Alternative A – Proposed Action Sample Clauses

Alternative A – Proposed Action. ‌ Under the Proposed Action, Participants engaged in Covered Activities would implement Conservation Measures (see Section 2.1.4) to reduce the impacts of the Covered Activities within the Covered Area. The Conservation Measures are designed to provide a net conservation benefit by reducing and eliminating threats to the Covered Species through avoiding and offsetting the amount of anticipated take of the Covered Species, which is represented by the acreage of disturbance or loss of DSL Habitat. Under the Proposed Action, the Participants would avoid or minimize new disturbances including coordination between the 2020 DSL CCAA Administrator and non-Participants to maximize use of existing infrastructure, access roads, and rights-of-way (ROW) and minimize the footprint of development, traffic, and use of OHV consistent with the terms of the CCAA. The Participants engaging in Covered Activities associated with oil and gas, sand mining operations, renewable energy operations, and linear infrastructure would avoid new surface disturbance in areas categorized as High or Intermediate Suitability DSL Habitat under the Texas State University model (Hardy et al. 2018), subject to certain exceptions and requirements including disturbance limits, payment of Habitat Conservation Fees, feasibility constraints, and specified thresholds of oil well pad densities. Participants conducting seismic activities would refrain from using heavy machinery in these areas. Participants conducting agriculture or ranching Covered Activities would also refrain from initiating new or increased levels of agricultural and ranching in areas categorized as High or Intermediate Suitability DSL Habitat. Sand mining Participants would implement an annual limit on new surface disturbance on their Enrolled Properties and avoid areas where site-specific surveys for the Covered Species indicate potential presence based on ground cover types or detection of individuals, unless that new surface disturbance can be offset as described in the 2020 DSL CCAA. The 2020 DSL CCAA Administrator would work with Participants and non- Participants in the Covered Area to limit disturbance to 34,940 acres of DSL Habitat, or approximately 12% of the Covered Area, over the CCAA and permit term. Although avoidance is subject to certain exceptions, and there may still be loss, modification, and fragmentation of habitat, the disturbance limits and offsets are still anticipated to reduce threats to the Covered Species ...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Alternative A – Proposed Action. ‌ Under the Proposed Action, groundwater would be used for Covered Activities occurring in the Covered Area. Conservation Measures would be implemented to minimize groundwater use and provide site- specific data on water use through the development and implementation of water use and minimization plans. Each plan includes monitoring and annual performance reports that would be submitted by the Participants to the Administrator. Participants of the sand mining industry would also complete a TWDB water use survey containing information on groundwater drawn by aquifer. Other Conservation Measures associated with surface landscape management (as discussed in Section 4.4 and 4.5) would also indirectly reduce impacts from the Covered Activities related to groundwater flows, infiltration, and recharge. Given the limitations of groundwater use data within and beyond the Covered Area, the impacts of these Conservation Measures on the groundwater supply cannot be quantitatively analyzed. While the development and implementation of site-specific water use and minimization plans would reduce groundwater usage in the Covered Area, these benefits, which would occur over the long-term, are not anticipated to be detectable or perceptible. Similarly, these benefits to dune-stabilizing vegetation are not anticipated to be detectible or perceptible. Therefore, the Proposed Action would result in negligible changes to groundwater resources within the Covered Area.
Sample 1Sample 2
Alternative A – Proposed Action. ‌ As part of the Proposed Action, the Conservation Measures (see Section 2.1.4) would avoid or minimize surface disturbances within the Covered Area. Setting a limit on development activities within the Covered Area would minimize the loss of habitat present in the Covered Area by limiting and offsetting surface disturbance, thus benefitting the local wildlife that utilize habitat that overlaps DSL habitat. By relocating or concentrating development activities outside of DSL habitat within the Covered Area and onto adjacent lands where wildlife may occupy suitable habitat, some habitats may be disturbed or changed and some species may be displaced or avoid the area. Displacement of wildlife species individuals would potentially force the wildlife into competition with residents of adjacent habitat for available resources. This displacement could produce short-term changes in localized species composition (Xxxxx and Xxxx 1981) or lead to reduced physical condition and health of affected individuals. Habitat disturbance or changes would be reduced and minimized in the Covered Area under the Proposed Action, thereby preserving other species habitat in areas that overlap DSL habitat. However, activities in adjacent areas may lead to habitat disturbance or change, or displacement, avoidance, injury or mortality of wildlife species. It is anticipated that wildlife would avoid disturbed areas during construction or other noise-producing activities. Once activities have ceased, wildlife would return to the area, if habitat for these species still exists. As a result, the Proposed Action would result in short- and long-term due to modification of the landscape and vegetation, minor to moderate impacts; and minor, short- to long-term benefits to wildlife, depending on the participation level and amount of impact avoidance and minimization implemented.
