Summary of the Proposed Project Sample Clauses

Summary of the Proposed Project. As certificated, the Ocean Express Pipeline Project would consist of a new 24-inch-diameter interstate natural gas pipeline, and certain ancillary facilities, that would extend approximately 54.5 miles from a receipt point on the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) boundary between the United States and the Bahamas to two delivery points in Broward County, Florida, one at an interconnection with the existing Florida Gas Transmission System (FGT) pipeline at the Florida Power and Light (FPL) Fort Lauderdale Power Plant, and the other at an interconnection with the FPL gas line that serves the FPL Fort Lauderdale plant. Ocean Express’s proposed modifications reflect the incorporation of tunnel construction schedule. Ocean Express explains that the use of the tunnel construction methodology would allow it to construct the nearshore portion the pipeline using an approximately 14,000-foot-long tunnel, with certain minor route changes to accommodate the methodology, as opposed to the horizontal directional drills (HDDs) that the Commission has already approved. Ocean Express also proposes to increase the pipeline diameter from 24 inches to 26 inches and internally coat the pipeline, to allow for increased hourly flow rates, but does not propose to increase the certificated capacity (842,000 dekatherms/day) of its pipeline. Additionally, Ocean Express proposes to install a pressure reducing station inside the tunnel to reduce the onshore Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (MAOP) to 1,480 pounds per square inch gauge (psig) or less, from the certificated MAOP of 2,200 psig. An aboveground tunnel shaft/access building and gas vent would also be installed at the Dania Beach Boulevard Traffic Circle.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of the Proposed Project. The proposed project would allow DOMAC to supply 280,000 million British thermal units per day of regasified LNG to an electric power generating plant. Specifically, DOMAC requests Commission authorization to: • Install four submerged combustion vaporization units capable of 600,000 thousand cubic feet per day; • Replace the existing LNG tank pumps with higher capacity pumps; • Install eight LNG booster pumps; • Modify the LNG impoundment and vapor control systems; and • Install various cross-connections, tie-ins, pollution control systems, and odorization equipment. In addition to the above jurisdictional facilities, Sithe Mystic Development LLC is constructing the New Mystic Station, a 1,550 megawatt natural gas- fired, combined-cycle electric generating power plant at Everett, Massachusetts. The New Mystic Station, approved by the Massachusetts Energy the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern. The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the construction and operation of the proposed project under these general headings: • Geology and soils • Vegetation and wildlife • Public safety • Cultural resources • Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands • Endangered and threatened species • Land use • Air quality and noise impacts We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project or Facilities Siting Board on September 30, 1999, is currently under construction portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen or DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP00–447–000] Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed High Pressure Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues October 4, 2000. The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will discuss the environmental impacts of the High Pressure Expansion Project involving construction and operation of facilities by Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC (DOMAC) at its existing liquefied ...
Sample 1
Summary of the Proposed Project. Columbia Gulf wants to replace an aging compressor package at its existing Xxxxxxx Compressor Station. Columbia Gulf seeks authority for the following activities: • Abandon by removal one 12,050- horsepower (hp) gas-powered turbine compressor and driver, the related compressor and control buildings, and associated piping and valves; • Construct and operate a new 14,470-hp gas turbine compressor package within a new prefabricated building; • Construct a second prefabricated building to house compressor control and communication equipment; and
Sample 1
Summary of the Proposed Project. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) proposes to amend its Market Expansion Project authorized in a Commission Order dated May 14, 1997 (Order). Columbia states that due to a more detailed facility design analysis, it has determined that certain compression facilities approved in the Order are no longer required and certain other facilities not approved in the Order will be needed. The effect of the proposed facility revisions would be to decrease the overall cost of the Market Expansion Project facilities by about $3,280,700. The new facilities that Columbia proposes to construct and the facilities its proposes to delete from the Market Expansion Project (facilities approved but not yet constructed) are listed below: New Proposed Facilities (Louisa County, Virginia) • Line VM–105 Loop—construct 0.3 mile of 20-inch-diameter loop on the suction side of the Boswells Tavern compressor Station; • Line VM–106 Replacement— replace 0.6 mile of 12-inch-diameter pipeline with 24-inch-diameter pipeline on the discharge side of the Boswells Tavern Compressor Station; • Upgrade a meter station within the Boswells Tavern Compressor Station; and • Line VM–109—construct 6.0 miles of 24-inch-diameter pipeline loop from its mainline valve 3 to its Louisa Compressor Station.
Sample 1
