Work Verification Sample Clauses

Work Verification. ‌ Consistent with New York State’s approved Work Verification Plan (WVP), and in accordance with the requirements established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, districts must develop a quality assurance plan to ensure that the data reported, from which their work participation rates are derived, are accurate. The plan must include the district’s procedure for monitoring reported scheduled and actual attendance in paid employment and unpaid work activities and the controls in place to ensure that reported exemption statuses resulting in federal exclusions from the work participation rate calculation are accurately made, work eligible individuals are correctly identified, hours of attendance reported are accurate and documented, data entry is accurate and that the district and its providers adhere to the approved work activity definitions and the determination of countable excused absences and holiday reporting within federal limits. Each district must maintain the documentation to verify what is being reported to NYS OTDA. Each district must describe how it will conduct periodic self audits to determine that system entries are consistent with documentation in case files. The district must also explain how it will choose the sample size, select sample cases and establish the review period (no less frequently than semi-annually). The plan must indicate the district will maintain documentation on all pertinent findings produced through its self audit process and that case records for all reviewed cases will be available for State and other auditors in their review of the local work verification system for the standard 6 year period associated with such reviews. The district will sample cases from each month within the (6 month) semi-annual period. The October to March review will be due by May 20th. The April to September review will be due by November 20th. The results of these audits will enable the district to identify policies, processes or cases that may need corrective action. After each self audit is completed, the district must submit a summary of findings to OTDA A&QI at XXX.XX.XxxxXxxxxx@xxxx.xx.xxx for State review including specific information on each of the errors identified. In addition, when monitoring reveals substantial problems, the district must describe the corrective action it will take. The Quality Assurance (QA) plan must include the following elements:‌ • Ensure that documentation of wages and actual hours o...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (89)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Work Verification. Con Xxxxxx or an authorized entity on behalf of Con Edison may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by Con Xxxxxx’s programs, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, as referred to by the Program Manual and also as Con Edison may notice to the Participating Contractor, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as Con Xxxxxx may notice to the Participating Contractor, Con Xxxxxx will also conduct certain additional inspections and “Evaluations, Measurement and Verification” (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by Con Xxxxxx or any other entity authorized on behalf of Con Xxxxxx determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then Con Edison may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by Con Xxxxxx.
Sample 1
Work Verification. Strategies/Procedures for Accommodating Individuals with Limited English Proficiency Section 3.9 Strategies/Procedures for Increasing Program Attendance Section 3.10 Strategies/Procedures for Engaging Sanctioned Temporary Assistance Participants Section 4 Support Services (Reference 18 NYCRR 385.4) Section 4.1 TA and Non-TA SNAP Applicants and Recipients in Work Activities Approved by the District Section 4.2 Transitional Support Services Section 4.3 Extended Support Services (Reference 18 NYCRR 385.11 and 385.12)
Sample 1
Work Verification. The Utilities or an authorized entity on behalf of a Utility may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by the Program, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as the Utilities may notice to the Participating Contractor, the Utilities will also conduct certain additional inspections and Evaluations, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by the Utilities or any other entity authorized on behalf of a Utility determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then the Utilities may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by the Utilities.
Sample 1
Work Verification. When scheduled for work, the Contractor’s personnel shall check in at the Contractor's offices at each facility. The Contractor shall present daily work orders or schedule with a brief description of the work to be performed to its employees. At that time, additional instructions, if any, shall be provided. When the work is completed the Contractor shall report to the Facility Manager in order to verify completion of work.
Sample 1
Work Verification. ‌ A. Whenever the cost of any Work is to be determined pursuant to Paragraph 12.4.A and 12.4.B, CONTRACTOR will submit in a form acceptable to CITY REP, daily work sheets showing an itemized labor, material and equipment cost breakdown together with supporting data. No payment will be made for Work not verified by CITY REP. B. Whenever it is necessary to determine the Cost of the Work because CITY and CONTRACTOR do not agree on an appropriate price for a change in the Work, CITY will incur additional costs to document the time, materials and equipment performed or used at the Site for such Work. CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY for all such additional costs to CITY in the event such documenting of time, materials and equipment charges result in a price equal to or less than the amount offered by CITY to CONTRACTOR for such work. CITY’S additional costs will include but not be limited to the cost to CITY for additional time of CITY REP and/or assistants to document CONTRACTOR’S time and materials.
Sample 1

