Facility Assessment Clause Samples

Facility Assessment a) The Architect and the Architect’s consultants will gather information from the Client to assist with their analysis of the existing building through the following methods: i. Conduct a kickoff meeting with the Client to tour the building and record the Client’s project vision and goals for expansion and renovation. ii. Review the current condition of the facility to understand lifespan of existing building systems and ascertain when those systems may need maintenance or replacement (i.e., roofs, tuckpointing of masonry, HVAC systems, etc.). The Architect will enlist the assistance of a structural engineer, mechanical engineer and an electrical engineer to assist with this scope. iii. Document deficiencies in existing architectural, structural, mechanical, plumbing, fire sprinkler and electrical components. b) The Architect will assess the existing conditions of the Youth Services Center for compliance with current building codes and ADA regulations. If required, the Architect will make recommendations to the Client to modify the existing building to comply with current building codes. c) Discuss and evaluate the suitability of existing spaces for program use and goals.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Facility Assessment. Commencing on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Agreement Commencement Date, and by no later than the anniversary date of each fifth year thereafter during the Term of this Agreement, the LESSEE shall provide the LESSOR with a “Condition Assessment Report” of the leased Premises and site improvements thereon, prepared by either a licensed contractor, engineer or architect (“A/E”), and licensed to do business in the State of Kansas. This Condition Assessment Report shall address the current condition, the contractor’s or A/E’s professional opinion of the useful life remaining of the structures and systems, and the contractor’s or A/E’s professional opinion of repairs, replacements, or refurbishments recommended to maintain the operationally useful state and condition of the Premises. Condition Assessment Reports shall primarily focus on major structural systems and components, including but not limited to: pavements, utilities, building structures, roofs, and heating/ventilation/air conditioning (HVAC), plumbing, and electrical systems.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Facility Assessment a. Review current building plans, internal layouts, site and utility plans as needed for each of the ten (10) RPL branch library facilities. b. Evaluate and document crucial factors as identified by the Branch Project Advisory Committee and RPL to address future facility needs including but not limited to ease of access (parking and public transportation), capacity for functional public requirements (seating, meeting rooms, technology, shelving), functional staff requirements (offices, break rooms, maintenance/IT needs), operational capacity (number of floors, service layout, egress) and expansion potential. c. Utilize needs assessment and service recommendations to develop an action matrix for branch libraries. The matrix should address current library service areas and any proposed changes to service area based on projected population changes, with recommendations for optimal geographic location, type and size for potential new facility, expanded facility, renovated facility or new service delivery model. d. Where changes to an existing facility are proposed, provide detail for the design standard under the action matrix, including minimum library square foot objective, minimum site standards (parking), and projected per square foot cost for construction, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other soft costs, budgeted as a minimum cost per square foot. Note where alternate costs exist that cannot be immediately calculated (e.g., site preparation and land acquisition) that would be required for the recommendation. e. Where new facilities, co-located or relocated facilities are proposed, document priority criteria for site selection based on interactions with RPL administration and stakeholders (e.g. visibility, access to transportation, other service adjacencies) and basic functional design criteria (e.g. single-floor with ground- level access, open flexible floor plan, 24-hour meeting room or materials pickup capability, etc.). f. Ensure recommendations are compliant and reflective of the RPL’s mission and current strategic plan, current and proposed demographic data, state library standards, peer comparisons and library best practices into facilities analysis and recommendations. g. Incorporate technological innovations and sustainable/energy efficient opportunities into all facility considerations.
View Source
Facility Assessment. ENGINEER will conduct Concept Workshop #1 with its key team leaders and technical experts to draw on past, similar experiences in setting the stage for the Facility Assessment (Task 4), Hydraulics / Pumping Assessment (Task 5), and Zebra Mussel Control Alternatives Evaluation (Task 6). The primary objective for the workshop is to confirm truly viable alternatives and streamline the evaluation relative to the goals and criteria established in Task 3. ENGINEER will then conduct a 1-day site visit to assess the current condition of the LARWPS facilities, equipment, and infrastructure (as a focused follow-up to build upon the assessment by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Inc. in February 2013). The assessment will include representatives from applicable design disciplines (process-mechanical, HVAC-mechanical, electrical/I&C, architectural, structural, site-civil). ENGINEER will document the age, condition, remaining life estimate, criticality, impact of failure, “do-nothing” risk, and benefit of improvements for the existing facilities, equipment, and infrastructure. ENGINEER will identify needed improvements and alternatives to address items identified as priority items (items needed to extend useful life to the desired level as established in Project Meeting #1). ENGINEER will conduct Project Meeting #2 to provide an update on project status and to review initial findings from the facility assessment as well as findings from the initial analysis of system hydraulics (see Task 5). ENGINEER will then summarize the facility assessment and identified alternatives for evaluation in Technical Memorandum (TM) #1. ENGINEER will submit and present TM #1 to AWU and TRA for discussion and comment in Project Meeting #3. The objective for Project Meeting #3 will be to confirm alternatives that will be evaluated under Task 7. The corresponding sub-tasks for Task 4 are as follows: Task 4.1 – Internal Concept Workshop #1 Task 4.2 – Site Visit / Reconnaissance Task 4.3 – Confirm Needs and Alternatives (develop TM #1) • Civil-Site, Architectural, and Process-Mechanical Assessment ENGINEER will assess accessible portions of the existing civil-site features, building envelopes, roof system, and related architectural items, piping, valves, and pumping equipment, and HVAC and plumbing equipment and fixtures to further assess their condition and ascertain whether existing assets can be re-used, rehabilitated / refurbished, or if they need to be replaced. The assessment will include a review o...
View Source
Facility Assessment. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Design Work performed January 2017 through May 31, 2017: $7,230.00
View Source
Facility Assessment. Develop a implementation plan that identifies the type and quantity of charging systems, electrical grid infrastructure upgrades requirements and costs; identify upgrades to meet safety codes, regulations, or best practices; identify mechanical equipment requirements; determine back-up power, energy storage, construction requirements, and any cost savings or revenue opportunity; and develop conceptual site drawings and identify on-route charging location, considering future proofing and operational impacts.
View Source
Facility Assessment the Facility Assessment is used to determine if a facility meets policy definitions. The Facility Evaluations are provided for the specific level of care being considered. No claimant assessment information is included in a facility evaluation.
View Source
Facility Assessment. AQUA TECH will perform a Pre/Post Season Facility Assessment for no additional fee. AQUA TECH will provide the OWNER with recommendations for short-term as well as long-term needs of the facility. At the OWNER’s request, AQUA TECH will perform any repairs listed in the survey.
View Source
Facility Assessment. You will ensure that, at all times, the facility at which the Outposts Equipment is located (the “Designated Facility”) meets the minimum requirements necessary to support the installation, maintenance, use, and removal of the Outposts Equipment as described here and otherwise as described in the Outposts Documentation or provided to you during the ordering and installation process.
View Source

