the Offeror submits a proposal that clearly outlines their approach to meeting Performance Requirements as outlined in the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). S ubfactor 1 – TECHNICAL UNDERSTANDING The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s understanding of all requirements of the PWS and its approach to meeting these requirements. STANDARD: The Offeror clearly understands the service support requirements of the PWS and demonstrates an understanding of the Army PEO Aviation UAS Project Office mission and programmatic needs. S ubfactor 2 – ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT APPROACH The Government will evaluate the organizational structure to include subcontractors that comprise the entire contractor team. The Government will evaluate the performance-based approach to managing the contractor team in conducting day-to-day operations, coordinating and collaborating with Government personnel in both management and service delivery functions, and effectively and efficiently meeting all contract requirements. STANDARD: The performance-based management approach and contractor team organizational structure supports effective management of contractor and subcontractor personnel in performing the task requirements defined in the PWS while collocated with Government personnel and at Contractor sites.
Sample 1
Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven practices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the Offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule. The Offerors shall address each of the sub-factors within its technical proposal. Offerors must receive a rating of Acceptable or better in each of the sub-factors to receive an Acceptable rating for this factor. Sub-factor 1b: Management Approach Sub-factor 1c: Recruitment and Retention DRAFT Each sub-factor within Factor 1 will be rated as Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Unacceptable. The ratings for the sub-factors will then be summarized and one overall rating will be given for Factor 1 of either Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal or Unacceptable. If an Offeror receives a rating of Unacceptable or Marginal for any of the individual sub-factors, the entire factor will be rated as Unacceptable. All Offerors must receive a rating of Acceptable or better in the Technical factor and each sub-factor, to be eligible for award. Factor 1 ratings are defined as follows:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Feasibility of Approach

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • STABILITY OF AGREEMENT No amendment, alteration or variation of the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall bind the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing by the parties hereto.

  • Feasibility Each of the Project Budget, the Project Schedule and the Disbursement Schedule is realistic and feasible.

  • Feasibility Study A feasibility study will identify the potential costs, service quality and other benefits which would result from contracting out the work in question. The cost analysis for the feasibility study shall not include the Employer’s indirect overhead costs for existing salaries or wages and benefits for administrative staff or for rent, equipment, utilities, and materials, except to the extent that such costs are attributable solely to performing the services to be contracted out. Upon completion of the feasibility study, the Employer agrees to furnish the Union with a copy if the feasibility study, the bid from the Apparent Successful Bidder and all pertinent information upon which the Employer based its decision to contract out the work including, but not limited to, the total cost savings the Employer anticipates. The Employer shall not go forward with contracting out the work in question if more than sixty percent (60%) of any projected savings resulting from the contracting out are attributable to lower employee wage and benefit costs.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • Applicability of Agreement The Developer agrees that the Lands shall be developed and used only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

  • Inspections and Tests 26.1 The Supplier shall at its own expense and at no cost to the Procuring Entity carry out all such tests and/or inspections of the Goods and Related Services as are specified in the SCC. 26.2 The inspections and tests may be conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods' final destination, or in another place in Kenya as specified in the SCC. Subject to GCC Sub-Clause 26.3, if conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, all reasonable facilities and assistance, including access to drawings and production data, shall be furnished to the inspectors at no charge to the Procuring Entity. 26.3 The Procuring Entity or its designated representative shall be entitled to attend the tests and/or inspections referred to in GCC Sub-Clause 26.2, provided that the Procuring Entity bear all of its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with such attendance including, but not limited to, all travelling and board and lodging expenses. 26.4 Whenever the Supplier is ready to carry out any such test and inspection, it shall give a reasonable advance notice, including the place and time, to the Procuring Entity. The Supplier shall obtain from any relevant third party or manufacturer any necessary permission or consent to enable the Procuring Entity or its designated representative to attend the test and/or inspection. 26.5 The Procuring Entity may require the Supplier to carry out any test and/or inspection not required by the Contract but deemed necessary to verify that the characteristics and performance of the Goods comply with the technical specifications codes and standards under the Contract, provided that the Supplier's reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the carrying out of such test and/or inspection shall be added to the Contract Price. Further, if such test and/or inspection impedes the progress of manufacturing and/or the Supplier's performance of its other obligations under the Contract, due allowance will be made in respect of the Delivery Dates and Completion Dates and the other obligations so affected. 26.6 The Supplier shall provide the Procuring Entity with a report of the results of any such test and/or inspection. 26.7 The Procuring Entity may reject any Goods or any part thereof that fail to pass any test and/or inspection or do not conform to the specifications. The Supplier shall either rectify or replace such rejected Goods or parts thereof or make alterations necessary to meet the specifications at no cost to the Procuring Entity, and shall repeat the test and/or inspection, at no cost to the Procuring Entity, upon giving a notice pursuant to GCC Sub- Clause 26.4. 26.8 The Supplier agrees that neither the execution of a test and/or inspection of the Goods or any part thereof, nor the attendance by the Procuring Entity or its representative, nor the issue of any report pursuant to GCC Sub-Clause 26.6, shall release the Supplier from any warranties or other obligations under the Contract.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Deemed Compliance with Proposition 65 The Parties agree that compliance by Xxxxxxxx with this Settlement Agreement constitutes compliance with Proposition 65 with respect to exposure to DEHP from use of the Products.

  • Possibility of Declining a Request 1. The requested Party shall not be required to obtain or provide information that the applicant Party would not be able to obtain under its own laws for purposes of the administration or enforcement of its own tax laws. The competent authority of the requested Party may decline to assist where the request is not made in conformity with this Agreement. 2. The provisions of this Agreement shall not impose on a Contracting Party the obligation to supply information which would disclose any trade, business, industrial, commercial or professional secret or trade process. Notwithstanding the foregoing, information of the type referred to in Article 5, paragraph 4 shall not be treated as such a secret or trade process merely because it meets the criteria in that paragraph. 3. The provisions of this Agreement shall not impose on a Contracting Party the obligation to obtain or provide information, which would reveal confidential communications between a client and an attorney, solicitor or other admitted legal representative where such communications are: (a) produced for the purposes of seeking or providing legal advice or (b) produced for the purposes of use in existing or contemplated legal proceedings. 4. The requested Party may decline a request for information if the disclosure of the information would be contrary to public policy (ordre public). 5. A request for information shall not be refused on the ground that the tax claim giving rise to the request is disputed. 6. The requested Party may decline a request for information if the information is requested by the applicant Party to administer or enforce a provision of the tax law of the applicant Party, or any requirement connected therewith, which discriminates against a national of the requested Party as compared with a national of the applicant Party in the same circumstances.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!