GENERAL RECITALS. The parties agree that entering this IDIQ Master Contract (hereinafter “CONTRACT”) is no assurance that Work Assignments will be assigned the CONSULTANT hereunder or that the parties will enter Work Assignments hereunder. If and when Work Assignments are entered, the CONSULTANT shall provide the SERVICES specified in each individual Work Assignment issued under this CONTRACT for the agreed price specified in each Work Assignment. Each Work Assignment, if any, shall become a part of Exhibit 8 hereto and be made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference as if fully copied herein in words and figures. The CONSULTANT shall, for the agreed fees, furnish all services and materials required to fully perform and complete the SERVICES required in the specific Scope of Work for each individual Work Assignment as shown in “Exhibit 8" hereto. Services provided by the CONSULTANT under this CONTRACT shall be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances. In so doing, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all terms of this CONTRACT, including the Work Assignments, and other exhibits, to the satisfaction of the COMMISSION, which shall include any special requirements of the COMMISSION. The COMMISSION, in support of the CONSULTANT, will provide the CONSULTANT a Scope of Work shown in "Exhibit 2" hereto and any other data which may be of assistance to the CONSULTANT and within the possession and control of the COMMISSION. Manuals, guides, standards, and specifications applicable to this CONTRACT shall be those approved and/or adopted by MDOT and/or the COMMISSION and the FHWA and in effect on the effective date of the Work Assignment, unless otherwise specified in the Work Assignment or subsequently directed by MDOT or the COMMISSION during the course of the Work Assignment.
GENERAL RECITALS. The CONSULTANT shall, for the agreed fees, furnish all services and materials required to perform the tasks described in the Scope of Work for the proposed transportation related project. Services provided by the CONSULTANT under this CONTRACT shall be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances. In so doing, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all terms of this CONTRACT, including the Scope of Work and other exhibits, to the satisfaction of the COMMISSION, which shall include any special requirements of the COMMISSION. The CONSULTANT shall perform all SERVICES according to the terms of the CONTRACT, including all technical specifications and according to the prevailing industry standards, including standards of conduct and care, format and content. The COMMISSION, in support of the CONSULTANT, will provide the CONSULTANT a Scope of Work shown in "Exhibit 2" hereto and any other data which may be of assistance to the CONSULTANT and within the possession and control of the COMMISSION. Manuals, guides, standards, and specifications applicable to this CONTRACT shall be those approved and/or adopted by MDOT and/or the COMMISSION and the FHWA and in effect on the effective date of this CONTRACT, unless otherwise specified in this CONTRACT or subsequently directed by MDOT or the COMMISSION during the course of the CONTRACT.
GENERAL RECITALS. CONSULTANT shall, for the agreed fees, furnish all Right of Way (ROW) services and materials required to perform the tasks described in the Scope of Work for the proposed project. In so doing, CONSULTANT shall meet the current industry standards as to general format and content and in addition thereto, any special requirements of the LPA. The LPA, in support of the CONSULTANT, will provide the CONSULTANT a Scope of Work shown in "Exhibit 2" hereto and any other data which may be of assistance to the CONSULTANT and within the possession and control of the LPA. Manuals, guides, and specifications applicable to this CONTRACT shall be those approved and/or adopted by MDOT and in effect on the effective date of this CONTRACT, unless otherwise specified in this CONTRACT or subsequently directed by MDOT during the course of the CONTRACT. When in conflict between the Project Development Manual for LPA (PDM) and this CONTRACT, the PDM will govern.
GENERAL RECITALS. CONSULTANT shall, for the agreed fees, furnish all {Select Engineering or Architectural} services and materials required to perform the tasks described in the Scope of Work for the proposed transportation project. In so doing, CONSULTANT shall meet the current industry standards (and those MDOT and LPA standards specified in Exhibit 2) as to general format and content and in addition thereto, any special requirements of the LPA. THE LPA, in support of CONSULTANT will provide the CONSULTANT a Scope of Work shown in "Exhibit 2" hereto and any other data which may be of assistance to CONSULTANT and within the possession and control of the LPA. Manuals, guides, and specifications applicable to this CONTRACT shall be those approved and/or adopted by MDOT and in effect on the effective date of this CONTRACT, unless otherwise specified in this Contract or subsequently directed by MDOT during the course of the CONTRACT.
GENERAL RECITALS. Declarant is the owner of land (the “Property”) more particularly described on “EXHIBIT A” attached hereto and incorporated for all purposes.
GENERAL RECITALS. The Action is now pending in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Pursuant to agreement and stipulations by the Parties, and orders of the Court, the Action has been stayed for purposes of the Parties’ efforts to resolve this litigation pursuant to the terms of the Parties’ Structured Negotiations Agreement (“SNA”).
GENERAL RECITALS. 3.1. SCE owns a 78.21% share of SONGS. SDG&E owns a 20% share of SONGS. The City of Riverside owns a 1.79% share of SONGS.
