We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Final Summative Evaluation Conference Sample Clauses

Final Summative Evaluation Conference a. Prior to May 15th the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year. b. The classroom teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. Evidence must be submitted to the evaluator by May 1st, unless the evaluator and teacher mutually agree to a later date. c. If the evaluator judges the teacher be below Proficient the evaluator must articulate multiple points of evidence that deemed the score less than Proficient. d. When a final summative score is below Proficient and the teacher believes certain teacher evaluator evidence was not considered and/or the criteria were not objectively scored the teacher and shall mutually agree on one of the following: 1) An additional formal observation by June 1st. 2) An alternative evaluator scoring the evidence. The alternative evaluator will be mutually agreed upon by the Association and the District. 3) Assignment of a new evaluator for the ensuing school year. 4) An additional observation by a different evaluator. e. Nothing prohibits an evaluator from evaluating any or all teachers as Distinguished based on the evidence within a school year. f. All evidence, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted. g. Upon completion of an evaluation by the principal or other evaluator, the employee shall be provided with a copy of the summative evaluation report within three (3) days. h. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the teacher agrees with its contents. The teacher shall have the right to attach any comments to the evaluation report. This may be done at the time the employee receives a copy of the report and prior to the report being forwarded to the District Personnel Office; or the comments may be forwarded to the Personnel Office within seven (7) school days following the evaluation conference.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. A. The evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. B. Each teacher shall sign and date the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt, not agreement. The teacher may attach any written comments to any observations and to the final annual evaluation report. C. If the teacher does not agree with a final summative rating of Basic or Unsatisfactory, the teacher may request that the Association and District designate representatives to meet with the employee and principal to review the evidence and scoring that led to the evaluator’s rating.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 10th the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. 2. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year. 3. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. 4. All evidence, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted. 5. If the evaluator assigns the teacher a final summative score below Proficient, the evaluator must provide at least three (3) pieces of evidence for each criterion scored Basic or Unsatisfactory. 6. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well. 7. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than June 1st the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher's final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher's performance over the course of the year. 2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. 3. All evidence, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted 4. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well. 5. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments or a rebuttal to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 10, the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year. 2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. 3. All evidence, measures, and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted. 4. If the teacher believes the criterion score or final summative score did not consider certain teacher evidence, procedures outlined in this section were not followed, and/or the criteria were not objectively scored, they shall be granted any of the following (except for teachers being recommended for non-renewal, beyond May 15th): a. An additional formal observation by June 1st; and/or b. An alternative evaluator scoring of evidence. 5. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluation forms to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well. 6. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comments or a rebuttal to the Final Summative Evaluation.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. A. The evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year. B. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. C. All evidence, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted. D. If the evaluator judges the teacher to be below Proficient, the evaluator must provide at least three (3) pieces of evidence from at least two (2) artifacts.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than June 10th the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. 2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. 3. All evidence, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted. 4. If the evaluator assigns the teacher a final summative score below Proficient, the evaluator must provide evidence for each criterion scored Basic or Unsatisfactory.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 1. No later than May 15th the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. 2. All evidence, measures and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted and have been shared with the teacher in accordance with Section 9. 3. If the evaluator judges the teacher to be below Proficient overall, the evaluator must have documented evidence drawn from more than one occasion of when the teacher showed deficiencies in his/her professional performance. No teacher shall be judged to be below Proficient in any criterion without prior notice to allow for improvement. 4. The teacher will receive a copy of the Comprehensive Evaluation State Criterion Worksheets (Appendix Exhibit C) and The Comprehensive Teacher Summative Evaluation Form (Appendix: Exhibit D) The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Comprehensive Teacher Summative Evaluation Form to indicate receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written comments to observations and to the final annual evaluation report as well.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference. 2 1. By the end of May, the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the 3 teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the 4 student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This 5 analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the 6 course of the year. 7 2. The teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion 8 to be scored. 9 3. If the evaluator assigns the teacher a final summative score below 10 Proficient, the evaluator must provide at least three (3) pieces of evidence 11 from at least two (2) artifacts for each criterion scored Basic or 13 4. The teacher will sign a copy of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. 14 Each teacher shall sign the observation and evaluations forms to indicate 15 receipt. The signature of the teacher does not, however, necessarily imply that 16 the employee agrees with its contents. The teacher may attach any written 17 comments or rebuttals to observation and to the final annual evaluation report 18 as well, at the summative conference. 19 5. Teachers shall have the right to attach additional comment or a rebuttal to 20 the Final Summative Evaluation.
Final Summative Evaluation Conference a. Prior to June 1 the evaluator and teacher shall meet to discuss the teacher’s final summative score. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will take a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year. b. The classroom teacher has the right to provide additional evidence for each criterion to be scored. Evidence must be submitted to the evaluator by May 15th, unless the evaluator and teacher mutually agree to a later date. c. The students may also be included in the evaluation process (RCW 28A.405.100) if agreed upon by the teacher and evaluator. d. If the evaluator judges the teacher to be below Proficient the evaluator must articulate evidence that deemed the score less than Proficient. e. When a non-provisional final summative score is below Proficient and the teacher believes certain teacher evidence was not considered and/or the criteria were not objectively scored the teacher and evaluator shall mutually agree on one of the following: 1) An additional formal observation by the end of the school year, which may be done by a different evaluator if requested. 2) An alternative evaluator scoring the evidence. The alternative evaluator will be mutually agreed upon by the Association and the District. 3) An additional review of the evidence and materials by the teacher and original evaluator with representation of the Association.