Internal Appeal Process Sample Clauses

Internal Appeal Process. (a) When an employee wishes to have a classification decision further reviewed, the employee, in consultation with the Union should submit a written request to the Employer within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the employee became reasonably aware of the classification decision. The written request should:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Internal Appeal Process. (i) Following confirmation of appeal validity, as noted above, the Employer (Human Resources-Job Evaluation) will conduct a further internal review based on the information provided, which may include discussions with the Employee, the Employee's Manager and/or Director and the Union. The Employer (Human Resources- Job Evaluation) will meet with the Union Representative (Classification) within sixty (60) consecutive calendar days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Named Holidays) following receipt of the appeal to communicate its' decision and discuss the rationale for the decision. The Employee or Management representative may attend this meeting as needed.
Internal Appeal Process a. The Plan maintains an internal appeal process involving one (1) level of review.
Internal Appeal Process. An appeal is a request to review a Notice of Action. You can request this review by phone or in writing. You must follow a request by phone in writing unless it is an expedited appeal. An adverse decision can be when Ambetter from Sunshine Health:  Denies the care requested;  Decreases the amount of care;  Ends care that has previously been approved;  Denies payment for care and you may have to pay for it.
Internal Appeal Process. An appeal is a request to review a Notice of Adverse Benefit Determination (NABD). You can request this review by phone or in writing. You must follow a request by phone in writing unless it is an expedited appeal. An adverse decision can be when Ambetter from Sunshine Health:  Denies the care requested  Decreases the amount of care  Ends care that has previously been approved  Denies payment for care and you may have to pay for it
Internal Appeal Process a. The MCO shall develop written policies and procedures for each component of its internal appeals process. The MCO's policies and procedures must include the elements specified in this contract and must be approved by the DEPARTMENT in writing. The MCO shall not be excused from meeting the requirements for the policies, procedures and pending the DEPARTMENT's written approval of these documents.
Internal Appeal Process. The request to appeal a classification decision shall be in writing, and signed by the Employee. The request to appeal shall list the reasons for disagreeing with the classification allocation decision. The reasons should specifically detail how the job duties fit within the classification the Employee thinks is appropriate and include all additional information that the Employee believes is necessary to evaluate the request. The appeal shall be requested by the Employee, to the Employee’s immediate supervisor, within ten (10) calendar days of the time that the Employee could reasonably have become aware of the Employer’s classification allocation decision. The supervisor shall forward the appeal to a Classification and Compensation Department within ten (10) calendar days. The decision of the Employer from the Classification and Compensation Department regarding the classification appeal shall be made known to the Employee within twenty-one (21) calendar days of receipt of the written appeal.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Internal Appeal Process. (i) Following confirmation of appeal validity, as noted above, the Employer (Human Resources-Job Evaluation) will conduct a further review of the position which may include discussions with the Employee, the Employee's Manager and/or Director and the Union. Following the review, the Employer (Human Resources-Job Evaluation) will provide notification of the classification decision in writing and include a detailed rationale for the decision specifically addressing the reason(s) identified in the appeal request. The response will be provided within sixty (60) consecutive calendar days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Named Holidays) following receipt of the appeal.

Related to Internal Appeal Process

  • Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

  • Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

  • Reply Procedures In connection with any Auction, each Lender holding the relevant Term Loans subject to such Auction may, in its sole discretion, participate in such Auction and may provide the Auction Agent with a notice of participation (the “Return Bid”) which shall be in a form reasonably acceptable to the Auction Agent, and shall specify (i) a discount to par (that must be expressed as a price at which it is willing to sell all or any portion of such Term Loans) (the “Reply Price”), which (when expressed as a percentage of the par principal amount of such Term Loans) must be within the Discount Range and (ii) a principal amount of such Term Loans, which must be in whole increments of $1,000,000 (or, in any case, such lesser amount of such Term Loans of such Lender then outstanding or which is otherwise reasonably acceptable to the Auction Agent) (the “Reply Amount”). Lenders may only submit one Return Bid per Auction, but each Return Bid may contain up to three bids only one of which may result in a Qualifying Bid. In addition to the Return Bid, the participating Lender must execute and deliver, to be held in escrow by the Auction Agent, an Assignment and Assumption with the dollar amount of the Term Loans to be assigned to be left in blank, which amount shall be completed by the Auction Agent in accordance with the final determination of such Lender’s Qualifying Bid pursuant to clause (c) below. Any Lender whose Return Bid is not received by the Auction Agent by the Auction Response Date shall be deemed to have declined to participate in the relevant Auction with respect to all of its Term Loans.

  • Accounting Controls The Company and its Subsidiaries maintain systems of “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act Regulations) that comply with the requirements of the Exchange Act and have been designed by, or under the supervision of, their respective principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including, but not limited to, internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any material weaknesses in its internal controls. The Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company have been advised of: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are known to the Company’s management and that have adversely affected or are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (ii) any fraud known to the Company’s management, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!