Disputes Procedure. If a dispute relating to a Script licensed in accordance with this Agreement arises between the Writer and the BBC which cannot be settled by direct discussion then either party will have the right to refer the issue to a panel of five which shall be comprised of the Writer and their representative, two representatives from the BBC and an independent third party to be appointed by agreement between the Writer and the BBC. This clause shall not however be invoked in a manner which might override any other clause in this Agreement or call into question the BBC’s reasonable and proper discretion to exercise its editorial control over a Programme.
Disputes Procedure. Disputes concerning the interpretation, application or operation of this agreement shall be settled in accordance with procedures prescribed in Parts 9 and 10 of the Employment Relations Xxx 0000.
Disputes Procedure. 12.1 If a dispute relating to a Script covered by this Agreement arises between a Writer and the BBC which cannot be settled by direct discussion then either party will have the right to refer the issue to a panel which shall consist of the Head of Talent & Rights Negotiation Group the relevant head of the production department and two of the Writer, the Writer’s representative or representative of the Society, the WGGB or the PMA, at the Writer’s election. This clause shall not however be invoked in a manner which might override any other clause in this Agreement or call into question the BBC’s reasonable and proper discretion to accept or reject a Script.
Disputes Procedure. Disputes concerning the interpretation, application or operation of this agreement shall be settled in accordance with the procedures described in Parts 9 and 10 of the Employment Relations Xxx 0000.
Disputes Procedure. Subject to the provisions of the Act, all grievances, claims or disputes in relation to matters arising under this Agreement or the NES shall be dealt with in the following manner: Any grievance or dispute which arises shall, where possible, be settled by discussion between the Teacher and the Principal or his or her nominee in accordance with any procedures that have been adopted by the School. The reference to his or her nominee applies to a Teacher as well as the Principal; Teachers may be represented for purposes of this clause 6. Should the matter not be resolved, it may be referred by either party to the Fair Work Commission, or any person agreed between the parties, for conciliation. During the conciliation the Member of the Fair Work Commission may:
Disputes Procedure. 11.1 The parties shall co-operate to investigate promptly and resolve any dispute concerning the accuracy of any billing data, any amount payable and any other issue arising pursuant to the Contract.
Disputes Procedure. 7.1 If a dispute relating to a Work covered by this Agreement arises between a Writer and the BBC which cannot be settled by direct discussion then either party will have the right to refer the issue to a panel which shall consist of the Head of Talent & Rights Negotiation Group the relevant head of the production department and two of the Writer, the Writer’s representative or representative of the Society, the WGGB or the PMA, at the Writer’s election. This clause shall not however be invoked in a manner which might override any other clause in this Agreement or call into question the BBC’s reasonable and proper discretion to accept or reject a Work .
Disputes Procedure. 10.1 Any dispute or claim (whether any such dispute or claim arises out of the operation of this agreement or not) as to the wages or conditions of employment of any of the employees covered by this agreement shall be settled in the following manner:
Disputes Procedure. It is the intention of the parties that all disputes arising out of the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall be dealt with at the local level to the maximum extent possible. There will not be any stoppage of work by employees whilst the procedure contained herein is being followed.
Disputes Procedure. This Memorandum of Understanding is attached to and made a part of the Agreement for Protection of Employees represented by The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers in connection with coordinations. Upon notice in writing served by one party on the other of intent by that party to refer the dispute or controversy to a Public Law Board, each party shall within ten (10) days, select a member or members of the Board; and the members thus chosen shall endeavor to select a neutral member who shall serve as Chairman, in which event the compensation and expenses of the Chairman shall be borne equally by the parties to the proceeding. All other expenses shall be borne by the party incurring them. Should the members designated by the parties be unable to agree upon the appointment of the neutral member within ten (10) days, either party may request the National Mediation Board to appoint the neutral member, whose compensation and expenses shall be paid in accordance with existing laws. All other expenses shall be borne by the party incurring them. If any party fails to select its member of the Board within the prescribed time limit, the representative of such party signatory to this agreement or his designated representative shall be deemed to be the selected member and the committee shall then function and its decision shall have the same force and effect as though all parties had selected their members. The Committee shall meet within fifteen (15) days after selection or appointment of the neutral member and shall render its decision within sixty (60) days thereafter. The decision of the majority of the Board shall be final and binding, except that in any case in which there is an unequal number of carrier and organization members of the Board, the decision of the neutral member shall be final and binding. In the event of any dispute as to whether or not a particular employee was affected by a coordination described in this agreement, it shall be his or the General Chairman’s obligation to identify the coordination and specify the pertinent facts of that coordination relied upon. It shall then be the carrier’s burden to prove that factors other than a described coordination affected the employee.
