Traffic and Parking. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) was submitted by the applicant. The traffic impact statement suggests that the expected new vehicle trips generated by the proposed development are expected to have a negligible impact on the existing traffic operations on the adjacent streets and intersections. As such, there is expected to be sufficient residual capacity along the Cow Bay Road corridor to accommodate the expected increase in traffic associated with the proposed development. The statement was reviewed by HRM engineering staff and determined to be acceptable. Existing MPS policy directs Council to consider if the parking area is adequate while addressing potential impacts on adjacent development and meeting residents needs. The proposed 16 parking spaces for 12- unit residential development is slightly higher than one space per unit but lower than the LUB required 1.5 space per unit for multi-unit development. Staff advise that it is suitable to provide a lower minimum parking supply rate as this proposed development is located along a transit route and Active Transportation path. This also helps promote the use of sustainable transportation modes other than single‐occupant commuter vehicles.
Traffic and Parking. Prior to approval of development at Cheakamus and South Base and any new parking spaces, the Developer will work with the Ministry of Transportation and the Resort Municipality of Whistler to complete Traffic Impact Assessments and address any demands that the development of these areas may have on traffic and the Function Junction/Highway 99 intersection.
Traffic and Parking. If needed, we will work with you to locate and/or provide parking assistance.
Traffic and Parking. The use of public transit to and from the area will be encouraged through the provision of minimum and maximum parking standards, as appropriate.
Traffic and Parking. Patrons of and those employed by WWSC (or its contracted pool operation service) may use the parking lot in Royal Oak Park (the “Parking Lot” as shown on Exhibit B) during the months that the Warson Xxxxx Pool is in service. The City though shall maintain all authority and control over the parking lot and may limit some or all use of the Parking Lot when other City activities, events or public safety concerns require. The WWSC and its patrons must abide by all the requirements contained in the Traffic Code of the City of Warson Xxxxx, St. Xxxxx County, and the State of Missouri. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to any events (such as swim meets) for which it may reasonably be expected that Warson Xxxxx Pool patrons may attempt to park on Warson Xxxxx Drive or other City streets, WWSC shall give the City notice of such event. WWSC will instruct its patrons where parking is available and not to park where posted as “No Parking.” The City shall be responsible for the general maintenance and upkeep of the Parking Lot except that if the Parking Lot is damaged by WWSC or its agents or patrons, WWSC shall be responsible for City’s cost for repairs. The City will endeavor to schedule any work that might affect the usage of the Parking Lot to between September and early May but, if any work becomes necessary during pool season, the City will give WWSC notice at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to undertaking any activity.
Traffic and Parking. During both public information meetings there was concern regarding the increase in traffic to the area and the potential for overflow parking on the neighbouring side streets. As part of the application, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) was completed. The TIS outlined that the site can be accessed at 3 points; at Simpsons Lane, Chebucto Road and at the intersection of Xxxxxx Street and Xxxxxxx Street. The TIS further sets out that the subject property is close to various transit locations including the Mumford Transit Terminal. It was concluded that, due to the various accesses and the proximity to transit service, the proposed office addition would have a minimal impact on the existing traffic network. Regardless of the TIS, there were still several concerns from the public regarding the increase in traffic to the area, especially the effect on pedestrians. The subject property is located in close proximity to a seniors home and a junior high school. There is a sidewalk on the east side of Xxxxxxx Street and on both sides of Xxxxxxx Street. There are currently well marked crosswalks at the intersection of Xxxxxxx Street and Xxxxxxx Street. It was determined by the HRM Traffic Authority that changes to the street and pedestrian networks were not warranted at this time. It should also be noted that the majority of the pedestrian network that is not accommodated through HRM sidewalks is located on an adjacent property that is not subject to this application. Regarding concerns of insufficient parking, the proposed development agreement requires 720 parking spaces to be located within the parking garage. Staff are of the opinion that this quantity of parking is adequate. The Halifax Peninsula LUB does not require parking for commercial uses. Although there is no specific policy correlation in the MPS on this item, staff advise that the requirement is likely due to the urban context of peninsular Halifax and the minimized need for commercial parking in an urban area. During the public information meeting, it was suggested that on-site parking be provided at no cost to reduce the incidence of parking on the side streets. Although the applicant has committed to provide free parking to tenants for a period of time, this is not a matter which can be included within the development agreement.
Traffic and Parking. Coordinate all traffic and parking issues, as applicable, related to the daily and Event activity. This effort may include but is not limited to internal traffic flow, client parking needs, available parking spaces, Stadium Site accessibility, the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota traffic control, Metro Transit with regard to the light rail trains and station, parking ramp and lot owners and operators, and the staffing of all entrances and gates. The Manager shall meet with the Team, the City of Minneapolis, Metro Transit and/or other government officials regarding traffic management plans on a periodic basis as reasonably requested by the Authority.
Traffic and Parking. CSU and the City agree to encourage multi-modal methods of transportation, such as walking, bicycles, buses, and shuttles, as well as vehicles, to the Stadium for Major Events. CSU is developing a traffic management and campus parking plan for Major Events at the Stadium (the “Traffic/Parking Plan”), and CSU agrees to confer with the City about the Traffic/Parking Plan and any amendments, additions or replacements of or to said Plan. The Parties agree to work together in good faith, in continuation of the spirit of current practices, regarding such approvals and such a Plan. The Parties acknowledge that the initial Traffic/Parking Plan will be based on the expectations for the initial operation of the Stadium, and that any Traffic/Parking Plan will likely require modifications over time, depending upon attendance, traffic patterns, and the availability of public transportation, as well as the evaluation of impacts based on experience with events at the Stadium. The Parties agree to review and develop plans to address costs associated with heightened or special parking enforcement in areas around the campus on Major Event days as part of post-event review process described below in Section 8(B), and on an ongoing basis.
Traffic and Parking. A Traffic Impact Statement submitted by the applicant was reviewed by engineering staff and determined to be acceptable. This statement found that the number of vehicle trips resulting from the proposed building addition are not expected to negatively affect traffic operations on the surrounding street network. The current entrance for the existing residential buildings will not change. The existing access is from the end of Xxxxxxxxx Court and is shared with the residential buildings at 00 xxx 00 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx. The supply of parking, including spaces for visitors, was a concern expressed through the engagement process. However, the Land Use By-law does not require on-site parking for visitors of apartment building sites and the proposal exceeds LUB requirements for the overall number of parking spaces provided. In terms of bicycle parking, the addition will include spaces for bikes as per LUB requirements.
