EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors: Factor 1- Offeror Experience Factor 2- Management Plan/Quality Control Factor 3- Safety Factor 4- Past Performance The distinction between Offeror experience and past performance is Offeror experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Evaluation of proposals will be based on a fair, impartial, and competitive selection process in which the evaluation of proposals will not be limited to price alone. Proven expertise in performing pre-employment psychological evaluations and other psychological services for public safety agencies will be the primary consideration in the selection process. The City reserves the right to select a vendor based solely on the information submitted in the proposal and to make a contract award without any further discussion with the Vendors regarding the responses received. Therefore, responses should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms available to the City from a price, contractual terms, and conditions. The City also reserves the right to conduct discussions with Vendors who submit proposals. Proposals shall be consistently evaluated based on the following competitive selection criteria: Criteria Portion Public Safety Psychological Services Experience 40% Responsiveness of the RFP Proposal 20% Costs 20% References 20% Total 100% Notification. Any firm or firms submitting proposals judged as being "most qualified" by the selection committee may be contacted and asked to provide additional information to supplement their initial proposal. Staff will negotiate a professional services agreement with the selected applicant and the final agreement will be presented to the City Council for approval.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Any award to be made pursuant to this RFP will be based upon the proposal with appropriate consideration given to operational, technical, cost and management requirements. Evaluations of offers will be based upon the Proposer’s responsiveness to the RFP and the total price quoted for all the items covered by the RFP. The following elements will be the primary consideration in evaluating all submitted proposals and in the selection of a Proposer: • 40% - Price of ELIGIBLE products and services, including unit prices, labor rates, travel/trip charges (if applicable), etc. • 20% - Proposal preparation, thoroughness and responsiveness to this request for proposal. • 15% - Proposer’s experience, FUESD’s prior experience with Proposer (if any), overall installation and integration capabilities based upon performance record and availability of sufficient high quality personnel with the required skills and experience for the specific approach. • 10% - Client references and/or citations from prior installations where equal services have been provided for projects of similar size and scope. • 15% - The extent to which the Proposer’s solution fulfills FUESD’s stated requirements as set out in this RFP. FALLBROOK UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT RFP 16-110 General Information for Vendors The District is seeking proposals from service providers for high-speed telecommunication services. Potential service providers must have demonstrated the experience and expertise necessary, in the sole judgment of Fallbrook UESD (District), to capably: supply, install, configure, test, start-up, service, and maintain the proposed Wide Area Network (WAN) high speed communications services as requested in this RFP. Fallbrook Union Elementary School District invites vendors to submit proposals in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP). This RFP provides the services sought requirements and evaluative criteria for one company to provide Fallbrook UESD with a WAN solution as described in this RFP. Fallbrook UESD requests a response from all prospective vendors, including pricing and service descriptions. The District intends to partially fund the services contemplated herein by leveraging the Federal E-Rate program. Vendors should be familiar with and compliant with all applicable federal E-Rate policies. Bids from vendors that are not e-rate eligible will not be considered for this RFP. Vendors must provide a response to this RFP that is compliant wit...
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Proposals will be evaluated using the factors and subfactors, listed below.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Evaluation of proposals will be based on a fair, impartial, and competitive selection process in which the evaluation of proposals will not be limited to price alone. Proven expertise in occupational health services for municipal government agencies will be the primary consideration in the selection process. The City reserves the right to select a vendor based solely on the information submitted in the proposal and to make a contract award without any further discussion with Proposers regarding the responses received. Therefore, responses should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms available to the City from a price, contractual terms, and conditions. The City also reserves the right to conduct discussions with Proposers who submit proposals. Proposals shall be consistently evaluated based on the following competitive selection criteria: Criteria Portion Experience 30% Ability to Meet Scope of Services 30% Costs 30% References 10% Total 100% Notification. Any Proposer(s) submitting proposals judged as being "most qualified" by the selection committee may be contacted and asked to provide additional information to supplement their initial proposal. Staff will negotiate a professional services agreement with the selected applicant and the final agreement will be presented to the City Council for approval.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. To be considered for award, a bid must comply in all material respects with the invitation for bids. Such compliance enables bidders to stand on an equal footing, and maintain integrity of the sealed bidding system (Subpart 14.301). Once an “Apparent Low Bid” has been selected the bid submission will be examined to ensure that it completely addresses all of the requirements listed in Section L of the IFB. .
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. 1. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This acquisition utilizes the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. The Government will evaluate proposals using the Technical factor.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. Proposals will be evaluated using the factors below, which are listed in descending order of importance. Technical is more important than Past Performance, which is more important than Cost. The Technical and Past Performance factors, when combined, are more important than Cost. However, cost is an important factor and cannot be ignored. As the ratings of proposals in relation to non-cost factors become more equal, cost will become more of a deciding factor in selecting the best-value offer. Evaluation Factors:
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD. The Government reserves the right to incorporate by reference, some, or all of the Offeror’s proposal under this solicitation. Statements in the Offeror’s proposal that exceed the requirements in the Statement of Work will become the new standard for the requirement. No statement within the Offeror’s proposal will grant the awardee relief from the existing requirements.
