Senior Management Review Sample Clauses

Senior Management Review. The State shall develop and implement a system for review by senior management of youth-on-youth violence.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Senior Management Review. The State shall develop and implement a system for review by senior management of uses of force, alleged child abuse and youth‐on‐ youth violence. Status Xxxxxx School Substantial Compliance (as of October 25, 2007) Cheltenham Youth Facility Substantial Compliance (as of June 30, 2008) Discussion The following policies are relevant to this provision: ▪ Office of Professional Responsibility and Accountability, Standard Operating Procedures ▪ Videotaping of Incidents Incident Reports: The Department’s Incident Report (IR) requires a Supervisor to review each IR. This review serves two purposes: 1) to ensure the IR packets are complete; and 2) to provide a thoughtful critique of how staff handled the incident, how similar incidents could be prevented in the future, and to identify any training needs. Among the 57 IRs reviewed across both facilities, the majority of the IR supervisory reviews evidenced an adequate critique of the way in which staff handled each situation. A few Supervisors limited their comments to a list of the documents that were missing from the incident report package. It is the Supervisor’s responsibility to ensure the package is complete. Simply identifying missing documents does not enhance the usefulness of the incident report and, absent efforts to collect the missing information, Supervisors will not have the information they would need to complete a satisfactory critique. Moving forward, Supervisors should be held firmly responsible for creating complete incident report packages and offering initial comments on staff’s handling of the incident. Internal File Audits: At both facilities, the facility Superintendent or his designee conducts an audit of each incident once the package is submitted by the Supervisors. While the audit process at both facilities is usually timely and requires staff response, this process can easily be disrupted by an auditor’s absence or a lack of vigilance around staff responsiveness. At both facilities, these critiques offer the keys to strategic violence prevention efforts. By probing for the causes of violence or the environmental conditions that created the opportunity for violence to occur, the file audits are a critical step in strategic violence prevention initiatives to enhance the safety of the facilities. OIA Investigations: All 20 of the OIA investigations completed January 1 through April 30, 2008 were reviewed (9 from Xxxxxx; 11 from CYF). None of the incidents were accepted for review by Chil...
Sample 1
Senior Management Review. Prior to the delivery to any Principal Investor (or any Affiliate hereof) of any Confidential Information, the Senior Management, in consultation with the competition counsel and other advisors, will make a good faith determination as to whether all or any portion of such Confidential Information should be withheld from such Principal Investor (and its Affiliates) (the “Withheld Information”) because such Principal Investor has a conflict of interest with respect to such Confidential Information or the disclosure thereof would present a risk of violating the Compliance Statement, when adopted, or Antitrust Laws. In the event of uncertainty as to whether any particular Confidential Information should be classified as Withheld Information, the Senior Management should consult with the Company’s outside competition counsel to assure the Company complies with the Compliance Statement, when adopted, and Antitrust Laws. Senior Management also should discuss with competition counsel any practical methods to limit the amount of Withheld Information (e.g., by consolidating information on any single competitive market with a broad group of markets that are not competitive vis a vis such Conflicted Principal Investor), with the objective of providing as much meaningful Confidential Information to Conflicted Principal Investors as is practical under the circumstances and does not present a risk of violating or the appearance of violating Antitrust Laws. .
Sample 1
Senior Management Review. If any dispute or difference has not been resolved within a period of fifteen (15) Days of mutual discussions conducted in accordance with the foregoing clause (a) of this Section 38.1, or such longer time as is mutually agreed in writing, the dispute or difference shall be submitted for resolution to responsible senior management of each Party who are not directly involved with this Contract or the Systems, who shall (i) meet in person, (ii) allocate sufficient time and resources for thorough consideration of all relevant matters and (iii) endeavor to resolve the relevant dispute or difference within fifteen (15) Days of the matter being referred to them.
Sample 1

Related to Senior Management Review

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Transition Committee 8.1.0 A transition committee comprised of the employee representatives and the employer representatives, including the Crown, will be established by January 31, 2016 to address all matters that may arise in the creation of the Trust.

  • Document Review The Company and the Executive hereby acknowledge and agree that each (i) has read this Agreement in its entirety prior to executing it, (ii) understands the provisions and effects of this Agreement, (iii) has consulted with such attorneys, accountants and financial and other advisors as it or he has deemed appropriate in connection with their respective execution of this Agreement, and (iv) has executed this Agreement voluntarily and knowingly.

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.