Deprivation. Over 2,400 people, 10% of the population of Caithness, live in four small areas in Wick that are among the most multiply deprived 20% of areas in Scotland. A consequence of deprivation and poverty is generally poorer health and an increased demand for health and social care services. In addition, in remote and rural Caithness many disadvantaged individuals and households live in pockets of areas not identified as being particularly deprived by SIMD. These people live at some distance from service access points and therefore may struggle to access health and social care services.
Deprivation. There are eight data zones in Midlothian within the 20% most deprived areas of Scotland; with 4 of these in the most deprived 15%. There is one data zone in Midlothian that falls into the most deprived 15% for health deprivation. The most health-deprived areas are Woodburn, Dalkeith and Xxxxxxxx. Further analysis is needed to determine whether there is a higher incidence of disability and age-related need in these areas. Scotland's drink problem is significantly worse than the rest of the UK. Alcohol consumption across the country has increased by 19 per cent since 1980 and as consumption has increased, so has alcohol related harm. Drug misuse is a priority for a number of agencies throughout the Midlothian area and has direct links to crime and social deprivation. It is estimated that a quarter of new individual patients reported to the Scottish Drug Misuse Database in Midlothian are living in households with dependent children. The estimated cost to Midlothian in terms of crime; social care; loss of productivity; health; accidents etc is in the region of £27 million per annum.
Deprivation. While not suffering from the same concentrations of deprivation as experienced in the cities and some other local authorities, there are still pockets of deprivation in most of the towns in the Council area. Following the 2001 Census, the Partnership carried out its own deprivation analysis which identified eleven Priority Areas. The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) published in 2004 confirmed much of this analysis and this was reinforced when it was updated in the SIMD 2006 which identified ten areas of deprivation – datazones in the worst 15% in Scotland - which almost exactly matched our own analysis. We are now working through the Fairer Scotland Fund in the following ten areas7: • Bo’ ness • Camelon • Xxxxxx • Xxxxx • Grangemouth • Hallglen • Maddiston • Westquarter • Callendar Park Flats, Falkirk 7 For further information on these areas see: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.xx/services/corporate_neighbourhood/policy_performance_review/corporate_policy/community_regene ration/priority_areas_for_regeneration.aspx • Middlefield, Falkirk Each of these areas has its own characteristics and vary in size from a population of just 600 to almost 3,000. Various projects and initiatives are underway in these areas. In the SIMD 2006 almost 13,000 people lived in an area ranked in the worst 15% in Scotland – 8.8% of the total population of our area. We expect to review these areas when the new SIMD is published in the autumn of 2009. However it is recognised that many of those who suffer from deprivation do not live in the most deprived areas. There are a significant number of people in our area living on working age benefits. 5,420 people of working age (aged 16-59) were on Income Support in May 2008 and 7,560 on Incapacity Benefit. This represents 6.0% and 8.4% of the working age population respectively and compares with the Scottish proportions of 6.9% and 8.4%. The current state of the economy, with increased costs of fuel etc has an impact on people within our communities and in particular people in our poorer communities. We are monitoring the situation to ensure we have the right balance of services when people most need them. This is particularly important when people require advice for debt and money problems. • Joint Statistics for the Council’s Community Advice Service and the 3 CAB’s which cover the Falkirk Council area highlight that in the third quarter October 08– December 08, there was a total of £12.2 million of debt over 374 new cases compare...
Deprivation. Deprivation is a wide concept covering unmet needs due to a lack of resources and opportunities, including finances. It is also a key determinant of health, with people living in more deprived areas having worse health outcomes on average. Overall St.Helens is now ranked as the 36th most deprived local authority in England out of 326. Its relative position has deteriorated since the 2010 Index of Deprivation where St.Helens was ranked as the 51st most deprived area. There are now a total of 28 neighbourhoods (Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs)) within the Borough that fall within the 10% most deprived LSOAs nationally, compared with 24 in 2010. An estimated 41,264 St.Helens residents live within these neighbourhoods, which is just under a quarter (23.4%) of the Borough’s population. There are 4 LSOAs within the 1% most deprived nationally.
