Comparable Evaluations. 2. When evaluations are comparable, seniority in the District shall prevail, with the contract of the least senior continuing contract teacher in the affected teaching field the first to be suspended.
Comparable Evaluations. Suspension of Bargaining Unit Members, and recall of eligible Bargaining Unit Members whose contracts have been suspended pursuant to a RIF, will not be based upon seniority, except in circumstances when choosing between OTES Bargaining Unit Members with “comparable evaluations” or non-OTES Bargaining Unit Members. The application of the term “comparable” as applied to teacher evaluations shall be based on the following:
Comparable Evaluations. For the duration of this contract, all Bargaining Unit Members who receive a rating of developing, skilled or accomplished will be considered to have “comparable” evaluations.
Comparable Evaluations. 1. All teachers within the District shall be deemed to have comparable evaluations except those with a designation of “ineffective”.
Comparable Evaluations. For purposes of determining whether evaluations are “comparable” under this Article, the Board will look only at the teacher performance rubric of any OTES evaluation and disregard the student growth component of the evaluation until at least three (3) years of student growth data are available. It is further agreed that comparable evaluations shall be defined as follows and RIFs will be conducted in the following order:
Comparable Evaluations. 2. Greater seniority of the teacher which is defined as the length of continuous and uninterrupted service by the teacher in the Bay Village City School District. (Seniority is figured from the initial date of hiring.) Length of continuous service will not be interrupted or affected by authorized leaves of absence or layoff of not more than two (2) years due to a reduction in force.
Comparable Evaluations. Since seniority may not be the basis for teacher retention or other employment decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations, this refers to teachers within the categories of “Ineffective,” “Developing/Skilled,” and “Accomplished.”
Comparable Evaluations. 1. Comparable evaluations shall be defined as:
Comparable Evaluations. All evaluations above “ineffective” on the teacher performance standards of the evaluation shall be deemed comparable.
Comparable Evaluations. For the purposes of Reduction in Force, comparable evaluations shall be based solely on the professional component of the member’s state evaluation system and shall be defined as follows:
