Administrative Process. 10.2.1 DP and Owner agree that all other parties involved in the Project, including but not limited to the Contractor, can be made parties to the administrative process called for by Section 3-809 and to this end, both DP and Owner will include appropriate provisions in all contracts they execute with other parties in connection with the Project requiring attendance and participation by those other parties in any such administrative proceeding.
10.2.2 Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the DP shall carry on the Work and maintain its progress during the course of any unresolved Dispute, and the Owner shall continue to make payments as they fall due to the DP in accordance with the Contract Documents.
Administrative Process. The Administrative Investigation Team for the involved agency is not bound by some of the same investigative restrictions that apply to RMCT criminal investigators. The employer - employee relationship and the personnel rules affecting administrative process is guided by the commissioning agency’s local contracts, Civil Service provisions, and policy / procedures.
Administrative Process. 1. Prior to issuing final building permits for projects using Regional TDR Credits to gain bonus floor area, the City shall require applicants to produce documentation issued by a participating county demonstrating ownership of the Regional TDR Credits.
2. Prior to issuing a final certificate of occupancy for projects using Regional TDR Credits to gain bonus floor area, the City shall require applicants to produce documentation issued by a participating county demonstrating extinguishment of the transferred Regional TDR credits.
3. The City shall, to the extent practical, track the total number, type, and prices paid for Regional TDR Credits extinguished in the LIPA and shall report to the County within 30 days after the end of each calendar year the number, type, and prices paid for Regional TDR Credits that have been approved by the City for transfer into the LIPA, and shall identify the specific projects involved. In addition, the City shall cooperate with the County in providing the information required for the annual report as described in Section VI.
4. The City shall use the Property Tax Allocation Revenue Value it receives from King County for eligible Public Improvements in the LIPA.
5. The City has, in consultation with the County and the Washington State Department of Transportation, developed a plan that identifies the public improvements within the LIPA to be financed using Property Tax Allocation Revenue Value, and the Plan is attached as Exhibit C to this Agreement.
6. The City agrees that it will only create other LIPAs or increase the Specified Portion after consultation with the County and only according to terms provided for in an interlocal agreement.
Administrative Process. The County shall notify the City within 30 days after the end of each calendar year the number of Regional TDR Credits eligible to be used in the LIPA that it has qualified and certified in the County for such use and the source and use of any funds placed in a segregated account subject to the restriction that the funds in the account were derived from the sale of Regional TDR Credits from forest- zoned and Rural-zoned properties, which funds shall only be used for purchasing new Regional TDR Credits from agriculturally-zoned lands.
Administrative Process. 24.1. The following administrative arrangements will apply to the regular review and stakeholder liaison process for the Company to obtain a Test Surface Water Drought Permit.
24.2. The Agency agrees to review and comment on the Company’s Test Surface Water Drought Permit application documents every six (6) months (in February and September) to indicate what needs to be done to ensure that the Test Surface Water Drought Permit documents are “application ready”. As part of this review, the Company and the Agency will make any necessary amendments to the process set out in this agreement for the Test Surface Water Drought Permit to ensure it is compliant with any relevant changes to statutory requirements in the preceding six months.
24.3. The Company commits to initiate stakeholder liaison in relation to the Test Surface Water Drought Permit. This will involve sending stakeholders updated Test Surface Water Drought Permit application documents every six (6) months, inviting stakeholders to a meeting to discuss and provision of detailed written information to ensure the need for the Test Surface Water Drought Permit and its impact are understood. The Agency accepts that so long as the Company has carried out these steps to engage with stakeholders, the absence of stakeholder engagement or consent will not be a barrier to the Agency accepting that a Drought Permit application is “application ready”.
24.4. The following administrative arrangements will apply to the pre-application process for the Company to obtain a Test Surface Water Drought Permit:
(1) When the Company identifies that flows in the Test are 60 days away, unless otherwise agreed, from reaching 355 Ml/d (TTF), the Company and the Agency will engage in pre-application discussions and actions, including but not limited to the following:
(i) the Company will send the proposed draft Test Surface Water Drought Permit, including forecast ESOR and threat to supplies, to the Agency and relevant stakeholders for review.
(ii) The Agency will check the draft Permit is “application ready” and advise the Company of any consents that need to be obtained.
(iii) The Agency will undertake appropriate consultation with other authorities in respect of the draft Permit.
(iv) The Agency will advise the Company of any additional supporting information required for the draft Permit.
(v) The Agency will raise and discuss any possible contentious issues in respect of the permit with the Company.
(vi) The Agency will no...
Administrative Process. The Ocean Dumping Program is jointly administered by EPA, Region 6 and the USACE, New Orleans District and Galveston District. In accordance with Section 103 of MPRSA, the USACE is the permitting authority for dredged material disposal, subject to EPA review and concurrence. Navigational projects constructed and maintained by the USACE are subject to the same Federal environmental laws and regulations as the general public even though the USACE does not issue a permit document to authorize its own activities. Prior to disposal of dredged material at any designated ODMDS, both EPA and the USACE are charged with making independent evaluations of all proposed dredged material disposal actions (40 CFR 225). Figure 1 shows a flowchart overview of the review process.
Administrative Process. The Parties shall endeavor to resolve any dispute that may arise between them through good faith negotiations. If the dispute is not resolved to the mutual satisfaction of all Parties within 30 Days after written notification of a problem or claim, or such longer time as is mutually agreed, the dispute shall next be referred to the Steering Committee, as described below. The stated intent of the Steering Committee dispute process is, to the extent possible, resolve all disputes within the context of the Steering Committee, and without reference to litigation.
.1 The Party initiating the dispute shall submit to the Authorized Representative a written claim along with, if applicable, documents reflecting actual costs for material, labor and equipment, which shall set forth all facts, including all pertinent data and correspondence that may substantiate the claim. The Steering Committee shall meet within 30 Days after submission of the claim to review documentation and meet with any individuals who, in the opinion of the Steering Committee, have knowledge of or information regarding the dispute.
.2 If the dispute cannot be resolved by the Steering Committee at its meeting described in Section 9.1.1 above, the Party that initiated the dispute shall notify the Commissioner in writing, within 30 Days from date of the meeting of the Steering Committee, that it desires to appear before him or her, whether in person or through counsel, and present additional facts and arguments regarding the dispute. The Commissioner shall schedule and meet with VDOT and ERC within 30 Days after receiving the request, provided that such meeting may occur after 30 Days but not later than 60 Days after receiving the request by mutual agreement between VDOT, ERC, and the Commissioner. Within 45 Days from the date of the meeting, the Commissioner, or his or designee, shall investigate the claim, including the additional facts presented, and notify VDOT and ERC in writing of the Commissioner’s decision, provided that such 45 Days may be extended for up to another 30 Days by mutual agreement between VDOT, ERC, and the Commissioner. If the Commissioner deems that all or any portion of a claim is valid, the Commissioner shall have the authority to negotiate a settlement with ERC subject to the provision of Virginia Code §2.2-514.
.3 If ERC is dissatisfied with the decision of the Commissioner, it may institute a civil action as to such portion of the claim as is denied by the Commissioner ...
Administrative Process. On, Off, Club Licences
Administrative Process. Special Licences
Administrative Process. The City will utilize a process whereby “Stakeholders” participate in the design, construction and modifications of the Project Oxford Utility Infrastructure.
