Population(s served by this location (select all that apply) General pediatric population General adult population Adults 65 years of age and older Long-term care facility residents (nursing home, assisted living, or independent living facility) Health care workers Critical infrastructure/essential workers (e.g., education, law enforcement, food/agricultural workers, fire services) Military – active duty/reserves Military – veteran People experiencing homelessness Pregnant women Racial and ethnic minority groups Tribal communities People who are incarcerated/detained People living in rural communities People who are underinsured or uninsured People with disabilities People with underlying medical conditions* that are risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness Other people at higher risk for COVID-19 (Specify: ) [List IIS Identifier: ] If YES If NOT, please explain planned method for reporting vaccine administration data to the jurisdiction’s IIS or other designated system as required: If NOT APPLICABLE, please explain: Refrigerated (2°C to 8°C): No capacity OR Approximately additional 10-dose MDVs Frozen (-15°C to -25°C): No capacity OR Approximately additional 10-dose MDVs Ultra-frozen (-60°C to -80°C): No capacity OR Approximately additional 10-dose MDVs
Population(s. Pleas Check All That Apply For Populations.
Population(s. This demonstration includes two distinct components. The following is an overview of eligibility for the two components, which are described in more detail in Tables 1 and 2.
a. Under the HHW program, children, pregnant women and caretaker adults who are otherwise eligible under the state plan (with the exception of such adults who are eligible as aged, blind or disabled)receive state plan benefits and additional HHW benefits through comprehensive managed care organizations as described below.
b. Under the HIP program, uninsured adults with and without children who have specified income and assets and are not otherwise eligible under the state plan or Medicare receive benefits through a high-deductible managed care health plan and, as a condition of eligibility, contribute to a POWER Account. The mandatory and optional Medicaid state plan populations described below in Table 1 derive their eligibility through the Medicaid state plan and are subject to all applicable Medicaid laws and regulations in accordance with the Medicaid state plan, except as expressly waived. Groups made eligible by virtue of the expenditure authorities expressly granted in this demonstration as described below in Table 2 are subject to all applicable Medicaid laws and regulations in accordance with the Medicaid state plan, except as specifically waived or identified as not applicable to the expenditure authorities. The eligibility criteria for this demonstration are outlined below. These tables are presented for information purposes and do not change the state plan requirements or otherwise establish policy. Pregnant women 0% FPL through 200% FPL; no resource limit HHW Pregnant Women Qualified Pregnant Women Pregnant women up to the AFDC income limit for the particular family size as indicated in the state plan; resource limit of $1,000 HHW Caretakers Children under age 1 0% FPL through 200% FPL; no resource limit HHW Children Xxxxxxxx born to & living with a woman who was eligible and received Medicaid on the date of the child’s birth Eligible for 1 year as long as mother is eligible for Medicaid or would be if pregnant and the child remains in the same household as mother. HHW Children Children 1 through 5 0% FPL through 133% FPL; no resource limit HHW Children Children 6 through 18 0% FPL through 100% FPL; no resource limit HHW Children Blind and Disabled children under age 18 receiving SSI and except for receipt of SSI would be eligible for AFDC Income up to and including the A...
Population(s. The terms applicable to the determination of population are stipulated in the MPSAs and MPUAs. The population of a Municipality is determined by the Statistics Canada Census of Population in the following manner: • for the period of April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2017, with the 2011 federal census data (published in February 2012); • for the period of April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2022, with the 2016 federal census data; • for the period of April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2027, with the 2021 federal census data; and • for the period of April 1, 2027, to March 21, 2032, with the 2026 federal census data. Population data from the federal census provides the basis upon which the contract parties will identify emerging Municipalities. The PTs are responsible for providing the RCMP and Public Safety Canada with clarification and confirmation of any emerging Municipality.15 Municipalities that meet or exceed 5,000 population in the federal census and want to continue to receive RCMP services, will need to enter into a MPSA or MPUA, unless the PT Minister directs that the Municipality be policed by a Unit of the Provincial Police Service. The effective date of new MPSAs or MPUAs is April 1 of 2012, 2017, 2022, or 2027. Some provinces have legislation that allows a specific amount of time for a municipality to transition into a municipal agreement. In these cases, the contract parties will work together to find a mutually agreeable solution. All MPSAs and MPUAs include similar terms and conditions and are only customized to reflect information specific to that Municipality (such as its name, the CEO’s information, and the specific authorization to enter into the Agreement). The terms and conditions of any new MPSAs and MPUAs will also contain similar clauses and are not subject to negotiation.