Deprivation. The deprivation supplement is intended to support children to have equal chances of achieving success irrespective of their family circumstances or where they live. Only eligible three- and four-year-old children will attract this funding for a provider. If your provision attracts this funding it will be detailed on your indicative annual financial estimate issued at the start of the financial year. Using the IDACI indices of Multiple Deprivation scoring system, the value of this funding will be calculated annually from the Autumn funded period headcount data and applied to the whole of the following financial year. Each provider will receive a supplement for the number of weighted hours delivered to qualifying children. The deprivation supplement is paid at 40p per weighted hour. Providers will not be informed which children have attracted this funding so it should be spent on improving the overall outcomes of all children. The deprivation supplement will be divided equally over the 12 months of the financial year and paid along with each monthly Early Years Entitlement payment. However, the supplement will only be paid when a provider is open and delivering the Early Years Entitlement, for example if a provider is only open for the Summer funding period within a financial year, then only 5 months of the supplement annual allocation will be paid. The rurality/sustainability supplement is intended to enable small early years providers, where there is no alternative provision, to retain a degree of stability. Where applicable, an early years provider will receive an annually calculated additional 52p per hour where in the current year’s Summer funding period: • they had fewer than ten children in attendance; and • they delivered less than 300 hours; and • there was no other early years provider within a two mile radius. Please note that this supplement is not available to childminders due to the generally small size of their provision. The rurality supplement will be divided equally over the 12 months of the financial year and paid along with each monthly Early Years Entitlement payment. I am the Registered Person for this provision (or Responsible Person, if the Registered Person is a ‘body’). I have read and agree to abide by all aspects of the:
Deprivation. Everton tops the LCC Deprivation Indices chart for overall deprivation. Everton shows an extremely high level of overall deprivation with almost the entire xxxx (97.6%) of the xxxx falling into the most deprived 5% of neighbourhoods nationally. • More than four fifths of the xxxx (84.5%) is in the most deprived 1% of areas nationally. • Household incomes are the lowest in all 30 Liverpool wards at £21,441 and are considerably lower than the city wide average of £29,379 and the national average of £36,172. • Marginally less than half of the xxxx’x children (48.1% or 1,470 children) are living in poverty. This is the second highest child poverty rate in all Liverpool wards. • Over half (54.8%) of all residential properties are socially rented, in relation to a city average of 26.7%. • 86.0% of all dwellings in Everton are in Council tax band “A” • 3.7% of all properties are vacant. This is above the city-wide rate of 2.9%, but a considerable improvement on 6.7%, which it has been of recent years. • House prices in Everton are considerably lower than the Liverpool average; which is most notable in semi-detached property prices where the city-wide average is 73% higher than that of Everton. • A fifth (19.9%) of Everton households are pensioner households, compared to 17.2% in the rest of Liverpool. • 15.3% of households in the xxxx consist of a single pensioner living alone; while in Liverpool as a whole, this figure is less at 11.9%. • Everton also encompasses a higher percentage of disabled residents; 41.7%, compared to 31.0% for the rest of Liverpool. • At 114.4 crimes per 1,000 population, in Everton overall crime levels are higher than the city average (91.1 per 1,000 people); but have fallen of recent times from 139.7%. • Despite this decrease, certain crimes have risen between 2012/2013 and 2013/2014. Business robbery increased by 50%, but the city-wide average also went up in this period. • There is however a fall in the longer-term crime rates for Everton.
Deprivation. 75% of students progressing to higher education from Hull post codes HU1 – 9 pay no fees. • Over 75% of Hull wards are in the top quartile by indices of deprivation • The Humber sub region is recognised by the EU for structural fund assistance purposes as having Objective 2 status and it also benefits from the Objective 3 programme. • The area has three statutory Education Action Zones in Hull, Grimsby and Withernsea dn annex3/orig may 03.rev contact: Xxxxx Xxxxxx Head of Strategic Development Unit University of Hull Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxx XX0 7RX [Please note – this briefing document was updated in December 2004 by means of footnotes throughout the text to indicate some of the developments since its preparation]
Section A: Raising Aspirations
Deprivation. Several practical investments such as provision of affordable/supported homes, rural transport measures, skills training and physical employment led development which will reduce deprivation are contained elsewhere in this LIP.
Deprivation. The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), produced by the Scottish Government, identifies small-area concentrations of multiple deprivation across Scotland. The SIMD is produced at data zone level, with datazones being ranked from 1 (most deprived) to 6,505 (least deprived). The SIMD calculates deprivation across seven ‘domains’. The results from each Domain are weighted (see below), then combined to give Overall Deprivation rankings and scores: • Current Income (weighting of 28%) • Employment (28%) • Health (14%) • Education, Skills and Training (14%) • Geographic Access to Services (9%) • Housing (2%) • Crime (5%). Patterns of Geographic Access Deprivation tend to be the reverse of other types of deprivation. In Argyll and Bute, all the datazones that are in the 15% most Overall, Income, Employment and Health deprived datazones in Scotland are in our main towns. Conversely, Geographic Access Deprivation is most pronounced in our rural areas. The SIMD 2012 ranked ten datazones in Argyll and Bute in the 15% most overall deprived datazones in Scotland. Nine datazones are among the 15% most income deprived datazones in Scotland, eight datazones are in the most employment deprived datazones, and twelve datazones are in the 15% most health deprived datazones. Fifty-three of Argyll and Xxxx’s 122 datazones (43%) are amongst the 15%t most geographic access deprived datazones in Scotland. These 53 datazones cover 495,700 hectares, 71%of Argyll and Bute’s land area (SIMD 2012; 2001 Census). Thirteen of Argyll and Bute’s datazones – more than 10% – are in the 1% most access deprived datazones in Scotland. The most access deprived datazone in Scotland covers the islands of Coll and Tiree.
Deprivation. East Ayrshire is one of four Local Authorities to have seen large increases in the number of datazones in the 0-15% most deprived on the health domain between 2006 and 2009, with over a quarter of the datazones in East Ayrshire featuring among Scotland’s 0-15% most health deprived. Indicator/s Frequency/Type/Source Baseline at 2006/07 Baseline at 2009/10 ‘Progress’ ‘End’ target/s Direction of travel Active, healthy lifestyles and positive behaviour change promoted 1. Life expectancy at birth - males/females Annual/NHS Ayrshire and Arran (General Register Office for Scotland – Life Expectancy for Administrative Area within Scotland) 74.5 years males 78.2 years females (2004-2006) 74.6 years males 78.5 years females (2006-2008) Increase in life expectancy Increase in life expectancy 2. Deaths per 100,000 population from coronary heart disease (CHD) (under 75 years) Annual/NHS Ayrshire and Arran (ISD Scotland) 89.9 per 100,000 population (2006) Revised baseline provided based on codes used for CHD 64.9 per 100,000 population (2008) Revised baseline provided based on codes used for CHD Reduction in mortality rate for coronary heart disease Reduction in coronary heart disease 3. Deaths per 100,000 population from all cancers (under 75 years) Annual/NHS Ayrshire and Arran (Scottish National Statistics) 171.8 per 100,000 population (2006) 181.2 per 100,000 population (2008) Reduction in mortality rate for cancer Reduction in cancers
