Deliverable 1. Audit plan Tasks: 1.5. Finalizing the audit plan According to Od Burtgel Audit LLC’s internal audit standard and internal quality control standard, audit plan of all the engagement are required to be reviewed and finalized by director. Therefore, General Director Oyunaa had reviewed and finalized all audit plan of above mentioned engagements which are relevant to this assignment. To conclude, Oyunaa’s previous experience demonstrates that she is capable to handle this assigned task.
Deliverable 1. Audit plan Tasks: 1.3. Reviewing the audit plan 1.5. Finalizing the audit plan In her role in previous audit firm, Narantuya had performed few audit engagements of projects and public companies. Also, in Od Burtgel Audit LLC, Narantuya has been working as Senior Auditor for last 5 years. As described in Od Burtgel Audit LLC’s internal audit standard and internal quality control, senior auditor and auditors are responsible for conducting first level quality review during all stages of audit engagement including plan, field work and reporting. Narantuya performs such required first level quality review on all assignments that she engaged in. As a senior auditor, she provides technical and methodological assistance to auditors and audit teams. Moreover, Narantuya had performed and reviewed audit plans of few project audits as indicated above. Based on above experience and credentials, Narantuya’s previous experience demonstrates that she has profound capability to handle this assigned task. Narantuya will be reviewing all the engagement works and providing assistance to each project audit team on technical matters, methodology and any other issues arise during this assignment.
Deliverable 1. Audit plan Tasks: 1.3. Understanding the project 1.4. Drafting the audit plan 3.4. Receiving comment from the client (MNAO) While working as auditor in audit team of above mentioned public clients and NGO engagements, Dagiiragchaa performed in audit planning including understanding audit client, drafting the audit plan, and receiving insights from clients. As a matter of fact, National Recovery Center and Mining Rescue Office were appointed and supervised by MNAO and Sukhbaatar Devshil’s engagement was appointed and supervised by Capital Audit Office. Therefore Dagiiragchaa has good experience in engagements appointed by state audit offices and audit of public entities and NGO. Therefore, Dagiiragchaa’s previous experience demonstrates that she is fully capable to handle these assigned tasks.
Deliverable 1. Audit plan Tasks: 1.1.Understanding the project While working as audit associate in audit team of above mentioned public clients and NGO engagements, Byambadelger used to participate tasks including understanding audit client in audit planning stage. As a matter of fact, National Recovery Center and Mining Rescue Office were appointed and supervised by MNAO and Sukhbaatar Devshil’s engagement was appointed and supervised by Capital Audit Office. Therefore Byambadelger has good experience in engagements appointed by state audit offices and audit of public entities and NGO. Therefore, Byambadelger’s previous experience demonstrates that she is fully capable to handle these assigned tasks.
Deliverable 1. The Contractor will conduct a Child Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Health Plan Survey 5.0 Medicaid version, including the Children with Chronic Conditions Supplemental Items to be completed by June 30, 2015. The survey will be reviewed and approved by the State Authorized Representative prior to being released to the public. The Contractor will use the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s (NCQA) required sample size for conducting the Child Medicaid CAHPS survey with the Children with Chronic Conditions (CCC) measurement set. This includes confirming the reliability of the sample frame through data verification tests of the data file elements, randomly pulling 1,650 records for Sample A (general population) and then pulling 1,840 records for Sample B (members whose history of utilization indicates a higher possibility of chronic conditions). The Contractor must meet a response rate of 50% or better.
Deliverable 1. 6 is added within Task 1 (an additional semi-annual status report, target date: January 2021).
Deliverable 1. Grantee shall prepare a written analysis of a minimum of four (4) and up to seven (7) older neighborhoods on the north and south sides of US Highway 41 along the Big Slough. This analysis shall include at a minimum:
Deliverable 1. Project management plan The Contractor will be required to provide a project plan after formal acceptance of a purchase order from ACARA. The project plan will need to be approved by ACARA and include the following: • An overall project management plan which includes:
Deliverable 1. 1. Grantee shall conduct an advertised public meeting with the public to identify and discuss key issues, opportunities, current and potential projects, and current and potential programs within the Xxxxxxxx Villa Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). Grantee shall prepare a public notice and agenda for the meeting. Grantee shall prepare and present a PowerPoint Presentation to assist in identifying/discussing key issues, opportunities, projects, and programs regarding the CRA. Grantee shall prepare a written narrative summary of the public input received at the public meeting.
Deliverable 1. An inception report detailing the evaluation objectives, methodology, approach, scope for the evaluation. The evaluation phase can only commence once the inception report is approved by DFID. The inception report must include a clear evaluation matrix relating the following aspects. literature review (including findings and recommendations from other donors and government) and set out plan for the case studies description of evaluation methodology/methodological approach, a concrete sampling strategy, data collection tools, data analysis plan, key informants/agencies, evaluation questions (clarifying which key evaluation questions as indicated in the section 2.3 can be answered and which cannot be answered), performance criteria, issues to be studied final work plan/schedule and reporting requirements. how the institutional, technical and/or leadership capacities at state and/or local levels will be strengthened through the evaluation communication plan that details out how stakeholders will be engaged and how DFID should consider disseminating results3. The Communications Plan should identify key stakeholder groups, what role their representatives will have in evaluation design and implementation; how dissenting views will be heard, considered and recorded; how confidentiality concerns will be addressed, and the appropriateness of means of communication
