Project Implementation and Monitoring. Project proponents will be responsible for implementing proposed projects and for providing project reports to the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency will be responsible for coordinating data collection and dissemination. The RWMG will be responsible for monitoring the implementation of the IRWM Plan.
Project Implementation and Monitoring. (a) Proposals that are adopted by the consensus of NRs will not require formal endorsement at the next NRM following the due date;
(b) Implementation should start as soon as practical and be managed by the DIR RCARO;
(c) Progress Reports should be submitted by the LC to the DIR RCARO, the RCA Focal Person and the RCA Chair6 weeks prior to each NRM and a final report submitted within 3 months of project completion; and,
(d) Reports on SP activities will be included in the RCA Annual Report and shall be provided to the NRM through the DIR RCARO.
Project Implementation and Monitoring. Covering the PMU expenses, including on: (i) staffing, (ii) data collection, aggregation, and periodic reporting on the Project’s implementation progress, including costs associated with the recruitment of a TPMA; (iii) monitoring of the Project’s key performance indicators; (iv) overall Project Operating Costs, audit costs and monitoring and compliance with environmental and social standards; and (v) performing the role of the PPR Steering Committee secretariat, including: (a) monitoring and evaluation activities; and (b) collation of inputs from MoH, WHO, UNICEF, and FAO into joint progress reports.
Project Implementation and Monitoring. Subject to available funding, an approved project should commence as soon as practical and no more than 3 months after approval by the NRM or GCM;
Project Implementation and Monitoring. (a) Subject to approval by the NRM or GCM and available funding, an approved TP should commence in accordance with the timetable set out in the proposal.
(b) Responsibility for implementing the project will be taken by the DIR RCARO.
(c) A LCC will be nominated by the NR of the GP, which proposed the event. The LCC will be responsible for leading the event, preparing the prospectus, programme and other related documents including the training materials and any resource documents.
(d) Reports should be submitted by the LC to the DIR RCARO, the RCA Focal Person and the RCA Chair within 1month of the completion of the TP.
(e) Reports on TP activities will be included in the RCA Annual Report and shall be provided to the NRM through the DIR RCARO.
Attachment 1: RCARO MANAGED PROJECT RCA RESEARCH PROJECT THEME PROPOSAL TEMPLATE Proposed by Potential for development into an RCA technical cooperation project Potential for improving the utilisation of established national research organisations / institutes, increasing regional research networks and resources and adding value to future inputs to that particular area of research FLOW CHART FOR THE FAST-TRACKING OF NEW COOPERATIVE PROJECT PROPOSALS FROM THE RCARO
(a) The DIR RCARO should prepare a draft annual work plan based on the RCA Guidelines and Operating Rules, addressing all aspects of his/her roles and responsibilities with targets, milestones and measurable Performance Indicators (PIs) for each aspect of activities, and submit it to the RCARO SAC by 1 January each year.
(b) The draft work plan should be negotiated and agreed between the members of SAC and the DIR RCARO.
(c) An annual work plan should be agreed upon by 1 February with finalized PIs and targets/milestones for each aspect of activities therein.
(d) The annual work plan is subject to a mid-term review by the SAC. The DIR RCARO should inform the SAC if there are major items with the potential to affect the implementation of the agreed annual work plan. The SAC should provide its views and agree on any adjustment to the annual work plan. The mid-term review is undertaken before the GCM or otherwise scheduled as agreed between the DIR RCARO and the SAC.
(e) The DIR RCARO should prepare the report on his/her performance in fulfilling the agreed work plan, and submit it to the SAC by 1 January of the following year for evaluation.
(f) The SAC will assess the annual report through electronic interactions with the DIR RCARO, and submit its report to ...
Project Implementation and Monitoring. Support for Project implementation and management including: (a) support for procurement, financial management, environmental and social risk management, monitoring and evaluation, and reporting; (b) recruitment and Training of Grants Management Unit and EPHI staff and technical consultants; and (c) Operating Costs.