Summary of the Proposed Project. CIG proposes to construct, operate, and abandon facilities in Colorado and Kansas to increase the maximum daily storage withdrawal quantity and increase capacity on its transmission system. CIG seeks authority to: • Drill one injection well/withdrawal well and convert one observation well to a salt water disposal well at the Fort Xxxxxx Storage Field and upgrade two segments of the Fort Xxxxxx Storage Field gathering system from an MAOP of 1,800 and 2,000 to an MAOP of 2,160 psig; • Increase Fort Xxxxxx Storage Field allowed maximum storage gas in place from 14,322 MMcf to 14,858 MMcf, and increase the average shut-in reservoir bottom hole pressure to a maximum of 2,390 psia; • Add 4 injection/withdrawal xxxxx and convert 8 injection/withdrawal xxxxx to observation xxxxx at the Xxxxx Storage Field; • Install a 600 horsepower compressor along with hydrogen sulfide treatment and appurtenant facilities at the Xxxxx Storage Field to remove Xxxxx Xxxxx Reservoir base gas. The compressor would be used until the pressure in the Xxxxx Sand Reservoir is too low to be effectively utilized. CIG would then abandon the compressor and the Xxxxx Xxxxx Reservoir; • Construct 26.2 miles of 24-inch- diameter pipeline loop adjacent to CIG’s existing pipeline which would run between CIG’s existing Cheyenne Compressor Station and Ault Meter Station in Weld County, Colorado; • Construct new Fort Xxxxxx Compressor Station consisting of three natural gas-fired reciprocating engines each rated at 2,225 horsepower and appurtenant facilities in Weld County, Colorado; • Construct 27 miles of 24-inch- diameter pipeline loop and appurtenant facilities from CIG’s proposed Fort Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 228 / Monday, November 27, 2000 / Notices 70709 Xxxxxx Compressor Station in Weld County, Colorado to CIG’s existing Xxxxxxx Compressor Station in Xxxxx County, Colorado; and • Install miscellaneous facilities within the Xxxxxxx Compressor Station that include yard piping, pipe valves, fittings, controls and regulation and measurement equipment. CIG states that these facilities would increase its storage pool deliverability from 775 MMcf to 877 MMcf per day and increase capacity from the Cheyenne Compressor Station. The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 1.
Sample 1
Summary of the Proposed Project. Maritimes wants to extend its mainline system from a point near Methuen, Massachusetts, to an interconnection with Algonquin’s proposed HubLine facilities in Beverly, Massachusetts. Maritimes’ proposed Phase III facilities would have an initial capacity to deliver approximately 360,000 million British thermal units per day of natural gas. Algonquin wants to interconnect with the proposed Maritimes system in Beverly, Massachusetts, by constructing the proposed HubLine facilities from Beverly to an interconnect with its existing I–9 pipeline system at the Sithe Fore River Power Plant in Weymouth, Massachusetts. Maritimes seeks authority to construct and operate: • Approximately 23.8 miles of 30- inch-daimeter pipeline and 1.0 mile of 24-inch-diameter pipeline; and • Appurtenant facilities to include three mainline valves, one tap valve, two cathodic protection ground beds, and two meter stations. Algonquin seeks authority to construct and operate: • Approximately 29.4 miles of 24- inch-diameter offshore mainline pipeline;
Sample 1
Summary of the Proposed Project. Xxxxxxxx wants to expand the capacity of its facilities in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri to transport an additional 55,000 decatherms per day of natural gas to Empire District Electric Company’s (Empire) State Line Plant. (This would result in a total of 83,800 decatherms per day of natural gas to the State Line Plant.) Xxxxxxxx seeks authority to: • Reclaim three mainline valves and two mainline drips, replace fine mainline valves and one mainline drip, replace 11 road crossings, and install a 16-inch-diameter pig launcher and appurtenant piping along the existing 16-inch-diameter, 85-mile-long Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Valley pipeline in Xxx, Osage, and Washington Counties, Oklahoma; • Upgrade 14 domestic meters, which would include upgrading/replacing regulators and valves as needed, along with Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Valley pipeline in Xxx, Osage, and Washington Counties, Oklahoma; • Increase the maximum allowable pressure along the Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx Valley pipeline from 500 psig to 690 2 The appendices referenced in this notice are not being printed in the Federal Register . Copies are available from the Commission’s Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, XX., Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000, or call (202) 208–1371. Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this notice in the mail. psig in Xxx, Osage, and Washington Counties, Oklahoma; • Extend the existing 20-inch- diameter Southern Trunk Loop an additional 36.8 miles in Labette and Cherokee Counties, Kansas; • Relocate the existing 20-inch- diameter pig receiver to the end of the 36.8-mile Southern Trunk Loop and install two mainline valves in Cherokee County, Kansas; • Install a dual 6-inch regulator setting, a dual 8-inch turbine meter setting, an 8-inch flow control setting, and about 450 feet of 16-inch-diameter pipeline at a new location within the existing Empire property area in Jasper County, Missouri; and • Install a 4-inch flow control setting at Empire’s existing site in Jasper County, Missouri. The general location of the project facilities as well as a detailed version of the Southern Trunk Loop are shown in appendix 2.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Summary of the Proposed Project

