Job Evaluation Appeals Sample Clauses

Job Evaluation Appeals. Where an employee believes her/his job has not been properly evaluated under the Plan, the employee shall have the right to appeal the evaluation of her/his job through the Union. Such an appeal shall be in accordance with the provisions of this Article. Where an employee believes that the duties she/he performs are more properly characterized by a job profile other than her/his own, such a dispute shall be processed as a grievance under Article 3.06.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Evaluation Appeals. (a) The Union may appeal new or existing Job Evaluations within sixty (60) calendar days from the date the Union is notified of the completed Job Evaluation. All notice of appeals by the Union shall be made in writing to Compensation Services and will include:
Job Evaluation Appeals. The Procedure to be used by employees appealing against the job evaluation results arising from Single Status will be in accordance with the existing Council’s appeals process for job evaluation. Following exhaustion of the local procedures reference may be made to the GLPC Joint Secretaries in accordance with the GLPC Constitution for resolution.
Job Evaluation Appeals. The purpose of the Job Evaluation Appeals process is to provide a method of challenging the evaluation results of positions Article 15 (Job Evaluation). An appeal may be submitted by an incumbent or a Department Head. It is not the intent of the Appeals process to address minor changes to job duties or concerns relating to job content. All of the time limits referred to in this Article will be exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, paid holidays or official University-wide days off.
Job Evaluation Appeals. 29.01 (a) Any individual employee or group of employees shall have the right to appeal their job evaluation. When a job is occupied by more than one (1) employee, the majority of the employees in the job must agree in writing to appeal the job.
Job Evaluation Appeals. (a) An employee or Supervisor who disputes the evaluation of a job may send a letter giving the reasons for challenging the evaluation to the compensation area of Human Resources requesting an appeal.
Job Evaluation Appeals 
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Job Evaluation Appeals

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.