Submittal Reviews. 4.3.1 The Criteria A/E shall receive from the Contracting Authority and promptly review a copy of the Contractor’s submissions at the end of each of the Preconstruction Stages.
4.3.1.1 If the Project is administered using the State’s web-based project management software, the Criteria A/E shall receive the Contractor’s submissions and any revisions through the “Design Review” business process.
4.3.2 Within 7 days after receiving a Contractor submission, the Criteria A/E shall review and analyze it in detail and submit a written report to the Contracting Authority and Owner through which the Criteria A/E shall individually address each of the following topics at a minimum:
4.3.2.1 whether the Work described in the submission appears consistent with the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents;
4.3.2.2 whether the Work described in the submission appears consistent with the Construction Budget; and
4.3.2.3 whether the Work described in the submission appears consistent with the Project Schedule.
4.3.3 If the Criteria A/E finds that the Work described in the submission appears inconsistent with the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents, Construction Budget, or Project Schedule, the Criteria A/E shall also describe and identify in writing specific examples of the inconsistencies.
4.3.4 If the Contracting Authority requests, the Criteria A/E shall meet with the Contracting Authority, Owner, and Contractor to review the Criteria A/E’s report.
4.3.5 If the Contracting Authority requests, the Criteria A/E shall assist the Contracting Authority and Owner with negotiation of the Contractor’s GMP Amendment.
Submittal Reviews. Review all commissioned equipment submittals and provide comments to the District and engineer of record for communication to the contractor. Keep a log of these comments, ensure record submittals address commissioning concerns, and confirm that Buildings & Grounds (B&G) comments are being logged.
Submittal Reviews. The ENGINEER will review and indicate a disposition for submittals including shop drawings, samples, test results, guarantees, and miscellaneous submittals required by the Contract Documents. The ENGINEER’s review is for conformance with the design concepts of the project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such review will not extend to means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction selected by the CONTRACTOR, or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. The ENGINEER will provide responses to CONTRACTOR RFIs and clarification requests during construction which may involve interpreting the Contract Documents and addressing actual field conditions encountered.
Submittal Reviews. Record Of Comments and Observations (ROCO) A City endorsement may be accompanied by a form recording all comments and observations on the Submittal (a “Record Of Comments and Observations Form (ROCO)”) for Submittals endorsed as “Accepted”, “Observations”, or “Rejected”. The ROCO Form will include the following information, at the discretion of the City:
(a) Submittal date;
(b) name and tracking number of Submittal;
(c) Submittal references (to identify specific documents within Submittal package);
(d) issues (e.g. deficiencies, non-conformances and comments), with each such issue separately provided with:
(i) unique issue ID;
(ii) page or drawing number reference to the specific document within the Submittal package (this may be “General” for issues that are not specific to any document);
(iii) reference to section of the Agreement from which the deficiency or non- conformance arises;
(iv) issue category classification:
(A) CAT-1 – issue is of a serious enough nature, in the opinion of the City, to warrant City’s rejection of the Submittal;
(B) CAT-2 – issue is a non-conformance or other deficiency which must be resolved prior to Design-Builder proceeding with those activities to which the identified non-conformance or deficiency relates;
(C) CAT-3 – issue is a non-conformance or other deficiency which, at Design-Builder’s discretion can either be:
(I) interpreted and treated as a CAT-2 issue, or
(II) resolved through Design-Builder’s acceptance of accompanying City condition(s) for acceptance of future related Submittal(s), which in the opinion of the City, would allow the Submittal under review to generally conform to the applicable Project Requirements. Upon Design-Builder’s confirmed acceptance of the condition(s), Design-Builder may immediately proceed with those activities to which the identified non-conformance or deficiency relates; or
(D) CAT-4 – issue is informational in nature and is provided for Design- Builder’s consideration and response. Design-Builder may incorporate changes addressing these comments in a future resubmittal at its discretion, and if the City requests, an informative response documented in the ROCO form, for City’s information;
(v) initials of City reviewer;
(vi) date of City reviewer comment;
(vii) fields for Design-Builder response and proposed closure of the issue; and
(viii) City issue closure status (identified as open or closed by the City) and date of latest status. Design-Builder will provide any required responses...
