ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. The Government will perform an evaluation of the non-price evaluation factors based on the Offeror’s proposal. This evaluation focuses on strengths and weaknesses of the Offeror’s proposal, resulting in the assignment of an adjectival rating for each factor. Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. The Government will perform an evaluation of the non-cost/price evaluation factors and subfactors of the Offeror’s proposal. Cost/Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.
4.1 Pass/Fail Ratings Pass Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation. Fail Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation
4.2 Technical Ratings
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. For evaluating each subjective criterion (i.e. Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, and Regulatory Compliance), the following adjectival ratings will be used: performance requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. All unsatisfactory performance identified for the criterion during the period was considered minor in nature and has been addressed appropriately. requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. Any unsatisfactory performance has been or is in the process of being addressed. requirements of the applicable criterion for the award-fee evaluation period. The following is applied to the final adjectival rating(s) for the subjective evaluation criteria: EXCELLENT 91 to 100% VERY GOOD 76 to 90% GOOD 51 to 75% SATISFACTORY No greater than 50% UNSATISFACTORY 0% Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship. Assess how successfully the Contractor meets program/project quality objectives such as producibility, reliability, maintainability, and inspectability. Assess the Contractor’s management of the quality control programs, as well as the work itself. Assess the Contractor’s ability to maintain quality control, address and review comments, identification and correction of deficient work, and overall quality related performance. The following items will be considered for evaluation: o QA Program – SIMCO maintains and implements an effective Quality Assurance program, with emphasis on Nuclear Quality Assurance (NQA)-1. SIMCO ensures compliance with and implementation of the prime contract requirements, and the quality and effectiveness of the Contractor’s implementing policies, plans, and procedures. o Assessments – SIMCO QA improves assessment results, trending metrics and NCR/CAR closeout timeliness within the CCP program and the following high-risk functional areas at the WIPP site: Configuration Management, Training Programs, Conduct of Operations, Maintenance, Design Control, Contractor Assurance Systems, and Waste Handling. SIMCO maintains timely control of OE submittals (no late) to CBFO during audit planning. Assessment results should show marked improvement in areas where indeterminant or marginal ratings are assigned or where the number of issues generated during the previous assessment was > 5. o NCR/Corrective Action – SIMCO metrics...
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS. The Government will perform an evaluation of the Technical Capability evaluation factors and sub-factors based on the offeror’s proposal. This evaluation focuses on strengths and weaknesses of the offeror’s proposal, resulting in the assignment of an adjectival rating for each factor and sub-factor. Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating.
