SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW Sample Clauses

SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. 1 Section 01 33 00: Submittal Procedures. .2 Shop Drawings: Indicate profiles, sizes, connection attachments, reinforcing, anchorage, size and type of fasteners, and accessories. Include erection drawings, elevations, and details where applicable. .3 Indicate welded connections using standard AWS A2.0 welding symbols. Indicate net weld lengths.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. A. When the following are specified in individual sections, submit them for review:‌ 1. Product data. 2. Shop drawings.
Sample 1
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. A. Resumes of key tunnelling staff as specified. Submit resume’s of the Tunnel Design Manager prior to start of Tunnel Design and that of tunnel construction staff (TBM superintendent, TBM operators and hyperbaric consultant) at least 60 days prior to start of Bored Tunnel construction. B. Resumes of safety supervisor and safety representative at least 60 days prior to start of construction. C. At least 60 days before commencing Bored Tunnel excavation, submit or resubmit the following: 1. Detailed working drawings of excavation sequence, a schedule of operations and methods of construction, including sequence and methods for mobilizing TBM to assembly area, launching TBM, partial or complete disassembly and re-launching TBM for second Bored Tunnel drive. Include a description of any ground treatment carried out at the portals to enable launch and reception of the TBM. 2. For the precast segment lining, details of maintaining circularity and stability of the initial start-up rings, confining the backfill grout and ring build measures to be taken while the TBM advances sufficiently to reach normal production mode. Ring build measures shall meet the tolerances described herein. 3. A Tunnel Safety Plan that meets all Federal and Provincial regulations. Include the following as a minimum: a.) A description of all safety personnel, the chain of responsibility, and the procedure for correcting safety deficients. b.) A description of all training provided to workers including initial training, tool box meetings, and special work safety meetings. c.) A description of emergency procedures including egress of workers during fire and smoke incidents. d.) Detailed descriptions including drawings and method statements of the health and safety equipment installations including those required for air quality monitoring, fire protection, gas detection, procedures for calibration and operation and certifications from manufacturers that equipment meets applicable regulatory requirements. e.) A detailed hyperbaric safety plan prepared by the Primary Contractor’s hyperbaric consultant, if required, to include the following; a. Part 1: Requirements for compressed air work below 3.5 bar. b. Part 2: Requirements for compressed air work above 3.5 bar. Part 2 to be used to obtain a variance from WorkSafeBC in accordance with CAN/CSA-Z275.3-09. Be responsible for obtaining a temporary variance to CAN/CSA-Z275.3-09 for workers exposed to compressed air pressures in excess of 3.5 bar...
Sample 1
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. A. While tunnel excavation is in progress, submit to the Province’s Representative a daily record showing line and grade of centerline of tunnel at the invert relative to the theoretical alignment. The record shall be based on records from the TBM guidance system, supported by as-built survey described herein. B. Submit weekly the results of as-built line and grade survey results. Also submit tunnel cross sections showing the actual tunnel lining cross-sections compared to the theoretical cross-sections. Submit cross sections only after deformation of the ring has stabilized. The as built cross section shall comply with the construction tolerances. C. Submit the line and grade TBM guidance system information, both in hard copy and in electronic form. The hard copy shall show the current data, while the electronic file shall contain both the current and historic data. The initial submittal shall also detail the Primary Contractor’s complete procedures on the operation of the guidance system, frequency of setups on tangents and in curves, bringing the line and grade into the tunnel and independent verification measures to check the accuracy of the surveys. D. Within 60 days of completion of excavation of each Bored Tunnel, provide a complete record in electronic form, in tabular form and drawing form, the as-built survey data. Data must be presented in the form of station, offset from the baseline track (as stated in the contract documents, or design centerline for untracked structures) and elevation, and include cross section diagrams that show the variance of the as-built from design with values of maximum differentials indicated. Data points and a best-fit surface shall be shown with any anomalies explained. Survey data, including graphical cross sections, shall be presented at regular intervals not to exceed every fifth ring; also at each side of abrupt changes in cross section and at other points. Contour-type diagrams shall be produced as developed plans/sections for the entire surface of each Bored Tunnel indicating deviation from the design (showing extra clearance as positive). E. Final As-Built Tunnel Survey of Precast Concrete Segment Liner: 1. A tunnel survey shall be conducted upon completion of the precast concrete tunnel lining installation and prior to any subsequent concreting work, to verify final as-built line, level, grade and internal clearances. 2. Fix permanent reference points in the crown of the tunnel at maximum intervals of 60m on ...
Sample 1
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM): Detailed description of the proposed TBM to be used including preliminary drawings and plans within 90 calendar days of the Effective Date to include. o General arrangement drawings from TBM manufacturer showing details of TBM and backup equipment layout including detailed scale drawings with sufficient vertical and horizontal sections at tunnel axis and cross sections to clearly identify the different components of the TBM. Show the following features of the TBM:  Complete technical description and detailed general arrangement drawings of TBM and backup equipment, including cutters and cutterhead, conditioning system, thrust, articulation, and steering systems, drive system, muck system, main bearing and tail seals, guidance system, probe hole drilling system, segmental lining grouting system, gas monitoring system, fire suppression system, schematic electrical system, ventilation system, segment erector and the interface of TBM with the segmental lining system elements, muck transport system. o Details of the tunnel spoil transport system and slurry treatment facility if applicable. o Provide detailed narrative supported with sketches demonstrating the suitability of the TBM and backup for tunneling in the ground conditions as determined by the Primary Contractor. o Provide a narrative description of how the working chamber is ventilated during manual intervention. o A complete technical description of the proposed TBM and all necessary backup equipment and systems for this project. Detail in submittal shall be sufficient to demonstrate that all aspects of the specification requirements are met. The proposed TBM manufacturer shall certify in writing that TBM and backup equipment and systems meet the requirements of the Project Agreement.  Provide written certification from TBM manufacturer of full and complete design coordination between TBM manufacturer and liner manufacturer. Include a written certification by both manufacturers affirming the compatibility of total TBM system and back-up equipment with lining, segment erector and backfill grout injection system.
Sample 1
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. At least 60 days before commencing Tunnel construction, submit the following:
Sample 1
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. Xxxxxxx, maintain, and provide on a daily basis, daily records including the following performance records for each shift of grouting, and for each type of grouting (backfill, pre- excavation and contact):
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. Submit qualifications for independent testing agency and personnel as indicated at least 30 days before commencing shotcrete application.
Sample 1
SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW. A. When the following are specified in individual sections, submit them for review: 1. Product data. 2. Shop drawings. 3. Samples for selection. 4. Samples for verification. B. Submit to Architect for review for the limited purpose of checking for compliance with information given and the design concept expressed in Contract Documents. 1. Prepare clearly identified shop drawings or schedules to this specific project, containing only data applicable. Include with the shop drawings or schedules a letter of transmittal listing and dating the submitted drawings in sets. 2. Contractor to review all submittals prior to submittal to Architect, and indicate such review with a stamp and signature. Review submittals for conformance to Drawings, Specifications, coordination with other trades and adjacent construction and verification of field dimensions. Failure of Contractor to adequately review submittals shall be cause for rejection. 3. Prepare and submit electronically (with exception for color charts and samples) to Architect for review, all shop drawings and manufacturers catalog sheets showing illustrated cuts of items to be furnished, scale details, sizes, dimensions, performance characteristics, capacities, wiring diagrams, weights and arrangements. Each submittal to include a transmittal on contractor letterhead. Submittal to be in the form of one combined PDF, labeled with project name, professionally assembled so all documents are facing the same way. C. If equipment other than that used in the design of this project is proposed to be used, the Contractor and/or supplier shall verify electrical differences, dimension variations and weight increases. The Contractor shall be responsible for any extra costs incurred as a result of equipment substitutions. D. Samples will be reviewed for aesthetic, color, or finish selection. 1. Unless otherwise specified, submit samples of size, and nature representing typical qualities. Where required, submit a sufficient number of samples to demonstrate the complete range of variations of the material or quality. Written acceptance of the Architect is required prior to ordering any item for which samples are required. E. After review, provide copies and distribute in accordance with SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES article below and for record documents purposes described in Section 01 78 00 - Closeout Submittals.
Sample 1

Related to SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria: (1) you should have firsthand experience with the person/entity being reviewed; (2) your reviews should not contain offensive profanity, or abusive, racist, offensive, or hate language; (3) your reviews should not contain discriminatory references based on religion, race, gender, national origin, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or disability; (4) your reviews should not contain references to illegal activity; (5) you should not be affiliated with competitors if posting negative reviews; (6) you should not make any conclusions as to the legality of conduct; (7) you may not post any false or misleading statements; and (8) you may not organize a campaign encouraging others to post reviews, whether positive or negative. We may accept, reject, or remove reviews in our sole discretion. We have absolutely no obligation to screen reviews or to delete reviews, even if anyone considers reviews objectionable or inaccurate. Reviews are not endorsed by us, and do not necessarily represent our opinions or the views of any of our affiliates or partners. We do not assume liability for any review or for any claims, liabilities, or losses resulting from any review. By posting a review, you hereby grant to us a perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, fully-paid, assignable, and sublicensable right and license to reproduce, modify, translate, transmit by any means, display, perform, and/or distribute all content relating to reviews.

  • Request for Review Within sixty (60) days after receiving notice from the Plan Administrator that a claim has been denied (in part or all of the claim), then claimant (or their duly authorized representative) may file with the Plan Administrator, a written request for a review of the denial of the claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) shall then have the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the claimant’s claim for benefits.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Submittals Submittals required by the Contract Documents shall be prepared specifically for the Work by the Contractor to illustrate some portion of the Work. Submittals are not Contract Documents.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Motions for Directions (1) Class Counsel or the Settling Defendants may apply to the Ontario Court and/or such other courts as may be required by the Courts for directions in respect of the interpretation, implementation and administration of this Settlement Agreement. Unless the Courts order otherwise, motions for directions that do not relate specifically to the matters affecting the Quebec Action shall be determined by the Ontario Court. (2) All motions contemplated by this Settlement Agreement shall be on notice to the Parties.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!