Proposed Scope. In response to project scope changes requested by Fort Bend County, a scope amendment for the Tamarron Crossing Road project has been prepared which includes the following items:
Proposed Scope. In response to additional scoping items requested by Fort Bend County, a scope change for the Xxxxxx Road project has been prepared. The additional scope shall include redesign for the addition of a right turn lane for the westbound lanes of Reading Road, adding approximately 400 LF of 8-inch sanitary sewer main and services, and construction phase services for the traffic signal subconsultant.
Proposed Scope. In response to project scope changes requested by Fort Bend County, a scope amendment for the Stella Road project has been prepared which includes the following items:
Proposed Scope. The proposed project is comprised of 3 phases: Study (PER)/preliminary design, final design, and bidding/construction phase services. The scope of services will include surveying and professional engineering services. The project will involve expansion of SH 6 in the raised median to add pavement to accommodate a dedicated northbound left‐turn lane from SH 6 into Xxxxxxxx Park with approximately 400 LF of new pavement and reconfigured raised median. The project geometrics and tapers will be designed based on the existing speed limits of this facility. Drainage will be evaluated to determine if mitigation will be necessary and develop alternatives to provide mitigation (if necessary), including potential expansion of roadside ditches and/or off‐site detention pond between the Xxxxxxxx Park access road.
Proposed Scope. The proposed project is comprised of 3 phases: Study (PER) update/preliminary design, final design, and bidding/construction phase services. The scope of services will include professional engineering, surveying and ROW mapping, and geotechnical investigation services. The project will involve expansion of existing W. Belfort WB curb & gutter paving to accommodate for construction of a dedicated right turn lane from the W. Belfort WB lanes onto the SH 99 NBFRD for approximately 500 LF concrete curb and gutter pavement. The existing curb inlets will be relocated laterally to receive the existing and future pavement run‐off which is currently draining into the existing closed system storm sewer drainage system. The project limits are from 50‐ft east of the Meadow Ranch Parkway to a new curb return at the XX 00 XXXXX outer lane. The proposed roadway section(s) and the ROW width will be evaluated along West Belfort Road. It is anticipated that proposed widening would not require additional ROW along West Belfort north ROW line; however, final determination of the existing W. Belfort north ROW line is required to accurately accommodate the proposed right turn lane with a minimum of 15‐ft border. The existing posted speed limit is 40 MPH. The project will be designed based on 40 MPH design speed. The primary goals are to (1) establish an alignment with a typical cross section, (2) positively determine the existing and proposed right‐of‐way acquisition, if needed, (3) determine potential conflicts with existing facilities, (4) identify critical path items, (5) identify problem areas and potential resolution(s), and (6) prepare a reasonable construction cost estimate. CobbFendley will prepare and deliver a “30 percent” plan set as part of the preliminary design, consisting of all existing features shown in plan and profile, and proposed improvements with plan & profile with minor annotation. These plans, along with a typical section sheet, are the only drawings that are necessary at this point. The purpose of this PER is to clearly depict a more refined horizontal and vertical alignment design, incorporate the new project limits, and to document the six goals stated above. CobbFendley will not prepare a Presentation‐quality document as the report will remain internal to Fort Bend County Engineering staff and the County’s project management consultant. The updated PER will include a narrative, applicable plans, a preliminary construction cost estimate, and a geotec...
Proposed Scope. The proposed scope is comprised of 3 phases: Study (PER)/preliminary engineering, final design & bidding phase services in addition to phase III, limited construction administration services. The scope of services will include professional engineering, surveying ROW mapping, and geotechnical investigation services. The project will involve installation of an 8‐inch water main, constructing 6‐ft sidewalks along the east & west ROW lines and reconstruction of approximately 6,500 LF of 2‐12’ lanes undivided asphalt pavement with open ditch drainage system including a potential detention site for drainage mitigation to be determined upon completion of the drainage analysis during the PER phase. Additionally, the scope includes design of an 8‐inch water main within the length of the project to be coordinated with the City of Houston drinking water operations for design approval and construction permitting. The scope of the project extends from approximately 200‐ft north of Trammel‐Fresno to future Lake Olympia Blvd. eastbound lanes. Dedicated left turn lanes will be provided at the Lake Olympia intersection The proposed roadway section(s) will be evaluated along the existing California Street during the study phase. Final Posted speed will be determined after the completion of the project by conducting speed study analysis followed by issuance of a certified letter indicating the safe posted speed limit. The following constitute the primary goals of the study phase:
Proposed Scope. (a) Software licences and implementation services including: Open Source, commercial, off the shelf (COTS) software, operating systems, middleware, utilities including anti-virus and configuration services related to the implementation of this software.
(b) Value-added services including (but not limited to): provision of advice and tools for software licensing and asset management, software configuration and optimisation capability, pre sales support for specification clarification, delivery of training on software packages, post sales support for commoditised software, support, upgrades and maintenance services associated with products purchased.
