EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Any award to be made pursuant to this RFP will be based upon the proposal with appropriate consideration given to operational, technical, cost and management requirements. Evaluations of offers will be based upon the Proposer’s responsiveness to the RFP and the total price quoted for all the items covered by the RFP. The following elements will be the primary consideration in evaluating all submitted proposals and in the selection of a Proposer: • 35% - Price of ELIGIBLE products and services, including unit prices, labor rates, travel/trip charges (if applicable), etc. • 20% - Proposal preparation, thoroughness and responsiveness to this request for proposal. • 15% - Proposer’s experience, FUESD’s prior experience with Proposer (if any), overall installation and integration capabilities based upon performance record and availability of sufficient high quality personnel with the required skills and experience for the specific approach. • 10% - Client references and/or citations from prior installations where equal services have been provided for projects of similar size and scope. • 20% - The extent to which the Proposer’s solution fulfills FUESD’s stated requirements as set out in this RFP. The District is seeking proposals from service providers for high-speed telecommunication services. Potential service providers must have demonstrated the experience and expertise necessary, in the sole judgment of Fallbrook UESD (District), to capably: supply, install, configure, test, start-up, service, and maintain the proposed Wide Area Network (WAN) high speed communications services as requested in this RFP. Fallbrook Union Elementary School District invites vendors to submit proposals in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). This RFP provides the services sought requirements and evaluative criteria for one company to provide Fallbrook UESD with a WAN solution as described in this RFP. Fallbrook UESD requests a response from all prospective vendors, including pricing and service descriptions. The District intends to partially fund the services contemplated herein by leveraging the Federal E-Rate program. Vendors should be familiar with and compliant with all applicable federal E-Rate policies. Bids from vendors that are not e-rate eligible will not be considered for this RFP. Vendors must provide a response to this RFP that is compliant with e-rate. Vendors must submit their E-Rate Service Provider Identification Number (SPI...
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Evaluation of proposals will be based on a fair, impartial, and competitive selection process in which the evaluation of proposals will not be limited to price alone. Proven expertise in performing pre-employment psychological evaluations and other psychological services for public safety agencies will be the primary consideration in the selection process. The City reserves the right to select a vendor based solely on the information submitted in the proposal and to make a contract award without any further discussion with the Vendors regarding the responses received. Therefore, responses should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms available to the City from a price, contractual terms, and conditions. The City also reserves the right to conduct discussions with Vendors who submit proposals. Proposals shall be consistently evaluated based on the following competitive selection criteria: Public Safety Psychological Services Experience 40% Responsiveness of the RFP Proposal 20% Costs 20% References 20% Notification. Any firm or firms submitting proposals judged as being "most qualified" by the selection committee may be contacted and asked to provide additional information to supplement their initial proposal. Staff will negotiate a professional services agreement with the selected applicant and the final agreement will be presented to the City Council for approval.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Evaluation of proposals will be based on a fair, impartial, and competitive selection process in which the evaluation of proposals will not be limited to price alone. Proven expertise in portfolio management will be the primary consideration in the selection process. The City reserves the right to select Firms based solely on the information submitted in the proposal and to make (a) contract award without any further discussion with the Firms/Professionals regarding the responses received. Therefore, responses should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms available to the City from a price, contractual terms, and conditions. The City also reserves the right to conduct discussions with Firms/Professionals who submit proposals. Proposals shall be consistently evaluated based on a competitive selection criteria.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. 1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This acquisition utilizes the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. EVALUATION AND AWARD The Government will establish a BPA resulting from this RFQ to the responsible Offeror whose quote conforms to the RFQ, and will be most advantageous to the Government considering the following factors:
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. FACTOR 1: Technical Acceptability
1. Management approach Offeror’s comprehensive management approach will be used to evaluate its ability to satisfy the Government’s requirements under BPA awarded from this solicitation. Management approach includes organizational structure, lines of authority, staffing plan, subcontracting plan (if applicable), strategic supplier plan (if applicable), and implementation plan for this BPA. This also includes the measures and procedures in place to uphold safeguarding considerations; responses may include, but are not limited to, policies and procedures for prevention within the workplace, training or guidance provided to staff, procedures for raising concerns, evidence of processes and capacity to investigate claims, and measures designed to ensure the same standards for downstream suppliers.
2. Quality control Offeror’s quality control approach will be used to evaluate its ability to satisfy the Government’s requirements under contracts awarded from this solicitation. This includes quality system plans and processes, certifications, measures taken in response to audit findings, and product testing to produce required commodities that are safe for human handling/usage. This can also include descriptions of measures and procedures in place to uphold the quality of goods produced; responses may include, but are not limited to, policies and procedures for quality management, procedures for self-inspection, evidence of audits, inspections and test results, and measures designed to ensure the same standards for downstream suppliers. Annex scans of supporting documentation specifying the material and physical specifications of the commodities, including scans of valid/up-to-date testing and analysis certificates for the raw material and material composition of commodities offerors are offering, and relevant ISO certifications.
3. Technical approach Offeror’s comprehensive technical approach will be used to evaluate its ability to satisfy the Government’s requirements under contracts awarded from this solicitation. The technical approach should demonstrate the offeror’s expertise and how it will successfully fulfill requirements outlined in Sections
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. FACTOR 1: Technical Technical evaluation of proposals will be based on the extent and appropriateness of the proposed approaches and feasibility of achieving the strategic objectives, in accordance with the evaluation
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Factor 1; Sub-factor c for further details on preferable locations within Beaver County, PA.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. NOTICE: The following solicitation provisions pertinent to this section are hereby incorporated by reference:
