Accreditation Process. 4.2.1 The Registrar must apply for Accreditation as set out in the published Registrars application forms. The application must be submitted to the Registry with the attached mandatory documents and all information filled in the form.
4.2.2 The Accreditation process takes 7-14 working days.
Accreditation Process. 6.1 CTHS will use STAR MI received from the Member and any Submitting Affiliate in order to provide the Member and any Submitting Affiliate with an Accreditation Level.
6.2 CTHS will review the STAR MI in conjunction with the STAR Steering Group against the Service Levels and allocate the Accreditation Level relevant to the Member's performance in order to either:
(a) provide a revised Accreditation Level to the Member and any Submitting Affiliate; or
(b) advise that the Member and any Submitting Affiliate will retain its existing Accreditation Level,
6.3 Subject to Clause 6.4, the Accreditation Process will take place at a frequency agreed by the STAR Steering Group.
6.4 The Member and any Submitting Affiliate must provide at least a full three (3) consecutive months of STAR MI to CTHS during any calendar year in order for that entity to be given an Accreditation Level for that year. For the avoidance of doubt, once the Member or a Submitting Affiliate starts submitting STAR MI then it must continue to submit STAR MI to that SLA Group on a monthly basis for the duration of the Member’s participation in STAR.
Accreditation Process. The Institution shall engage in PTSF’s accreditation process in good faith. The Institution shall abide by all applicable PTSF standards, policies and procedures, which are incorporated herein by reference, and shall adhere to PTSF’s accreditation program and all associated standards and requirements, including periodic monitoring for compliance as well as re-evaluation of the Institution’s accreditation status to be conducted by PTSF in accordance with PTSF accreditation policies and procedures.
Accreditation Process. The Registrar must apply for Accreditation as set out in the Published Policies, and in the case of a first Accreditation must make application within five (5) calendar days after the Commencement Date. If the Registrar has provided Registrar Services in the past, the Registry may take into account the Registrar’s prior conduct in providing these services when considering the Registrar’s application for Accreditation.
Accreditation Process. The Engineering Education Accreditation Body must publish appropriate policies and procedures to provide clear and sufficient information as guidance for engineering programs seeking accreditation. These policies and procedures should include at least the following elements:
(1) Documents to be provided by engineering programs The Engineering Education Accreditation Body must require engineering programs seeking accreditation to conduct and a full self‐review process and submit a report documenting outcomes of the self‐review. The self‐review process must answer whether the engineering program fulfils requirements set out by the accreditation body. Specifically, the engineering program must provide sufficient evidence, through appropriate and diverse assessment means, to demonstrate that it fulfils the accreditation body’s requirement on engineering graduate outcomes. The accreditation team will deliver preliminary findings from reviewing the report and verify their findings through the accreditation visit.
(2) Composition of accreditation team The engineering education accreditation team should consist of at least two persons, preferably more, representing a balance of relevant experience and expertise as well as employment orientation, academics or industry. All members of the accreditation must be sufficiently trained and competent for conducting the review process. Conflict of interest is a critical issue in the accreditation process and must be taken into account in assembling the engineering education accreditation team. Each member of the accreditation team must submit a statement indicating partiality prior to his/her nomination.
(3) Duration of accreditation visit The engineering education accreditation visit should last at least two days to allow sufficient time for documentation review and the interviews.
(4) Structure of the accreditation visit The engineering education accreditation visit should include the following elements:
1. Preliminary meeting of the accreditation team prior to the visit to identify what information is to be obtained during the visit;
2. Meeting with educational institution’s administrators;
3. Meeting with head of engineering program;
4. Meeting with academic staff members;
5. Meeting with support staff members;
6. Meeting with students;
7. Meeting with alumni;
8. Meeting with employers/industry/professional engineering organisation’s representatives;
9. Visit of facilities;
10. Review of engineering project work, final...
Accreditation Process. The process an Access Point Provider must follow to obtain accreditation and become a Participant under the Framework is as follows:
(a) Step 1 Downloading the Testing Requirements from the Council’s Website;
(b) Step 2 Testing its software against the Testing Requirements described in clause 3.1 and recording the results;
(c) Step 3 Uploading the test results into the Council’s Website and ensure that the test results are stored in a form that can be audited by the Council in accordance with clause 17 for a period of not less than two (2) years;
(d) Step 4 Uploading the declaration providing the information required by clause 3.1(c) in the form required by clause 3.4;
(e) Step 5 Signing this Agreement and undertaking to comply with the terms of use for the application of the Council’s name and logo as published on the Council’s website from time to time and uploading the signed copy of this Agreement to the Council’s Website;
(f) Step 6 The Council will notify the Access Point Provider with confirmation of Accreditation or will request more information; and
(g) Step 7 The Access Point Provider is Accredited once it has received a written notice of confirmation from the Council in accordance with clause 4.1.
Accreditation Process. 5.1 The Council shall:
5.1.1 Offer all potential Landlords access to all appropriate documents, including any standard agreements, the Specification and Selection Criteria and to any additional documents relating to the provision of the Property from the date the electronic system operates until the system ceases to be operated.
5.1.2 Give any potential Landlords the opportunity to submit a ‘request to participate’ and to proceed through the Accreditation process and become an Approved Landlord. Admission onto the Approved Landlord List is subject to the Landlord satisfying the Selection Criteria and passing the Council’s review of the Landlord’s request to be Accredited which complies with the Agreement.
5.1.3 Complete the evaluation of a request to be Accredited as specified by the Council.
5.1.4 Invite relevant Landlords who have been admitted to the Approved Landlord List to submit an offer for each applicable Requirement within a time limit specified by the Council at the time of each applicable Requirement.
