Interagency Agreements Sample Clauses

Interagency Agreements. City Bureaus shall enter into interagency agreements with Prosper Portland and Portland Streetcar, Inc., as necessary and appropriate to further define

Interagency Agreements. 1.1 Both Parties will endeavour to provide opportunities for the other Party to provide input to or involvement in interagency initiatives with other organizations that impact the activities of the other Party within the local trust area/electoral area. 1.2 Either Party will refer interagency agreements or initiatives with other organizations that impact the activities of the other Party within the local trust area/electoral area for comment before concluding such an interagency agreement. 1.3 Either Party will provide copies to the other Party of interagency agreements or terms of reference for interagency projects relevant to the local trust area/electoral area.

Interagency Agreements. The Army and EPA are encouraged to enter into interagency agreements with other federal, state, tribal and local agencies which will provide assistance to the Corps and EPA in pursuit of Section 404 enforcement activities. For example, the preliminary enforcement site investigations or post-case monitoring activities required to ensure compliance with any enforcement order can be delegated to third parties (e.g., FWS) who agree to assist Corps/EPA in compliance efforts. However, only the Corps or EPA may make a violation determination and/or pursue an appropriate enforcement response based upon information received from a third party.

Interagency Agreements. The World Health Organization agrees to inform the Council of any for- mal agreement between the Organization and any other specialized agency, intergovernmental organization or non-governmental organization and in particular agrees to inform the Council of the nature and scope of any such agreement before it is concluded.

Interagency Agreements. If an executive agency (as defined under the Commonwealth Attorneys Act) and an independent agency desire a binding, contractual arrangement, such arrangement shall be denominated an “Interagency Agreement.” Interagency Agreements should be reviewed and executed by all intended contracting agencies as follows: 1. Executed by the appropriate agency heads or designated deputies. 2. Reviewed and approved by the appropriate agency counsels. 3. Reviewed and approved by the office of General Counsel. (Agency transmitting document shall copy counsel for the Office of the Budget.) 4. Reviewed and approved by the Office of the Attorney General for form and legality under the Commonwealth Attorneys Act. 5. Reviewed and approved by the applicable disbursing and receiving agency comptrollers or designees. The comptroller of the disbursing agency should sign last.

Interagency Agreements. Federal facilities on the National Priorities List (NPL) are required to enter into an interagency agreement (IAG) or a federal facility agreement (FFA) within 180 days of completion of the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS), per the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act provisions codified as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §120(e)(2). The IAG outlines the responsibilities of the Military Component(s), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and, frequently, the state in the cleanup process. It allows EPA and states to assume regulatory oversight over environmental restoration activities at DoD installations. CERCLA §120(e)(5) requires that the number of IAGs and FFAs signed and in negotiation, the costs associated with IAGs, public comments, and IAG and FFA developments within the previous fiscal year be reported in the DERP Annual Report to Congress. The information provided in this appendix is for Fiscal Year 2001 (FY01). The three IAGs signed in FY01 (Table D-1) bring the total number of DoD IAGs to 117. Table D-2 lists all installations that conducted negotiations or Component IAGs/FFAs Signed in FY01 IAGs/FFAs in Negotiation in FY01 signed IAGs or FFAs in FY01 and provides additional information on IAGs and FFAs that are under negotiation or were not concluded within the required time frame. Other information that must be reported according to CERCLA §120(e)(5) is provided as follows Fort Eustis Negotiations ongoing The RI/FS is not complete, and a Record of Decision (ROD) has not been prepared. FFA negotiations between Army and EPA are considered ongoing until the FS is complete. Fort ▇▇▇▇▇ Negotiations ongoing A portion of Fort ▇▇▇▇▇ (▇▇▇▇▇▇ Army Airfield) was deleted from the NPL. The Fort ▇▇▇▇▇ partnering team is working on a site management plan as well as a draft FFA. Redstone Arsenal Negotiations ongoing A state-stipulated penalties issue needs to be resolved. Soldier Systems Center Negotiations ongoing FFA negotiations began with EPA. Alameda Naval Air Station Signed Signed 7/5/01 Cherry Point Marine Corps Base Negotiations ongoing FFA signature did not occur due to disputed language in the agreement. Concord Naval Weapons Station Signed Signed 6/12/01 Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center Signed FFA negotiated and signed in FY01. Mechanicsburg Naval Inventory Control Point Negotiations ongoing Not signed. Protracted negotiations with the Pennsylvania Departm...

Interagency Agreements. By October 1, 1987, the commissioner and the commissioner of human services shall enter into a written contract for the design, delivery, and administration of employment and training services for applicants for or recipients of food stamps, the Minnesota family investment program, and general assistance. The contract must address: (1) specific roles and responsibilities of each department; (2) assignment and supervision of staff for interagency activities including any necessary interagency employee mobility agreements under the administrative procedures of the Department of Management and Budget; (3) mechanisms for determining the conditions under which individuals participate in services, their rights and responsibilities while participating, and the standards by which the services must be administered; (4) procedures for providing technical assistance to local service units, Indian tribes, and employment and training service providers; (5) access to appropriate staff for ongoing development and interpretation of policy, rules, and program standards; (6) procedures for reimbursing appropriate agencies for administrative expenses; and (7) procedures for accessing available federal funds.

Interagency Agreements. The Adminis- trator and the Secretary of Energy are authorized to enter into interagency agreements with one another for the purpose of providing for research, evaluation, testing, development, and demonstration into alter- native or innovative technologies to characterize and assess the nature and extent of hazardous waste (in- cluding radioactive mixed waste) contamination at the Hanford site, in the State of Washington.

Interagency Agreements. Urbana- Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, FACTS/ LRE. Kansas Department of Health and Environment. (1994). Procedure manual for infant/ toddler services in Kansas. Topeka: Author. Kansas Inservice Training System. (1993). Technical assistance packet: Transi- tions from Part H to Part ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, KS: Kansas University Affiliated Program. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, S. (1995). Interagency agreement for col- laborative preschool services for children with disabilities: What you may want to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, N. & ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (1991). Rapid transits: Moving from preschool to kindergarten-transition planning for children with disabilities. Parsons, KS: Kansas University Affiliated Program, Rural Alternatives for Preschool Integrated Delivery of Services. Missouri Linc. (1990). Cooperative interagency agreements. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. Region VII Resource Access Project (1995). Developing an agreement with your local education agency. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas Medical Center. Books: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇, G. B. (1993). Deciphering the System: A Guide for Fami- lies. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (1994). Bridging early services for children with special needs and their families: A practical guide for transition Name of Program: Teacher: Phone Number: