Feasibility Study Report. A draft Feasibility Study Report, prepared in a manner consistent with the NCP and Feasibility Study guidance, shall be submitted 90 days after EPA approves or modifies the Development and Initial Screening of Alternatives Report. After EPA approves or modifies the draft FS, a final FS shall be submitted by Respondents within 90 days. FIGURE 1: Location of Cell House Property (or Parcel), Eastern and Southern Facility Study Areas (FSA), and general features surrounding the Chlor-Alkali Facility (Former) Superfund Site, City of Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire (N 44° 28' 43", W 71° 10' 01"). Locus FIGURE 2: Supplemental Remedial Investigation timeline. 2015 April May June July August September October November Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Scope of Work Task Work Days Begin End 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 6/1 6/8 6/15 6/22 6/29 7/6 7/13 7/20 7/27 8/3 8/10 8/17 8/24 8/31 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24 5/1 5/8 5/15 5/22 5/29 6/5 6/12 6/19 6/26 7/3 7/10 7/17 7/24 7/31 8/7 8/14 8/21 8/28 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 10/2 10/9 10/16 10/23 10/30 11/6 11/13 11/20 11/27 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Administrative Order on Consent and Statement of Work AOC-SOW Effective Date 1 4/13 4/13 ***WORK PREPARATION and FIELD SEASON Dates are calculated assuming an Effective Date of April 13, 2015. All dates shall be extended by one day for each day of a later Effective Date*** WORK PREPARATION 2015 Site Visit Site Visit 2 4/20 4/22 Site Preparation Work Plan Document preparation 15 4/13 5/4 Agency Review (assumed) 5 5/5 5/12 Revision and submittal 5 5/13 5/20 Agency Approval (assumed) 5 5/21 5/28 SRI Work Plan Document preparation 30 4/23 6/4 Agency Review (assumed) 10 6/5 6/19 Revision and submittal 14 6/20 7/9 Agency Approval (assumed) 5 7/10 7/17 FIGURE 2 (Continued): Supplemental Remedial Investigation timeline. Scope of Work Task FIELD SEASON 2015 Mobilization and Site Prep (3.D.1. a to d) Misc. (trailer, layout) Roadway Improvements Bridge Repair permit equiv. & planning Fence Installation Fence Sketch Plan Well Assessment & Security Well Assessment Report Survey & Benchmark Install Site Survey Wall Stability Assessment (3.D.2) Baseline Investigation Work Days 34 10 1 5 2015 Week Begin End 5/25 6/8 6/8 6/15 6/15 7/13 4/22 5/20 5/25 6/8 4/28 4/28 5/25 7/11 10/31 10/31 5/25 6/8 10/31 10/31 7/18 7/25 April 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24 5...
Feasibility Study Report. VHB will compile the results of each of the analyses described above into a comprehensive but understandable study report. Based on experience with similar projects, we expect that the report would be between 80 to 100 pages, exclusive of appendices, with up to 20 color figures. It is understood that the draft feasibility study will be prepared for review by the Town officials and project partners prior to its distribution to the public. A final report will be prepared after the public has had an opportunity to review and provide comment. The final feasibility study will be provided to Town officials prior to final publication. Up to eight (8) hard copies would be printed, and a PDF version suitable for posting on the internet would also be delivered.
Feasibility Study Report. The Parties agree that the Feasibility Study Report raises but does not resolve certain issues related to the Project Plan. The Parties will undertake studies related to these issues, pursuant to the Application Study Plan (as approved by FERC) and may undertake further studies. These studies, and further negotiations, are necessary to resolve these issues before finalizing the Project Plan in the new license application. The Parties intend that the final Project Plan will be consistent with the Shared Objectives stated in this Second Amended Planning Agreement.
Feasibility Study Report. The Respondent shall prepare a draft FS report for each of the Sites for EPA’s review and comment. This report, as ultimately adopted or modified by EPA, provides a basis for remedy selection by EPA, the Forest Service, and DOI and documents the development and analysis of remedial alternatives. The Respondent shall refer to the RI/FS Guidance for an outline of the report format and the required report content. The Respondent shall prepare a final FS report for each of the Sites which satisfactorily addresses EPA and Support Agency comments. REFERENCES EPA 1988. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Interim Final, October, 1988. EPA 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual. Interim Final, USEPA, December 1989. EPA 1991. Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance: Standard Default Exposure Factors, USEPA, 1991. EPA 1992. Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term. USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, publication 9285.7-081, 1992.
