Solution Design. The Contractor will collect and review the current-state data, hold visioning sessions with stakeholders, and then document and finalize design decisions. The Contractor will introduce, train, and support the Clerk’s Office workgroups and stakeholders in data collection tasks required for the design process. The Contractor will develop the final detailed design document for the UCMS solution and verify completeness and accuracy. Provide OCA and appropriate stakeholders written updates on how the system will look and function early on and continuously throughout the design and development process. Follow an agreed methodology to clearly define design-level requirements for the future-state solution that are based on stakeholder inputs and collaboration. The Contractor shall be responsible for the following Solution Design activities: Conduct workshops – Engage stakeholders to collect design-level requirements. Create future-state conceptual design – Create conceptual future- state design documentation for application, data/content, and integration architectures, and all activities required to achieve the overall application architecture associated with the UCMS. Global Conceptual Design Documentation – shall include, but not be limited to, the following content: Description of implementation methodology (e.g., agile and waterfall) Description of global user interface(s) Detailed specifications for global business rules, external system interfaces, validations, screen layouts and user interfaces Solution global software configuration and setup requirements Security design and programming specifications Global report specifications Global interface descriptions Global Security design and programming specifications Local implementation future-state solution documentation, which may include but is not limited to: Detailed specifications for business rules, workflows, screen layouts, and user roles per implementation Solution software configuration and setup requirements per implementation
Solution Design. During a
Solution Design. Pravega and GEDS Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.1 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3 Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4 Conclusions 10 AI Artificial Intelligence API Application Programming Interface AWS Amazon Web Services CC Creative Commons CoW Copy-on-Write CSI Container Storage Interface CSV Comma-separated values CUDA Compute Unified Device Architecture DOI Digital Object Identifier GEDS Generic Ephemeral Data Store GPU Graphics Processing Unit HDFS Hadoop Distributed File System IO Input/Output JNI Java Native Interface KV Key/Value LTS Long-Term Storage MDS Metadata Service ML Machine Learning NVMe NonVolatile Memory express NVMeoF NVMe over Fabrics POSIX Portable Operating System Interface RDMA Remote Direct Memory Access RPC Remote Procedure Call S3 Amazon Simple Storage Service TCP Transmission Control Protocol TEE Trusted Execution Environment TPC-DS Transaction Processing Performance Council Benchmark - Decision Support WAL Write-ahead log 1 Executive summary The Generic Ephemeral Data Store (GEDS) aims at the efficient handling of temporary data as being created, exchanged and consumed by compute tasks of a complex, potentially multi-staged computa- tional workload. Particular attention was paid to the efficient execution of workloads in a serverless context, where the number of compute elements may vary greatly during runtime. Efficiency is achieved by direct integration of application buffer management with the lowest tier (Tier 0) of the muti-tiered GEDS. With the exception of a namenode maintaining object metadata, the data store is implemented as an application loadable library, which avoids running any extra storage service when deploying GEDS. At the current implementation status, besides Tier 0, a Persistency Tier provides node-independent, disaggregated storage resources and object persistency, respectively. GEDS configuration allows au- tomated object spilling from Tier 0 into the Persistency Tier. It has been integrated into GEDS via S3 API. GEDS is positioned within the CloudSkin project as a flexible service to access and exchange working set data in an efficient manner and to allow for seamless integration with a persistent, S3 based data store. With its lightwight architecture, we aim at fulfilling the specific requirements of a data store for serverless workload executi...
