Evaluator Signature. Date: Employee Signature: Date: Port Xxxxxxxx School District Certificated Teacher Focused Summative Scoring Document Criterion 3: UW-CEL 5D+ Teacher: Grade/Subject: District/School: School Year: Evaluator: Date:
Evaluator Signature. Date: Employee Signature: Date: Port Xxxxxxxx School District – Addendum to Evaluation Document Explanation of Student Growth Inquiry Process WAC 392-191A-100 Minimum procedural standards—Conduct of a student growth inquiry. Within two months of receiving the low student growth score or at the beginning of the following school year, one or more of the following must be initiated by the evaluator: • Examine student growth data in conjunction with other evidence including observation, artifacts and other student and teacher information based on appropriate classroom, school, school district and state-based tools and practices; • Examine extenuating circumstances which may include one or more of the following: Goal setting process; content and expectations; student attendance; extent to which standards, curriculum and assessment are aligned; • Schedule monthly conferences focused on improving student growth to include one or more of the following topics: Student growth goal revisions, refinement, and progress; best practices related to instruction areas in need of attention; best practices related to student growth data collection and interpretation; • Create and implement a professional development plan to address student growth areas. [Statutory Authority: RCW 28A.405.100. WSR 00-00-000, § 392-191A-100, filed 2/7/13, effective 3/10/13.] Port Xxxxxxxx School District Certificated Teacher Focused Summative Scoring Document Criterion 1: UW-CEL 5D+ Teacher: Grade/Subject: District/School: School Year: Evaluator: Date: Criteria 1: Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished 1 2 3 4 P1 : Connection to standards, broader purpose and transferable skill P4: Communication of learning target(s) P5: Success criteria and performance task(s) SE3: Work of high cognitive demand CEC3: Discussion, collaboration and accountability Student Growth: Use EITHER 3 or 6; do not use both. Student Growth Criteria 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs. 3.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s) 3.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Student Growth Criteria 6: Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning. (Student Growth Cycle) 6.1 Establish Student Growth Goal(s) 6.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Any student growth score of “1” will result in an inquiry. (WAC 392-191A-100) Enter the criterion score to the ri...
Evaluator Signature. Date: I have read this appraisal of my performance and discussed it with my supervisor. Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement. Statement by employee attached: Yes No Employee Signature: Date: Other Distinguished: Results show achievements which contribute to organizational goals well beyond the primary work objectives, surpassing what is reasonably expected for a well-trained individual in this position. Proficient: Results show that quality performance has been observed in the attainment of primary work objectives.
Examples of Evaluator Signature in a sentence
Experience with cooperative purchasing.PPW Sub-Section 1.2. Name of Evaluator Signature Date ATTACHMENT F OREGON REVISED STATUTES (AS MAY BE AMENDED) REQUIREMENTSSuccessful Proposer (Contractor) shall comply with the requirements of this ATTACHMENT F to the extent required by any applicable federal or state law.
Evidence Indicators: Goal 2 : Teacher Performance on the Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession Goal Statement: Evidence Indicators: Evaluator Signature Date Teacher Signature Date The signatures above verify that the teacher and evaluator have discussed and agreed upon this Professional Growth Plan.
Teacher Signature Date Evaluator Signature Date The signatures above indicate that the teacher and evaluator have discussed the Summative Rating.
Areas needing corrective measures and suggested corrective action (To be accompanied by written improvement plan as needed) Employee Signature Date Evaluator Signature Date The employee’s signature indicates that he or she has received the evaluation.
Date: Email: Telephone: Printed Name and Title of Evaluator: Signature: Address of Agency: Thank you for your time and effort in assisting the Mountain Line in this important endeavor.