Related to Facility Assessment

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Security Assessments Upon advance written notice by the JBE, Contractor agrees that the JBE shall have reasonable access to Contractor’s operational documentation, records, logs, and databases that relate to data security and the Contractor’s Information Security Program. Upon the JBE’s request, Contractor shall, at its expense, perform, or cause to have performed an assessment of Contractor’s compliance with its privacy and data security obligations. Contractor shall provide to the JBE the results, including any findings and recommendations made by Contractor’s assessors, of such assessment, and, at its expense, take any corrective actions.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors: a. Number or proportion of persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) eligible to be served or encountered by the program. b. Frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with the program. c. Nature and importance of the services provided. d. Local or frequently used resources available to the Contractor. This group-needs assessment will serve as the basis for the Contractor’s determination of “reasonable steps” and provide documentary evidence of compliance with Cal. Gov. Code § 11135 et seq.; 2 CCR 11140, 2 CCR 11200 et seq., and 22 CCR98300 et seq. 2. The Contractor shall prepare and make available a report of the findings of the group-needs assessment that summarizes: a. Methodologies used. b. The linguistic and cultural needs of non-English speaking or LEP groups. c. Services proposed to address the needs identified and a timeline for implementation. [22 CCR 98310] 3. The Contractor shall maintain a record of the group-needs assessment on file at the Contractor’s headquarters at all times during the term of this Agreement. [22 CCR 98310, 98313]

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.