Solution Design. The Contractor will collect and review the current-state of the Early Adopter Clerk’s Office and hold visioning sessions with the OCA and the Early Adopter Clerk’s Office limited to configuration of system – or global – code tables listed below, Contractor’s structured configuration approach whereby Contractor configures limited local configuration. Conduct workshops – Engage stakeholders to collect design-level requirements. Create future-state conceptual design – Create conceptual future-state design documentation for application, data/content, and integration architectures, and all activities required to achieve the overall application architecture associated with the UCMS. Global Conceptual Design Documentation – shall include, but not be limited to, the following content: Description of implementation methodology (e.g., agile and waterfall) Plan to manage those system-wide, or global, code tables Description of global user interface(s) Solution global software configuration and setup requirements Global report specifications Global interface descriptions Global Security design: User Roles (including User Accounts, eSignatures, User Security Case Manager Rights and Roles, Case Security, Officers and Agencies), Forms, Organization Chart Local implementation future-state solution documentation, which may include but is not limited to: Solution software configuration and setup requirements per implementation Offense Codes, Hearing Types (including Courtrooms) User Roles (including User Accounts, eSignatures, User Security Case Manager Rights and Roles, Case Security, Officers and Agencies), Forms, Organization Chart Node
Solution Design. Upon execution of this Purchase and Sale Agreement and Purchaser’s payment of the initial installment described above, the Seller and the Purchaser shall proceed to negotiate a mutually satisfactory Solution Design that will state the exact services to be provided by Seller to Purchaser. The parties acknowledge that this Purchase and Sale Agreement, and the ExecuTime Software License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) and the ExecuTime Software Support Agreement (the “Support Agreement”) executed contemporaneously herewith, are contingent upon the parties’ execution of a mutually satisfactory Solution Design. In the event the parties are unable to reach agreement as to a Solution Design, either party may, upon notice to the other party, terminate this Purchase and Sale Agreement, the License Agreement and the Support Agreement, without liability to the other party. Upon such termination, Seller shall have the right to take possession of all Equipment and shall be obligated to return to Purchaser all amounts previously paid by Purchaser under this Purchase and Sale Agreement, less Seller’s out-of-pocket expenses and a reasonable fee for services rendered by Seller prior to termination.
Solution Design. If Device-as-a-Services are being provided by the Supplier, this section must be completed]
Solution Design. Description of the Services
Solution Design. To agree on feasibility and workload of business pro- cesses Business Service Level Agreements (BSLA) are proposed as abstraction layer for the contracting of service quality between service consumer and ser- vice provider. BSLAs are focused on the description of the estimated usage behaviour, extended by the declaration of the maximum allowed response time for service requests and can optionally be enriched by the declaration of maintenance windows, maximum unplanned downtimes, fines, pricing or other non- functional properties. BSLAs are aimed at replacing SLAs. In BSLAs the consumer’s usage behaviour is described by Usage Patterns (Xxxxxxxx and Phip- pen, 2010), which offer an approach for the descrip- tion of the quantitative consumer-provider-relation in terms of request frequency and processing complex- ity. BSLAs enable analyses on business process feasi- bility and workload by specifying the contracted us- age. In opposite, the monitored usage reflects the cur- rent request amount and resource utilisation within IT infrastructures. The business process’s workload is determined by comparing its contracted and mon- itored usage, assuming all infrastructure components are technically available. To enable monitoring of the request amount this paper proposes the use of a cen- tralised request routing component, named Service Broker4 (see Figure 1). The Service Broker provides a measuring point for request amounts per business pro- cess, which represent the process’s workload, taking the contracted usage as reference. The business pro- cess’s feasibility is lead back from its workload com- bined with information about the technical availabil- ity of all infrastructure components hosting the pro- cess. The aggregation of technical monitoring informa- tion in service cascades hosting business processes is addressed by a topology graph. The term topology graph is introduced to reflect the functional depen- dencies between the components in an IT infrastruc- ture. To build the topology graph infrastructure com- ponents can be retrieved from a configuration man- agement database (CMDB) (Group et al., 2011). To represent redundant service offers within a topology graph service lines are introduced. A service line is a logical group of infrastructure components that are necessary to provide an application layer service. To aggregate resource utilisation of service line spanning resources the term component category is introduced. Component categories logically ...
Solution Design. Solution design, identification of the best device deployment topology and configuration activities required for the installation as well as drawing of the High Level Design (HLD) and Low Level Design (LLD) of the infrastructure.
Solution Design. Figure 1 (Software Design)