Work Verification Sample Clauses

Work Verification. ‌ Consistent with New York State’s approved Work Verification Plan (WVP), and in accordance with the requirements established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, districts must develop a quality assurance plan to ensure that the data reported, from which their work participation rates are derived, are accurate. The plan must include the district’s procedure for monitoring reported scheduled and actual attendance in paid employment and unpaid work activities and the controls in place to ensure that reported exemption statuses resulting in federal exclusions from the work participation rate calculation are accurately made, work eligible individuals are correctly identified, hours of attendance reported are accurate and documented, data entry is accurate and that the district and its providers adhere to the approved work activity definitions and the determination of countable excused absences and holiday reporting within federal limits. Each district must maintain the documentation to verify what is being reported to NYS OTDA. Each district must describe how it will conduct periodic self audits to determine that system entries are consistent with documentation in case files. The district must also explain how it will choose the sample size, select sample cases and establish the review period (no less frequently than semi-annually). The plan must indicate the district will maintain documentation on all pertinent findings produced through its self audit process and that case records for all reviewed cases will be available for State and other auditors in their review of the local work verification system for the standard 6 year period associated with such reviews. The district will sample cases from each month within the (6 month) semi-annual period. The October to March review will be due by May 20th. The April to September review will be due by November 20th. The results of these audits will enable the district to identify policies, processes or cases that may need corrective action. After each self audit is completed, the district must submit a summary of findings to OTDA A&QI at XXX.XX.XxxxXxxxxx@xxxx.xx.xxx for State review including specific information on each of the errors identified. In addition, when monitoring reveals substantial problems, the district must describe the corrective action it will take. The Quality Assurance (QA) plan must include the following elements:‌ • Ensure that documentation of wages and actual hours o...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (89)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Work Verification. Con Edison or an authorized entity on behalf of Con Edison may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by Con Edison’s programs, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, as referred to by the Program Manual and also as Con Edison may notice to the Participating Contractor, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as Con Edison may notice to the Participating Contractor, Con Edison will also conduct certain additional inspections and “Evaluations, Measurement and Verification” (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by Con Edison or any other entity authorized on behalf of Con Edison determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then Con Edison may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by Con Edison.
Sample 1Sample 2
Work Verification. Section 3.8 Strategies/Procedures for Accommodating Individuals with Limited English Proficiency Section 3.9 Strategies/Procedures for Increasing Program Attendance Section 3.10 Strategies/Procedures for Engaging Sanctioned Temporary Assistance Participants Section 4 Support Services (Reference 18 NYCRR 385.4) Section 4.1 TA and Non-TA SNAP Applicants and Recipients in Work Activities Approved by the District Section 4.2 Transitional Support Services Section 4.3 Extended Support Services Section 5 Conciliation, Sanction and Dispute Resolution Procedures (Reference 18 NYCRR 385.11 and 385.12)
Sample 1
Work Verification. When scheduled for work, the Contractor’s personnel shall check in at the Contractor's offices at each facility. The Contractor shall present daily work orders or schedule with a brief description of the work to be performed to its employees. At that time, additional instructions, if any, shall be provided. When the work is completed the Contractor shall report to the Facility Manager in order to verify completion of work.
Sample 1
Work Verification. The Utilities or an authorized entity on behalf of a Utility may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by the Program, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as the Utilities may notice to the Participating Contractor, the Utilities will also conduct certain additional inspections and Evaluations, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by the Utilities or any other entity authorized on behalf of a Utility determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then the Utilities may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by the Utilities.
Sample 1

Related to Work Verification

  • E-Verification If applicable, Contractor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§ 71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Contractor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Contractor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Contractor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Contractor to the following:

  • Third Party Verification 4.8.1 The SPD shall be further required to provide entry to the site of the Power Project free of all encumbrances at all times during the Term of the Agreement to SECI and a third Party nominated by any Indian Governmental Instrumentality for inspection and verification of the works being carried out by the SPD at the site of the Power Project.

  • Account Verification Whether or not a Default or Event of Default exists, Agent shall have the right at any time, in the name of Agent, any designee of Agent or any Borrower, to verify the validity, amount or any other matter relating to any Accounts of Borrowers by mail, telephone or otherwise. Borrowers shall cooperate fully with Agent in an effort to facilitate and promptly conclude any such verification process.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.