Permanent Teacher Intervention Sample Clauses
Permanent Teacher Intervention. 39.4.1 The Permanent Teacher Intervention Component is a cooperative effort between the Union and the District. The intervention process is an outgrowth of the Union’s and District’s desire to maintain quality performance standards for the teaching staff and to comply with state funding incentives.
39.4.1.1 Program participation is defined in Section 39.1.1
39.4.1.2 It shall be the obligation of the Panel to report the results of this intervention to the District Superintendent and to the Board of Education.
39.4.1.3 The written documentation in the final review shall become a part of the permanent teacher’s personnel file.
39.4.2 The primary focus of the Program is to provide assistance and renew quality teaching.
39.4.3 Assistance and remedial efforts and activities shall be intense and multifaceted.
39.4.3.1 To initiate the intervention process following a referral, a conference shall be held. The conference shall involve the Intervention Teacher, the teacher’s evaluator, and the assigned Peer Coach.
39.4.3.2 The permanent teacher has the right to request Union representation, as per Section 16.3.
39.4.4 Peer Coaches and the PAR Panel shall have primary responsibility in the assistance and review of Intervention Teachers to whom they are assigned.
39.4.5 The Permanent Teacher Intervention Component shall be responsible for the review of teachers so assigned. Said review shall be based upon the permanent teacher’s adherence to the teaching standards adopted by the Union and District.
39.4.6 The principal shall have responsibility for reporting to the Intervention Teacher and to the PAR Panel the teacher’s performance as it relates to the school as a whole (e.g. compliance with duty schedules, punctuality, Standard 6 of the San Francisco Teaching Standards, etc.).
39.4.7 The responsibilities of the site administrator are specified in the Attachment to the Letter of Transmittal (See Archive #4).
Permanent Teacher Intervention. 13.4.1 The purpose of this PAR Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been evaluated as "unsatisfactory" in one or more of the California Standards for the Teaching Profession by the principal, or who are otherwise assigned or volunteer to participate in the PAR Program to achieve a ''proficient" level of performance consistent with the Standards. In addition, it shall be the obligation of the Panel to report the results of this intervention to the Board of Education of the school district. The written documentation in the evaluation report shall become a part of the permanent teacher's personnel file.
13.4.2 The prime focus of this PAR Program is to provide assistance and renew quality teaching.
Permanent Teacher Intervention. A. The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been evaluated as ?Does Not Meet Standards” in one or more of the California Standards for the Teaching Profession by the prime evaluator. In addition, it shall be the obligation of the Panel to report the results of this intervention to the Board of Education of the school district. The written documentation in the evaluation report shall become a part of the permanent teacher’s personnel file. Voluntary referrals do not get reported to the Board of Education, nor does the written documentation become a part of the personnel file.
B. The prime focus of this Program is to provide assistance and renew quality teaching.
C. Assistance and remedial efforts and activities shall be intense and multifaceted and shall be preceded by a conference in the year when the teacher receives the ?Does Not Meet Standards” rating. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher, and the assigned consulting teacher to begin the development of a Teacher Development Plan. If the permanent teacher so desires, FTA shall provide representation in this meeting.
D. During the period of assistance, the permanent teacher’s evaluation shall be the joint responsibility of the consulting teacher and the Panel. It is the intent of the parties that this process serve as the sole evaluation process for the permanent teacher and that it be based on the permanent teacher’s adherence to the identified California Standard(s) for the Teaching Profession in which the unit member has been rated as “Does Not Meet Standards” and the evaluation procedures set forth in this article.
E. The assistance shall be provided by the peer consulting teachers under this article and shall be closely monitored by this Program’s governing Panel.
F. Communication and consultation with the principal shall be ongoing.
G. Nothing in this article precludes the principal or District from doing informal observations nor from notifying the teacher verbally and/or in writing regarding incidents or events related to the teacher’s fulfillment of his/her professional obligations.
1) Should the principal deem it necessary to communicate with a teacher in this intervention program in a manner that relates to progressive discipline, i.e., letter of warning, reprimand, etc., he/she may copy the consulting teacher who shall report the same to the Panel.
H. The consulting tea...
Permanent Teacher Intervention. 1.4.1 The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been evaluated as “unsatisfactory” in subject matter knowledge and/or teaching strategies of two (2) or more of the California Standards 1-5 for the Teaching Profession by the principal. In addition, it shall be the obligation of the Panel to report the results of this intervention to the Board of Education of the school district. The written documentation shall become a part of the permanent teacher’s personnel file at the request of the teacher.
1.4.1.1 The District shall select one (1) standard in which all teachers will be evaluated. The principal shall select one (1) standard and the teacher shall select one (1) standard.
1.4.2 This Program shall be limited to addressing those areas of performance set forth in the evaluation document listed as “unsatisfactory” encompassed in the areas of subject matter knowledge, teaching strategies, or both.
1.4.3 Assistance provided by the consulting teachers shall focus on the specific areas recommended for improvement by the participating teachers’ evaluator based upon the unsatisfactory rating or ratings in the performance evaluation that resulted in the referral to the PAR Program.
1.4.4 Assistance and remedial efforts and activities shall be intense and multifaceted, and shall be preceded by a conference in the spring of the year when the teacher received the “unsatisfactory” evaluation. The conference shall involve the teacher being referred, the evaluator who evaluated the teacher and the consulting teacher to begin the development of an Individual Assistance Plan. If the permanent teacher so desires, the Association shall provide representation during this meeting.
1.4.5 The assistance shall be provided by peer coaches under this Article and shall be closely monitored by the PAR Panel.
1.4.6 The course of assistance shall include one or more of the following:
1.4.6.1 Multiple classroom observations by the consulting teacher;
1.4.6.2 Assistance specific to the area of subject matter knowledge and/or teaching strategies which has been evaluated to be “unsatisfactory”, or other areas identified by the consulting teacher and referred teacher that may impact subject matter knowledge and/or teaching strategies.
1.4.6.3 Opportunities for the teacher receiving assistance to observe exemplary practice, either by the consulting teacher or other exemplary teachers;
1.4.6.4 District-provided professional deve...
Permanent Teacher Intervention. A. The purpose of this Program is to assist and offer remediation to permanent teachers whose performance has been evaluated as "Does Not Meet Standards" in one or more of the California Standards for the Teaching Profession by the prime evaluator. In addition, it shall be the obligation of the Panel to report the results of this intervention to the Board of Education of the school district. The written documentation in the evaluation report shall become a part of the permanent teacher’s personnel file. Voluntary referrals do not get reported to the Board of Education, nor does the written documentation become a part of the personnel file.