Decision Criteria Sample Clauses

Decision Criteria. The decision to impose either corrective or disciplinary action and which type of action to impose will be based on just cause and governed by the nature, severity, and effect of the offense; the type and frequency of previous offenses; the period of time elapsed since a prior offensive act; the record and the length of service to the Agency; and consideration of extenuating circumstances. The Agency will ensure that all employees are equally treated with respect and dignity and are afforded the right of privacy when being counseled on performance issues. Disciplinary action may be imposed whether or not corrective action has preceded it, however, before a written warning is given as correction action, it generally will be preceded by oral counseling. The employee against whom any disciplinary action is brought will be notified of such action as soon as it is initiated and will be kept informed of all processes during the disciplinary action. Not more than one (1) form of disciplinary action may be in effect against an employee at any one (1) time for the same infraction, except in the case of a suspension pending a dismissal action.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision Criteria. 15 The arbitrator shall base the decision on the following criteria: 16 A. The long-term stability and viability of the Plan. 17 B. The best interests of the Plan participants. 18 C. The equitable allocation of any increased costs of providing 19 health, dental and vision benefits under the plan.
Sample 1
Decision Criteria. The Director will approve the proposed Agreement upon a written finding that it will: 1) promote the conservation of all natural resources; 2) promote the prevention of economic and physical waste; and 3) provide for the protection of all parties of interest, including the state. 11 AAC 83.303(a). The following evaluates the proposed McCovey Unit under these criteria. 1. The Conservation of All Natural Resources
Sample 1
Decision Criteria. The decision to impose either corrective or disciplinary action and which type of action to impose shall be governed by the nature, severity, and effect of the offense; the type and frequency of previous offenses; the period of time elapsed since a prior offensive act; the record and the length of service to the Agency; and consideration of extenuating circumstances. The Agency shall ensure that all employees are equally treated with respect and dignity and are afforded the right of privacy when being counseled on performance issues. Disciplinary action may be imposed whether or not corrective action has preceded it. The employee against whom any disciplinary action is brought shall be notified of such action as soon as it is initiated and shall be kept informed of all processes during the disciplinary action. Not more than one (1) form of disciplinary action may be in effect against an employee at any one (1) time for the same infraction, except in the case of a suspension pending a dismissal action.
Sample 1
Decision Criteria. A development agreement (general development agreement and development agreements in order to increase height above 70 feet) may be granted by the City only if the applicant demonstrates that: 1. The project is consistent with goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. If the project is located within a subarea plan, then the project shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the subarea plan. 2. The proposed development uses innovative, aesthetic, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable architecture and site design. 3. There is either sufficient capacity and infrastructure (e.g., roads, sidewalks, bike lanes) that meet the City’s adopted level of service standards (as confirmed by the performance of a transportation impact analysis) in the transportation system (motorized and nonmotorized) to safely support the development proposed in all future phases or there will be adequate capacity and infrastructure by the time each phase of development is completed. If capacity or infrastructure must be increased to support the proposed development agreement, then the applicant must identify a plan for funding their proportionate share of the improvements. 4. There is either sufficient capacity within public services such as water, sewer and stormwater to adequately serve the development proposal in all future phases, or there will be adequate capacity available by the time each phase of development is completed. If capacity must be increased to support the proposed development agreement, then the applicant must identify a plan for funding their proportionate share of the improvements. 5. The development agreement proposal contains architectural design (including but not limited to building setbacks, insets, facade breaks, roofline variations) and site design standards, landscaping, provisions for open space and/or recreation areas, retention of significant trees, parking/traffic management and multimodal transportation improvements and other features that minimize conflicts and create transitions between the proposal site and property zoned R-4, R-6, R-8 or MUR-35'. 6. The project is consistent with the standards of the critical areas regulations, Chapter
Sample 1
Decision Criteria. Before authorizing an employee to telework, the manager must analyze each request and ensure that the following conditions apply: 4.1 The nature of the work to be performed must be operationally feasible; check if the use of resources is only available at the workplace (e.g. files, high speed internet access, equipment, tools, etc.). 4.2 The work to be done and the deliverables can be easily measured and verified remotely. 4.3 The employee is able to provide the same level of customer service at a distance. 4.4 The employee has the equipment, supplies and tools related to the technologies required for telework; the employer will not assume any costs associated with the subscription to a high-speed Internet connection or to adequate telephone service, including voice mail. 4.5 There are no repercussions or harm to colleagues, clients, citizens, and other collaborators. 4.6 The employee maintains an adequate level of performance. 4.7 The employee is able to provide quality work independently. 4.8 The telework location meets occupational health and safety criteria and the "Safe and Appropriate Home Office Design Questionnaire" has been completed by the employee; the employer will not incur any costs associated with upgrading the telework location to meet health and safety provisions. 4.9 The employee has consulted the documentation related to cybersecurity.
Sample 1
Decision Criteria. 26 The arbitrator shall base the decision on the following criteria:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision Criteria. All applications for grants must be received by the deadline date of the corresponding funding cycle as published. Once a complete application has been submitted in conformity with these guidelines, the amount of grant funds requested will be compared to the amount of available funds. Projects with the highest rankings will be prioritized. If the total requested amount exceeds the available funds, then the Committee will rank the applications based on the criteria listed below. Properties that have not received funding in previous funding cycles, may have a higher scoring potential for project approval/funding in an effort to evenly distribute funds across the district. The City’s final decision is not appealable by applicants. The Committee reserves the right to reduce grant awards if project activities are ineligible or the amounts requests exceed available funding. The Committee may consider projects outside of the application review window if funding is available. Projects will be ranked, and prioritized. Grants will be given to projects that result in comprehensive restoration or substantial improvement to the exterior of an entire building or façade. Priority will be given to projects that result in comprehensive restoration, high visibility and impact on public streets and for projects supporting independent businesses not required by a contractual arrangement to maintain standardized décor, architecture, signs or similar features. The criteria listed below (in no particular order) will be taken into account: ● Instances where an immediate renovation would stop serious deterioration of the building’s façade and where historic or architecturally significant features contributing to the building’s character are in danger of being lost ● Projects that would restore the historic features of a building ● Projects that would improve the architectural integrity of a building ● Projects that demonstrate the ability to attract people to the Uptown District ● Projects that would result in significant new investment and the creation of jobs in the Uptown District ● Projects involving buildings with vacant or underutilized spaces where the overall marketability of the building would be improved ● Projects that incorporate mixed uses or multiple tenants ● Applications that demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to complete the project
Sample 1

Related to Decision Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Desirable Selection Criteria Post registration qualification in the area of specialty or evidence of significant progression towards one.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Design Criteria A/E shall prepare all work in accordance with the latest version of applicable County’s procedures, specifications, manuals, guidelines, standard drawings, and standard specifications. A/E shall prepare each Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) package in a form suitable for letting through County’s construction contract bidding and awarding process.

  • Goals & Objectives The purpose of this Agreement is to ensure that the proper elements and commitments are in place to provide consistent IT service support and delivery to the Customer by Centre. The goal of this Agreement is to obtain mutual agreement for IT service provision between Centre and Customer. The objectives of this Agreement are to:  Provide clear reference to service ownership, accountability, roles and/or responsibilities.  Present a clear, concise and measurable description of service provision to the Customer.  Match perceptions of expected service provision with actual service support & delivery.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Acceptance Criteria The Services and Deliverables must meet the following acceptance criteria or the JBE may reject the applicable Services or Deliverables. The JBE may use the attached Acceptance and Signoff Form to notify Contractor of the acceptance or rejection of the Services and Deliverables. Contractor will not be paid for any rejected Services or Deliverables.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!