Management Oversight. 1. WPD shall continue to ensure that its use-of-force training complies with applicable laws and WPD policy. WPD may continue to seek technical assistance from DOJ on the content and conduct of WPD’s use-of-force training. Status Substantial compliance – ongoing obligation Analysis WPD has provided us with its use-of-force PowerPoint presentations that WPD uses to train its officers. This material usefully and accurately highlights key language from the Settlement Agreement and WPD’s revised use-of-force policies regarding when force is constitutionally justified and related issues. Technical Assistance We will observe WPD’s training in the 2014 training cycle to further assess compliance with this provision.
Management Oversight. The Management Oversight Committee (“MOC”) shall meet at least four (4) times each year to (1) consider policy matters associated with the operations of the Center for Demographic Research, (2) review products status and activities which are part of the core Work Program, (3) review the Center for Demographic Research’s financial status and status of annual MOU signatures, (4) set CDR budget and modify staff salaries funded by this MOU (5) consider requests from additional agencies wishing to become sponsors or contributing partners, (6) modify budget and work program upon addition or termination of a sponsor or contributing partner,
Management Oversight. 49. The PGPD will coordinate and review all use of force policy and training to ensure quality, consistency, and compliance with applicable law and PGPD policy. The PGPD will conduct regular subsequent reviews, at least semi-annually.
Management Oversight. 1. WPD shall continue to ensure that its use-of-force training complies with applicable laws and WPD policy. WPD may continue to seek technical assistance from DOJ on the content and conduct of WPD’s use-of-force training. Analysis WPD has provided us with its use-of-force PowerPoint presentations that WPD uses to train its officers. This material usefully and accurately highlights key language from the Settlement Agreement and WPD’s revised use-of-force policies regarding when force is constitutionally justified and related issues. Technical Assistance We will observe WPD’s training in the 2014 training cycle to further assess compliance with this provision.
2. WPD’s director of training shall, consistent with applicable law and WPD policy:
a. ensure the effectiveness of all use-of-force training by implementation of competency-based written examinations covering the use-of-force policies and requiring a minimum passing score of 90% for all WPD officers;
b. develop and implement use-of-force training curricula;
c. select and train WPD officer trainers;
d. develop, implement, approve, and oversee all in-service training;
e. in conjunction with the Chief of Police, develop, implement, approve, and oversee a patrol division roll call protocol designed to effectively inform officers of relevant changes in policies and procedures;
f. establish procedures for evaluating all training curricula and procedures; and
g. conduct regular needs assessments to ensure that use-of-force training is responsive to the knowledge, skills, and abilities of the officers being trained. Analysis WPD has developed and implemented a use-of-force training curriculum that includes training on the use of force as well as lethal and less lethal weapons. WPD reports having trained all of its active, sworn officers on its revised use-of-force policies. In 2013, following the training WPD provided to its officers regarding use-of-force policies during the 40-hour training block, WPD required officers to take a 25-question test comprised of True/False and multiple choice questions covering the use-of-force policy, but not the electronic control weapon policy. Supervisors then reviewed the test with officers, who were allowed to correct their answers. Correcting of answers undercuts the 90%-threshold requirement of the Settlement Agreement. Supervisors currently are providing training and policy updates at various times during roll call. Following our visit to Xxxxxx, WPD began, but has not...
Management Oversight. A management committee (the “Management Committee”) comprising two representatives from each Party shall have oversight responsibility for the following: (i) reviewing and approving annual budgets for the Project during the Operations Phase as proposed by the Operator; (ii) reviewing and approving a development plan for any expansion of, or additional phases for, the Project; (iii) receiving and reviewing quarterly financial reports prepared by the Operator containing an income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statement prepared in accordance with US GAAP, subject to customary year-end adjustments and the absence of footnote disclosures (in addition, NGP will receive monthly trial balances); (iv) reviewing and approving the EPC Contract for the Project (and any expansion or additional phase of the Project); (v) reviewing and approving power purchase agreements, and reviewing other material project agreements; (vi) overseeing long-term project financing by CGC; (vii) reviewing and/or preparing informal progress updates for the Parties; and (viii) establishing such other protocols and procedures necessary from time to time to implement the transactions contemplated herein. The Management Committee shall also be authorized to make a recommendation to the Parties to replace the Operator for any reason permitting such replacement under the terms of the O&M Agreement and, during the period prior to execution of an O&M Agreement, if the Operator has been grossly negligent, or has acted in bad faith, or engaged in willful misconduct. The Management Committee shall meet on a monthly basis during the Development Phase and the Construction Phase, and quarterly thereafter (or more frequently if necessary) to conduct its necessary activities. Management Committee decisions shall be made on the basis of voting reflecting the ownership ratios. Simple majority will be required for all decisions other than (x) transactions with any affiliate of either Party, which shall require a super-majority vote of 75%, (y) any merger, consolidation, sale, lease, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of CGC (in one or a series of transactions), and (z) a bankruptcy filing or any other liquidation or analogous proceeding by or relating to CGC, which shall require unanimous approval.
Management Oversight. Active oversight by senior management; senior management must be proactive in overseeing compliance with corporate policies and procedures.
Management Oversight. Capital shall oversee any material community operating issues which may arise, and shall oversee and enforce on behalf of the Company the management agreement between the Company and Capital Senior Living, Inc., or any successor thereto retained by the Company in connection with the operation and management of the Company.
Management Oversight. Columbia shall provide advisory, consultative and other direct services to the Partnership to assist the Partnership in achieving its objectives.
Management Oversight. DEFENSE SOLUTIONS, LLC is entitled to one seat on the Board of Directors for GIS. The occupant of this seat on the Board of Directors is entitled to the same compensation and has full authority to exercise all rights, privileges and responsibilities as any other member of the board. This term for this seat on the Board of Directors shall run concurrent with the term of this contract and any renewals to this contract, as may be in force from time to time
Management Oversight. Either party may, upon notice and within 15 days of receipt of a notice from the Management Committee of an unresolved Dispute pursuant to Section 23.2, elect to utilize a non-binding resolution procedure whereby each presents its case at a hearing (“Hearing”) before a panel consisting of 2 senior executives of each party and, if such executives can agree upon such an individual, a mutually acceptable neutral advisor. If either party elects to use the procedure set forth in this Section 23.3, the other party shall participate. The Hearing will occur no more than ten days after a party serves notice to use the procedure set forth in this Section 23.3. Each party may be represented at the Hearing by lawyers. If the matter cannot be resolved at such Hearing by such senior executives, the neutral advisor, if one has been agreed upon, may be asked by either party to assist such senior executives in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s position on the Dispute’s merits. Within thirty (30) days after the Hearing, such senior executives shall meet and try again to resolve the Dispute. If the Dispute cannot be resolved at such meeting, such senior executives shall inform their respective senior management and each party may, but shall not be obligated to, submit to binding arbitration regarding the Dispute as provided for in Section 23.4. The proceedings occurring pursuant to this Section 23.3 will be without prejudice to either party’s legal position with respect to the Dispute. Except as set forth in Section 23.4, no arbitration or litigation may commence concerning the Dispute until 10 business days have elapsed from the last day of the Hearing. The parties shall each bear their respective costs incurred in connection with the procedure set forth in this Section 23.3, except that they shall share equally the fees and expenses of the neutral advisor, if any, and the Hearing facility cost.
