Facility Assessment a) The Architect and the Architect’s consultants will gather information from the Client to assist with their analysis of the existing building through the following methods:
i. Conduct a kickoff meeting with the Client to tour the building and record the Client’s project vision and goals for expansion and renovation.
ii. Review the current condition of the facility to understand lifespan of existing building systems and ascertain when those systems may need maintenance or replacement (i.e., roofs, tuckpointing of masonry, HVAC systems, etc.). The Architect will enlist the assistance of a structural engineer, mechanical engineer and an electrical engineer to assist with this scope.
iii. Document deficiencies in existing architectural, structural, mechanical, plumbing, fire sprinkler and electrical components.
b) The Architect will assess the existing conditions of the Youth Services Center for compliance with current building codes and ADA regulations. If required, the Architect will make recommendations to the Client to modify the existing building to comply with current building codes.
c) Discuss and evaluate the suitability of existing spaces for program use and goals.
Facility Assessment. Commencing on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Agreement Commencement Date, and by no later than the anniversary date of each fifth year thereafter during the Term of this Agreement, the LESSEE shall provide the LESSOR with a “Condition Assessment Report” of the leased Premises and site improvements thereon, prepared by either a licensed contractor, engineer or architect (“A/E”), and licensed to do business in the State of Kansas. This Condition Assessment Report shall address the current condition, the contractor’s or A/E’s professional opinion of the useful life remaining of the structures and systems, and the contractor’s or A/E’s professional opinion of repairs, replacements, or refurbishments recommended to maintain the operationally useful state and condition of the Premises. Condition Assessment Reports shall primarily focus on major structural systems and components, including but not limited to: pavements, utilities, building structures, roofs, and heating/ventilation/air conditioning (HVAC), plumbing, and electrical systems.
Facility Assessment the Facility Assessment is used to determine if a facility meets policy definitions. The Facility Evaluations are provided for the specific level of care being considered. No claimant assessment information is included in a facility evaluation.
Facility Assessment. AQUA TECH will perform a Pre/Post Season Facility Assessment for no additional fee. AQUA TECH will provide the OWNER with recommendations for short-term as well as long-term needs of the facility. At the OWNER’s request, AQUA TECH will perform any repairs listed in the survey.
Facility Assessment a. Review current building plans, internal layouts, site and utility plans as needed for each of the ten (10) RPL branch library facilities.
b. Evaluate and document crucial factors as identified by the Branch Project Advisory Committee and RPL to address future facility needs including but not limited to ease of access (parking and public transportation), capacity for functional public requirements (seating, meeting rooms, technology, shelving), functional staff requirements (offices, break rooms, maintenance/IT needs), operational capacity (number of floors, service layout, egress) and expansion potential.
c. Utilize needs assessment and service recommendations to develop an action matrix for branch libraries. The matrix should address current library service areas and any proposed changes to service area based on projected population changes, with recommendations for optimal geographic location, type and size for potential new facility, expanded facility, renovated facility or new service delivery model.
d. Where changes to an existing facility are proposed, provide detail for the design standard under the action matrix, including minimum library square foot objective, minimum site standards (parking), and projected per square foot cost for construction, furniture, fixtures and equipment, and other soft costs, budgeted as a minimum cost per square foot. Note where alternate costs exist that cannot be immediately calculated (e.g., site preparation and land acquisition) that would be required for the recommendation.
e. Where new facilities, co-located or relocated facilities are proposed, document priority criteria for site selection based on interactions with RPL administration and stakeholders (e.g. visibility, access to transportation, other service adjacencies) and basic functional design criteria (e.g. single-floor with ground- level access, open flexible floor plan, 24-hour meeting room or materials pickup capability, etc.).
f. Ensure recommendations are compliant and reflective of the RPL’s mission and current strategic plan, current and proposed demographic data, state library standards, peer comparisons and library best practices into facilities analysis and recommendations.
g. Incorporate technological innovations and sustainable/energy efficient opportunities into all facility considerations.
Facility Assessment. ENGINEER will conduct Concept Workshop #1 with its key team leaders and technical experts to draw on past, similar experiences in setting the stage for the Facility Assessment (Task 4), Hydraulics / Pumping Assessment (Task 5), and Zebra Mussel Control Alternatives Evaluation (Task 6). The primary objective for the workshop is to confirm truly viable alternatives and streamline the evaluation relative to the goals and criteria established in Task 3. ENGINEER will then conduct a 1-day site visit to assess the current condition of the LARWPS facilities, equipment, and infrastructure (as a focused follow-up to build upon the assessment by Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx, Inc. in February 2013). The assessment will include representatives from applicable design disciplines (process-mechanical, HVAC-mechanical, electrical/I&C, architectural, structural, site-civil). ENGINEER will document the age, condition, remaining life estimate, criticality, impact of failure, “do-nothing” risk, and benefit of improvements for the existing facilities, equipment, and infrastructure. ENGINEER will identify needed improvements and alternatives to address items identified as priority items (items needed to extend useful life to the desired level as established in Project Meeting #1). ENGINEER will conduct Project Meeting #2 to provide an update on project status and to review initial findings from the facility assessment as well as findings from the initial analysis of system hydraulics (see Task 5). ENGINEER will then summarize the facility assessment and identified alternatives for evaluation in Technical Memorandum (TM) #1. ENGINEER will submit and present TM #1 to AWU and TRA for discussion and comment in Project Meeting #3. The objective for Project Meeting #3 will be to confirm alternatives that will be evaluated under Task 7. The corresponding sub-tasks for Task 4 are as follows: Task 4.1 – Internal Concept Workshop #1 Task 4.2 – Site Visit / Reconnaissance Task 4.3 – Confirm Needs and Alternatives (develop TM #1) • Civil-Site, Architectural, and Process-Mechanical Assessment ENGINEER will assess accessible portions of the existing civil-site features, building envelopes, roof system, and related architectural items, piping, valves, and pumping equipment, and HVAC and plumbing equipment and fixtures to further assess their condition and ascertain whether existing assets can be re-used, rehabilitated / refurbished, or if they need to be replaced. The assessment will include a review o...
Facility Assessment. You will ensure that, at all times, the facility at which the Outposts Equipment is located (the “Designated Facility”) meets the minimum requirements necessary to support the installation, maintenance, use, and removal of the Outposts Equipment as described here and otherwise as described in the Outposts Documentation or provided to you during the ordering and installation process.
Facility Assessment. Develop a implementation plan that identifies the type and quantity of charging systems, electrical grid infrastructure upgrades requirements and costs; identify upgrades to meet safety codes, regulations, or best practices; identify mechanical equipment requirements; determine back-up power, energy storage, construction requirements, and any cost savings or revenue opportunity; and develop conceptual site drawings and identify on-route charging location, considering future proofing and operational impacts.
Facility Assessment. Xxxxxx Design Work performed January 2017 through May 31, 2017: $7,230.00
