The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements Contract with Trinity Expert Systems Limited (Sub-contractor) by provision of a Contractor purchase order for the services defined in the attached Sub-contractor proposal referred to in section 4 [1], the content of which has been agreed between the Authority and the Sub-contractor. Present to the Authority for approval any related and due invoices received from the Sub-contractor, prior to payment.
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements The Contractor shall address the Assignment by the supply of: A DESN level 5 grade Architect on the basis of an Individual Assignment, reporting to the IM Services Chief Architect. This will be for 59 maximum Working Days commencing the 23rd July 2012 until 26th October 2012 inclusive. The resource will be under the sole direction of the IM Services Chief Architect, and any such work required from the resource will be agreed directly between the IM Services Chief Architect and the resource. No deliverables or specific schedule of work will be included within this FSC. A weekly/monthly report will be provided to the IM Services Chief Architect to measure progress and ensure delivery alignment and milestone tracking. Capgemini reserves the right to withdraw the Programme Architect’s time on this Individual Assignment, in agreement with IM Services and with due notice, to support other IM Services/Skills Funding Agency/YPLA projects from time to time.
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements This FSC covers the Elaboration phase of the NAS AV R5a project and as such does not deliver a technical solution. However, this work is intended to drive out an approved set of detailed business requirements and a high level solution design to a level where the Construction phase of the project can begin. Based on our initial assessment of the outline functional requirements stated in section 1.1 and our understanding of the testing requirement for a new release of AV, we do not believe the go-live aspiration of January is achievable. However in parallel with the Elaboration work detailed below, the team will identify potential options for phasing the work and the incremental costs associated with them to determine whether a cost effective compromise can be achieved. It should be noted that a multi-phased approach will inevitably be more expensive because there will be a duplication in the implementation and testing costs associated with multiple releases. Until such time as a decision is reached we propose that the project proceeds on the working assumption of a single release delivering all the required functionality. We have attempted to secure the resources requested in section 1.1.4 however in a number of cases the individuals are committed to other work and cannot be released. Appropriately skilled alternatives have been secured. Elaboration We propose that a team is setup comprising Project Manager, Solution Architect, Business Analyst and a User Journey consultant. This team will be supplemented by a Lead Developer/Designer, a Test Manager, an Environments Manager and a DBA as the Elaboration stage moves towards the Construction stage. This team will then work through the analysis and design work needed to deliver the stated objective and the specific deliverables D1-D7 detailed. To try to limit the impact of this work on the business, the requirements analysis work will be driven through a series of workshops, totalling around 2 days a week, for weeks 2-4 of the Elaboration phase, with a final workshop in week 5. These workshops will be focussed on areas of change, with the following as the planned structure: Geography Changes Minimum Contract Level (Hierarchies) Transfer Vacancy for MCL End-to-End View of LASS Changes and External Interfaces End-to-End View o...
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements The Contractor will provide services to assist the Authority to initiate the IdAMS Delivery Project. As part of this work the Contractor’s team will: Work with nominated representatives of the 5 projects identified in Section 1.1 above to identify, clarify, agree and baseline a consolidated set of functional and non-functional requirements for extensions to the existing IdAMS solution. These will documented in a Requirements Matrix (D1) which will be reviewed with representatives of the consuming projects and approved by the Authority’s IdAMS Project Manager Investigate the status of the existing IdAMS solution in the DTE, VOTE and LIVE environments, identifying any remedial work to both environments and solution that may be necessary prior to beginning work on extending the IdAMS solution. The team will also identify changes to the environments, solution and supporting documentation required to meet the consolidated functional and non-functional requirements. The output of this work will be documented in an IdAMS Design review document (D2) Produce a Delivery Approach and Governance Plan (D3) defining the overall project approach to delivery including: Project governance Roles and resources Requirements management Risk and Issue management Change control Communications. Produce and maintain a high level Project Plan (D4) for the initiation phase Produce and maintain a Risks, Issues, Assumptions and Dependencies Log (D5) for the initiation phase Investigate the cause of the ADFS issues identified with the implementation of the current IdAMS solution in Live and provide recommendations Work to identify any additional remedial or implementation work that may reasonably be progressed in advance of completion of Project Initiation. Any such work to be agreed with the Authority via a FSC Change Note prior to execution.
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements As part of this FSC, the Contractor shall complete the Construction and Transition activities for CCM 2012/13 Release 2 in the ’Functional Scope’ table below. This FSC shall only cover the Construction Sprints 2, 3, 4, Demo 1 and 2, SIT, UAT and VOTE Testing. Furthermore this FSC shall cover deployment into Live and Post Implementation Support (PIS). Construction sprint 1 has been commissioned under FSC2219. This project shall follow an Agile-RUP process for the Construction phase, the waterfall method shall be used for subsequent phases. Functional Scope Based upon the outputs from the Initiation phase the following requirements have been identified for the SFA to be delivered by this FSC:Functional Scope Ref. ID Requirement Title S-DC01 Import of mainstream funding actual S-DC02 Modify DC Summarisation interface to support UKPRN S-DC03 2012/13 ILR Changes that impact ESF Summarisation S-DC04 Extend ESF Actuals timetables for 2012/13 S-CLM01 Support for extended Funding Claim Reconciliation settings S-CLM03 Inclusion of growth payments in reconciliation calculation S-CLM04 Update of the Reconciliation Statement for 2011/12 S-CLM05 Display reconciliation parameters S-CLM06 Updates to Funding Claims reconciliation report S-CLM13 Production of the 11/12 ASC & ALS reconciliation statement S-CLM14 Ability to reconcile 11/12 ASC & ALS claims S-CLM15 Ability to enter 11/12 LSH claims for Admin expenditure S-CLM16 Production of the 11/12 LSH reconciliation statement S-CLM17 Ability to reconcile 11/12 LSH claims S-CLM18 Production of the 11/12 ASL reconciliation statement S-CLM19 Ability to reconcile 11/12 ASL claims S-CLM21 12/13 claims for LSH funding S-EOP01 Ability to restrict access to enter actuals to just Agency staff S-EOP02 Delivery Statement National Access S-EOP03 Update Delivery Statements to operate at FSP level S-EOP05 EOP Payments & PTS configuration S-PM01 Support for the Performance Management of 12/13 16-18 Apps and ASTO contracts S-PM03 ESF Performance Management Reporting S-PAY01 Update to P&P report to include NAS employer flag S-PAY03 Update payment file validation against PIMS funding Flags The details of the requirements in Table 1 can be found in the approved Business Requirement Specifications, see section 4 – AD1 Delivery Approach In order to meet the...