Related to Work Verification

  • E-Verification The Vendor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Vendor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Vendor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Vendor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Vendor to the following: termination of this contract for goods or services and ineligibility for any state or public contract in Mississippi for up to three (3) years with notice of such cancellation/termination being made public; the loss of any license, permit, certification, or other document granted to Vendor by an agency, department or governmental entity for the right to do business in Mississippi for up to one (1) year; or,

  • Third Party Verification 4.8.1 The SPD shall be further required to provide entry to the site of the Power Project free of all encumbrances at all times during the Term of the Agreement to SECI and a third Party nominated by any Indian Governmental Instrumentality for inspection and verification of the works being carried out by the SPD at the site of the Power Project. 4.8.2 The third party may verify the construction works/operation of the Power Project being carried out by the SPD and if it is found that the construction works/operation of the Power Project is not as per the Prudent Utility Practices, it may seek clarifications from SPD or require the works to be stopped or to comply with the instructions of such third party.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • Employee Verification In accordance with Neb. Rev.

  • Account Verification Whether or not a Default or Event of Default exists, Agent shall have the right at any time, in the name of Agent, any designee of Agent or any Borrower, to verify the validity, amount or any other matter relating to any Accounts of Borrowers by mail, telephone or otherwise. Borrowers shall cooperate fully with Agent in an effort to facilitate and promptly conclude any such verification process.

  • Identity Verification In the case that the Subscriber provides telecommunication services to any Subscriber’s Customers pursuant to Section 8.1, the Subscriber is responsible for performing and shall perform personal identification of Subscriber’s Customer. SORACOM shall not bear any responsibility in relation to dealing with such matters.

  • Inspection and Verification The Secured Parties and such persons as the Secured Parties may reasonably designate shall have the right to inspect the Collateral, all records related thereto (and to make extracts and copies from such records) and the premises upon which any of the Collateral is located, to discuss the Grantor’s affairs with the officers of the Grantor and its independent accountants and to verify under reasonable procedures the validity, amount, quality, quantity, value, condition and status of, or any other matter relating to, the Collateral, including, in the case of collateral in the possession of any third Person, by contacting any account debtor or third Person possessing such Collateral for the purpose of making such a verification. Out-of-pocket expenses in connection with any inspections by representatives of the Secured Parties shall be (a) the obligations of the Grantor with respect to any inspection after the Secured Parties’ demand payment of the Notes or (b) the obligation of the Secured Parties in any other case.

  • Seniority Verification Process i. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee achieves continuing contract status. ii. The employee must initiate the seniority verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of receiving a continuing appointment in the new school district. iii. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the seniority credits which the employee seeks to port.

  • Sick Leave Verification Process a. The new school district shall provide the employee with the necessary verification form at the time the employee receives confirmation of employment in the school district. b. An employee must initiate the sick leave verification process and forward the necessary verification forms to the previous school district(s) within ninety (90) days of commencing employment with the new school district. c. The previous school district(s) shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve and verify the sick leave credits which the employee seeks to port.

  • Eligibility Verification (a) HHSC will verify Medicaid eligibility for Dual Eligible Members by the fifth business day of the month following the receipt of the MA Dual SNP’s monthly enrollment file, in accordance with Section 3.02(b). (b) To verify Medicaid eligibility of an individual Member, HHSC agrees to provide the MA Dual SNP with real-time access to HHSC’s claims administrator’s Medicaid eligibility verification system.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!