Consultation Responses Clause Samples
Consultation Responses. As would be expected for an application of this magnitude, significant statutory and non-statutory consultations have been undertaken with an extensive range of public and private bodies, the results of which are summarised below, with samples of the responses provided as Appendices to the report. Members should note that in the majority of cases, most consultee’s have responded by one letter to both applications. As a consequence the letters of response are reported in detail in respect of both this application and that application relating to the ABP, even though elements of the responses may not be relevant to both applications.
1. The noise disturbance from the new range and field training area at Picketston (does not apply to 2009/00501/OUT)
2. Increased traffic using the Cowbridge to St Athan Road
3. Increased demand on local amenities
4. The environmental impact which will irrevocably change this part of rural Wales A copy of their representations are provided in full at Appendix 1. The Council resolved to support the planning application for the Defence Training College. The Council appreciated the efforts made by Metrix and the developers of the scheme to involve the local community in the build up to the planning submission and are pleased that the major concerns the Community Council had about the closure of Eglwys Brewis Road, the impact of housing on the golf course and the availability of community and sports facilities for the local community appear to have been addressed. However there are still issues where the Community Council would wish improvements to be made to the scheme The response is provided in full at Appendix 2, but the key issues raised are summarised as follows: - The Community Council urge the Vale of Glamorgan Council to continue to press the Welsh Assembly Government for the completion of the Airport Access Road link to Junction 34 of the M4…benefit the DTC development and reduce the … problems of rat running through the local villages particularly from the A48 to the college. The Community Council expects to see a planning condition restricting construction traffic through St Athan village.
Consultation Responses. 3.1 There are no consultation responses in this case.
Consultation Responses. 3.1 No comments have been received from consultees.
Consultation Responses. The request to vary the S.106 has not been the subject of any consultation. The need for consultation with parties beyond the applicant and Metropolitan Police is unnecessary. Consultation with the Environment Agency and with local residents will be undertaken in association with the planning application/approval of details application that will follow the variation of the S.106 agreement to fund the works.
Consultation Responses. 4.1 Additional letter from New Romney Town Council to ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ dated 9th September 2015 :-
Consultation Responses. Site is on a busy corner. The addition of 10 flats will increase the traffic problems; 11 Car parking spaces are not sufficient as each flat will have two cars; Proposal would result in overspill parking on already congested neighbouring roads; Access for residents must be maintained during construction; Development should have access onto Headstone Lane not Fernleigh Court – these issues have been addressed in the Traffic and Parking Section of the appraisal Design is clever, but needs to be scaled back; Building is too high and should be a normal two-storey building the same height as ▇▇▇▇▇ Court; No indication of proposed materials – these issues have been addressed in the character and appearance of the area section of the appraisal Density of the building is too high and not compatible with Metroland plan aspiration – this issue has been addressed in the Principle of Development and Housing Provision sections of the appraisal
Consultation Responses. 3.1 The Council’s Legal Department have stated that the planning condition by itself is adequate, with the Section 52 appearing too restrictive.
Consultation Responses. The majority of these are dealt with in the report above. In terms of treating this site with the adjacent former post office site as one development, this can only be given very limited weight, given that the proposal is seeking the re-use of the existing building, and not full redevelopment, and also that the two sites are in completely different ownerships. The applicant has stressed that “The lack of progress on the adjoining site (in terms of securing a planning permission) should not hinder / delay the delivery of compatible development at The Hub”, and Officers would echo these sentiments in terms of securing the re-use of this building as quickly as possible.
Consultation Responses. Environmental Health: No objection. Satisfied that the development will not give rise to noise levels which would pose any amenity concerns. Recommend that noisy construction work should be limited to Monday to Friday 0700 – 1900, Saturday 0800
Consultation Responses a. Scottish Parliament Local Govt and Communities Committee Cal for Evidence on Planning Bill Response submitted within deadline.
b. Scottish Government "A Connected Scotland: Tackling Social Isolation and Loneliness and Building Stronger Communities"
c. Bus, Free Bus, LEZ, Smart Ticketing, Roadworks Consultations - Update BK and ECS gave an update on progress since the range of Scottish Government consultations in late 2017. Noted that the DfT were currently undertaking a consultation on Section 19 and 22 permits for operating public service vehicles, closing on 4 May. MC noted that ZetTrans had been provided with funding by ▇▇▇▇ Govt to undertake a pilot project for free travel for Modern Apprentices.