Project Structure. Section 6.1: Context
Figure.1: Following the trend of Progressive Civil Aviation Reform
Project Structure. Vendor will use a comprehensive project plan with tasks, estimated work effort by task, critical path relationships among tasks, start and finish dates, and related deliverables. The project resource view will show the assigned person for each task. The project structure will show the relationship of the team members to accomplish the County’s overall mission. Vendor has selected Xxx XxXxxxxxx, a highly qualified and experienced Project Manager, to manage this project. Xxx will be supported by two outstanding technical leaders also named as Key Personnel – Xxxx Xxxxxxxx as Vendor’s Lead Architect, and Xxxxxx Kolhapure as Vendor’s Testing Lead – based on their relevant experience and qualifications for this project. Vendor provide full resumes for these critical resources in Table 12 summarizes their key qualifications and experience.
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals of OSCAR, it is necessary to have (1) detailed understanding of the level of awareness and acceptance of open science in AAT research,
Project Structure. The Parties will jointly agree on a suitable structure for the PV Systems at each Facility which incorporates reasonable tax-efficiency, suitable risk management and appropriate governance to the financial benefit of both Parties.
Project Structure. The Project structure will be maintained by TGR so that it is structurally sound in accordance with the initial design plans as depicted in Exhibit B2. Any structural defect in the Project will be examined by a TGR engineer to determine if the defect materially affects the Project’s integrity, and if so whether a repair needs to be undertaken and as well as the requirements of said repair. TGR will repair within sixty (60) days of being able to access the defect location with the proper equipment any of the following conditions to their normal state as found during an inspection:
a) any bollard or bollard section tilting more than 6 degrees from vertical;
b) a differential settlement of 12 inches or greater of the concrete foundation or bollards from adjacent foundation; or
c) a crack in the concrete of greater than 3 inches in width.
Project Structure. The SODALES work plan is structured around six major activities in order to match the project objectives: • Analysis and technical definition of the SODALES network architecture • Study and specification of the subsystems and the physical and switching layer • Study and design of the SODALES control and network management plane • Prototyping and Validation of the SODALES interconnection service in the lab and in a real environment • Dissemination, standardization and techno-economics activities • Coordination and project management All work packages are organized to create a proof-of-concept platform at the end of the project, and this will be used to prototype the key challenges of the project. Table 1 lists the work packages (WP1 to WP6). WP1 Network and hardware architecture WP2 Subsystems and physical layer WP3 Control plane and network management WP4 Prototypes and Validation WP5 Dissemination, Standardisation & Techno-Economics WP6 Project management During this reporting period, as scheduled, the following Work Packages were active: • WP1: Network and hardware architecture • WP5: Dissemination, Standardization & Techno-Economics WP1: Network and Hardware Architecture 62 M1.1 M1.2 M1.3 T1.1 General SODALES architecture 23 D1.1 T1.2 ARN modeling and roadblocks 15 D1.2 T1.3 OAM and control plane building blocks 11 D1.3 T1.4 Simulations and validations 13 WP2: Subsystems and Physical Layer Definition 62 M2.1 T2.1 ARN switching fabric design and interfacing 15 D2.1 T2.2 WDM/radio CPE demarcation unit 15 T2.3 Headend L2 interface 23 T2.4 L2 interface design for LTE and legacy services 9 WP3: Control Plane and Network Management 47 M3.1 T3.1 Control Plane service requirements 7 D3.1 T3.2 OAM parameters 9 D3.2 T3.3 Control Plane Design 9 D3.3 T3.4 Control Plane implementation and validation 22 WP4: Prototypes and Validation 60 T4.1 Prototype concept 16 T4.2 Prototype implementation and lab validation 16 T4.3 Lab and Field service validation 28 WP5: Dissemination, Standardisation & TechnoEconomics 32 M5.1 T5.1 Dissemination 8 D5.1 T5.2 Standardization 11 T5.2 Technoeconomics 13 D5.2 WP6: project management 18 M6.1 T6.1: Establishing the project management procedures 0,5 D6.1
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals of XXXXX, we need to have (1) detailed understanding of the level of awareness and acceptance of open science in AAT research, (2) to develop and adapt implementation approaches for open science and (3) to evaluate those approaches. While these three objectives provide tools and practical information to implement open science in AAT research projects it is also necessary to raise the motivation to implement open science within the AAT research community. Objective 1, WP2, WP3: An assessment of the development of open science in European AAT projects since the beginning of FP7, i.e. FP7 and Horizon 2020, considering also the AAT related JTIs Clean Sky and SESAR. To some extent, projects, which relate at least partly with core AAT research, have been considered. The assessment shall have been based on: o a statistical analysis of estimated 1500+ collaborative research respectively CSA projects. It should have revealed factors facilitating respectively hampering the acceptance of open science approaches; o an intense consultation phase with researchers and administrative or legal staff from industry (IND) including SME, research organisations (REC), universities and academia research (HES) to gather comprehensive first-hand experience about awareness of open science as such, perceived benefits and drawbacks of the idea and potentially concrete examples. o However, during the implementation of OSCAR legal constraints prevented accessing the needed EU eCORDA database, thus the statistical analysis had to be replaced by other means in order to identify suitable target projects. Objective 2, WP4: Objective 2 is to develop an open science code of conduct that is tailored to the needs of the European AAT research landscape. This includes analysing current legal constraints and opportunities as well as implementation approaches of open science into the European AAT research landscape. Objective 3, WP5: Objective 3 is to test the (interim) results in the course of WP4, to finalise recommendations targeting legal aspects and to validate the related open science code of conduct by simulating the application of the code of conduct in pilot project cases. Objective 4, WP6: Objectives 1 to 3 will contribute to increase of the implementation of open science in the European AAT research landscape. However, to achieve the ambitious goal of XXXXX, the acceptance of the idea as such, as well as open science code of co...
Project Structure. The Environment Agency envisages that the Study will comprise the following components of work:
Project Structure. As a result of preparatory activities, the CAMP Montenegro is designed to encompass two major components with a set of activities and sub-activities. These components are listed below: A Horizontal activities, and B Individual project activities, while a more detailed presentation of all CAMP activities is provided in the Box 2-1:
1. Project co-ordination, integration and dissemination of results
2. Training / capacity building 3. Awareness raising
1. Support for the Coastal Area Spatial Plan (CASP) of Montenegro and ICZM framework setup
1.1 Analysis of implications of the ICZM Protocol for spatial planning
1.2 CASP baseline studies enabling integration of ICZM principles
2. ICZM Plan
Project Structure. In order to realize the main goal and the related sub-goals, XXXXX will achieve the following Objec- tives and measurable results: Achieving the main goal of OSCAR requires (1) detailed understanding of knowledge and acceptance of Open Science in AAT research, (2) development of adapted imple- mentation approaches and (3) their validation. While these three objectives provide tools and prac- tical information to implement Open Science in AAT research projects it is also necessary to raise the motivation to implement Open Science within the AAT research community. Objective (4) ad- dresses the latter. Objective 1 à WP2, WP3: An assessment of the development of Open Science in European AAT projects since the beginning of FP7, i.e. FP7 and Horizon 2020, considering also the AAT related JTIs Clean Sky and SESAR. To some extent projects which relate at least partly with “core AAT” will be considered. The assessment will be based on o a statistical analysis of estimated 1000 collaborative research respectively CSA projects. It shall reveal factors facilitating respectively hampering the acceptance of Open Science approaches; o an intense consultation phase with researchers and administrative / legal staff from IND, REC, HES to gather comprehensive first-hand experience about awareness of Open Science as such, per- ceived benefits and drawbacks of the idea and potentially concrete examples. Objective 2 à WP4: Objective 2 is a practically usable guidance for participants in AAT pro- jects. It will be developed taking up the outcome of objective 1 and considering both legal frameworks and the need for an Open Science Code of Conduct.
