Evaluation Standards Sample Clauses

Evaluation Standards. Unit member performance shall be evaluated and assessed as it reasonably relates to: 1. Engaging & supporting all students in learning 2. Creating & maintaining an effective environment for learning 3. Understanding & organizing subject knowledge 4. Planning, designing & delivering learning experiences for all students 5. Assessing student learning
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Standards. The District and the Association agree to adopt for the purposes of evaluating the instructionally related areas, the California Standards for the Teacher Profession (CSTP). The CSTP provides a common language on teaching that will be used by teachers to prompt reflection about teaching and learning, develop professional goals, and guide, monitor and assess the progress of the unit member’s practice towards their professional goals. Non-permanent teachers will be evaluated on all six (6) standards, while permanent teachers will primarily focus on a single primary standard selected from Standards 1-5. The teacher and the evaluator shall agree upon the primary standard for evaluation. In the event the teacher and the evaluator cannot agree upon the primary standard, the teacher may request that the Superintendent or the Superintendent’s designee meet with the teacher and the evaluator to facilitate the selection of a primary standard.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Evaluation Standards. The demonstration evaluation will meet the prevailing standards of scientific and academic rigor, as appropriate and feasible for each aspect of the evaluation, including standards for the evaluation design, conduct, and interpretation and reporting of findings. The demonstration evaluation will use the best available data; use controls and adjustments for and reporting of the limitations of data and their effects on results; and discuss the generalizability of results.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Evaluation Standards. Note: It is intended by CMBA that the standards referred to in this section be negotiated between CMBA and the District during negotiations. All evaluations of job performance shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the California Education Code and pursuant to the “evaluation standards” attached hereto as Appendix “E” and incorporated by reference as part of this agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Standards. All applicants shall be evaluated based upon standards which related directly to the duties, responsibilities and requirements of the position. 14.6.1 While the District supports the concept of promotion from within, that person deemed “most qualified” shall be appointed over other applicants in filling a vacant bargaining unit position. 14.6.2 An existing permanent employee, if deemed by the District to be equally “qualified” with another applicant, the most senior applicant shall be appointed over the other applicant in filling a vacant bargaining unit position.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Standards. The CHS office conducts end-of-term student course evaluations for each course section offered through CHS. The CHS office will also conduct surveys of CHS alumni and participating high school instructors, principals and guidance counselors at regular intervals to inform and guide program improvement. • Designate a program contact and CHS administrator (Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Associate Xxxx of Academic Affairs). • EnsureNACEP program standards – including curriculum, faculty, student, assessment, and evaluation – are met. • Consult with the District regarding any instructor non-compliance issues. • Ensure College policies on academic freedom are applied to the teaching and learning processes. • Assign experienced College faculty as Faculty Coordinators to work closely with high school instructors to articulate the course, coordinate program activities and meet all program requirements. Coordinators will provide ongoing collegial interaction to address course content, course delivery, assessment, evaluation, and/or research in the field. • Conduct annual meeting and new instructor orientation to review program policies and procedures. College Faculty Coordinators will provide discipline-specific training for new instructors. • College Faculty Coordinators will work with CHS instructors to plan and approve annual discipline-specific professional development. • Program policies and information will be available on the College website. • Provide high school instructors with program information and registration processes. • Work in tandum with the College’s Enrollment Services to manage the student admissions and registration process. • Award college credit to high school students who enroll in and successfully complete the CHS course(s). • Maintain student records and transcripts. • Lead evaluation of the program, and ensure that courses are equivalent to the same courses offered on the college campus. • Select high school instructors to teach CHS courses based on the same qualifications used to select adjunct college faculty. • Conduct end of term student course evaluations and share results with Faculty Coordinators and CHS instructors. • Offer high school students and instructors participating in CHS use of the College resources such as the library, writing center and tutoring services. • The College assures the District that its agency complies with all state and federal guidelines and/or regulations and does not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, na...
Sample 1
Evaluation Standards. The Service will evaluate the sale of visitor convenience items by using the Retail (10-RET) standards located on the NPS Commercial Services website, including adjustments to standards listed below. (a) Adjustment to Standards
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Standards. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CCTC) has adopted professional standards that will guide teacher preparation programs and new teacher assignments. These standards are organized around six (6) interrelated categories of teaching practice, with several supporting elements under each Standard. The California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) are incorporated into the evaluation process of all certificated employees: 1. Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning 2. Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning 3. Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning 4. Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students 5. Assessing Student for Learning
Sample 1
Evaluation Standards 
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Standards

  • Reformulation Standards A “reformulated” product (a) contains lead in concentrations that do not exceed 90 parts per million, equivalent to 0.009%, in any exterior parts analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methodologies 3050B and 6010B, or (b) yields a result of no more than 1.0 micrograms of lead when sampled according to NIOSH 9100 protocol and analyzed according to EPA 6010B. In addition to the above tests, the Settling Entity may use equivalent methods utilized by any California or federal agency to determine lead content in a solid substance or the amount of the bioavailability of the toxicant through a wipe test, respectively.

