Work Package Leader. For every Work Package a Work Package leader is appointed who will be responsible for: - The management of the Work Package in order to follow up the progress of the activities as included in the Work Package; - Intermediate reporting: at least every 6 months (as part of the status report) to the project leader. This report details the progress of the Work Package (% completed) and possible bottlenecks and risks.
Work Package Leader. The Work Package Leader shall have the following functions only: – Coordinating the progress of the technical work under the Work Package – Defining and updating the detailed work breakdown for the Work Package activities – Communicating any plans, deliverables, documents and information connected with the Work Package between its Members and, if relevant, to the Project Board – Delivery of Work Package contributions to progress reports and other project documentation – Following up decisions made by Project Consortium Bodies insofar as they affect the Work Package – Advising the Project Lead of any discrepancy with the Project Plan, including any delay in performance or delivery, and proposing an update of the Project Plan, including possible exchange of tasks and related budgets between the Parties in the Work Package – Alerting the Project Board and the Project Lead in case of breach of responsibilities of any Party under said Work Package and preparing a proposal of remedies to the Project Board. – If responsible for the Work Package related to the Information Platform, the Work Package Leader is also the main contactpoint for the Information Platform project.
Work Package Leader. The Work Package Leader of each Work Package (as currently set out under Table 5 of Xxxxx X) is appointed by the General Assembly. The Work Package Leader shall have the following functions only: • communicating any plans, deliverables, documents and information connected with the Work Package between its Members and, if relevant, to the Executive Board; • submitting the implementation plan of the Work Package to the Executive Board for review and proposing an update of the Consortium Plan; • coordinating on a day-to-day basis the progress of the technical work under the Work Package; • following up decisions made by Consortium Bodies insofar as they affect the Work Package; and • advising the Coordinator of any discrepancy with the Consortium Plan, including any delay in delivery.
Work Package Leader. HUS - Daily management of the network The coordination team will organize daily activities within the network, such as organize regular coordinating committee conference call (at least twice a month, by teleconference or physically if joint with another event), write the minutes of the meetings, and stay available to reply to the requests for its members. - Coordination of the annual meeting (Governance board and ERN-EYE general meeting). Every year during the spring, the annual ERN-EYE meeting will be organised. The project manager will coordinate the practical organisation of the event. - Virtual meetings and web-based tools for each WG all year: All necessary tools created during the 2 first years are managed by the PMT to fit the needs of all WG and TWG, to work together or to meet virtually regularly. The coordination team will organize these meetings to help their daily work. The coordination team also created and will maintain a dedicated space for each WG and TWG in the extranet ERN-EYE website. These dedicated pages must: o Be restricted to the ad hoc WG members o Be accessible by all HCP members of the group but also by the patient representatives (e-PAG or not) involved in the WG/TWG. o Be organised in four section: o Presentation & text with all possible media (audio, videos, pictures); o A library with all reference documents;
Work Package Leader. The Work Package Leader shall have the following functions :
Work Package Leader. The Work Package Leader of each Work Package is appointed by the General Assembly. The Work Package Leader shall have the following functions: communicate any plans, deliverables, documents and information connected with the Work Package between its members and, if relevant, to the Management Committee submitt the implementation plan of the Work Package to the Management Committee for review and proposing an update of the Consortium Plan. coordinate on a day-to-day basis the progress of the technical work under the Work Package follow up decisions made by Consortium Bodies insofar as they affect the Work Package assess the quality of deliverables and verify their compliance with the Work Plan before submission to the project office provide a report on the work package activities in the first week of months 12, 18, 24 and 36 forming the basis for the two 18 month scientific reports organize and present the progress of the work package at the General Assembly meetings organize Work Package meetings with with the majority of the researchers involved every 12 month and during the meetings of the General Assembly advise the Project Manager and the Coordinator of any discrepancy with the Consortium Plan, including any delay in delivery.
Work Package Leader. The section ‗Work progress and achievements during the period (WPL)‘ concerns the project work carried out in the different work packages and has to be completed by each work package leader or a designated responsible. Here work package leaders have to provide input to the work progress description, the deliverables and milestones lists (see also Annex II, p. 98ff).
Work Package Leader. The Work Package Leader of each Work Package is appointed by the General Assembly. The Work Package Leader shall have the following functions only:
Work Package Leader. The Work Package Leaders are proposed by the Coordinator following the Annex 1 of the GA and appointed by the General Assembly. They will chair the work of the partners in the different work packages. They will organise the work at the Work Packages level and monitor it at a high scientific and technical quality level, as well as to ensure that the deadlines and quality for deliverables and milestones are met. Consequently, they shall undertake: • technical coordination and supervision of the work related to the assigned Work Package, including the organisation of the Work Package relevant meetings, attended by some or all of the participants in the Work Package; • reviewing the results of the work carried out in the Work Packages, confirming the suitability of the next stages in the project plan and identifying possible problems; • ensuring the timely submission of agreed Work Package deliverables to high standards and ensuring the accomplishment of the specific objectives of the Work Package; • log major decisions related to the progress of the Work Packages; • flag insufficient quality or unacceptable delays in the contribution of individual members. • co-ordinate the production of external papers in topics dealing with their activities; • validate or refuse labour reports of the partners involved in the Work Package. • submitting the implementation plan of the Work Package to the Executive Board for review and proposing updates of the Consortium Plan when required; • submitting the Results Map of Ownerships and Rights of the Sub Project to the Executive Board for review and proposing updates of the Consortium Plan when required; • advising the Coordinator of any discrepancy with the Consortium Plan, including any delay in delivery. If unforeseen difficulties arise which cannot be solved within the Work Packages by the Work Packages Leaders, he or she will contact the Executive Board or the Management Team. The Coordinator will give notice to the contractors in question and request for a report on their activities. The Coordinator will inform the Commission and the consortium of the event and the Executive Board shall take the necessary actions to avoid a delay in the implementation of the Project. CA VERSION 4.2 EnhANcing emergencY management and response to extreme WeatHER and climate Events
Work Package Leader. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Objectives • Compile a complete overview of the Sagalassos quarry landscape regarding site characterisation, production and consumption patterns and potential risks • Explore the quarry landscape as being a part of the extended "town landscape" of Sagalassos and discuss the consequences for conservation and promotion to the general public Description of work The Sagalassos Project has provided extensive knowledge of the architectural heritage and use of stone in Sagalassos; QuarryScapes will take this research further by undertaking an in-depth study of the ancient quarry landscape surrounding the town by establishing its relationship with the various periods of construction. The WP will focus on both the geographical dimension as well as the development of quarrying through time and the chronological link between stone extraction and construction periods. It will also explore the unique opportunity of the area to view the quarry landscape as the "larger Sagalassos landscape", adding new dimensions to the quarry landscape itself and to the ancient town of Sagalassos. It will address conservation measures in the light of an integrated landscape, risks and the potential of the quarry sites for adding value to cultural tourism. The methodology will include: • Archaeological and geological field surveys • Provenance studies to fulfil the already extensive work carried out in this field • Relative dating of quarrying with the development of the quarry landscape • Contextualising the quarry landscape in the "larger Sagalassos cultural landscape" • Designing an integrated GIS for visualisation and "baselining" the management of the landscape The Sagalassos Work Package will serve as a showcase on how a prodigious quarry landscape can be interpreted, in particular its relationship with stone consumption in the nearby Sagalassos town.