More Definitions of Evaluator Signature
Evaluator Signature. Date: Employee Signature: Date: Port Xxxxxxxx School District Certificated Teacher Focused Summative Scoring Document Criterion 2: UW-CEL 5D+ Teacher: Grade/Subject: District/School: School Year: Evaluator: Date: Criterion 2: Demonstrating effective teaching practices Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished 1 2 3 4 SE1: Quality of questioning SE5: Expectation, support & opportunity for participation & meaning making SE6: Substance of student talk CP6: Scaffolds the task CP7: Gradual release of responsibility Student Growth: Use EITHER 3 or 6; do not use both. Student Growth Criteria 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs. 3.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s) 3.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Student Growth Criteria 6: Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning. (Student Growth Cycle) 6.1 Establish Student Growth Goal(s) 6.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Any student growth score of “1” will result in an inquiry. (WAC 392-191A-100) Enter the criterion score to the right. Criterion Score Continued on Back Final Summative Rating It is my judgment that during the evaluation period covered in this report, the certificated employees overall performance has been:
Evaluator Signature. Date: Counselor Signature: Date: Formal Post-Observation Conference Licking Valley School Counselor Evaluation System Guidelines for Conducting a Formal Post-Observation Conference While the School Counselor Performance Evaluation Rubric is used to evaluate school counselor performance, its primary purpose is to provide the basis of support school counselors receive for their own professional growth. The evaluator’s support should be provided in numerous ways, including the modeling of specific standard areas in professional development meetings, in school counselor’s daily activities and in the post-observation conference. The purpose of the post-observation conference is to provide school counselors opportunities to self-reflect on their activities with guidance and support from the evaluator who conducted the observation. This guidance should be provided through the use of leading questions by the evaluator along with the identification of an area of reinforcement (relative strength) and an area of refinement (area in which the observer needs to help the school counselor improve). Therefore, the focus of the post- observation conference is on two standard areas from the rubric as opposed to multiple areas. By focusing on just two areas, school counselors have the opportunity to segment their own learning with support from an evaluator. When choosing an area of reinforcement and refinement from the rubric, evaluators should ask themselves several guiding questions to ensure that a school counselor’s professional growth will have the maximum impact on the achievement of his/her students. Examples of these questions can be found on page 72. Hints and Questions for Choosing Reinforcement and Refinement Objectives ● Which areas on the rubric received the highest ratings (reinforcements) and the lowest ratings (refinements)? ● Which of these areas would have the greatest impact on student achievement? ● Which of these areas would have the greatest impact on the other areas of the rubric? ● In which areas will the school counselor have the most potential for growth? ● Choose a refinement area for which you have sufficient and specific evidence from the observed activity to support why the school counselor needs to work in this area. ● Select refinement topics with which you have personal knowledge or experience. Once the areas of reinforcement and refinement have been selected, the post-observation conference is developed. On the next page is a format for deve...
Evaluator Signature. Date: Employee Signature: Date: Port Xxxxxxxx School District Certificated Teacher Focused Summative Scoring Document Criterion 4: UW-CEL 5D+ P2: Connection to previous and future lessons CP1: Alignment of instructional materials and tasks CP2: Discipline-specific conceptual understanding CP3: Pedagogical content knowledge CP4: Teacher knowledge of content Student Growth: Use EITHER 3 or 6; do not use both. Student Growth Criteria 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs. 3.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s) 3.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Student Growth Criteria 6: Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning. (Student Growth Cycle) 6.1 Establish Student Growth Goal(s) 6.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Any student growth score of “1” will result in an inquiry. (WAC 392-191A-100) Enter the criterion score to the right. Criterion Score Teacher: Grade/Subject: District/School: School Year: Evaluator: Date: Final Summative Rating It is my judgment that during the evaluation period covered in this report, the certificated employees overall performance has been:
Evaluator Signature. Date: Evaluatee Signature: Date: APPENDIX F XXXXXXXXX SCHOOL DISTRICT - FORM C: GOAL SETTING FORM Student Growth Goal (3.1) Student Growth Goal (6.1) Student Growth Goal (8.1) Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs. Using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning. Create one Instructional Practice Goal based on a component of the Eight State Criteria. Goal 1: Goal 2: Goal 3: Identify a minimum of two student data sources that will be used for each Student Growth Goal. One data source may be used for multiple goals. Evidence and Measure Action Steps/Target Dates: Evidence and Measures: Action Steps/Target Dates: Evidence and Measures: Action Steps/Target Dates: [Fall] Teacher Signature Date [Fall] Evaluator Signature Date How did you meet or attempt to meet your three goals for this school year? [Spring] Teacher Signature Signature Date Date [Spring] Evaluator APPENDIX F
Evaluator Signature. Date: Employee Signature: Date: Port Xxxxxxxx School District No. 50 APPENDIX 4 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Evaluator Signature. Date: Teacher Signature: Date: *Please note signature indicates acknowledgement not agreement The evaluator’s signature on this form verifies that the proper procedures as detailed in the local contract have been followed.
Evaluator Signature. Date: Teacher Signature: Date: *Please note signature indicates acknowledgement not agreement The evaluator’s signature on this form verifies that the proper procedures as detailed in the local contract have been followed. *The acceptable level of performance varies depending on the teacher’s years of experience. Teachers in residency—specifically in Years 1 through 4—are expected to perform at the Developing level or above. Experienced teachers—with five or more years of experience—are expected to meet the Proficient level or above. Pre- and Post- Conference Questions