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements The contractor will deliver the deliverables described in s1.2; those identified as draft will be submitted for review. The systems/applications in scope of the solution are those identified as retained in the YPLA ICT Audit Analysis v3.9 spreadsheet, referenced in Section 4.0 Ref 3. The initial high level design (HLSD) identifies that these systems/applications will be accessible by one of 4 mechanisms: External internet access (already available in the live estate) Internal web access to application over GSi and published through UAG, Internal access over GSi via SSL over VPN (Coda). Internal access to applications published through UAG and directed onto the Remote Desktop solution (separate commission) DfE “thick client”. (Capgemini support only). The system/applications associated with mechanisms 2) to 4) are referenced in Section 4.0 Ref 4. Capgemini will complete the business and technical analysis for the systems in scope. For mechanism 2), Capgemini will design, build the infrastructure, configure and test the solution. For mechanism 3), Capgemini will build the infrastructure, review the designs, implement the configuration and test the solution For mechanism 4), Capgemini will provide responses to DfE questions in support of their package and build activities, for the duration of this FSC. During this period, Capgemini will set up an environment in DTE, perform Coda proof of concept testing over VPN and commence active directory migration proof of concept testing. Further, Capgemini will perform the DTE part of system testing, as defined in D12 – Test approach Additionally during this period, the new infrastructure components will be installed in the live environment, including the power supply via the 3rd party contractor and an initial number of applications published on the UAG. Changes to the scope will be managed via change controls and approved by the project board prior to impacting and estimating. The deliverables identified in s1.2 will be produced for the purpose and to the quality criteria stated for each deliverable in the product descriptor P066b referenced in Section 4.0 Ref 1. Progress will be reported and reviewed during weekly project checkpoints. Burn rate will be provided on a weekly basis and reconciled at month end reporting. The IM Servic...
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements Approach Deploy new Blue Coat proxy and AV solution in parallel to existing Blue Coats Move NCS web application on to the new devices Deploy Blue Coat Enterprise Reporter and configure logging from new and existing appliances Enterprise Reporter Capgemini will supply a virtual machine to install the Bluecoat Reporter appliance. The specification is 2 processor and 8GB of RAM. Disk space requirement is still to be finalised, but it is proposed that initially 100GB is made available. Capgemini will install the Bluecoat Reporter and assign an IP address and temporary password for BT. BT will supply the IP address including VLAN ID for the engineer to assign. Deliverables The table below identifies at a management summary level the list of products to be provided as part of this solution: ID Title Description
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements Background Capgemini have been requested to provide the Authority with further services to assist The Authority to continue the Windows Products Upgrade Project principally in the areas of support for: High Level Designs and TID documentation review, Production of Test Approach documentation Production of System Acceptance Test Plans Production of Operational Acceptance Test Plans This FSC follows on from the project work previously carried out under FSC2303. Scope of Services Architects and Service SMEs: Provide support to IM Services (for Dell) with regards to information required to complete and review Design documentation; covering the areas of; Final support required to review and upgrade the High Level Design and TID for Windows 7 and Application Packaging, High Level Design and TID for Active Directory and High Level Design and TID for MS Lync 2010 Installation of SCCM in the sandbox environment Engage with BT to procure services based upon requirements detailed in the TID for the Active Directory Stream for future work that is out of scope of this FSC. Define constituents of base build for servers as part of Active Directory Sub-Project and start activity of creating image Project Management: Management of the Capgemini team for the Month of September Respond to the FSC Part 1s issued by the Agency for FSCs 2254 and 2262 Plan for LIVE implementation of hardware (part of Active Directory Sub-Project) Involvement in joint (Agency, Dell) project planning Test Management: Production of Xxxxxxxxxxxx X0, X0, X0, X0, X0 and D7
The Contractor’s Solution the technical proposal from the Contractor which sets out an overview of the proposed solution supported by the necessary detail of the Contractor’s response to the Authority’s Requirements The feasibility report will be achieved through Trinity consultants working collaboratively with the NAS team and E-Comms as well as independent working to assess the detailed functionality and make-up of the existing site. The feasibility study will focus on the following areas: • Functionality – technical assessment, complexity, ease of replication, etc • Business Processes – impact identification, etc • Content – Migration options • Operations/Support – SLA assessment, current vs proposed (Portal KBB), etc • Costs – cost/service comparison, development/migration ROI assessment (indicative effort/cost), etc • Risks – identification of any migration risks • Benefits – Sitecore/SCC offering vs MS SharePoint/IM Services offering
