Performance Evaluation Plan Clause Samples
The Performance Evaluation Plan clause establishes the framework and criteria for assessing a party’s fulfillment of contractual obligations. Typically, it outlines the specific metrics, timelines, and methods by which performance will be measured, such as periodic reviews, reporting requirements, or achievement of milestones. This clause ensures that both parties have a clear understanding of expectations and provides a structured process for monitoring and addressing performance issues, thereby promoting accountability and reducing the risk of disputes.
Performance Evaluation Plan. 15.1.1 The parties will jointly develop a PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN to assess the performance of selected varieties developed pursuant to this SCHEDULE relative to a jointly agreed upon reference variety (the “STANDARD”), with the goal to determine the percent increase in biomass relative to the STANDARD. A template of the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN is attached hereto as Attachment B.
(a) Either party may propose modifications to the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN to achieve the mutual goals of assessing the performance and/or range of selected varieties developed pursuant to this SCHEDULE.
(b) The MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE shall review the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN at least annually and modify it as appropriate.
Performance Evaluation Plan. All of the following will apply unless otherwise decided by the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE. • The Performance Trial is a multi-location trial coordinated by the parties jointly or by Ceres. • Goal: to determine the biomass yield of [***] experimental varieties compared to the standard checks ‘NF/GA993’, [***], [***], and [***] (or other check varieties to be agreed) at multiple locations throughout the southern USA and the Southern great plains region (or other locations to be agreed). • Prior to changing check variety NF/GA993 the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE will agree on the relative performance of the new standard check varieties to NF/GA993. • The trial will be carried out over a three (3) year period. • Individual locations or entries may be dropped during the evaluation period if such locations have been severely damaged due to environmental conditions as agreed by the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE. • No fewer than [***] representative locations shall be selected. • Ceres or the parties shall be responsible for contracting with each site pursuant to the terms and obligations of this Agreement. • At each location, multiple entries will be planted as [***] plots. Plot size is [***] X [***] with [***] (randomized complete block design). • The core entries that will be evaluated at all test locations are NF/GA993, [***] (commercially available), [***] (commercially available) and [***] (commercially available), and [***]. • In addition to the baseline evaluations reference above the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE may elect to include other entries in the Performance Trial for competitive or other purposes. Planting of other entries may be at any or all locations depending on availability of sees, or other factors. • A seeding rate of [***] per acre pure live seed (PLS) or another planting rate or rates to be agreed. • Below is the NOBLE protocol, developed internally, that will apply to all test locations for the establishment and management of these trials.
Performance Evaluation Plan. The Village and Union recognize that the Performance Evaluation Plan is a vehicle intended to measure and evaluate on-the-job performance. The employee’s annual performance evaluation shall be completed by the employee’s current supervisor and discussed with the employee prior to the end of the year. If an employee has a disagreement with his/her evaluation, the first step of review will be at the level of the employee’s immediate supervisor. If the immediate supervisor cannot resolve the disagreement, the next step will be to have the employee’s Battalion Chief review the evaluation. If at this step the employee’s disagreement is not resolved, the employee may then appeal to the Fire Chief in conjunction with the Director of Human Resources. If the employee’s disagreement is not resolved at this level, the employee may then meet with the Village Manager as a final step of appeal. The findings of the Village Manager will be deemed the final resolution and his findings may not be grieved. All final resolutions, no matter at what level, will be in writing. For the first and second step of this process, the time frame allotment will be fifteen
Performance Evaluation Plan. (i) A Performance Evaluation Plan shall be developed and finalized by the Contracting Officer, with Contractor input, prior to the scheduled start date of the appraisal period. The Performance Evaluation Plan shall document the process and associated performance objectives, performance incentives, award term incentives and associated measures and targets by which the Contractor’s performance will be evaluated. The Parties will attempt to reach mutual agreement on performance objectives, performance incentives, award term incentives and associated measures and targets that reflect expected business, operational and technical performance tied to key end products and NNSA/DOE strategic goals and objectives. The NNSA Los Alamos Site Office Manager reserves the unilateral right to make the final decision on all performance objectives and performance incentives (including the associated measures and targets) used to evaluate Contractor performance. The NNSA Administrator reserves the unilateral right to make the final decision on all award term incentives (including the associated measures and targets) used to evaluate Contractor performance.
(ii) Only the Contracting Officer may revise the Performance Evaluation Plan, consistent with the Contract’s Statement of Work, during the appraisal period of performance. The Contracting Officer shall notify the Contractor:
(I) Of such bilateral changes at least sixty calendar days prior to the end of the affected appraisal period;
(II) Of such unilateral changes at least ninety calendar days prior to the end of the affected appraisal period and at least thirty calendar days prior to the effective date of the change; or
(III) If such change, whether unilateral or bilateral, is urgent and high priority, at least thirty calendar days prior to the end of the appraisal period.
Performance Evaluation Plan. Any bargaining unit member determined to be improperly performing some facet of his duties and/or responsibilities may be conferenced by his superior(s). This conference shall indicate to the bargaining unit member exactly what is not acceptable, why such action is not acceptable, and exactly what action is acceptable. Such sessions shall be documented and signed by both parties (Employee and Supervisor). Any bargaining unit member who has been conferenced is entitled to a copy of the signed documentation upon request and may respond in writing if he disagrees with the conference report.
Performance Evaluation Plan. (a) The determination of award fee earned shall be based upon a Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) which includes the performance criteria in earning award fee. The PEP will be unilaterally established by the Government. A copy of the plan shall be provided to the Contractor prior to the beginning of the evaluation period. Draft Performance Objectives are located in Section L, Attachment D.
(b) The PEP will set forth the evaluation period and the criteria upon which the Contractor will be evaluated. The Contractor may submit a self-evaluation of performance for each evaluation period. While it is recognized that the basis for determination of the fee shall be the evaluation by the Government, the self evaluation, which should be received 15 calendar days after the end of the period being evaluated, will be given consideration as the FDO finds appropriate.
(c) The PEP may be revised unilaterally by the Government at any time during the period of performance. Notification of such changes shall be provided to the Contractor at least 30 calendar days prior to the start of the evaluation period to which the change will apply.
(d) The amount of award fee earned shall be based upon the Contractor's performance against the criteria established in the PEP.
(e) While it is recognized that the basis for determination of the fee shall be the evaluation by the Government in accordance with this clause and the PEP, the FDO may also consider information available to him or her which relates to the Contractor's performance of task order requirements, regardless of whether those requirements are specifically identified. To the extent the Contractor does not perform those requirements, the FDO may, at his/her sole discretion, determine the Contractor's overall performance to be unacceptable, and accordingly may withhold the entire award fee for the evaluation period.
Performance Evaluation Plan. The performance of all employees shall be evaluated once each year. Any employee who receives the lowest rating on the District’s evaluation rating system shall not receive an increase.