Sample 1Sample 2
Alternative A – Proposed Action. ‌ No Federally listed or proposed species (other than the Covered Species) have the potential to be present in the Covered Area, and there is no designated or proposed critical habitat in the Covered Area. As a result, the Proposed Action would have no impact and no effect on these resources. Of the State-listed, proposed, and candidate species, the Texas State-listed Dune Umbrella Sedge and Texas Horned Lizard were identified to have potential presence within the Covered Area (see Chapter 3.6). Conservation Measures implemented under the Proposed Action would avoid or minimize new development and surface disturbances within the Covered Area. By limiting new surface disturbances within the Covered Area, changes would be avoided or minimized to potential habitat for any Dune Umbrella Sedge plants or Texas Horned Lizards. Setting a cap on development activities within the Covered Area would encourage the preservation of open grassland habitats utilized by the Texas Horned Lizard and limit disturbances to blowouts within sand dunes used by the Dune Umbrella Sedge. However, by limiting surface disturbances within the Covered Area, and by moving development activities out of DSL habitat within the Covered Area, this may move activities into adjacent suitable habitat. Any potential impacts to habitats of State-listed, proposed, and candidate species would be minimized or avoided in compliance with Texas State law. As a result, the Proposed Action would have no impact on listed, proposed, or candidate species, and avoidance or limits to surface disturbance as part of Conservation Measures would provide short- to long-term benefits to these species by minimizing the threat of habitat loss. Given these findings, the Proposed Action would not result in significant impacts to non-covered listed, proposed, or candidate species.
Sample 1Sample 2
Alternative A – Proposed Action. ‌ Land ownership would not change as a result of the Proposed Action. Under the Proposed Action, development associated with certain Covered Activities would be restricted or precluded in areas of High and Intermediate Suitability DSL Habitat, subject to certain exceptions, as part of implemented Conservation Measures. Overall new surface disturbance by sand mining operations of DSL Habitat in the Covered Area would be limited to 60 acres annually and would not exceed 1,380 acres over the duration of Permit and 2020 DSL CCAA term. The use of existing developed areas and ROW for developing infrastructure would be encouraged, and the footprint for development would be minimized. Utilizing existing developed areas would also allow more efficiencies during development activities because less new area and infrastructure would need to be developed. As a result, restrictions or changes to existing land uses would be temporary and localized. Any temporary restrictions or closures to land uses, including recreation opportunities, would be coordinated as appropriate with those landowners and applicable management agencies. Where new development is necessary to accommodate permanent infrastructure, the Participants would comply with existing zoning regulations and applicable land use plans and avoid, to the extent possible, any permanent conversion of existing land uses. Where permanent conversion of existing land uses is necessary, the Proposed Action would comply with permit allowances and applicable land use policies or regulations. Temporary and permanent changes to land use may result in delays for obtaining permits or leases due to additional agency involvement and expanded necessary approvals. Therefore, under the Proposed Action, impacts on land use and ownership would be short- to long-term and minor to moderate. Non-Participant mineral development on Enrolled Properties, or “stratification,” could lead to the diminishment of benefits or improvements of Conservation Measures implemented under the 2020 DSL CCAA. However, as part of the 2020 DSL CCAA, non-Participants sharing access to the same surface estate as Participants would be encouraged to become Participants. For severed properties, surface and mineral estate owners would collaborate to develop approaches to development that avoid, minimize, or offset impacts from development. These approaches may include cooperation to minimize new disturbances through the use of an existing or shared right-of-way or...