3.2. In Decision No. 00-00-000, the Commission approved SCE’s application to replace the steam generators in SONGS Units 2 and 3.
3.3. In Decision No. 00-00-000, the Commission found that SDG&E’s participation in the SGRP was reasonable and approved an unopposed settlement agreement, including SDG&E’s ownership share of the maximum allowable 100%, 2004$, level of the SGRP cost plus SDG&E’s internal costs.
3.4. In January 2010, SCE replaced the steam generators in SONGS Unit 2. In January 2011, SCE replaced the steam generators in SONGS Unit 3.
3.5. The replacement steam generators in Units 2 and 3 were designed and manufactured by Mitsubishi.
3.6. On January 10, 2012, SONGS Xxxx 0 was removed from service for a scheduled refueling and maintenance outage that was expected to end on March 5, 2012.
3.7. On January 31, 2012, SONGS Xxxx 0 was taken offline because station operators at SONGS detected a leak in a steam generator tube.
3.8. In early February, 2012, inspections of Unit 2 steam generators showed accelerated tube wear. This tube wear caused unexpected and extensive property damage to Unit 2’s steam generators
3.9. In February and Xxxxx, 0000, inspections in Unit 3 revealed extensive wear on the Unit’s steam generator tubes. Some of this wear was caused by the steam generator tubes rubbing against each other (“tube-to-tube wear”). This tube-to-tube wear caused unexpected and extensive property damage to Unit 3’s steam generators.
3.10. On March 27, 2012, the NRC issued a Confirmatory Action Letter confirming SCE’s commitment not to restart either Unit 2 or Unit 3 until the source of the tube wear was understood and SCE had confidence that the units could be safely restarted.
3.11. Further inspections of the Unit 2 steam generators revealed more property damage in the form of early indications of tube-to-tube wear. SCE formally notified the NRC of SCE’s finding of tube-to-tube wear in Unit 2 on April 20, 2012.
3.12. On November 1, 2012, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Investigation Regarding San Xxxxxx Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3. (I. 00-00-000.) The Order stated that the Commission intended to examine “the causes of the outages, the utilities’ responses, the future of the SONGS units, and the resulting effects on the provision of safe and reliable electric service at just and reasonable rates.” The Order al...
GENERAL RECITALS. This Agreement is made for the following purposes and with reference to the following
GENERAL RECITALS. 1.1 On April 28, 2022, PG&E filed its Application for Authorization of PG&E’s Customer Service Office (“CSO”) Closure and Transformation Proposal, Application (“A.”) 00-00-000. The Application requested an expedited schedule under Rule 2.9. On the same day, PG&E filed a Motion to Maintain the Status 1 As part of the Application, PG&E submitted a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) signed by The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”), the Public Advocates’ Office (“Cal Advocates”), and Center for Accessible Technology (“CforAT”) in which TURN, Cal Advocates, and CforAT agreed not to oppose the Application under certain conditions. Quo, requesting that PG&E be permitted to keep the CSOs closed until the Commission decided PG&E’s Application.
1.2 NDC timely filed its responses on May 11 and 12, 2022.2
1.3 PG&E timely filed a reply to all filed responses on May 19, 2022.
1.4 Pursuant to Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx’s June 10, 2022 ruling, a prehearing conference was held on June 20, 2022 to determine the parties, discuss the scope, schedule, and other procedural matters.
1.5 On June 23, 2022, ALJ Fortune granted PG&E’s Motion to Maintain the Status Quo, but denied PG&E’s Request for Expedited Schedule Treatment Pursuant to Rule 2.9 (“Request”).
1.6 On July 18, 2022, ALJ Fortune vacated the June 23, 2022 ruling denying PG&E’s Request and granted the Request.
1.7 On August 15, 2022, Assigned Commissioner Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx issued a scoping memo and set forth the issues in the proceedings as:
1.7.1 Whether the Application and Joint Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), among PG&E, TURN, Cal Advocates and CforAT, filed with PG&E’s application satisfy all of the requirements of the Public Utilities Code and all applicable Commission Rules, General Orders, and Decisions? 2 NDC initially filed one response on May 11, 2022 that encompassed its response to both the Application and Motion. At the direction of the CPUC Docket Office, NDC filed two separate responses to the Application and Motion on May 12, 2022. The substance of NDC’s responses remained the same between May 11 and May 12, 2022.
1.7.2 Should all remaining 65 CSOs be permanently closed; and if so, are mitigations necessary to address customer impacts, including small business customers?
1.7.3 Would the closures of the CSOs result in unmitigated impact on the achievement of the Commission’s Environmental and Social Justice Action Plan?
1.7.4 Has PG&E appropriately engaged with underserved communit...
GENERAL RECITALS. The purpose of this Agreement is for Professional to .