  • Construction Standards The Developer shall construct the Subdivision in accordance with the Subdivision Plan, as approved by the Planning Commission, and if applicable, the requirements of the Design Review Committee, and in accordance with the requirements of (a) the Millington Subdivision Regulations; (b) standards and specifications contained in “Local Public Works Standard, and Specifications”, as amended to include specific requirements for construction in Millington, TN; (c) the Building Code (as adopted by Shelby County); (d) the Fire Code (as adopted by Shelby County); (e) the Millington Zoning Ordinance; and (f) the applicable Ordinances of the City. Items (a) through (f) are hereby made a part of this Agreement by reference and are hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Codes”. References herein to the Codes are to those in effect on the Effective Date unless amendments are hereafter made which apply to all improvements or subdivisions regardless of their date of commencement and/or completion of construction. The Conditions of Approval established by the Planning Commission, and, as applicable, the Design Review Committee (any or all of which as may have been modified by the Board of Mayor and Aldermen) are set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Agreement and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

  • Institution Standards Residents are also responsible for reading, understanding and adhering to the academic and non-academic policies and procedures that have been established by the Institution, including the Code of Conduct and its penalties.

  • Reformulation Standard “Reformulated Products” shall mean Products that contain concentrations less than or equal to 0.1% (1,000 parts per million (ppm)) of DEHP when analyzed pursuant to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency testing methodologies 3580A and 8270C or other methodology utilized by federal or state government agencies for the purpose of determining the phthalate content in a solid substance.

  • OMB Standards Unless specified otherwise within this agreement, the Subrecipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR 84.40−48.

  • Professional Standards The Contractor agrees to maintain the professional standards applicable to its profession and to Contractors doing business in the United States Virgin Islands.

  • Ethical Standards ‌ 7.8.1 Within ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, Developer shall adopt written policies establishing ethical standards of conduct for all Developer-Related Entities, including Developer’s supervisory and management personnel, in dealing with (a) IFA and the Department and (b) employment relations. Such policy shall be subject to review and comment by IFA prior to adoption. Such policy shall include standards of ethical conduct concerning the following: 7.8.1.1 Restrictions on gifts and contributions to, and lobbying of, IFA, the Department and any of their respective members, commissioners, directors, officers and employees, and elected State officials; 7.8.1.2 Protection of employees from unethical practices in selection, use, hiring, compensation or other terms and conditions of employment, or in firing, promotion and termination of employees; 7.8.1.3 Protection of employees from retaliatory actions (including discharge, demotion, suspension, threat, harassment, pay reduction or other discrimination in the terms and conditions of employment) in response to reporting of illegal (including the making of a false claim), unethical or unsafe actions or failures to act by any Developer-Related Entity; 7.8.1.4 Restrictions on directors, members, officers or supervisory or management personnel of any Developer-Related Entity engaging in any transaction or activity, including receiving or offering a financial incentive, benefit, loan or other financial interest, that is, or to a reasonable person appears to be, in conflict with or incompatible with the proper discharge of duties or independence of judgment or action in the performance of duties, or adverse to the interests of the Project or employees; 7.8.1.5 Restrictions on use of office or job position for a purpose that is, or would to a reasonable person appear to be, primarily for the private benefit of a director, member, officer or supervisory or management person, rather than primarily for the benefit of Developer or the Project, or primarily to achieve a private gain or an exemption from duty or responsibility for a director, member, officer or supervisory or management person; and 7.8.1.6 Restrictions on directors, members, officers or employees of any Developer-Related Entity performing any of the Work if the performance of such services would be prohibited under IFA’s conflict of interest rules and policies. 7.8.2 Developer shall cause its directors, members, officers and supervisory and management personnel, and require those of all other Developer-Related Entities, to adhere to and enforce the adopted policy on ethical standards of conduct. Developer shall establish reasonable systems and procedures to promote and monitor compliance with the policy. 7.8.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing in this Section 7.8, Developer has an affirmative obligation under this Agreement to disclose to IFA and to the Indiana State Ethics Commission when an interested party is or becomes an employee of IFA or the State. This obligation extends only to those facts that Developer knows or reasonably could know. For purposes of this Section 7.8.3, “interested party” means (a) the individual executing this Agreement, (b) an individual who has an interest of three percent (3%) or more of Developer, (c) any member of the immediate family of an individual specified in clause (a) or (b). For purposes of the preceding sentence, “immediate family” means the spouse and the unemancipated children of an individual.‌

  • Technical Standards The Generation System shall be installed and operated by the Interconnection Customer consistent with the requirements of this Agreement; the Technical Requirements; the applicable requirements located in the National Electrical Code (NEC); the applicable standards published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE); and local building and other applicable ordinances in effect at the time of the installation of the Generation System.

  • Standards Any additions, modifications, or replacements made to a Party’s facilities shall be designed, constructed and operated in accordance with this Agreement, NYISO requirements and Good Utility Practice.

  • Prescription Drug Plan Retail and mail order prescription drug copays for bargaining unit employees shall be as follows:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!