Sample 1Sample 2
Alternative A – Proposed Action. ‌ The Proposed Action would entail avoidance, minimization, and offset of disturbance of the Covered Area, and by extension, minimization of harm to Covered Species via the voluntary implementation of Conservation Measures (see Section 2.1.4). The issuance of the Permit and approval of a CCAA constitutes an undertaking using the definition found in 36 CFR 800.16(y) of the implementing regulations of the NHPA. However, the undertaking is limited to the evaluation of the efficacy, legality, suitability of the CCAA and permitting of the incidental take of the Covered Species, should the species be listed in the future. The underlying commercial, industrial and other sector activities, including oil and gas development and sand mining are not authorized by the Proposed Action and do not require a federal approval. Additionally, no historic structures or cemeteries have been recorded in the vicinity, and no NRHP individual properties or districts have been recorded within, or within 1 mile of, the Covered Area. Finally, the Covered Species is not eligible for listing in the NRHP, as it is not a site, building, structure, or object (54 USC 300308). Thus, the Proposed Action has no potential to affect historic properties. Given these findings, the Proposed Action will have no effect on cultural resources.
Sample 1Sample 2
Alternative A – Proposed Action. Lower Padre Canyon Detention Basin - Access within Tuacahn Wash Photo 1. View of proposed Lower Padre Canyon detention basin site, looking southeast. Table 1 Acreage of permanent and temporary disturbance of the main basin and dam under each alternative. ALTERNATIVE C Construction: Although soils investigations have not yet been conducted, it is anticipated that the dam would be constructed with existing materials taken from the lower detention basins adjacent to Tuacahn Drive and Center Street (approximately 15,700 cubic yards) and additional imported fill (approximately 700 cubic yards of local, weed-free material). To finalize dam design details, geotechnical studies, including soil drilling, would be required prior to construction in order to assess the quality of fill for use during construction. Photo 2. Wash providing access to the proposed Lower Padre Canyon detention basin site, looking north.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Alternative A – Proposed Action

  • Acquisition Proposal “Acquisition Proposal” shall mean any offer or proposal (other than an offer or proposal made or submitted by Parent) contemplating or otherwise relating to any Acquisition Transaction.

  • Superior Proposal (a) Each party agrees and acknowledges that from and after the date hereof until the close of business on April 28, 1997, if Assignor receives a Superior Proposal, Assignor may (i) furnish any information requested by the Offering Party with respect to such Superior Proposal (other than the contents of this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement), (ii) participate in negotiations with such Offering Party regarding such Superior Proposal or (iii) enter into one or more letters of intent, term sheets or agreements with respect to any Superior Proposals; provided, however, that if Assignor proposes to take any of the actions specified in clause (iii) hereof, Assignor shall give Assignee prior written notice setting forth Assignor's proposed actions. (b) Not later than the close of business on May 12, 1997, Assignor shall require each Offering Party with whom it is still engaged in discussions to submit a final binding offer, subject only to acceptance by Assignor. Not later than the close of business on May 16, 1997, Assignor shall (i) determine whether any such offer constitutes a Superior Proposal, (ii) if there is more than one Superior Proposal, select which Superior Proposal Assignor intends to accept and (iii) provide written notice to Assignee setting forth all the material terms and conditions of such selected Superior Proposal ("SP Notice"). (c) After receipt of the SP Notice, Assignee shall have five (5) days to notify Assignor of its agreement to modify this Agreement and any Ancillary Agreement as necessary to acquire the Transferred Interests at the same price and under the same terms and conditions as set forth in the SP Notice ("Assignee Acceptance Notice"); provided further, however, if under the terms set forth in the SP Notice Assignor is proposing to accept property (other than cash or promissory notes), Assignee shall have the right to substitute cash in an amount equal to the value of such other property. (d) If Assignor does not give an SP Notice to Assignee on or before May 16, 1997, or if Assignee gives an Assignee Acceptance Notice to Assignor in accordance with subsection (c) hereof, neither Assignor nor Assignee shall thereafter have any right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 15(c).

  • Alternative Action In the event it shall become impossible for the Bank or the Plan Administrator to perform any act required by this Agreement due to regulatory or other constraints, the Bank or Plan Administrator may perform such alternative act as most nearly carries out the intent and purpose of this Agreement and is in the best interests of the Bank, provided that such alternative act does not violate Code Section 409A.

  • Notice of Proposed Actions (a) In case the Company, after the Distribution Date, shall propose (i) to effect any of the transactions referred to in Section 11(a)(i) or to pay any dividend to the holders of record of its Preferred Stock payable in stock of any class or to make any other distribution to the holders of record of its Preferred Stock (other than a regular periodic cash dividend), or (ii) to offer to the holders of record of its Preferred Stock or options, warrants, or other rights to subscribe for or to purchase shares of Preferred Stock (including any security convertible into or exchangeable for Preferred Stock) or shares of stock of any other class or any other securities, options, warrants, convertible or exchangeable securities or other rights, or (iii) to effect any reclassification of its Preferred Stock or any recapitalization or reorganization of the Company, or (iv) to effect any consolidation or merger with or into, or to effect any sale or other transfer (or to permit one or more of its Subsidiaries to effect any sale or other transfer), in one or more transactions, of more than 50% of the assets or earning power of the Company and its Subsidiaries (taken as a whole) to, any other Person or Persons, or (v) to effect the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, then, in each such case, the Company shall give to each holder of record of a Right Certificate, in accordance with Section 26 hereof, notice of such proposed action, which shall specify the record date for the purposes of such transaction referred to in Section 11(a)(i), or such dividend or distribution, or the date on which such reclassification, recapitalization, reorganization, consolidation, merger, sale or transfer of assets, liquidation, dissolution or winding up is to take place and the record date for determining participation therein by the holders of record of Preferred Stock, if any such date is to be fixed, and such notice shall be so given in the case of any action covered by clause (i) or (ii) above at least 10 days prior to the record date for determining holders of record of the Preferred Stock for purposes of such action, and in the case of any such other action, at least 10 days prior to the date of the taking of such proposed action or the date of participation therein by the holders of record of Preferred Stock, whichever shall be the earlier. (b) In case any of the transactions referred to in Section 11(a)(ii) or Section 13 of this Rights Agreement are proposed, then, in any such case, the Company shall give to each holder of Rights, in accordance with Section 26 hereof, notice of the proposal of such transaction at least 10 days prior to consummating such transaction, which notice shall specify the proposed event and the consequences of the event to holders of Rights under Section 11(a)(ii) or Section 13 hereof, as the case may be, and, upon consummating such transaction, shall similarly give notice thereof to each holder of Rights. (c) The failure to give notice required by this Section 25 or any defect therein shall not affect the legality or validity of the action taken by the Company or the vote upon any such action.

  • RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute a construction contract.

  • Alternative Transaction In the event that, in lieu of the Arrangement, the Purchaser seeks to complete the acquisition of the Company Shares other than as contemplated by the Arrangement Agreement on a basis that (a) provides for economic terms which, in relation to the Shareholder, on an after-tax basis, are at least equivalent to or better than those contemplated by the Arrangement Agreement taking into account the Intended Tax Treatment, (b) would not likely result in a delay or time to completion beyond the Voting Support Outside Date, and (c) is otherwise on terms and conditions not materially more onerous on the Shareholder than the Arrangement (including any take-over bid) any such transaction, an “Alternative Transaction”), then during the term of this Agreement the Shareholder may, on its own accord, and shall, upon written request of the Purchaser, support the completion of such Alternative Transaction in the same manner as the Arrangement in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement mutatis mutandis, including by (A) depositing or causing the deposit of its Subject Shares (including any Company Shares issued or issuable upon the exercise, conversion or vesting, as applicable, of any Company Options, Company Compensation Options or Company RSUs) into an Alternative Transaction conducted by way of a take-over bid made by the Purchaser or an affiliate of Purchaser and not withdrawing them; and/or (B) voting or causing to be voted all of the Subject Shares (to the extent that they carry the right to vote) in favour of, and not dissenting from, such Alternative Transaction proposed by the Purchaser, provided however that the Shareholder shall not be required to exercise, convert or exchange any Subject Shares (other than Company Shares) in connection with an Alternative Transaction.

  • PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The TTC will sell the properties in accordance with the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chapter 8 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC), and the Board of Supervisors' policy adopted on November 24, 1970. Exhibit A of the Chapter 8 Agreement Sale indicates the legal description and selling price of the properties. The Honorable Board of Supervisors 3/5/2019 The recommended action supports County Strategic Plan Strategy III.3 – Pursue Operational Effectiveness, Fiscal Responsibility, and Accountability.

  • Alternative Proposals (a) Prior to the Offer Closing Date, GFI and the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) may (directly or through their Representatives), in response to a bona fide written Takeover Proposal, subject to compliance with Section 5.4(c) (Change in Recommendation): (i) furnish information with respect to GFI and the GFI Subsidiaries to the Person making such Takeover Proposal and its Representatives pursuant to and in accordance with a customary confidentiality agreement; provided, further, that a copy of all such information provided to such Person has previously been provided to Parent or its Representatives or is provided to Parent substantially concurrently with the time it is provided to such Person; and (ii) participate in discussions or negotiations with such Person or its Representatives regarding such Takeover Proposal; provided, in each case, that the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and its independent financial advisor) that such Takeover Proposal is or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal. (b) As promptly as reasonably practicable after the receipt, directly or indirectly, by GFI of any Takeover Proposal or any inquiry with respect to, or that could reasonably be expected to lead to, any Takeover Proposal, and in any case within 24 hours after the receipt thereof, GFI shall provide oral and written notice to Parent of (i) such Takeover Proposal or inquiry, (ii) the identity of the Person making any such Takeover Proposal or inquiry and (iii) the material terms and conditions of any such Takeover Proposal or inquiry (including a copy of any such written Takeover Proposal and any amendments or modifications thereto). Commencing upon the provision of any notice referred to above and continuing until such Takeover Proposal is withdrawn or the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) has provided written notice to Parent that it is prepared to effect a Change in Recommendation pursuant to Section 5.4(c) (Change in Recommendation), (A) GFI (or its outside legal counsel) shall, in person or by telephone, keep Parent (or its outside legal counsel) reasonably informed of, and shall provide to Parent or Purchaser upon request, the status of such Takeover Proposal and any material developments related thereto, including material amendments or proposed amendments as to price and other material terms of such Takeover Proposal and (B) GFI shall, promptly upon receipt or delivery, and in any case within 24 hours after the receipt thereof, provide Parent (or its outside legal counsel) with copies of all drafts and final versions (and any comments thereon) of agreements (including schedules and exhibits thereto) relating to such Takeover Proposal exchanged between GFI or any of its Representatives, on the one hand, and the person making such Takeover Proposal or any of its Representatives, on the other hand. (c) Neither the Board of Directors of GFI nor any committee thereof (including the Special Committee) shall, directly or indirectly, effect a Change in Recommendation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to Expiration Date, the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) may, in response to a Superior Proposal or an Intervening Event, effect a Change in Recommendation; provided that the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and its independent financial advisor) that the failure to do so would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of GFI under applicable Law; provided, further, that the Board of Directors of GFI may not effect such a Change in Recommendation unless (i) the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) shall have first provided prior written notice to Parent that it is prepared to effect a Change in Recommendation in response to a Superior Proposal or an Intervening Event, which notice shall, in the case of a Superior Proposal, attach the most current version of any written agreement relating to the transaction that constitutes such Superior Proposal, and, in the case of an Intervening Event, attach information specifying such Intervening Event in reasonable detail and any other information related thereto reasonably requested by Parent, it being understood and agreed that the delivery of such