Project Implementation and Monitoring. During the implementation of the Project the Borrower shall ensure that:
(a) two operational audits shall be carried out:
(i) the first no later than three months prior to the Mid-Term Review; and
(ii) the second one year prior to the Project Closing Date;
(b) a management review of the PMU and the MOHFW shall take place no later than three years after the Effective Date, to plan for integration of PMU functions into the MOHFW;
(c) a transition plan, agreed with the Association, shall be implemented for transition from the Integrated Nutrition Project to this Project, in a manner satisfactory to the Association; and
(d) by no later than December 31, 2001 a phase wise exit strategy plan shall be developed and a copy of such plan shall be submitted to the Association for its review and approval and such plan shall be implemented promptly thereafter, taking into account the comments and recommendations of the Association.
Project Implementation and Monitoring. Commitments for mitigation and monitoring included in CEs, FONSIs and RODs must be adhered to unless the associated impact is reduced, eliminated or increased during final design. In those cases, the mitigation commitments will be adjusted accordingly. PROJECT DESIGN Preliminary Plans, Grading Plans, Right-of-Way and Engineering Inspection Plans, Right-of-Way and Utility Plans and Final Plans
A. Purpose
1. The purpose of this section is to outline the coordinated process used by SDDOT as they progress from preliminary design to final design. For information purposes, it is estimated that:
a. Preliminary Plans represent approximately 20% design,
b. Plans for Landowner Meeting represent 40% design,
c. Final Inspection Plans represent 75% design,
d. Right-of-Way and Utility Plans represent 90% design, and
e. Completed Final Plans represent 100% design completion.
B. Procedural Steps
1. Features of construction/reconstruction projects, such as design criteria derived from NEPA to mitigate any effect on the protection and utilization of the land traversed by the right-of-way and adjoining land under the administration of USFS will be mutually agreed upon by USFS, FHWA and SDDOT by conference or other communication during the preparation of the plans and specifications for each project.
2. During each of the five project development plan phases, SDDOT Road Design Office will provide the USFS District Ranger with one set of plans and the USFS Project Coordinator with one set of plans. SDDOT will invite USFS to attend each of the scheduled SDDOT plan reviews/field inspections. At that time, USFS may submit project specific comments and recommendations to SDDOT Road Design.
3. Recommendations received from USFS will be included in subsequent plans when feasible and incorporated into the design plans as much as possible to keep Letter of Consent stipulations to a minimum.
4. SDDOT Right-of-Way, Road Design, the Region and Area Engineers and FHWA will review comments and recommendations and return them to the USFS Project Coordinator if revisions are needed. USFS comments and recommendations need to be agreed upon and finalized prior to final design.
5. Prior to final design, SDDOT will define work limits and notify USFS of proposed clearing limits and timber and mineral materials to be removed. USFS will determine appropriate method of disposing of merchantable timber and mineral materials and will coordinate with SDDOT Road Design for inclusion in final plans....
Project Implementation and Monitoring. Commitments for avoidance, minimization, restoration, mitigation and monitoring included in CEs, FONSIs and RODs must be adhered to unless the associated impact is reduced, eliminated or increased during final design. In those cases, the mitigation commitments will be adjusted accordingly.
Project Implementation and Monitoring. (a) Subject to available funding, an approved project should commence as soon as practical and no more than 3 months after approval by the NRM or GCM;
(b) Responsibility for implementing the project will be taken by the DIR RCARO;
(c) All the usual TC modalities can be used in a SP (meetings, training courses, expert or scientific visits) but in view of the short duration of SPs and probable funding shortages, projects that have a few, highly focused activities, are most likely to achieve their target outcomes successfully;
(d) SP Progress Reports should be submitted by the LC to the DIR RCARO, the RCA Focal Person and the RCA Chair 6 weeks prior to each NRM and a final report submitted within 3 months of project completion; and,
(e) Reports on SP activities will be included in the RCA Annual Report and shall be provided to the NRM through the DIR RCARO.
