Work Verification Sample Clauses
The Work Verification clause establishes a process for confirming that the work performed under a contract meets the agreed-upon standards or specifications. Typically, this involves inspections, reviews, or approvals by the client or a designated representative before payment is released or the work is accepted. By requiring formal verification, the clause ensures that deliverables are satisfactory and helps prevent disputes over quality or completeness of the work.
Work Verification. Consistent with New York State’s approved Work Verification Plan (WVP), and in accordance with the requirements established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, districts must develop a quality assurance plan to ensure that the data reported, from which their work participation rates are derived, are accurate. The plan must include the district’s procedure for monitoring reported scheduled and actual attendance in paid employment and unpaid work activities and the controls in place to ensure that reported exemption statuses resulting in federal exclusions from the work participation rate calculation are accurately made, work eligible individuals are correctly identified, hours of attendance reported are accurate and documented, data entry is accurate and that the district and its providers adhere to the approved work activity definitions and the determination of countable excused absences and holiday reporting within federal limits. Each district must maintain the documentation to verify what is being reported to NYS OTDA. Each district must describe how it will conduct periodic self audits to determine that system entries are consistent with documentation in case files. The district must also explain how it will choose the sample size, select sample cases and establish the review period (no less frequently than semi-annually). The plan must indicate the district will maintain documentation on all pertinent findings produced through its self audit process and that case records for all reviewed cases will be available for State and other auditors in their review of the local work verification system for the standard 6 year period associated with such reviews. The district will sample cases from each month within the (6 month) semi-annual period. The October to March review will be due by May 20th. The April to September review will be due by November 20th. The results of these audits will enable the district to identify policies, processes or cases that may need corrective action. After each self audit is completed, the district must submit a summary of findings to OTDA A&QI at ▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇ for State review including specific information on each of the errors identified. In addition, when monitoring reveals substantial problems, the district must describe the corrective action it will take. The Quality Assurance (QA) plan must include the following elements: • Ensure that documentation of wages and actual hours of...
Work Verification. The Commissioning Manager, as an independent technical resource from the design, testing, and construction groups and is responsible to challenge all aspects of the substations design and construction in order to discover any mistakes and make sure that they are corrected before the new substation or modification to an existing substation goes into service.
Work Verification. Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ or an authorized entity on behalf of Con Edison may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s programs, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, as referred to by the Program Manual and also as Con Edison may notice to the Participating Contractor, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ may notice to the Participating Contractor, Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ will also conduct certain additional inspections and “Evaluations, Measurement and Verification” (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ or any other entity authorized on behalf of Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then Con Edison may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇.
Work Verification. Strategies/Procedures for Accommodating Individuals with Limited English Proficiency Section 3.9 Strategies/Procedures for Increasing Program Attendance Section 3.10 Strategies/Procedures for Engaging Sanctioned Temporary Assistance Participants Section 3.11 Strategies for reducing the need for Temporary Assistance Section 4 Support Services (Reference 18 NYCRR 385.4) Section 4.1 TA and Non-TA SNAP Applicants and Recipients in Work Activities Approved by the District Section 4.2 Transitional Support Services Section 4.3 Extended Support Services (Reference 18 NYCRR 385.11 and 385.12)
Work Verification. The Utilities or an authorized entity on behalf of a Utility may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by the Program, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as the Utilities may notice to the Participating Contractor, the Utilities will also conduct certain additional inspections and Evaluations, Measurement and Verification (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by the Utilities or any other entity authorized on behalf of a Utility determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then the Utilities may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by the Utilities.
Work Verification.
A. Whenever the cost of any Work is to be determined pursuant to Paragraph 12.4.A and 12.4.B, CONTRACTOR will submit in a form acceptable to CITY REP, daily work sheets showing an itemized labor, material and equipment cost breakdown together with supporting data. No payment will be made for Work not verified by CITY REP.
B. Whenever it is necessary to determine the Cost of the Work because CITY and CONTRACTOR do not agree on an appropriate price for a change in the Work, CITY will incur additional costs to document the time, materials and equipment performed or used at the Site for such Work. CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY for all such additional costs to CITY in the event such documenting of time, materials and equipment charges result in a price equal to or less than the amount offered by CITY to CONTRACTOR for such work. CITY’S additional costs will include but not be limited to the cost to CITY for additional time of CITY REP and/or assistants to document CONTRACTOR’S time and materials.
Work Verification. Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ or an authorized entity on behalf of Con Edison may conduct assessments (including field visits), audits, or inquiry on work performed under this Agreement in order to maintain the quality standards sought by Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s programs, and the Participating Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in connection therewith. In general, as referred to by the Program Manual and also as Con Edison may notice to the Participating Contractor, the assessments will be conducted to maintain the integrity of the Program through a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process (including, without limitation, Con Edison-sponsored field inspections) consisting of routine and systematic assessment activities to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. In addition, as Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ may notice to the Participating Contractor, Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ will also conduct certain additional inspections and “Evaluations, Measurement and Verification” (EM&V) activity to ensure the accurate determination of savings, and also to support quality installations and to ensure that the Participating Contractor complies with the rules of the Program. If an assessment, audit, or inquiry by Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ or any other entity authorized on behalf of Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇ determines that program standards are not being met, including that actual field conditions do not corroborate conditions indicated by the Participating Contractor and/or customer, then Con Edison may in any given case adjust incentives to the applicant, deem the applicant ineligible for incentives and/or find that the Participating Contractor is not in good standing. The Participating Contractor’s failure to meet minimum program standards and correct deficiencies may lead to, among other things, the Participating Contractor being removed from the Program, the Participating Contractor and its customers becoming ineligible to receive future program incentives, and such other disciplinary actions determined appropriate by Con ▇▇▇▇▇▇.
Work Verification. When scheduled for work, the Contractor’s personnel shall check in at the Contractor's offices at each facility. The Contractor shall present daily work orders or schedule with a brief description of the work to be performed to its employees. At that time, additional instructions, if any, shall be provided. When the work is completed the Contractor shall report to the Facility Manager in order to verify completion of work.