notice shall not, in and of itself, be deemed a Change in Recommendation, and (ii) Parent does not make, within four Business Days after receipt of such notice a proposal that the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and its independent financial advisor) would cause the proposal previously constituting a Superior Proposal to no longer constitute a Superior Proposal or obviates the need for a Change in Recommendation as a result of the Intervening Event, as the case may be. GFI agrees that, during the four Business Day period prior to its effecting a Change in Recommendation, GFI and its Representatives shall, if requested by Parent, negotiate in good faith with Parent and its Representatives (so long as Parent and its Representatives are negotiating in good faith) regarding any revisions to the terms of the Transactions proposed by Parent intended to cause such Takeover Proposal to no longer constitute a Superior Proposal or to obviate the need for a Change in Recommendation as a result of an Intervening Event. Any material amendment to the terms of such Superior Proposal or material change to the facts and circumstances that are the basis for such Intervening Event occurring or arising prior to the making of a Change in Recommendation shall require GFI to provide to Parent a new notice and a new negotiation period of two Business Days (instead of four Business Days). (d) Nothing contained in this Section 5.4 shall prohibit GFI or the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) from taking and disclosing any position contemplated by Rule 14e-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act or making any statement contemplated by Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A or Rule 14d-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act in respect of any Takeover Proposal, providing any information to stockholders of GFI required by Section 220 of the DGCL or making any disclosure to the stockholders of GFI if the Board of Directors of GFI (upon the recommendation of the Special Committee) determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make such disclosure would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of GFI under applicable Law; provided, however, that neither the Board of Directors of GFI nor any committee thereof (including the Special Committee) shall, except as expressly permitted by Section 5.4(c) (Change in Recommendation), effect a Change in Recommendation. (e) For purposes of this Agreement:

  • Superior Proposals Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Section 5.3, from the date hereof until the Company’s receipt of the Requisite Stockholder Approval, the Company and the Special Committee may, directly or indirectly through one or more of their Representatives (including the Advisor), contact the Person or group of Persons making such Acquisition Proposal to clarify the terms and conditions thereof so as to determine whether such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or could reasonably be expected to result in, a Superior Proposal, participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with, furnish any non-public information relating to the Company Group to, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or other non-public information, or to any personnel, of the Company Group pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement to any Person or its Representatives that has made or delivered to the Company an Acquisition Proposal after the date hereof, in each case with respect to an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from any material breach of Section 5.3(a); provided, however, that prior thereto, the Special Committee has determined in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel) that (i) such Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or is reasonably expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, and (ii) the failure to take the actions contemplated by this Section 5.3(b) would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties pursuant to applicable law; and provided further, however, that the Company will promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) make available to Parent any non-public information concerning the Company Group that is provided to any such Person or its Representatives that was not previously made available to Parent; and provided further, however, that if any such Person or its Representatives is a competitor of the Company Group, the Company Group shall not provide any information that in the good faith determination of the Company constitutes commercially sensitive non-public information to such Person in connection with any actions permitted by this Section 5.3(b) other than in accordance with “clean room” or other similar procedures designed to limit any potential adverse effect on the Company from sharing such information.

