Request for Classification Review Sample Clauses

Request for Classification Review. Step 1 If a significant change occurs in a position or classification that alters its duties or responsibilities in a manner that justifies a change in classification based on the principles underlying the Judiciary classification plan, the Court Administrator, the VSEA or the affected employee may request in writing that a classification review of the position occur to ascertain if it is assigned to the proper class. The request shall be submitted to the Human Resources Manager, and shall consist of a form containing the applicant’s name and other identifying and contact information, accompanied by a written statement of the facts upon which the applicant’s request is based, together with any documents supporting reclassification. The request shall be deemed filed on the date that it is received by the office of the Human Resources Manager. The VSEA may submit a class action request for classification review on behalf of employees in the same class, filing one (1) request that applies to the entire class.; Any employee within the affected class may elect via written notification to the Human Resources Manager not to have the results of the class review applicable to him/her until after such employee’s next step increase occurs. The Human Resources Manager or his/her designee shall conduct an analysis of the position or positions that are the subject of the request, based on the duties performed on the date the request was filed, gathering such information as is necessary to properly classify the position. The VSEA and/or the employee shall have the right to present documentary and other information to the Human Resources Manager, and shall have access to all information gathered by him/her, including participating in any site visit and the opportunity to hear any interviews or other oral statements, and shall be provided copies of any documents presented to or considered by the Human Resources Manager. Within 120 calendar days of filing of the request, the Human Resources Manager shall issue a written decision concerning the proper classification of the position(s), stating with specificity the facts and reasoning upon which the decision is based. The decision will be final on the thirtieth day following its receipt by the VSEA and the employee(s), unless the VSEA and/or the employee(s) file a request for reconsideration during that period.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Request for Classification Review. A request for classification review may be submitted by an employee if it is felt that the employee’s position is improperly classified. Such a request for review shall be made in accordance with procedures outlined in Schedule “C”. Once the PDQ has been completed, the supervisor will review and comment on the PDQ and must submit the PDQ to the Regional Director for comment and sign- off. The employee will be provided with the opportunity to review management comments and make their own additional comments prior to signing the PDQ a second time. Employees will also have the opportunity to submit the PDQ for review directly to the HR Department.
Request for Classification Review. A Department Director may initiate an informal classification review each year at the annual performance evaluation of the employee. If this classification review results in a department director suggesting formal review of the classification the Director will notify Human Resources to initiate a further review. If the reclassification review is not recommended by the Department Head, the employee may initiate a reclassification review request by submitting the County Desk Audit/ Reclassification review form to the Department Head and Human Resources within (thirty) 30 days after the annual performance review. Human Resources shall consider the comments from the employee, the supervisor, and the Department Head to determine if there is a need to conduct a classification review. A classification review will be processed as soon as practicable, however will not exceed (sixty) 60 days. The County may extend for reasonable circumstances. (*note: All days in this article are calendar days.) The reclassification request form will be available on the County’s intranet. 1. This does not preclude the County from having the employee perform occasional higher duties. The County may elect to create a new position based on the evaluation. In such event the County will follow Article 1.3.
Request for Classification Review. A. A Department Head may, at any time, submit a request to the Human Resources/Risk and Safety Manager for a review of an employee's position, setting forth the reasons for the request. The Human Resources/Risk and Safety Manager may conduct the review and make recommendations to the General Manager. All such requests may be acted upon within sixty (60) days of receipt. The decision of the General Manager shall be final without right of grievance or further hearing, except in cases where action by the Board of Directors' is required, in which case Board action shall be final. B. If an employee believes that his/her duties and responsibilities have changed significantly, the employee may request a classification study of his/her position. Such request must be submitted in writing to the Association representative. An employee shall not submit a subsequent request prior to 18 months after completion of any previous classification review. The Association Representative may, up to five times per year, submit a request to the Human Resources/Risk and Safety Manager for a review of an employee's position, setting forth the reasons for the request. The Human Resources/Risk and Safety Manager may conduct the review and make recommendations to the General Manager. All such requests may be acted upon within sixty (60) days of receipt.
Request for Classification Review. If the Union believes that assigned work has significantly changed for a specific individual or group of individuals within a position, the Union, or individual employee, may request a meeting to review whether the positions is in the correct classification. Should it be determined an employee has accreted additional work duties generally outside of their classification, the Employer and the Union will negotiate conditions of a reclassification for the incumbent employee. Within twenty (20) working days of the request of the review the Employer and the Union will meet to discuss. If the Union disagrees with the final decision regarding the proper classification for a job, the matter may be grieved.
Request for Classification Review. An employee and/or Departmental Head/Regional Manager who considers that the duties of the employees position have changed significantly since a previous review or appeal decision shall submit to the Human Resources Department revised position description/questionnaire and a request for review. The request for review shall be in writing and shall contain a statement of the reasons for the review request. Upon receipt by the Human Resources Department, of a request for classification review prepared and submitted in accordance with these procedures, the employee and the employee's Departmental Head/Regional Manager will be notified of the pending review.
Request for Classification Review. 1. An employee may request a review of the classification of their position to Campus Human Resources in accordance with the Campus Reclassification Procedures. The review shall be based on the employee's job description as approved by the supervisor. Campus Human Resources shall provide a response to the request within ninety (90) days after receiving the submission. 2. The University's Compensation unit will determine whether to reclassify the employee's position by evaluating the core functions and duties of the position and comparing them to pre- defined job families, classifications specifications, and comparable positions within the organization and/or external to the organization. Factors that may be considered include, but are not limited to, the scope of responsibility, skills and competencies required to perform the position. The classification review process will include all of the following: a. a review of the incumbent's prior job description; b. a review of a revised updated job description; and
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Request for Classification Review. A. A Department Head may, at any time, submit a request to the Human Resources and Risk Manager for a review of an employee's position, setting forth the reasons for the request. The Human Resources and Risk Manager may conduct the review and make recommendations to the General Manager. All such requests may be acted upon within sixty (60) days of receipt. The decision of the General Manager shall be final without right of grievance or further hearing, except in cases where action by the Board of Directors' is required, in which case Board action shall be final. B. If an employee believes that his/her duties and responsibilities have changed significantly, the employee may request a classification study of his/her position. Such request must be submitted in writing to the Association representative. An employee shall not submit a subsequent request prior to 18 months after completion of any previous classification review. The Association Representative may, up to five times per year, submit a request to the Human Resources and Risk Manager for a review of an employee's position, setting forth the reasons for the request. The Human Resources and Risk Manager may conduct the review and make recommendations to the General Manager. All such requests may be acted upon within sixty (60) days of receipt.
Request for Classification Review. Is pursuant to Article 14 of the MLA,

