Monitoring Phase. Upon completion of the Service Commitment Participants enter the Monitoring Phase. During this phase the Program Office monitors the Participant’s employment status and keeps current contact information on Participants. This begins upon completion of the Service Commitment and concludes 8 years after the Service Commitment end date. Participants will be required to:
a. update contact information when it changes;
b. complete periodic surveys as requested by SFS Program Office (usually annually).
Monitoring Phase. 7.5.1 The monitoring phase will include observation(s), conference(s), and, when appropriate, a Professional Improvement Plan (PIP), all with the express purpose of maintaining competency, commending outstanding accomplishments, identifying deficiencies, and improving performance. The immediate supervisor shall familiarize the unit member with the techniques to be used in observing and evaluating the unit member.
7.5.2 Temporary and Probationary employees will be formally evaluated their first two years. For each probationary and temporary unit member, the pre-conference/observation/post-conference cycle for classroom observations shall be used a minimum of two times. These observations shall preferably occur once in the fall and once in the spring. Scheduled Observation
(1) Pre-observation form and/or conference
(2) Classroom observation form
(3) Post-observation conference and unit member reflection
7.5.3 Permanent employees receiving a formal evaluation will determine with the evaluator whether to use scheduled or unscheduled observations. Scheduled Observation
(1) Pre-observation form and/or conference
(2) Observation form
(3) Post-observation conference and unit member reflection Unscheduled Observation
(1) Observation form
(2) Post-observation conference and unit member reflection
7.5.4 Permanent employees on all cycles will complete a Self-Assessment document by April 15. The Self-Assessment document and any updates or revisions in the teacher’s Individual Goal Setting form are due to the evaluator by April 15, unless requested earlier with a two-week advance notice.
7.5.5 To monitor the unit member’s progress toward the achievement of his/her IPG a mid-year progress check will occur. This may occur via email correspondence, revisions of the IPG form, a face-to-face conference, etc.
7.5.6 When an alternative assessment activity is selected, the evaluator shall review the assessment materials in determining the final evaluation.
Monitoring Phase. 6.3.2.1 During the course of the monitoring phase, the evaluator shall monitor such activities of the unit member as he/she deems necessary to evaluate the unit member's progress toward meeting the District Standards for the Teaching Profession and other evaluation criteria as identified in
Monitoring Phase. The Monitoring Phase shall commence at the conclusion of the Construction Phase. Monitoring Phase objectives include site stabilization and groundwater monitoring.
Monitoring Phase. The RCA-MI is capable of extracting the features characterizing the incidents and calculating the similarity to the learned ones to detect the recurrence with known causes.
Monitoring Phase. (October 1 through April 1)
a. The evaluator shall provide for monitoring activities including observations and conferences.
b. During an evaluation year the evaluator shall make at least two (2) formal observations of non-tenured certificated employees. One of the formal observations shall be in an area selected by the teacher. During an evaluation year for tenured employees, the evaluator shall make a minimum of one (1) formal observation. The administrator may also make other forms of observations.
c. During a non-evaluation year no formal observations need occur. The District continues to have the right to observe, confer, assist, and make suggestions for improvement. Any of the four (4) methods of observations may be used (Attachment F).
d. At least twice during the monitoring phase of the evaluation year the evaluator and employee will meet to review goals/objectives and the five (5) major performance areas (Education Code 44662). This may occur only once for tenured teachers. If goals/objectives need to be modified they must be documented (initialed and dated) and attached to the evaluation document.
e. When concerns arise and a less than satisfactory rating may result, the evaluator shall meet with the employee and note areas of concern and suggestions for improvement, if any, in writing. Follow-up conference(s) will take place as needed.
Monitoring Phase. AIR QUALITY
1. Emissions would be generated 1. 1 Use of low emission construction 1. Construction contract will specify equipment 1. Construction contractor. 1. B. Clly of Los Angeles. from diesel of gasoline powered equipment (dozers. Iraclors, scrapers) requirements. Field Inspection will confirm project engineer SCAOMD quipment during construction adequate traffic flow and defined equipment b. Clly of Los Angeles.
Monitoring Phase. 3. Fugitive dust would be generaled Adherence to SCAOMD Rule 403 3. Construction contract will specify sile 3. Construction contractor. 3. a. Clly of Los Angeles by construction activities such as Including maintenance and equipment requirements. Field project engineer x. Cily of Los Angeles trenching and earth movement, Inspections will confirm adequate dust control c. Construction excavalion and equipment inovernenl. 3 1 Spray, use soll birders, of cover measures. storage plies,
Monitoring Phase. Once the tolerance parameter λ is set, monitoring can be done in the following way: suppose is the empirical distribution function, defined as the proportion of sample response times less than x among population ∆. Then, as a first sight, the contract is violated when − sup (FS(x) G^S,∆(x)) (7) x∈R+ occurs. The problem with equation (7) is that G^S,∆(x) can randomly fluctuate around FS(x), especially when |∆| is the first N responses of service S have latencies δ1, . . . δN . Taking ∆ = δ1 . . . δN , we compute G^S,∆(x) and then check if condition (8) is violated. When the (N + 1)st delay, δN+1 is recorded, we shift ∆ by one observation, making it δ2, . . . δN+1 . We compute G^S,∆(x) for this new ∆ and check violation of (8) again. This process is repeated for { } { } { } further observed response times, each time shifting ∆ by one observation.2 So ∆ is a sliding window of fixed size N . The window size N is the same as the size |∆∗| in the calibration small. A solution to this problem is to have a tolerance zone for such deviations. Our on-line monitoring procedure is then as follows. De- cide that site S violated its contract at the first time t (if any) when − ≥ sup (FS(x) G^S,∆t (x)) λ (8) x∈R+ occurs, where λ is a small positive parameter which defines the tolerance zone. Reducing λ improves the chances of detecting contract violation earlier (it reduces the detection delay), but it also increases the risk of a false alarm (it increases the false alarm rate), see [6]. Thus, tolerance parameter λ has to be tuned in a meaningful way. This is done in an off-line “calibration phase”, performed prior to the monitoring.
Monitoring Phase provide support, two (2) times per year, at minimum, to maintain jobs. Once the client has obtained employment and is comfortable with the job, the job coach provides support via telephone calls, job-site visits, office face-to-face meetings and 24-hour response to emergencies that may arise at the job. This phase lasts six (6) months to two (2) years.