5.1.5 Enter into an agreement with the Landlord for the relevant Property following agreement on the Property to be provided and the rental/fee to be paid by the Council.
Accreditation Process. All parties, including SPSS, that desire to host OP Users must be accredited by AOL pursuant to the Accreditation Guidelines set forth in Exhibit C of this Agreement (each an "Accredited Partner") prior to the delivery by AOL or SPSS of any OP User to such party. It shall be AOL's responsibility to oversee the accreditation process. The Accreditation Guidelines may be modified by AOL from time to time as determined by AOL in its reasonable discretion, provided, however that SPSS shall receive reasonable prior written notification of any change to such Accreditation Guidelines. SPSS shall (i) inform all prospective SPSS Customers of the AOL accreditation requirement, (ii) confirm with AOL that any SPSS Customer that desires to host OP Users has been accredited by AOL before SPSS provides AOL Sample to any such SPSS Customer, and (iii) promptly inform AOL of any noncompliance with the Accreditation Guidelines by SPSS Customers, which comes to the attention of SPSS. In situations where SPSS will host OP Users on behalf of SPSS Customers, SPSS shall be required to abide by the Accreditation Guidelines with respect to that particular project and such SPSS Customers shall not be required to be Accredited Partners. It is understood that AOL may certify third parties in its sole discretion based on the Accreditation Guidelines, including without limitation, third parties identified by SPSS as potential customers or third parties identified by AOLTW or AOLTW Partners as further described in Section 4.1 below. In the event that AOL determines that an Accredited Partner is in material breach of the Accreditation Guidelines, AOL may require that SPSS immediately cease providing AOL Sample to such Accredited Partner until such time as AOL reasonably determines that the breach has been cured.
Accreditation Process. Re-accreditation is an arduous task that can take up to 12 months from the submission of the applications to completion. The process begins when ISPFS submits the applications and conformance files to the selected accrediting body. The accrediting body will review the submitted documents to determine conformance with hundreds of accreditation standards, which are the current industry standard. Any deficiencies identified during the document review will be remediated before proceeding with the on-site assessment. This remediation process may take months to complete. Once the document review process is complete, the accrediting body will assemble a team of qualified assessors for the on-site assessment of all three laboratories and ISPFS headquarters adjacent to the Meridian laboratory. The team will evaluate facilities, security, conduct interviews of personnel, conduct an audit trail, witness personnel conducting laboratory work, and review numerous additional records like case files, equipment calibration logs, reagent reliability testing, etc. The accrediting body will compile the results of the assessment into a final report. All findings of non-compliance will be addressed and corrected to the satisfaction of the accrediting body prior to accreditation being awarded. The locations which comprise ISPFS include: Coeur d’Alene Laboratory 000 Xxxxxx Xx. Ste. B Coeur d’ Xxxxx, XX 00000 6 PT Positions 2 Admin ISPFS Headquarters 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 00000 1 PT Position 3 Admin Meridian Laboratory 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx 000 Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 00000 22 PT Positions 3 Admin Pocatello Laboratory 000 X. Xxxxx Pocatello, Idaho 83201 6 PT Positions 2 Admin Collectively, the ISPFS laboratories offer service in the following areas: Drug Chemistry Controlled Substances Clandestine Laboratory Analysis Methamphetamine Quantitation Fire Debris Analysis Toxicology Human Performance Forensic Toxicology Post-Mortem Forensic Toxicology Biology/DNA Body Fluid Identification (Serology) DNA Nuclear Individual Characteristic Database Firearms/Toolmarks Firearms Toolmarks Serial Number Restoration Distance Determination Latent Prints Latent Print Comparisons Latent Print Processing Impression Evidence Latent Print Comparisons (AFIS) Alcohol Analysis Blood Alcohol Analysis Other Volatiles Analysis Controlled Substances (meth. quantitative analysis) Controlled Substances Controlled Substances Urine Toxicology (qualitative) Blood Toxicology (limited) Blood ...
Accreditation Process. The Client shall take the following steps as part of the Accreditation Process: (a) it shall have in place or conclude a Connectivity Agreement and any Other Euronext Agreements, as required by Euronext or any of its Affiliates; (b) it shall complete the Service Provider’s Response and provide such to Euronext (including all relevant ancillary documents) to demonstrate the Client’s (and its relevant Affiliates’) ability to provide the SP Services and to meet the Minimum Criteria when doing so; and (c) it shall successfully complete any Tests considered relevant by Euronext (e.g. based on any of the Policies or Euronext’s instructions). For the avoidance of any doubt, the aforementioned steps under (a) and (b) can be conducted in parallel and such does not constitute a breach by the Client hereunder or under such Connectivity Agreement. The Client may complete the Accreditation Process on its own behalf, as well as on behalf of any of its Affiliates specified in the Request Form using the Service Provider’s Network (in whole or in part) to provide ASP Services or ESP Services to its Service Provider’s End Users. In the event that the Approved Status is granted to the Client hereunder, such Approved Status shall also extend to such Affiliates, meaning that such Client Affiliate may also use the Service Provider’s Network as described in the Service Provider’s Response to provide ESP Services or ASP Services respectively to Service Provider End Users. The Client shall ensure that each such specified Client Affiliate complies with the Minimum Requirements and the other obligations applicable to the Client as set forth in the Agreement (as if it was directly a Party thereto) at all times and the Client shall be liable towards Euronext in respect of any breach of any such Client Affiliate in respect thereof.
