Unsatisfactory Sample Clauses

Unsatisfactory. An unsatisfactory rating is demonstrated by a value-added score of less than zero (0), where all of the scores contained within the 99-percent confidence interval also lie below zero (0).

Unsatisfactory. In the case of an evaluation report of “unsatisfactory,” the Mode A employee in years one (1), two (2), or four (4) is terminated. In the event of an unsatisfactory evaluation during Mode A, year 3, a remediation plan shall be given with specific recommendations for remediation of any deficiencies. The plan shall include a timeline for remediation, observation, and re-evaluation. The District shall provide assistance to remediate any deficiencies enumerated by the evaluation team. In the event of an unsatisfactory evaluation during the Mode B process, the College president may implement a Mode C evaluation.

Unsatisfactory. This rating indicates that the performance of the evaluatee is unacceptable or has failed to show sufficiently improved performance from a Needs Improvement rating. In accordance with the provisions of the California Education Code, an “Unsatisfactory” rating may result in appropriate administrative action including non-retention. For full- time faculty, poor performance in the categories of Section 18.2.3 may lead to an overall unsatisfactory rating.

Unsatisfactory. Documents submitted by the instructor reveal little or no quality information and evaluations of performance demonstrate additional regular, close supervision and evaluation of performance necessary. Vision Statement of the unique role of a full-time faculty member employed by SJR State. Length to be equivalent to two-pages, double-spaced. Is the faculty member’s vision congruent with the college’s mission and goals? Does the faculty’s vision statement clearly articulate and reflect the roles and responsibilities of their position? Evidence of continued professional development. Does professional development activity reflect the needs of the department? Do the professional development activities reflect areas addressed in evaluations? Do the professional development activities reflect new contributions to the department/discipline? Evidence of institutional involvement in terms of service on departmental/institutional committees.What departmental/institutional committees did the faculty participate in? Did faculty member make a meaningful contribution when serving on the committees? Evidence of institutional involvement in terms of service on curriculum review/development committees.What curriculum review/development activities did the faculty participate in? Did the faculty member make meaningful contribution to curriculum review/revisions? Was the faculty member a leader in curriculum development and insuring curriculum remains current? Evidence of institutional involvement in terms of service with accreditation and institutional effectiveness. What accreditation activities has the faculty member been involved in? How has the faculty member participated in the design and measurement of student learning outcomes? Evidence of institutional involvement in terms of service through participation and/or attendance at college sponsored events and activities, student activities, student clubs, etc. Changes that the applicant has made in the classroom or other areas in response to student evaluations. How has the faculty member utilized student evaluations? If an online instructor, what do student evaluations indicate? How has instruction been changed to reflect feedback? Changes that the applicant has made in the classroom or other areas in response to peer feedback. How has the faculty member responded to peer input? Has faculty member demonstrated collaboration with peers when evaluating student learning outcomes and closing the assessment loop? Changes that t...

Unsatisfactory. There are major weaknesses evident in meeting District standards which may affect job status.

Unsatisfactory. In the case of an evaluation report of “unsatisfactory,” the adjunct Article 7 (continued) faculty member will not be eligible for rehire.

Unsatisfactory. In the case of an evaluation report of “unsatisfactory,” the adjunct faculty member will not be eligible for rehire.

Unsatisfactory. An annual summative evaluation score that yields an ―Unsatisfactory‖ rating as determined by the qualifying range.

Unsatisfactory. Documents submitted by the instructor reveal little or no quality information and evaluations of performance demonstrate additional regular, close supervision and evaluation of performance necessary.

Unsatisfactory. Any “Unsatisfactory” rating in any one (1) of the domain areas shall result in a rating of “Unsatisfactory.”