  • Acquisition Proposals (a) Except as provided in this Section 6.2(a) and in Section 6.2(d), the Company shall not (and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries to not), and shall take such reasonable actions to cause (and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries to take such reasonable actions to cause) each Company Entity’s officers, directors, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants, financial advisors, agents, and other representatives (collectively, the “Representatives”) not to, (i) directly or indirectly initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage, or facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public information) any inquiries with respect to, or the making or submission of, any proposal that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, an Acquisition Proposal, or (ii) participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with, furnish any non-public information or data relating to any Company Entity or any Company Asset to, or provide access to the properties, books or records of any Company Entity to, any Person that has made an Acquisition Proposal or in contemplation of an Acquisition Proposal. Notwithstanding the immediately foregoing sentence, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Required Vote, the Company and the Company’s Board are permitted to take any actions described in clause (ii) of this Section 6.2(a) with respect to a third party if (w) the Company has received a written Acquisition Proposal from such third party (and such Acquisition Proposal did not result from a breach of this Section 6.2(a), whether by any Company Entity or any Representative (as if all Company Entities and Representatives were bound by this Section 6.2(a))), (x) the Company gives the Parent the notice required by Section 6.2(e), (y) after receiving the advice of its financial advisors, the Company’s Board determines in good faith that such proposal constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, a Superior Proposal, and (z) the Company’s Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to participate in such negotiations or discussions or to furnish such information or data to such third party is likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law; except that (1) the Company shall not deliver any non-public information to such third party without first entering into a confidentiality agreement with such third party on terms no less favorable to the Company than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement (any such confidentiality agreement with such third party, an “Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement”) and (2) subject to applicable Law, the Company shall make available to the Parent any non-public information concerning any Company Entity that is made available to any other Person or group in connection with any actual or potential Acquisition Proposal that was not previously made available to the Parent, contemporaneously with the delivery of such information to (or as promptly as practicable after such information is delivered to) such Person. Nothing contained in this Section 6.2 will prohibit the Company or the Company’s Board from taking and disclosing to the Company’s stockholders a position with respect to an Acquisition Proposal pursuant to Rule 14d-9 or 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act or from making any similar disclosure, in either case to the extent required by applicable Law, including the Company Board’s fiduciary duties; except that compliance with such rules will not permit the Company to make an Adverse Recommendation Change other than in accordance with Section 6.2(d). (b) Except as provided in Section 6.2(d) and in Section 6.2(g), each of the Company, the Company’s Board, and each Company Board Committee shall not (i) withdraw or withhold (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to any Buyer Entity), or publicly propose to withdraw or withhold (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to any Buyer Entity), the approval, recommendation, or declaration of advisability by the Company’s Board or any Company Board Committee of this Agreement, the Merger, or any Transactions, (ii) recommend, adopt, or approve, or propose publicly to recommend, adopt, or approve, any Acquisition Proposal (any action described in the immediately foregoing clauses (i) or (ii), an “Adverse Recommendation Change”). (c) Except as provided in Section 6.2(d), the Company shall not (and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries to not), and shall take reasonable actions to cause (and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries to take reasonable actions to cause) each Company Entity’s Representatives not to, execute or enter into any Contract (including any merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other similar agreement), or any letter of intent, term sheet, memorandum of understanding, or agreement in principle, (i) relating to or that could reasonably be expected to lead to any Acquisition Proposal (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement in circumstances contemplated in the penultimate sentence of Section 6.2(a)), or (ii) requiring the Company to abandon, terminate, or fail to consummate the Merger or any of the Transactions. (d) Notwithstanding the foregoing set forth in this Section 6.2, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Required Vote, and subject to the Company’s compliance at all times with the provisions of this Section 6.2 and Section 6.4(a), with respect to an Acquisition Proposal, the Company’s Board is permitted to make an Adverse Recommendation Change if (i) a written Acquisition Proposal (that did not result from a breach of Section 6.2(a), whether by any Company Entity or any Representative (as if all Company Entities and Representatives were bound by this Section 6.2(d))) is made to the Company by a third party, and such Acquisition Proposal is not withdrawn, (ii) the Company’s Board determines in good faith after consultation with its legal and financial advisors that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, (iii) the Company’s Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to make such an Adverse Recommendation Change is likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law, (iv) subject to compliance with applicable Law, the Company provides the Parent three Business Days’ prior written notice of the Company’s intention to make an Adverse Recommendation Change because of such Acquisition Proposal (such notice, a “Notice of Acquisition Proposal”), it being understood that a Notice of Acquisition Proposal does not in