Feasibility Study Report. Borrower shall prepare a Feasibility Study (FS) report for the Property which summarizes the results of the feasibility study, including the following:
Feasibility Study Report. The feasibility to ascertain the viability of the project has been made by economic evaluation as detailed below: This is an operating mine, the technical aspects of the mine are covered elaborately in other paragraphs of Modifications in the approved mining plan, only economical evaluation is carried-out. Key determinants in the decision making process on economic feasibility include the current and predicted market value of the Limestone Mineral and the cost of production. Production cost mainly include expenditures related to mineral production and environmental management during mining operations. The cost of reclamation and closure are usually the most significant thought in the project life cycle. Consequently, the cost of environmental management during operations and its closure is considered at an early stage in mine planning, often during the project feasibility analysis. The details of capital and recurring expenditure are given below: Budget for proposed mining Activi-ties Area of investment Method of calculation Basics Expenses(In Lakh Rs.) Capital Investment 35.03 I Land 7.16 a. Land cost expenditure Rs. 3.00 lakh/ Ha. for Private land Area: 2.387 Ha. Non-Forest land. 7.16 b. Cost on relief and rehabilitation action plan Rehabilitation notrequired 0.00 c. Compensation to the land outstees No land outstees 0.00 d. Cost of acquiring Surface Rights 0.00 II. Mining 25.00 a. Cost for infrastructure & equipments Manual Mining 25.00 III. Environmental protection 1.37 a. Pollution Control 0.70 Plantation 258plants @Rs 50/- perplant 0.13 Construction of bund 245m @ 100/- 0.24 b. Monitoring 1.00
Feasibility Study Report. The Local Public Entity shall prepare and submit to the State a Draft Final Feasibility Study Report at least 60 days before the scheduled completion date of the Final Feasibility Study Report. This report must contain the results of work performed pursuant to the tasks in the Feasibility Study Work Plan referenced in Section 1 of this Contract. It must provide a comprehensive analysis of the study’s findings.
Feasibility Study Report. 1. Prepare a Feasibility Study Report including options considered and conclusions and recommendations on project scope, costs, budget, construction, project-specific systems such as mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection, energy management, telecommunications, and security systems and any other project-specific items.
Feasibility Study Report. Blue hydrogen as accelerator and pioneer for energy transition in the industry. (July). Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx/en/financial Hers, X., Xxxxxxxx, T., xxx xxx Xxxx, R., van de Water, S., & Xxxxxxx, C. (2018). Hydrogen Routes in The Netherlands. 56. Hydrogen Europe. (2017a). Green Heating and Cooling. Retrieved April 7, 2020, from xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx/green-heating-and-cooling Hydrogen Europe. (2017b). Hydrogen Applications. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx/hydrogen-applications Xxxxxxxx, X. (2017). Looking Under the Hood of the Dutch Energy System. 0–84. Retrieved from xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxxxx, X., & Xxxx, X. (2016). The Role of Oxygen and Hydrogen in Refining. NS Energy. (2019). Nuon Magnum Power Plant. Retrieved May 19, 2020, from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/projects/nuon-magnum-power-plant/ Port of Rotterdam. (2015). Xxxx joins waste to syngas project. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/en/news-and-press-releases/port-joins-waste-to-syngas-project Port of Rotterdam. (2017). Port of Rotterdam: CO2 Neutral. Port of Rotterdam. (2020). Retrieved March 4, 2020, from xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/en
Feasibility Study Report. COMPANY will prepare a Feasibility Study Report for the intersection of Fabyan Parkway at IL 31. The Feasibility Study Report will include an evaluation of the existing roadway conditions and summarize the aforementioned analyses. The report will also include documentation of public involvement and ultimately be a starting point for the Phase I study. The following items will be included in the report:
