Interim Rating Sample Clauses

Interim Rating. 8.1 Where a new job classification is utilized by the Town and a JDA does not exist, a JDA will be established by the manager and an interim rating assigned by the Town. This rating shall be used to determine the pay band for up to six months. Where such a job classification is filled for more than six months, a JJEC rating, with input from the incumbent, shall be done.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interim Rating. A written appraisal of an employee’s performance conducted before the end of the appraisal period. Interim ratings are required for situations such as changes in supervisors, promotions, significant changes in responsibilities, and details and temporary promotions of 90 or more days. Interim ratings must be based on expectations formally communicated in a performance plan.
Interim Rating. An interim supervisor shall prepare an interim rating of performance for employees detailed ninety (90) calendar days or more. An interim rating is a written appraisal of an employee’s performance conducted before the end of the appraisal period. Interim ratings must be based on expectations communicated in a performance plan provided to the employee within fifteen (15) calendar days of starting the detail. An employee will have up to fourteen (14) calendar days after the completion of the detail period to submit written comments to the rating official to be considered for an interim rating. The interim rating must be formally documents on Form AD-435. The Employer will provide the employee (and the supervisor of record) with a copy of the completed Form AD-435 within thirty (30) calendar days after the completion of the detail.
Interim Rating. An appraisal which is completed when an employee has served on a performance plan for at least 90 days and a detail is terminated, the supervisor changes, or the employee is leaving one permanent position for another.
Interim Rating. A written rating prepared as input to the rating of record by the former supervisor when a change of supervisor occurs during the appraisal period. An employee must have completed the minimum period of performance to receive an interim rating.
Interim Rating. Interim ratings are prepared during the course of a rating period when an employee has spent the minimum appraisal period (120 days) in a covered position and then changes to another position. This may happen more than once during the rating period. These ratings must be completed within 30 days of the change of position and are prepared in the same manner as a summary rating. The interim rating is not a rating of record, but is factored into the final summary level assigned the employee at the end of the rating cycle. Minimum Appraisal Period is the minimum length of time an employee must perform under a performance plan prior to being appraised. The minimum appraisal period is 120 days. Opportunity to Demonstrate Acceptable Performance is a reasonable time period within which an employee, whose performance has been determined to be at Level 1 in one or more critical elements, has an opportunity to demonstrate performance at Level 3. Performance is an employee’s accomplishment of assigned work as specified in the critical elements and as measured against standards of the employee’s position. Performance-Based Actions based on unacceptable performance are the reduction in grade or removal of an employee based solely on performance at the unacceptable level as per 5 U.S.C. § 4303. Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) Is a plan to afford an employee the opportunity to demonstrate an acceptable level of performance. It is developed by the employee’s supervisor with specific guidance provided by the servicing human resource office. PIPs are required for employees at any point in the appraisal cycle when performance becomes level 1 in one or more critical elements. If the employee’s performance does not improve to an acceptable level during the opportunity period, action will be initiated to reduce in grade, reassign, or remove the employee. Performance Levels – The generic performance standards (GPS) and supplemental performance standards are used to assign an element rating in the Department of Commerce. The summary rating is determined by using the summary derivation method in Section 11 of this Article. Level 3 is performance that meets the acceptable level of performance for the NWS’s Five Level Performance Management System. Level 5 – This is a level of rare, high-quality performance. The quality and quantity of the employee’s work substantially exceed Level 3 standards and rarely leave room for improvement. The impact of the employee’s work is of such sig...
Interim Rating. A written appraisal of an employee’s performance conducted before the end of the appraisal period. Interim ratings are required for situations such as changes in supervisors, promotions, significant changes in responsibilities, and details and temporary promotions of 90 or more days. Interim ratings must be based on expectations formally communicated in a performance plan. M arginal Performance. The level of performance below ‘Fully Successful’ but above ‘Unacceptable’ that is sufficient to be retained in the position. In USDA, it is the summary rating ‘Minimally Satisfactory’, which is assigned when performance in a non- critical element is rated as ‘Does Not Meet Fully Successful’. M id-year Review. A required Progress Review conducted halfway through the performance year, or at the midpoint of another appraisal period of at least 180 days, to ensure that performance elements and standards are appropriate, and to advise an employee of current performance. M inimum Appraisal Period. The minimum 90-day period of performance that must be completed on a performance plan before a rating of record may be prepared. Interim ratings may be based on 90 or more days of performance, and advisory assessments may be based on fewer than 90 days of performance in a detail or temporary promotion. M ission Results (Critical) Element. A mandatory performance element which aligns performance expectations and outcomes directly to USDA and Agency or Staff Office mission, goals, initiatives and objectives. Commonly used mission results element names include Mission Results, Mission Support and Program Management. N on-Critical Element. An element of a performance plan which is related to a work assignment or responsibility that is important to the successful achievement of a position’s performance expectations, but not of such importance that failing to attain the “Meets Fully Successful” performance level of the element would result in a determination that an employee’s summary rating would be “Unacceptable.” A non- critical element may reflect group or team expectations. P erformance Improvement Plan. A written plan that provides an employee an opportunity to demonstrate an acceptable level of performance in one or more critical elements previously rated or determined to be at the ‘Does Not Meet’ level. Performance Plan. The written or automated document that communicates to the employee what is expected on the job. A plan must include all critical elements, non- critical el...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Interim Rating

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Insurance Company Rating The required insurance must be written by a company approved to do business in the State or Texas with a financial standing of at least an A- rating, as reflected in Best’s insurance ratings or by a similar rating system recognized within the insurance industry at the time the policy is issued.

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!