Related to Request for Classification Review

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Request for Review Within sixty (60) days after receiving notice from the Plan Administrator that a claim has been denied (in part or all of the claim), then claimant (or their duly authorized representative) may file with the Plan Administrator, a written request for a review of the denial of the claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) shall then have the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the claimant’s claim for benefits.

  • Request for a Panel 1. Unless the Parties agree on a different period for consultations, a complaining Party may request in writing the establishment of a Panel if the consultation referred to in the Article 176 (Consultations) fails to resolve a matter within 60 days, after the date of receipt of the request for consultations or 50 days in case of urgent matters. 2. The complaining Party shall deliver the request to the other Party, indicating at least, the reason of the request, the identification of the measure, an indication of the provision of this Agreement that it considers relevant and an indication of the legal basis of the complaint. The Panel will be considered as established on the date of receipt of the corresponding request to the other Party. 3. Unless otherwise agreed by the disputing Parties, the Panel shall be selected and perform its functions in a manner consistent with the provisions of this Chapter.

  • Request for Hearing The employee must file a written request for hearing within fifteen calendar days of receipt of the Notice of Dismissal or Suspension. Filing means receipt in the office designated no later than regular close of business on the last day of the filing period. Failure to file such request in a timely manner shall be deemed a waiver of the right to a hearing and the proposed action shall be effective upon action by the Governing Board without notice or hearing except as may be required in a board meeting agenda.

  • Contractor Certification Regarding Ethics The Contractor certifies that the Contractor is now, and shall remain, in compliance with Chapter 42.52 RCW, Ethics in Public Service, throughout the term of this Contract.

  • Request for clarification of the report 1. Within 10 days of the release of the report, either of the disputing Parties may submit a written request to the Panel, a copy of which shall be sent to the other Party, for clarification of any items the Party considers requires further explanation or definition. 2. The Panel shall respond to the request within 10 days following the submission of such request. The clarification of the Panel shall only be a more precise explanation or definition of the original contents of the report, and not an amendment of such report. 3. The filing of this request for clarification will not postpone the effect of the Panel report nor the deadline for compliance of the adopted decision, unless the Panel decides otherwise.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.

  • Project Administration Designation Pursuant to Paragraph (B) of Rule 164-1-21 of the Administrative Code, the Recipient shall designate its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Fiscal Officer and Project Manager in Appendix B of this Agreement. Changes in these designations must be made in writing.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!