PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN Sample Clauses

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. 15.1.1 The parties will jointly develop a PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN to assess the performance of selected varieties developed pursuant to this SCHEDULE relative to a jointly agreed upon reference variety (the “STANDARD”), with the goal to determine the percent increase in biomass relative to the STANDARD. A template of the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN is attached hereto as Attachment B. (a) Either party may propose modifications to the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN to achieve the mutual goals of assessing the performance and/or range of selected varieties developed pursuant to this SCHEDULE. (b) The MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE shall review the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN at least annually and modify it as appropriate.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. All of the following will apply unless otherwise decided by the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE. • The Performance Trial is a multi-location trial coordinated by the parties jointly or by Ceres. • Goal: to determine the biomass yield of [***] experimental varieties compared to the standard checks ‘NF/GA993’, [***], [***], and [***] (or other check varieties to be agreed) at multiple locations throughout the southern USA and the Southern great plains region (or other locations to be agreed). • Prior to changing check variety NF/GA993 the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE will agree on the relative performance of the new standard check varieties to NF/GA993. • The trial will be carried out over a three (3) year period. • Individual locations or entries may be dropped during the evaluation period if such locations have been severely damaged due to environmental conditions as agreed by the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE. • No fewer than [***] representative locations shall be selected. • Ceres or the parties shall be responsible for contracting with each site pursuant to the terms and obligations of this Agreement. • At each location, multiple entries will be planted as [***] plots. Plot size is [***] X [***] with [***] (randomized complete block design). • The core entries that will be evaluated at all test locations are NF/GA993, [***] (commercially available), [***] (commercially available) and [***] (commercially available), and [***]. • In addition to the baseline evaluations reference above the MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE may elect to include other entries in the Performance Trial for competitive or other purposes. Planting of other entries may be at any or all locations depending on availability of sees, or other factors. • A seeding rate of [***] per acre pure live seed (PLS) or another planting rate or rates to be agreed. • Below is the NOBLE protocol, developed internally, that will apply to all test locations for the establishment and management of these trials.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. ‌ The Village and Union recognize that the Performance Evaluation Plan is a vehicle intended to measure and evaluate on-the-job performance. The employee’s annual performance evaluation shall be completed by the employee’s current supervisor and discussed with the employee prior to the end of the year. If an employee has a disagreement with his/her evaluation, the first step of review will be at the level of the employee’s immediate supervisor. If the immediate supervisor cannot resolve the disagreement, the next step will be to have the employee’s Battalion Chief review the evaluation. If at this step the employee’s disagreement is not resolved, the employee may then appeal to the Fire Chief in conjunction with the Director of Human Resources. If the employee’s disagreement is not resolved at this level, the employee may then meet with the Village Manager as a final step of appeal. The findings of the Village Manager will be deemed the final resolution and his findings may not be grieved. All final resolutions, no matter at what level, will be in writing. For the first and second step of this process, the time frame allotment will be fifteen
Sample 1Sample 2
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. Any bargaining unit member determined to be improperly performing some facet of his duties and/or responsibilities may be conferenced by his superior(s). This conference shall indicate to the bargaining unit member exactly what is not acceptable, why such action is not acceptable, and exactly what action is acceptable. Such sessions shall be documented and signed by both parties (Employee and Supervisor). Any bargaining unit member who has been conferenced is entitled to a copy of the signed documentation upon request and may respond in writing if he disagrees with the conference report.
Sample 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. The performance of all employees shall be evaluated once each year. Any employee who receives the lowest rating on the District’s evaluation rating system shall not receive an increase.
Sample 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. (i) A Performance Evaluation Plan shall be developed and finalized by the Contracting Officer, with Contractor input, prior to the scheduled start date of the appraisal period. The Performance Evaluation Plan shall document the process and associated performance objectives, performance incentives, award term incentives and associated measures and targets by which the Contractor’s performance will be evaluated. The Parties will attempt to reach mutual agreement on performance objectives, performance incentives, award term incentives and associated measures and targets that reflect expected business, operational and technical performance tied to key end products and NNSA/DOE strategic goals and objectives. The NNSA Los Alamos Site Office Manager reserves the unilateral right to make the final decision on all performance objectives and performance incentives (including the associated measures and targets) used to evaluate Contractor performance. The NNSA Administrator reserves the unilateral right to make the final decision on all award term incentives (including the associated measures and targets) used to evaluate Contractor performance. (ii) Only the Contracting Officer may revise the Performance Evaluation Plan, consistent with the Contract’s Statement of Work, during the appraisal period of performance. The Contracting Officer shall notify the Contractor: (I) Of such bilateral changes at least sixty calendar days prior to the end of the affected appraisal period; (II) Of such unilateral changes at least ninety calendar days prior to the end of the affected appraisal period and at least thirty calendar days prior to the effective date of the change; or (III) If such change, whether unilateral or bilateral, is urgent and high priority, at least thirty calendar days prior to the end of the appraisal period.
Sample 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN. (a) The determination of award fee earned shall be based upon a Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) which includes the performance criteria in earning award fee. The PEP will be unilaterally established by the Government. A copy of the plan shall be provided to the Contractor prior to the beginning of the evaluation period. Draft Performance Objectives are located in Section L, Attachment D. (b) The PEP will set forth the evaluation period and the criteria upon which the Contractor will be evaluated. The Contractor may submit a self-evaluation of performance for each evaluation period. While it is recognized that the basis for determination of the fee shall be the evaluation by the Government, the self­ evaluation, which should be received 15 calendar days after the end of the period being evaluated, will be given consideration as the FDO finds appropriate. (c) The PEP may be revised unilaterally by the Government at any time during the period of performance. Notification of such changes shall be provided to the Contractor at least 30 calendar days prior to the start of the evaluation period to which the change will apply. (d) The amount of award fee earned shall be based upon the Contractor's performance against the criteria established in the PEP. (e) While it is recognized that the basis for determination of the fee shall be the evaluation by the Government in accordance with this clause and the PEP, the FDO may also consider information available to him or her which relates to the Contractor's performance of task order requirements, regardless of whether those requirements are specifically identified. To the extent the Contractor does not perform those requirements, the FDO may, at his/her sole discretion, determine the Contractor's overall performance to be unacceptable, and accordingly may withhold the entire award fee for the evaluation period.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!