itself institute an Adverse Recommendation Change for purposes hereof, which notice must include the information with respect to such Acquisition Proposal that is specified in Section 6.2(e); except that, if there are any material revisions to the Acquisition Proposal (relative to the terms of the Acquisition Proposal as set forth in the Notice of Acquisition Proposal as provided to the Parent), then the Company must provide to the Parent a new Notice of Acquisition Proposal and, if the Company has not made an Adverse Recommendation Change, and subject to compliance with applicable Law, an additional three Business Days following the provision of such new Notice of Acquisition Proposal, and (v) at the end of the three-Business Day period described in the immediately foregoing clause (iv) (including any extension of such period required thereunder), the Company Board again makes the determination in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors (and taking into account any adjustment or modification of the terms hereof that the Parent proposes) that the Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal and that the failure to make such Adverse Recommendation Change is likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law. If the Parent proposes to the Company any adjustment or modification of the terms hereof in response to a Notice of Acquisition Proposal, and such proposed adjustment or modification, if implemented, would reverse the determination of the Company Board that the Acquisition Proposal constituted a Superior Proposal, then the Company and Parent shall negotiate in good faith with the Parent to implement such adjustment or modification to the terms hereof and, upon implementation of such adjustment or modification, the Company Board shall not make an Adverse Recommendation Change (or, if already made, will reinstate its recommendation in favor of the Merger and this Agreement, as so adjusted or modified). (e) As promptly as practicable after receipt thereof (but in any event within 24 hours after the Company’s receipt thereof), the Company shall (i) advise Parent in writing of any request for non-public information or any Acquisition Proposal received from any Person, or any inquiry, discussions, or negotiations with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, and the material terms of such request, Acquisition Proposal, inquiry, discussions, or negotiations, and (ii) promptly provide to Parent a detailed, written summary of all of the material terms, provisions, and other information set forth in any materials (including any draft agreements) that the Company receives in connection with any Acquisition Proposal (or, at the Company’s election, a copy thereof) and the identity of the Person or group making any such request, Acquisition Proposal, or inquiry or with whom any discussions or negotiations are taking place. The Company shall keep the Parent reasonably informed of the status of any Acquisition Proposals (including disclosing to the Parent the identity of the parties, the price involved, and any material changes to any terms thereof and providing to the Parent detailed, written summaries of all of the material terms, provisions, or other information set forth in any amended or additional documents received from or provided to any Person with respect to such Acquisition Proposal). The Company shall not release any third party from, or waive any provisions of, any confidentiality or standstill agreement to which the Company is a party and shall use its reasonable efforts to enforce any such agreement at the request of or on behalf of the Parent. (f) Immediately after the execution and delivery hereof, the Company shall (and shall cause the Company Subsidiaries to) instruct the Representatives to cease and terminate any existing activities, discussions, or negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore with respect to any possible Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall (i) take the necessary steps to promptly inform the Representatives involved in the Transactions of the obligations undertaken in Section 6.2(a) and (ii) request each Person who has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with such Person’s consideration of acquiring the Company or any portion thereof to return or destroy (and certify such destruction in writing by an executive officer of such Person) all confidential information heretofore furnished to such Person by or on its behalf. (g) Nothing in this Agreement will prohibit or restrict the Company’s Board from effecting an Adverse Recommendation Change not involving or relating to an Acquisition Proposal in response to a material adverse development or change in circumstances with respect to the Parent Business occurring or arising after the Signing Date, if (i) the Company’s Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel that not making such Adverse Recommendation Change is likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law (ii) subject to compliance with applicable Law, the Company provides the Parent three Business Days’ prior written notice of the Company’s intention to make public an Adverse Recommendation Change because of such material development or change in circumstances (such notice, a “Notice of Material Development”); and that it is considering such a recommendation change and summarizing in reasonable detail the reasons therefor; and (iii) at the end of the three-Business Day period described in the immediately foregoing clause (ii), the Company Board again makes the determination in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors (and taking into account any adjustment or modification of the terms hereof that the Parent proposes in writing) that failure to make such an Adverse Recommendation Change is likely to be inconsistent with the Company Board’s fiduciary duties under applicable Law. If the Parent proposes to the Company any adjustment or modification of the terms hereof in response to a Notice of Material Development, and such proposed adjustment or modification, if implemented, would reverse the determination of the Company Board that it make an Adverse Recommendation Change, then the Company and Parent shall negotiate in good faith (during a period not exceeding three Business days, unless otherwise mutually agreed) with respect to such adjustment or modification to the terms hereof and, upon implementation of such adjustment or modification, the Company Board shall not make an Adverse Recommendation Change (or, if already made, will reinstate its recommendation in favor of the Merger and this Agreement, as so adjusted or modified).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!