Submittal Reviews x. Xxxxxx-Xxxx will review shop drawings and respond to requests for information (RFIs) submitted by the Contractor through the Client. Xxxxxx-Xxxx’x review shall be for conformance with the design of the project and for compliance with the information given in the Construction Documents. Such review or other action shall not extend to means, methods, sequences, techniques, or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor or to safety precautions and programs.
b. This task allows for the review of up to twenty (20) shop drawings and up to twenty (20) RFIs. Additional reviews beyond that amount will be considered additional services. Any other services, including but not limited to the following, are not included in this Agreement: · Construction management · Construction inspection on on-site observation · Field testing or QA/QC · Review of Contractor pay applications or change orders · Additional design or design modifications which may arise as a result of unforeseen field occurrences or requests by the Contractor · Preparation of As-Builts or Record Drawings Xxxxxx-Xxxx will perform the services in Tasks 1 - 2 on a labor fee plus expense basis with the maximum labor fee shown below. Task 1 Project Management and Meetings $17,055 Task 2 Submittal Reviews $25,850 Xxxxxx-Xxxx will not exceed the total maximum labor fee shown without authorization from the Client. Individual task amounts are provided for budgeting purposes only. Xxxxxx-Xxxx reserves the right to reallocate amounts among tasks as necessary. Labor fee will be billed on an hourly basis according to our then-current rates. As to these tasks, direct reimbursable expenses such as express delivery services, fees, air travel, and other direct expenses will be billed at 1.10 times cost. A percentage of labor fee will be added to each invoice to cover certain other expenses as to these tasks such as telecommunications, in-house reproduction, postage, supplies, project related computer time, and local mileage. Administrative time related to the project may be billed hourly. All permitting, application, and similar project fees will be paid directly by the Client; should the Client request Xxxxxx-Xxxx to advance any such project fees on the Client’s behalf, a separate invoice for such fees, with a ten percent (10%) markup, will be immediately issued to and paid by the Client. Payment will be due within 25 days of your receipt of the invoice and should include the invoice number and Xxxxxx-Xxxx ...
Submittal Reviews. KFA will maintain a log of all Contractor submittals, track review progress, review and approve submittals, and distribute submittals to the appropriate parties.
Submittal Reviews. Consultant shall review up to ninety eight (98) general contractor initial submittals and resubmittals, including shop drawings, substitution requests, plans, equipment O&M manuals, and/or other submittals as needed and directed by the City. City shall review each submittal and resubmittal prior to sending it to Consultant for review. Submittals shall be reviewed for conformance with and marked-up in accordance with the construction contract documents. Consultant shall consolidate its comments on each submittal with relevant City comments and return a compiled set of submittal review comments on each submittal to the City on EADOC for processing and distribution to the general contractor.
Submittal Reviews. The Consultant shall receive from the Contracting Authority and promptly review a copy of the Contractor’s submissions at the end of each of the Preconstruction Stages. If the Project is administered using OAKS CI, the Consultant shall receive the Contractor’s submissions, and any revisions, through the “Design Review” business process. Within 7 days after receiving a Contractor submission, the Consultant shall review and analyze it in detail and submit a written report to the Contracting Authority and the Owner through which the Consultant shall individually address each of the following topics at a minimum: whether the Work described in the submission appears consistent with the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents; whether the Work described in the submission appears consistent with the Construction Budget; and whether the Work described in the submission appears consistent with the Project Schedule. If the Consultant finds that the Work described in the submission appears inconsistent with the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents, Construction Budget, or Project Schedule, the Consultant shall also describe and identify in writing specific examples of the inconsistencies. If the Contracting Authority requests, the Consultant shall meet with the Contracting Authority, the Owner, and the Contractor to review the Consultant’s report. If the Contracting Authority requests, the Consultant shall assist the Contracting Authority and the Owner with the negotiation of the Contractor’s GMP Amendment.
Submittal Reviews. Stantec shall assist City by reviewing submittals and shop drawings as they are required and received from the Contractor via Condoc. The submittals will be reviewed for conformity with the contract documents and general engineering and operations compliance and functionality including cross discipline review. The submittal reviews do not relieve the Contractor’s responsibility to provide bid compliance materials, equipment and processes as required and communicated in the contract documents. Submittals will be reviewed and returned to the Contractor as approved, approved as noted, amend and resubmit or rejected. It is expected that 400 original plus 200 resubmittals (600 total) submittals will be received. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that each submittal is averages 6 hours with resubmittals averaging 3 hours. Stantec will also prepare and maintain a submittal log. The log shall capture submittal items by package for review and approval tracking. The final submittal count shall be compared to the scoping assumptions. Assumptions: • Stantec will review submittals within two weeks of receipt. • The City will receive submittals concurrently for their information and should the City have review comments prior to Stantec’s review finalization, Stantec will incorporate the review comments accordingly. • Stantec will not hold up submittal reviews for City’s review response.
Submittal Reviews. Review and take action on shop drawings, product submittals, test results, and other submittals
