Awarding of Contract. The Secretary shall solicit contract proposals under subsection (a) of this section from inter- ested parties. In awarding contracts under such subsection, the Secretary shall review such pro- posals and give priority to those alternatives that are the most cost effective for the Federal Government and that allow for the use of do- nated land, federally owned property, or lease- purchase arrangements. A contract under this subsection shall not be entered into unless such contract results in a net cost savings to the Fed- eral Government over the duration of the con- tract, as compared to the Government purchase price including borrowing by the Secretary of the Treasury.
Awarding of Contract. An employee who works five hundred (500) or more hours in a fiscal year will be given a contract with the exception of part-time adult education employees whose positions are contingent upon the receipt of annual grant funds and employees hired to replace employees on a leave of absence.
Awarding of Contract. Awarding of this Contract will be to the lowest responsive responsible Proposer meeting all the RFP requirements. Siskiyou County reserves the right to not award a contract. The deployment timeline for this Contract, which is identified in EXHIBIT A – Scope of Work, Section 8 “Operational Milestones and Mobilization Requirements”, will begin immediately upon delivery of the Notice to Proceed. The identified timeframes will be strictly enforced.
Awarding of Contract and scope and performance of the contractor’s services
2.1 Offers made by the contractor are binding. The period for acceptance of an offer by Munich Re shall be 20 days following receipt of the offer.
2.2 Details of the supplies and services to be provided by the contractor shall be regulated in a separate contract document. The provisions of the separate contract document shall take precedence over the provisions of these general conditions of contract.
2.3 The contractor shall perform the services designated in the separate contract document and also undertakes to document the sequence and results of its work in written form understandable to qualified third parties and pass the documentation to Munich Re.
2.4 The contractor shall render the contractual services with due expertise in accordance with the latest scientific and technical knowledge, to a superior standard and with special diligence.
2.5 If the assignment relates to the writing of computer programs, the service owed shall include instruction by the contractor and ensuring the functionality of the computer programs on Munich Re’s systems also and/or the systems of third parties named by Munich Re, and supplying to Munich Re the object code, source code and complete and orderly development documentation comprehensible to a third party.
2.6 The contractor may enlist the services of qualified third parties to fulfil its contractual duties only if it has obtained Munich Re’s prior written consent. The contractor shall conclude the corresponding third-party agreements on its own behalf and for its own account. Munich Re may require proof of the third party’s qualifications. Munich Re shall be entitled to withdraw its consent if there is an objective reason for doing so.
2.7 Munich Re may require that the contractor’s services be performed by specific qualified members of the contractor’s staff. Munich Re may require the replacement of a member of the contractor’s staff at any time provided it is able to give an objective reason for doing so. In particular, repeated complaints about the member of staff shall be deemed an objective reason. The contractor shall only be entitled to replace a staff member without Munich Re’s consent if such staff member is prevented from performing the contractual duties for reasons beyond the contractor’s control, and completion of the contract on time is thereby jeopardised. In each case, replacement shall only be permitted by staff with like qualifications. The cont...
Awarding of Contract. The Province assumed responsibility for the coastal Labrador marine service effective 1 April 1997 and contracted Marine Atlantic to provide this service temporarily to 31 December 1997. Tenders were not invited and this was not reported to the House of Assembly as a public tender exception, as required by the Public Tender Act. On 9 February 1998, the Province called for public tenders for the operation of the service. These tenders were originally requested to be submitted by 2 March 1998; however, as a result of complaints from potential bidders regarding the short response period, the deadline for responses was extended to 17 March 1998. The Province received three responses to the invitation to tender and the contract was offered to the lowest bidder on 24 March 1998. However, this bidder advised the Province on 31 March 1998 that they were withdrawing from the process and the tender was awarded on 2 April 1998 to the next highest bidder, 10663 Newfoundland Limited, in accordance with the Public Tender Act. During the period 1 January 1998 to 31 March 1998 the service was not operating as the two vessels providing the service were on lay up under the care of a separate contractor. The contract for this service was awarded without public tender as reported in section 3.39 of the 1999 Report of the Auditor General to the House of Assembly.
Awarding of Contract. AXS hereby awards Siemens the contract and Siemens undertakes to develop the PRODUCT for AXS according to the provisions of this contract and to produce it and deliver it to AXS, subject to the successful completion of the WORK as provided in Item 8.
Awarding of Contract. Effective 1 April 1997 the Province assumed responsibility for the ferry service between St. Barbe, Newfoundland and Labrador and Blanc Sablon, Quebec. At the time this service was being provided by a private operator under a contract with the Government of Canada. The Province assumed payments under this contract to the end of the contract period, 31 March 2000. Prior to the termination of the contract, the Province requested public tenders for the ferry service for an additional four years to 31 March 2004. Tenders were requested on 13 November 1999 with a closing date of 20 December 1999. However on 10 December 1999, which was prior to the closing of the tender, changes were made to the original tender to increase the age limit of the vessel from 25 to 30 years, increase the maximum length of the vessel providing the vessel could dock safely and to change the ice classification. We were informed by officials at the Department that these amendments were made as a result of requests from bidders. The Province received 4 responses to the request for tenders; however, the Department ruled that 3 of the bids did not meet the minimum specifications and were rejected. On 20 January 2000 the contract was awarded to Labrador Marine Incorporated. Our review of this process identified the following: • Although the Province assumed responsibility for the ferry service 1 April 1997 and was aware that the scheduled termination date for the contract in place was 31 March 2000, it did not request tenders until November 1999 for a ferry service which would normally start in May 2000. As a result, the Department established a tender closing date of 20 December 1999. These dates restricted the length of time provided to bidders for the preparation of their bids. In addition, this late tender date did not give the Department flexibility to change the closing date for the tenders or to re-tender if no qualified bids were received. • The original tender specifications limited the size of the vessel to 85 meters due to the limitations of the existing docking facilities at Blanc Sablon. However, these specifications were changed on 10 December 1999, which was prior to the tender closing of 20 December 1999, to permit vessels that exceeded the maximum 85 meters if it could be demonstrated that a longer vessel was capable of docking at the ramp in Blanc Sablon in the normal position for loading and offloading without the need to angle the vessel or compensate in other ways to en...
Awarding of Contract. Proposal price alone will not be the sole determining factor in the selection of the contractor for this work. The City will consider the proposed costs for all proposal items identified herein together with the contractor qualifications and references to form the basis for its selection decision.