Proposed Scope. (a) This Lot seeks the provision of Contracting Bodies user devices (any form factor) that will include (but not be limited to) desktop bundles, laptops, tablet/slates, thin-client devices and hybrid devices. There will be no service requirement within this Lot except the occasional delivery fulfilment or services that can be delivered during the commodity build process. The Supplier shall be Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM). The Suppliers shall be limited to supplying its own branded end-user devices. The Authority acting on behalf of central government departments (and their ALBs) seeks to aggregate and leverage saving via regular eAuctions.
(b) End of Life (EOL) provision of advice and guidance on avoidance of End of Life (EOL) issues, particularly for extended Call-Off Agreements where EOL issues may impact on technology roll-outs or other issues.
(c) Dependent on sufficient volumes being procured - custom builds requirements. Intellectual Property Rights in any custom build would reside with the OEM.
(d) OEMs will be required to contract directly with the Authority on this Framework. The Authority understands there may be Business to Business (B2B) limitations for (some) Suppliers. Where a Supplier requires, up to three (3) delivery partners can be nominated as subcontractors, provided it is understood the Framework Agreement will be between the Authority and the OEM. Similarly, the prime contractor under any Contracting Bodies order under the Framework Agreement will be the OEM. The Supplier as a prime contractor shall have ultimate responsibility for contract performance.
(e) Delivery partners may be used to: process orders, process invoices, payments and delivery (on behalf of the prime contractor). Additionally, delivery partners may be used to handle returns.
(f) Delivery partners may change during the lifetime of the Framework Agreement. The Authority must be provided with details of changes with a minimum of ten (10) Working Days notice.
(g) Appointment of delivery partners is the Supplier’s as a prime contractor’s responsibility. However, re-iterating that responsibility for contract performance under the Framework resides with the prime contractor.
(h) Delivery partners involved in an ongoing procurement must remain in place until completion of that procurement(s).
(i) The appointment and use of delivery partners must be communicated to Contracting Bodies as well as the Authority to reduce confusion. Particularly where delivery partners...
Proposed Scope. (a) This Lot targets value added resellers (VAR) to provide a wide range of vendor-neutral end user devices, and other hardware such as audio-visual, network infrastructure equipment and IT peripherals. Close to the box services.
(b) One-Stop Shop – The ability to compete VARs to select a single supplier for a defined requirement for a defined time period.
(c) Value-add associated services, including (but not limited to): pre- sales technical advice and support; extended product warranties; support, upgrade and maintenance services associated with products purchased; Round-The-Box Services (hardware configuration, imaging devices, delivery to desk/server room, installation); consignment stocking and deliveries as required; project management of implementations e.g. estate refreshes; provision of MI reports to customers; technical support, including training customer/third party staff to become accredited engineers for on-site warranty repairs (as required); loaning test devices; holding replacement stocks and spares to meet customer needs for critical fixes at short notice.
Proposed Scope. The proposed scope is comprised of 3 phases: preliminary engineering, final design, and construction phase services. The scope of services will include professional engineering, surveying, ROW mapping, and geotechnical investigation for a grade separated bridge structure spanning the existing UPRR track(s) and Preston Street. Additionally, the scope will include modification of the vertical grades of westbound lanes approaches to US 90A and FM 762 signalized intersection including modernization of the existing traffic signal hardware. The paving and drainage work along US 90A are needed to minimize the proposed bridge overpass grade south of the UPRR track(s). The proposed bridge section will depend largely on the proposed roadway section; however, at a minimum it will be configured to accommodate 4-lanes of traffic, divided configuration, with 6’ or 8’ sidewalks. The proposed bridge will be designed based on 30 MPH design speed. Final Posted speed will be determined after the completion of the project. During the 30% plan production, the existing US 90A intersection layout and traffic signal will be evaluated in coordination with the TxDOT Fort Bend County area office engineer and the Houston District for installation of a modernized traffic signal hardware. The proposed condition of the permanent traffic signal, any intersection modifications, and temporary signal for the traffic control plan will be designed and incorporated into the plans during the final design phase. A TxDOT Driveway Permit and local on-system improvements agreement (LOSA) will be prepared during the study & final design phases of the project. During the preliminary engineering phase, the existing and proposed drainage area maps with outfall locations will be identified for both bridge overpass and US 90A in addition to preliminary storm sewer sizes for the on-site drainage and off-site conveyance, if necessary. The project’s drainage design will be performed and prepared in coordination with the Fort Bend County drainage district & County Engineers, TxDOT’s Xxxxxxxxx Area Office Engineer, and the City of Richmond public works. During the preliminary engineering phase, the horizontal and vertical location of existing public and private utilities along the proposed bridge alignment, US 90A, and FM 762 will be identified in coordination with TxDOT, City of Richmond public works, and the private utility owners. If there are no existing records available, then subsurface utility engineer...