Population(s. Each member of the Covered Populations eligible to enroll in the Local 440 Benefit Plan(s), at each open enrollment, whether administered by the City or the Trust, shall be required to acknowledge and agree to the following as a condition of enrolling in the Local 440 Benefit Plan(s): I AGREE AT MY SOLE COST AND EXPENSE, TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, PROTECT, AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY AND THE CITY’S OFFICERS, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS EMPLOYEES, AND SERVANTS (COLLECTIVELY, "INDEMNITEES") FOR, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LIABILITIES, DAMAGES, LOSSES, LIENS, CAUSES OF ACTION, SUITS, JUDGMENTS AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COURT COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS OF INVESTIGATION), OF ANY NATURE, KIND OR DESCRIPTION ARISING OR ALLEGED TO ARISE BY REASON OF ANY CLAIM, CAUSE OF ACTION OR LOSS: (1) RELATING TO ANY CLAIM BY ME, MY ELIGIBLE SPOUSE OR DEPENDENT(S) THAT THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LOCAL 440 BENEFIT PLAN(S) IS UNENFORCEABLE, VOID OR VOIDABLE AS TO ME OR SUCH ELIGIBLE SPOUSE OR ELIGIBLE DEPENDENT;
Population(s. This cooperative grant announcement focuses on the development and demonstration of creative and innovative approaches that are effective in reducing the prevalence of overweight/obesity in young women, ages 16–24, by increasing the number of women who adopt positive, healthy, lifestyles. Organizations will be provided with funding that will aid in the development, expansion, or sustainment of effective obesity-related programs in order to effect lifestyle changes that will prevent the development of type II diabetes in the as follows: ‘‘If funding is requested in an targeted population. The interventions amount greater than the ceiling of the award range ($250,000 total cost for an 18-month period), the application will be considered non-responsive and will not be entered into the review process.’’ In the Federal Register of June 6, 2006, FR Doc. 06–5135, on page 32544, in the IV. Application and Submission Information section, under the Application section, column 2, first paragraph, seventh sentence, correct to read as follows: ‘‘The Project Narrative, AGENCY: Office on Women’s Health, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of the Secretary, DHHS. ACTION: Notice. implemented must be substantive in nature, incorporating evidenced-based nutrition, physical activity, and health/ wellness components, while also positively impacting knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Proposals must include programs for women who are members of racial and ethnic minority populations who are disproportionately affected by overweight/obesity. Grantees will be asked to describe the characteristics of excluding the appendices, is limited to its target population. Programs that seek a total of 50 pages, the fronts and backs of 25 pieces of paper.’’ In the Federal Register of June 6, 2006, FR Doc. 06–5135, on page 32548, in the Application Review Information section, under the Review and Selection Process section, column 1, first paragraph, sentence three, correct to read as follows: ‘‘If funding is requested in an award range ($250,000 for an 18-month budget period), the application will be returned with notification that it did not meet the submission requirements.’’ In the Federal Register of June 6, 2006, FR Doc. 06–5135, on page 32549, in the Other Information section, under Women and Cardiovascular Disease, column 1, fourth bullet, correct to read as follows: ‘‘Thirty-eight percent of women die within one year of having a heart attack compared to 25 percent of men who ...
Population(s. (a) Populations are eligible for assessment if Items 2.2(a)(i) and 2.2(a)(ii) of this Schedule both apply:
(i) the population is geographically isolated and is distinct and able to be defined in a way that differentiates it from all other populations; and
(ii) the taxon of which the population is a part is not listed as Nationally Threatened.