  • Scope of the Project Under this Agreement, the scope of the Project (the “Scope of the Project”) shall mean and include:

  • Drawings and Specifications at the Project Site The Contractor shall keep at the Site at least one copy of the Contract Documents and Change Orders, all in good order and available to the Design Professional and to his representatives.

  • Development of the Project 4.1 TSP's obligations in development of the Project: Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the TSP at its own cost and expense shall observe, comply with, perform, undertake and be responsible:

  • PROJECT 3.01. The Recipient declares its commitment to the objectives of the Project. To this end, the Recipient shall carry out the Project in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the General Conditions.

  • Development of the Property Except as modified by this Agreement, the Development and the Property will be developed in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations, including but not limited to the City’s ordinances and the zoning regulations applicable to the Property, and such amendments to City ordinances and regulations that that may be applied to the Development and the Property under Chapter 245, Texas Local Government Code, and good engineering practices (the “Applicable Regulations”). If there is a conflict between the Applicable Regulations and the Development Standards, the Development Standards shall control.

  • Project Summary The main objective of the LIFE GAIA Sense project is to demonstrate Gaiasense, an innovative “Smart Farming” (SF) solution that aims at reducing the consumption of natural resources, as a way to protect the environment and support Circular Economy (CE) models. More specifically, this project will launch 18 demonstrators across Greece, Spain and Portugal covering 9 crops (olives, peaches, cotton, pistachio, potatoes, table tomatoes, industrial tomatoes, grapes, kiwi) in various terrain and microclimatic conditions. They will demonstrate an innovative method, based on high-end technology, which is suitable for being replicated and will be accessible and affordable to Farmers either as individuals or collectively through Agricultural Cooperatives. Moreover, LIFE GAIA Sense aims to promote resource efficiency practices in SMEs of the agricultural sector and eventually, contribute to the implementation of the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. This project will demonstrate a method on how the farmer will be able to decide either to use or avoid inputs (irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides etc.) in a most efficient way, without risking the annual production. The focus is on the resource consumption reduction side of CE, and the results will be both qualitatively and quantitatively, considering the resources’ efficiency in agricultural sector.

  • Construction Development of the Project The Allottee has seen the proposed layout plan/demarcation-cum-zoning/sanctioned plans, / site plan / building plan, specifications, amenities and facilities, etc. depicted in the advertisement / brochure / agreement / website (as the case may be) regarding the Project where the Said Independent Floor for residential usage along with parking is located and has accepted the floor / site plan, Payment Plan and the specifications, amenities, facilities, etc. [annexed along with this Agreement] which has been approved by the competent authority, as represented by the Promoter. The Promoter shall develop the Project in accordance with the bye-laws such as Haryana Building Code, 2017, FAR, density norms, provisions prescribed, approved plans, terms and condition of the license/ allotment as well as registration of RERA, etc. Subject to the terms in this Agreement, the Promoter undertakes to strictly abide by such plans approved by the competent authorities and shall also strictly abide by the provisions and norms prescribed by the relevant State laws and shall not have an option to make any variation/ alteration/ modification in such plans, other than in the manner provided under the Act and Rules made thereunder or as per approvals/instructions/ guidelines of the competent authorities, and any breach of this term by the Promoter shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement.

  • of the Project III. 2 – Performance obligations

  • Project Completion Part 1 – Material Completion

  • Changes to the Project 9.1 All Changes must be approved by the Secretary of State prior to the relevant Change being deemed to be effective. The Grant Recipient shall request the Change on a Project Change Request Form. The Secretary of State shall either agree to the change request or reject the change request within 60 days of the date of the Project Change Request Form.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.