Population(s. Following a period of consistent population decline in the Outer Hebrides there has been in recent years evidence of some more positive trends with slight net annual increases in estimated population in 2004 (+250 persons) and 2005 (+110 persons) arising from in-migration, particularly from East European migrant workers. However, the latest 2006, and 2008 population estimates for the Outer Hebrides gave slight decreases of < 1%. The main component resulting in this decrease has been a gradual slowing down of recent gains in net migration to just 39 persons in 2006/7 from 315 in 2003/4 while declining birth and static death rates have continued. The table below shows how the population in various island areas has changed between 1981 and 2001 and also using the mid year estimates from 2004 to 2007. Census Results Mid Year Estimates 0000 0000 0000 2004 2005 2006 2007 Xxxxx 20,720 20,159 18,489 18,383 18,565 18,565 18,579 Xxxxxx 2,489 2,222 1,984 2,037 1,994 1,953 1,921 North Uist 1,803 1,815 1,657 1,598 1,565 1,551 1,548 Benbecula 1,887 1,803 1,249 1,195 1,213 1,237 1,223 South Uist 2,432 2,285 1,951 1,889 1,884 1,892 1,865 Barra & Vatersay 1,371 1,316 1,172 1,158 1,149 1,152 1,164 Outer Hebrides 30,702 29,600 26,502 26,260 26,370 26,350 26,300 Future projections suggest that between 2006 and 2031, the Outer Hebrides will see a -5.5% decline in overall population. Over the period, there will be a -25.5% fall in the 0-15 year age group; -11.5% decline in those of working age (16-59/64); an increase of 24.3% in those of pension able age. Furthermore, annual births will decline by -38% to 154 in 2030/31. The Outer Hebrides Migration Study (2007) found that out-migration in the Outer Hebrides is much higher among women and 71% of in-migrants (over the study period) were male. This has led to a widening gender imbalance in the population. It is a Partnership priority to tackle the issue of long-term population decline and demographic change, and what it means for future service provision and the ability to maintain services in the islands such as social care and health care. Population stability and growth is seen as an indicator of an area’s well-being and, at the extremes, an indicator of the future viability of communities. Depopulation in fragile areas such as the Outer Hebrides can have an adverse effect on community confidence and service sustainability. In the Outer Hebrides service sustainability is inextricably linked to numbers. The growth of the workin...
Population(s. The populations of this research were the tenth grade of MA laboratorium Kota Jambi 2020/2021 academic year. All students are divided into three classes, namely X IPA 1 with 17 students, X IPA 2 with 17 students and X IPS with 26 students.
Population(s. Xxxxx & Xxxx (1996) recognized several types of flyway or biogeographic 'populations' and this definition is also accepted by AEWA (see UNEP-AEWA/MOP3.12 and AEWA Res.
1. The entire population of a monotypic species;
2. The entire population of a recognized subspecies;
3. A discrete migratory population of a species or subspecies, i.e. a population which rarely if ever mixes with other populations of the same species or subspecies;
4. That ‘population’ of northern hemisphere birds which spends the non-breeding season in a rela- tively discrete geographic region. In many cases, these ‘populations’ may mix extensively with other populations on the breeding grounds, or may mix with sedentary populations of the same species during the migration seasons and/or on the non-breeding grounds;
5. A regional group of sedentary, nomadic or dispersive birds with an apparently rather continuous distribution and no major gaps between breeding units sufficient to prohibit interchange of indi- viduals during their normal nomadic wanderings and/or post-breeding dispersal. However, it is clear and well recognised (Xxxxx & Xxxx 1996) that in most species of Anatidae that have been subject to detailed migration studies there is no clear-cut relationship between the various breeding and wintering grounds. Flocks wintering in any given area are likely to contain individuals from several of the main breeding grounds and birds from the same breeding areas may often occur in a number of widely separated non-breeding quarters.
